Advances in Interventional Cardiology
eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current Issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Long-term effectiveness and safety of ablation index– guided high-power ablation combined with impedance spike cut-off in patients with atrial fibrillation

Fei Guo
1
,
Guanghui Zhu
2
,
Jianfeng Luo
1
,
Jing Zhu
1
,
Jian Xu
1

  1. Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
  2. Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
Adv Interv Cardiol
Online publish date: 2025/11/18
Article file
Get citation
 
 
1. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 2014; 129: 837-47.
2. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 2014; 129: 837-47.
3. Schnabel RB, Yin X, Gona P, et al. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet 2015; 386: 154-62.
4. le Polain de Waroux JB, Talajic M, Khairy P, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: past, present and future. Future Cardiol 2010; 6: 51-66.
5. Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Burkhardt DJ, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: state-of-the-art techniques and future perspectives. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2012; 13: 108-24.
6. Ali-Ahmed F, Goyal V, Patel M, et al. High-power, low-flow, short-ablation duration-the key to avoid collateral injury? J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2019; 55: 9-16.
7. Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace 2017; 19: 874- 80.
8. Pranata R, Vania R, Huang I. Ablation-index guided versus conventional contact-force guided ablation in pulmonary vein isolation – systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2019; 19: 155-60.
9. Ioannou A, Papageorgiou N, Lim WY, et al. Efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis. Europace 2020; 22: 1659-71.
10. O’Neill L, El Haddad M, Berte B, et al. Very high-power ablation for contiguous pulmonary vein isolation: results from the randomized POWER PLUS trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 9: 511-22.
11. Kuck KH, Hoffmann BA, Ernst S, et al. Impact of complete versus incomplete circumferential lines around the pulmonary veins during catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the Gap-Atrial Fibrillation-German Atrial Fibrillation Competence Network 1 Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2016; 9: e003337.
12. Rajappan K, Kistler PM, Earley MJ, et al. Acute and chronic pulmonary vein reconnection after atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective characterization of anatomical sites. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31: 1598-605.
13. Chen S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, et al. Impact of Cryoballoon freeze duration on long-term durability of pulmonary vein isolation: ICE Re-Map Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2019; 5: 551-9.
14. Kuck KH, Albenque JP, Chun KJ, et al. Repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation recurrence post cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in the FIRE AND ICE Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019; 12: e007247.
15. Ouyang F, Tilz R, Chun J, et al. Long-term results of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: lessons from a 5-year follow-up. Circulation 2010; 122: 2368-77.
16. Kumar S, Barbhaiya CR, Balindger S, et al. Better lesion creation and assessment during catheter ablation. J Atr Fibrillation 2015; 8: 1189.
17. Shin DG, Ahn J, Han SJ, Lim HE. Efficacy of high-power and short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Europace 2020; 22: 1495-501.
18. Kanj MH, Wazni O, Fahmy T, et al. Pulmonary vein antral isolation using an open irrigation ablation catheter for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a randomized pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1634-41.
19. Vassallo F, Cunha C, Serpa E, et al. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: initial results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30: 1877-83.
20. Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, et al. Long-term outcomes after low power, slower movement versus high power, faster movement irrigated-tip catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2020; 17: 184-9.
21. Theis C, Rostock T, Mollnau H, et al. The incidence of audible steam pops is increased and unpredictable with the ThermoCool® surround flow catheter during left atrial catheter ablation: a prospective observational study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015; 26: 956-62.
22. Plenge T, van den Bruck JH, Lüker J, et al. Porous tip contact force-sensing catheters for pulmonary vein isolation: performance in a clinical routine setting. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2020; 57: 251-9.
23. Chen S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, et al. Ablation index-guided 50 W ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: procedural data, lesion analysis, and initial results from the FAFA AI High Power Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2019; 30: 2724-31.
24. Winkle RA, Moskovitz R, Hardwin Mead R, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018; 52: 1-8.
25. Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, et al. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm 2019; 16: 165-9.
26. John M, Rook A, Post A, et al. Bipolar ablation’s unique paradigm: Duration and power as respectively distinct primary determinants of transmurality and steam pop formation. Heart Rhythm O2 2020; 1: 290-6.
27. Tsutsui K, Kawano D, Mori H, et al. Characteristics and optimal ablation settings of a novel, contact-force sensing and local impedance-enabled catheter in an ex vivo perfused swine ventricle model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32: 3187-94.
28. Luo J, Guo F, Zhu H, et al. Electro-characteristics of myocardial pouches and reduction of the frequency of steam pops during radiofrequency ablation. Front Physiol 2022; 13: 816865.
29. Mueller J, Halbfass P, Sonne K, et al. Safety aspects of very high power very short duration atrial fibrillation ablation using a modified radiofrequency RF-generator: single-center experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33: 920-7.
30. Chen WJ, Gan CX, Cai YW, et al. Impact of high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation technique on the incidence of silent cerebral embolism: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Med 2023; 21: 461.
31. Boga M, Suhai FI, Orbán G, et al. Incidence and predictors of stroke and silent cerebral embolism following very high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace 2023; 25: euad327.
Copyright: © 2025 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.