eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2018
vol. 14
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Short communication

Mehran in-stent restenosis classification adapted for coronary bifurcations: the impact on 4-year follow-up from randomized clinical studies POLBOS I and II

Jacek Bil, Robert J. Gil, Adam Kern, Luis A. Inigo-Garcia, Radosław Formuszewicz, Sławomir Dobrzycki

Adv Interv Cardiol 2018; 14, 3 (53): 299–303
Online publish date: 2018/09/21
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 

Introduction

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with stent deployment are the most widely performed procedures in the therapy of symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). In the last three decades, PCI with stent deployment has changed the practice in cardiology. Drug-eluting stents (DES) significantly reduced in-stent restenosis (ISR) rates – one of the key limitations of bare metal stents. In consequence, DES were rapidly and widely accepted, which allowed more complex coronary interventions, including bifurcations, to be performed. Nevertheless, ISR has remained a troublesome late stent complication [1, 2].
Multiple classification systems addressed the problem of ISR severity. The Mehran classification is a morphologic system which divides ISR lesions into four patterns: from focal pattern I when ISR is ≤ 10 mm in length within the stent to pattern IV when the ISR is the cause of vessel occlusion [3].

Aim

The aim of our study was to propose a modified Mehran restenosis classification adapted to bifurcation lesions and preliminarily assess its value in the 4-year follow-up on data from two randomized studies, POLBOS I and POLBOS II, that compared dedicated bifurcation BiOSS stents with regular drug-eluting stents (rDES) [4–6].

Material and methods

POLBOS I and POLBOS II were international, multi-center, randomized, open-label, controlled studies described previously [4, 6]. Briefly, the inclusion criteria were: stable CAD or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), age ≥ 18 years, de novo coronary bifurcation lesion, main vessel (MV) diameter ≥ 2.5 mm, and side branch (SB) diameter ≥ 2.0 mm on visual estimation. The Institutional Review Board of each participating center approved the study protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: POLBOS I – NCT02192840, POLBOS II – NCT02198300).
After providing written informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment strategies: BiOSS Expert (in POLBOS I)/BiOSS LIM (in POLBOS II) stent implantation or rDES implantation [7–9]. Provisional T-stenting was the default strategy. The stent nominal diameter was chosen according to the distal reference, and after stent deployment, the proximal part of the stent was optimized, if needed, with proximal optimization technique (POT) to obtain the proper apposition.
Clinical follow-up was performed by telephone 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after the...


View full text...
references:
Alraies MC, Darmoch F, Tummala R, et al. Diagnosis and management challenges of in-stent restenosis in coronary arteries. World J Cardiol 2017; 9: 640-51.
Rzeszutko L, Siudak Z, Tokarek T, et al. Twelve months clinical outcome after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndrome. Data from the Polish National Registry. Adv Interv Cardiol 2016; 12: 108-15.
Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999; 100: 1872-8.
Gil RJ, Bil J, Kern A, et al. Comparison of dedicated BIOSS bifurcation stents with regular drug-eluting stents for coronary artery bifurcated lesions: pooled analysis from two randomized studies. Cardiol J 2018; 25: 308-16.
Gil RJ, Bil J, Dzavik V, et al. Regular drug-eluting stent vs. dedicated coronary bifurcation BiOSS expert stent: multicenter open-label randomized controlled POLBOS I trial. Can J Cardiol 2015; 31: 671-8.
Gil RJ, Bil J, Grundeken MJ, et al. Regular drug-eluting stents versus the dedicated coronary bifurcation sirolimus-eluting BiOSS LIM(R) stent: the randomised, multicentre, open-label, controlled POLBOS II trial. EuroIntervention 2016; 12: e1404-12.
Bil J, Gil RJ, Vassilev D, et al. Dedicated bifurcation paclitaxel-eluting stent BiOSS Expert(R) in the treatment of distal left main stem stenosis. J Interv Cardiol 2014; 27: 242-51.
Bil J, Gil RJ, Pawlowski T, et al. Assessment of vascular response to BiOSS LIM C((R)) stents vs Orsiro((R)) stents in the porcine coronary artery model. Cardiovasc Ther 2017; 35. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12267.
Bil J, Grundeken MJ, Pawlowski T, et al. Self-positioning properties of dedicated bifurcation coronary stent BiOSS LIM(R) in the eye of 3D optical coherence tomography. Minerva Cardioangiol 2017; 65: 194-6.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012; 126: 2020-35.
Alfonso F, Auge JM, Zueco J, et al. Long-term results (three to five years) of the Restenosis Intrastent: balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 756-60.
Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, et al. Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1621-7.
Lassen JF, Burzotta F, Banning AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2018; 13: 1540-53.
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe