Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
eISSN: 1897-4252
ISSN: 1731-5530
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
4/2025
vol. 22
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

Results of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement

Adam R. Kowalówka
1
,
Jakub Staromłyński
2
,
Konrad Mendrala
3
,
Mariusz Kowalewski
2, 4
,
Ryszard Bachowski
1
,
Radoslaw Gocol
1

  1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Katowice, Poland
  2. Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
  3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  4. Thoracic Research Centre, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Innovative Medical Forum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2025; 22 (4): 258-266
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2025.158102
Online publish date: 2025/12/30
Article file
- Results of minimally.pdf  [0.36 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Yakub MA, Pau KK, Awang Y. Minimally invasive “pocket incision” aortic valve surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 5: 36-39.
2. Thourani VH, Edelman JJ, Holmes SD, Nguyen TC, Carroll J, Mack MJ, Kapadia S, Tang GHL, Kodali S, Kaneko T, Meduri CU, Forcillo J, Ferdinand FD, Fonta- na G, Suwalski P, Kiaii B, Balkhy H, Kempfert J, Cheung A, Borger MA, Reardon M, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Ad N. The International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement on transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in low- and intermediate-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized and propensity-matched studies. Innovations (Phila) 2021; 16: 3-16.
3. Boehm J, Libera P, Will A, Martinoff S, Wildhirt SM. Partial median “I” sternotomy: minimally invasive alternate approach for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 1053-1055.
4. Writing Committee M, Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin 3rd JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O’Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt 3rd TM, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77: 450-500.
5. Khalid S, Hassan M, Ali A, Anwar A, Siddiqui MS, Shrestha S. Minimally invasive approaches versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17,269 patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86: 4005-4014.
6. Hackney M, Caputo M, Angelini G, Vohra H. Quality of life after minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery: a systematic review. Innovations (Phila) 2025; 20: 252-256.
7. Semsroth S, Matteucci Gothe R, Raith YR, de Brabandere K, Hanspeter E, Kilo J, Kofler M, Müller L, Ruttman-Ulmer E, Grimm M. Comparison of two minimally invasive techniques and median sternotomy in aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104: 877-883.
8. Russo MJ, Thourani VH, Cohen DJ, Malaisrie SC, Szeto WY, George I, Kodali SK, Makkar R, Lu M, Williams M, Nguyen T, Aldea G, Genereux P, Fang HK, Alu MC, Rogers E, Okoh A, Herrmann HC, Kapadia S, Webb JG, Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ. Minimally invasive versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 114: 2124-2130.
9. Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98: 1499-1511.
10. Gasparovic I, Artemiou P, Hudec V, Hulman M. Long-term outcomes following minimal invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity match analysis. Bratisl Lek Listy 2017; 118: 479-484.
11. Orozco-Sevilla V, Salerno TA. Commentary: Is minimally invasive cardiac surgery a Chimera? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165: 1034-1035.
12. Kapadia SJ, Salmasi MY, Zientara A, Roussin I, Quarto C, Asimakopoulos G. Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 19: 95.
13. Semsroth S, Matteucci-Gothe R, Heinz A, Dal Capello T, Kilo J, Müller L, Grimm M, Ruttman-Ulmer E. Comparison of anterolateral minithoracotomy versus partial upper hemisternotomy in aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 868-873.
14. Szwerc MF, Benckart DH, Wiechmann RJ, Savage EB, Szydlowski GW, Mago-vern Jr GJ, Magovern JA. Partial versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 2209-2213.
15. Cammertoni F, Bruno P, Pavone N, Farina P, Mazza A, Iafrancesco M, Nesta M, Chiariello GA, Spalletta C, Cavaliere F, Calabrese M, D’Angelo GA, Sanesi V, Conti F, D’Errico D, Massetti M. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass set-up and management on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. Perfusion 2021; 36: 679-687.
16. Leviner DB, Ronai T, Abraham D, Eliad H, Schwartz N, Sharoni E. Minimal learning curve for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025; 73: 296-303.
17. Borger MA, Moustafine V, Conradi L, Knosalla C, Richter M, Merk DR, Doenst T, Hammerschmidt R, Treede H, Dohmen P, Strauch JT. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99: 17-25.
18. Almeida AS, Ceron RO, Anschau F, de Oliveira JB, Neto TCL, Rode J, Rey RAW, Lira KB, Delvaux RS, de Souza RORR. Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Innovations (Phila) 2022; 17: 3-13.
19. Awad AK, Ahmed A, Mathew DM, Varghese KS, Mathew SM, Khaja S, Ne- well PC, Okoh AK, Hirji S. Minimally invasive, surgical, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a network meta-analysis. J Cardiol 2024; 83: 177-183.
20. Bratt S, Dimberg A, Kastengren M, Lilford RD, Svenarud P, Sartipy U, Franco-Cereceda A, Dalén M. Bleeding in minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 19: 349.
21. Abraham B, Farina JM, Fath A, Abdou M, Elbanna M, Suppah M, Sleem M, Eldaly A, Aly M, Megaly M, Agasthi P, Chao CJ, Fortuin D, Alsidawi S, Ayoub C, Alkhouli M, El Sabbagh A, Holmes D, Brilakis ES, Arsanjani R. The impact of moderate aortic stenosis in acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter retrospective study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 102: 159-165.
22. Bonow RO, Kent KM, Rosing DR, Lipson LC, Borer JS, McIntosh CL, Morrow AG, Epstein SE. Aortic valve replacement without myocardial revascularization in patients with combined aortic valvular and coronary artery disease. Circulation 1981; 63: 243-251.
23. Ogami T, Yokoyama Y, Takagi H, Serna-Gallegos D, Ferdinand FD, Sultan I, Kuno T. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: the network meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2022; 37: 4868-4874.
24. Shneider YA, Tsoi MD, Fomenko MS, Pavlov AA, Shilenko PA. Aortic valve replacement via J-shaped partial upper sternotomy: randomized trial, mid-term results. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2020; 7: 25-30.
25. Johnston DR, Roselli EE. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 4: 140-147.
Copyright: © 2025 Polish Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (Polskie Towarzystwo KardioTorakochirurgów) and the editors of the Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.