Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
eISSN: 2449-8238
ISSN: 2392-1099
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2024
vol. 10
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Role of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratioin prediction of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Nizamettin Bozbay
1
,
Şeyma Kılıç
1
,
Osman Yildirim
1
,
Aybike Tazegül Pekin
1
,
Gökçen Örgül
1

  1. Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
Clin Exp HEPATOL 2024; 10, 4: 285-290
Online publish date: 2024/12/02
Article file
- Role of aspartate.pdf  [0.10 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Intrahepatic cholestasis (ICH) is the most common liver disease of pregnancy. Its prevalence varies according to ethnicity, geographical regions, and environmental factors [1]. Data in the literature show that it varies between 0.3% and 15% in different populations [2]. ICH is characterized by pruritus, especially on the palms and soles of the feet, and high serum bile acid levels without specific skin lesions. ICH is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, including premature delivery, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, fetal asphyxia, and even stillbirth [3].

The pathogenesis of ICH is still not fully known today. It is thought that increased bile acids in the mother pass to the fetus through the placenta and accumulate in the amniotic fluid or myocardium and cause fetal complications. Increased fasting serum bile acids with itching of the hands and feet, especially at night, are diagnostic. However, measuring serum bile acid levels is an expensive and not easily accessible laboratory test. ICH usually causes clinical signs and symptoms after the second trimester. Therefore, prediction of ICH in the early gestational weeks may help clinicians carry out close follow-up and reduce adverse fetal outcomes by early diagnosis [4].

The aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet (PLT) ratio index (APRI) is considered an indicator of liver fibrosis that can be easily calculated using routine laboratory blood tests [5]. The APRI score has previously been extensively studied to detect liver damage in patients with hepatitis C [6]. It has also been studied in obstetrics, particularly in ICH and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet) syndrome [7, 8]. In summary, the APRI score is considered to be an inexpensive, non-invasive, and easily accessible test that can be used to predict liver injury. A review of the literature has shown that first-trimester APRI scores are useful in predicting cholestasis [4, 7].

In this study, we aimed to compare the first, second and third trimester APRI scores in pregnant women with and without ICH. Moreover, the utility of the APRI score was analyzed to understand its usefulness in clinical practice.

Material and methods

This study was designed as a retrospective case-control study. The data of pregnant women admitted to the obstetrics and gynecology department in our clinic between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2024 were collected. Patient information was obtained from file archives together with a computerized electronic hospital system. The study was planned in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approval was obtained from the Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine Local Ethics Committee (Ethics Committee number: 2024/87) before starting the study.

Patients with pruritus together with fasting serum bile acid level > 10 μmol/l were diagnosed with ICH after exclusion of other hepatobiliary causes. Patients with known hepatobiliary diseases and maternal diseases, as well as those who did not meet the diagnostic criteria for ICH, were excluded from the study. The control group consisted of pregnant women with similar clinical characteristics and without any maternal diseases or fetal abnormalities. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, chromosomal or structural fetal anomalies, obstetric complications (placenta previa, hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, diabetes mellitus), and maternal comorbid diseases.

Maternal age, gravida, parity, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), AST values, PLT count, gestational age at delivery, pregnancy complications, mode of delivery, obstetric and perinatal outcomes were obtained for each patient. For patients diagnosed with cholestasis, data on bile acid levels and gestational week at diagnosis were also obtained.

In the study, laboratory test results for the period 8 to 14 weeks for the first trimester, 20 to 24 weeks for the second trimester, and 28 to 32 weeks for the third trimester were used to standardize laboratory findings. APRI scores were calculated using complete blood count and liver function tests. APRI score was calculated as AST/PLT ratio as described previously [5]. Demographic characteristics, neonatal outcomes, and laboratory findings were compared between the two groups.

Statistical analysis

The analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22. Descriptive data were presented as n, % values for categorical data, and median with interquartile range (25th-75th percentile values) for continuous data. Chi-square analysis (Pearson χ2) was used to compare categorical variables between groups. Compliance of continuous variables with normal distribution was evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare paired groups. The IPC diagnostic value of the APRI value was measured by ROC analysis. The Youden index was used to calculate the most appropriate cut-off value. The statistical significance level was accepted as p < 0.05 in the analyses.

