eISSN: 1897-4252
ISSN: 1731-5530
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Current issue Archive About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

4/2018
vol. 15
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental extracardiac findings in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Narumol Chaosuwannakit, Pattarapong Makarawate

Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2018; 15 (4): 241-245
Online publish date: 2018/12/31
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
Incidental pathological findings are frequently found outside the investigated cardiovascular system in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Some of these findings might have clinical importance.

Aim
To evaluate the prevalence and significance of extracardiac findings (ECFs) in patients referred for CMR. The CMR has the ability to depict ECFs in the visualized thorax and upper abdomen. These incidental lesions can often present a challenge to physicians.

Material and methods
A total of 192 CMR reports were retrospectively reviewed for extracardiac findings. ECFs were classified as benign, indeterminate, or of clinical significance at the time of image evaluation. Benign findings were those considered to be of little clinical significance with no follow-up needed. Indeterminate findings were those deemed of potential clinical importance, requiring correlation of the patient history or a follow-up study. Clinically significant findings were those felt to be of definite clinical importance requiring immediate evaluation or intervention.

Results
A total of 56 (29.2%) ECFs were found in 192 (29.2%) patients. Of those, 21 (37.5%) were considered benign, 23 (41%) indeterminate, and 12 (21.4%) clinically significant findings. In the clinically significant group, the most common findings were liver and pulmonary masses. Five malignancies were observed with certainty at CMR. All of them had been incidentally diagnosed on CMR for the first time, and the patients’ management was subsequently changed.

Conclusions
Extracardiac findings in clinically indicated CMR are common in the present study (about 29.2%). Radiologists and cardiologists should be aware of relevant extracardiac findings that might require additional diagnostics or treatment.

keywords:

extracardiac findings, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

references:
Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M, Schwitter J, van Rossum A, Pilz G, Nothnagel D, Steen H, Petersen S, Nagel E, Prasad S, Schumm J, Greulich S, Cagnolo A, Monney P, Deluigi CC, Dill T, Frank H, Sabin G, Schneider S, Mahrholdt H. European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry-multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 9.
American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents, Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, Ho VB, Jerosch-Herold M, Kramer CM, Manning WJ, Patel M, Pohost GM, Stillman AE, White RD, Woodard PK. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc 2010; 55: 2614-2662.
McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Böhm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Køber L, Lip GY, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Rønnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1787-1847.
Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H, Trindade PT, Schwitter J, Webb GD. Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 794-805.
Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 91-101.
Kirsch J, Araoz PA, Steinberg FB, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH, Williamson EE. Prevalence and significance of incidental extracardiac findings at 64-multidetector coronary CTA. J Thorac Imaging 2007; 22: 330-334.
Vogel-Claussen J, Li D, Carr J, Liu K, Szklo M, Lima JAC, Bluemke DA. Extracoronary abnormalities on coronary magnetic resonance angiography in the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis study: frequency and clinical significance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33: 752-754.
Zimmermann S, Pistner W, Uebis R, Freund M. Relevant secondary findings in magnetic resonance imaging of the heart using the examples of a bronchial carcinoma and a malignant lymphoma. Radiologe 2007; 47: 915-918.
Khosa F, Romney BP, Costa DN, Rofsky NM, Manning WJ. Prevalence of noncardiac findings on clinical cardiovascular MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: W380-W386.
Atalay MK, Prince EA, Pearson CA, Chang KJ. The prevalence and clinical significance of noncardiac findings on cardiac MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: W387-W393.
Khosa F, Romney BP, Costa DN, Rofsky NM, Manning WJ. Prevalence of noncardiac findings on clinical cardiovascular MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 380-386.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe