eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2009
vol. 5
 
Share:
Share:

Original paper
Problems that occurred during and after transcatheter closure of muscular ventricular septal defects in two patients

Małgorzata Szkutnik
,
Jacek Białkowski
,
Lyubomir Dymitrow
,
Anna Kaneva
,
Stoyan Lazarov
,
Margarita Tsonzarova

Post Kardiol Interw 2009; 5, 2 (16): 58-61
Online publish date: 2009/06/25
Article file
- Problems that.pdf  [0.20 MB]
Get citation
 
 
Introduction
Transcatheter closure of muscular ventricular septal defects (mVSD) is quite a complex interventional catheterization procedure. Various technical obstacles may be encountered while performing such a procedure. It is likely that complications following the procedure will be connected with new episodes of arrhythmia, late embolization, valvular regurgitation, etc.
Below are presented reports on the transcatheter closure of muscular ventricular septal defects during an intervention cardiology workshop which was held on 29-30 January 2009 at the National Institute of Cardiology in Sofia (Bulgaria) [1] and the problems which occurred during the procedures.

Case 1
A muscular ventricular septal defect was diagnosed in an 8-year-old girl with palpable tremor in the precordial area (thrill) with holosystolic murmur most audible at the left sternal margin. Echocardiography showed a 5 mm defect located in the medium segment of the septum (mid-muscular defect). Moreover, moderate enlargement of the left heart chambers was found (the left atrium and ventricle). Cardiac catheterization confirmed the presence of the muscular VSD (fig. 1. A), and Qp/Qs ratio was 1.7. An attempt was made to close the defect using a Muscular VSD Occluder (MVSDO) (AGA Med) applying a standard technique reported previously [2]. Briefly, according to these guidelines the defect is sounded from the left ventricular side. Subsequently, an arteriovenous loop is created from the guide wire and an implant is deployed transvenously. Implantation was performed via arterial access due to difficulties with transvenous insertion of the delivery system. The defect was closed using a 6 mm MVSDO (fig. 1. B, C). The procedure and postprocedural period were uncomplicated. Leakproof closure of the mVSD was obtained.

Case 2
In the other child, an 11-year-old boy (physical examination and echocardiographic findings similar to the case above), the defect was located in the muscular inlet section of the interventricular septum beneath the tricuspid valve leaflet (Fig. 2. A). In this case at the insistent request of the organizers, the decision was made to conditionally perform the procedure considering the risk of development of iatrogenic arrhythmias (AV block), or tricuspid insufficiency. It was postulated that in the case of presence of the above-mentioned complications the procedure would be discontinued. During cardiac catheterization Qp/Qs ratio was 2.0. The procedure course was free of complications. Transvenously an 8 mm MVSDO was inserted (fig. 2. B). The location of occluder discs was correct. The MVSDO opened on both sides of the interventricular septum caused neither arrhythmias nor tricuspid insufficiency. The decision was made to deploy the occluder (fig. 2. C). The direct course of the procedure was free of complications; on the first postprocedural day a leakproof occlusion of the mVSD was confirmed. Three days after implantation, the child experienced a sudden episode of fainting. In the ECG, an incomplete left bundle branch block was observed (without AV block), and echocardiography showed significant tricuspid insufficiency. On the same day the occluder was removed, and cardiac surgery was performed, resulting in closure of the VSD and reconstruction of the tricuspid valve (the surgeon found that tricuspid tendinous chords were partially cut (fig. 3).

Discussion
Our own experience published recently indicates the technical difficulty of those procedures [4]. They should be performed only where clearly indicated (i.e., Qp/Qs ratio > 1.5 and enlargement of the left heart chambers – as it was in the discussed children). The number of patients meeting those criteria is not high. It was also supported by the European Registry on transcatheter closure of VSD. It includes data on 119 subjects with muscular VSD (including 83 with mid-muscular, 250 with perimembranous, 16 with multiple and 45 with residual post-surgical mVSD (total of 430 patients). The authors highlighted that tricuspid regurgitation was observed in the periprocedural period in 27 (6.3%) patients, not defining the affected group of defects. They mentioned that in no cases did tricuspid regurgitation require treatment. One of the patients reported by Waight et al. [5], in whom the mVSD was closed with an MVSDO (similarly to the case presented in this case report), required further tricuspid reconstruction and removal of the implant due to iatrogenic tricuspid regurgitation. According to the opinion of Dr. Kurt Amplatz, the designer of the MVSDO (oral report), cutting of the tricuspid tendinous chords by the MVSDO is practically unpreventable, and this complication results from the specific anatomy of their attachment site. According to the AGA Med complication register (oral report – Dr. Amplatz), one more similar complication occurred in another European site. Our experience confirms the higher risk when closing interventricular septal defects located more to the inlet area of the IVS.

Conclusion
During the transcatheter closure of mVSD and after the procedure unpredictable problems and complications may result.

References
1. Białkowski J, Szkutnik M. Postępy w interwencyjnym leczeniu wrodzonych wad serca – na podstawie doświadczeń z warsztatów przeprowadzonych w Narodowym Instytucie Kardiologii w Sofii (29–30 stycznia 2009 r.). Kardiol Pol 2009; 67: 464-466.
2. Tofeig M, Patel RG, Walsh KP. Transcatheter closure of a mid-muscular ventricular septal defect with an Amplatzer VSD occluder device. Heart 1999; 81: 438-440.
3. Szkutnik M, Kusa J, Białkowski J. Przezskórne zamykanie mięśniowych ubytków międzykomorowych – pourazowego i wrodzonych – z zastosowaniem korków Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder. Kardiol Pol 2008; 66: 715-720.
4. Carminati M, Butera G, Chessa M, et al. Transcatheter closure of congenital ventricular septal defects: results of the European Registry. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2361-2368.
5. Waight DJ, Bacha EA, Kahana M, et al. Catheter therapy of Swiss cheese ventricular septal defects using the Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 55: 355-361.



Komentarz/Commentary
Kurt Amplatz


The development of massive tricuspid insufficiency is exceedingly rare and to our best knowledge we have only heard of one other instance occurring in Belgium. The occurrence obviously depends on the anatomy which one can not determine prior to the insertion of a device. Consequently, this complication is unavoidable and fortunately exceedingly rare.
Copyright: © 2009 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.