Results

A total of 113 patients (54 in the case group and 59 in the control group) were included in the study. Demographic data, obstetric characteristics, and neonatal and delivery outcomes of the patients are presented in Table 1. Gestational age at delivery was 37.00 (36.00-37.00) weeks in the cholestasis group and 38.00 (38.00-39.00) weeks in the control group (p ≤ 0.001). Birth weight was 2910.00 g (2500.00-3100.00) in the cholestasis group and 3340.00 g (2980.00-3640.00) in the control group (p ≤ 0.001). The rate of preterm delivery was 27.8% and 1.7% in the study and control group, respectively (p ≤ 0.001) The rate of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) was higher in the cholestasis group than in healthy pregnant women (13.0% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.027).

Table 1

Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of case and control groups

Demographic and clinical characteristicsICH group (n = 54)Control group (n = 59)p*
Median (IQR)Median (IQR)
Age29.00 (25.00-35.00)28.00 (24.00-33.00)0.188
Gravidity2.00 (1.00-3.00)2.00 (2.00-3.00)0.661
Parity1.00 (0.00-1.00)1.00 (0.00-2.00)0.114
BMI29.07 (27.53-32.87)29.69 (27.06-31.64)0.879
Bile acid value25.50 (17.00-42.00)
Gestational age at ICH diagnosis32.50 (30.00-34.00)
Gestational week at birth37.00 (36.00-37.00)38.00 (38.00-39.00)< 0.001
Birth weight2910.00 (2500.00-3100.00)3340.00 (2980.00-3640.00)< 0.001
APGAR score (1st minute)7.00 (6.00-8.00)7.00 (7.00-8.00)0.381
APGAR score (5th minute)9.00 (8.00-9.00)9.00 (8.00-9.00)0.152
Mode of delivery, n (%)NVD22 (40.7)26 (44.1)0.721**
CS32 (59.3)33 (55.9)
Preterm labor ratio, n (%)15 (27.8)1 (1.7)< 0.001**
IUGR ratio, n (%), Yes7 (13.0)1 (1.7)0.027**
Meconium amnion, n (%), Yes2 (3.7)0 (.0)0.226**

* Mann-Whitney U test,

** chi square test was performed,

BMI – body mass index, ICH – intrahepatic cholestasis, NVD – normal vaginal delivery, CS – cesarean section, IUGR – intrauterine growth retardation

The findings of the laboratory results of the case and control groups are shown in Table 2. AST was similar in the case and control groups in the first trimester, whereas it was significantly higher in the case group in the second and third trimesters (p = 0.140, p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.001, respectively). PLT was similar in case and control groups in all three trimesters (p = 0.271, p ≤ 0.275, p ≤ 0.947, respectively). APRI scores were significantly higher in the case group in all three trimesters (p = 0.028, p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.001, respectively).

Table 2

Comparison of APRI scores of case and control groups

ParameterICH group Median (IQR)Control group Median (IQR)p*
1st trimester AST (U/l)15.00 (12.00-19.00)14.00 (12.00-15.00)0.140
1st trimester PLT (K/μl)240.00 (210.00-290.00)267.00 (218.00-316.00)0.271
2nd trimester AST (U/l)24.00 (18.00-38.00)14.00 (12.00-17.00)< 0.001
2nd trimester PLT (K/μl)223.50 (195.00-268.00)239.00 (205.00-284.00)0.275
3rd trimester AST (U/l)52.00 (33.00-85.00)16.00 (13.00-18.00)< 0.001
3rd trimester PLT (K/μl)214.00 (180.00-280.00)225.00 (186.00-271.00)0.947
First-trimester APRI score0.06 (0.05-0.08)0.05 (0.04-0.06)0.028
Second-trimester APRI score0.12 (0.08-0.18)0.06 (0.05-0.08)< 0.001
Third-trimester APRI score0.25 (0.14-0.45)0.07 (0.05-0.09)< 0.001

* Mann-Whitney U test,

AST – aspartate aminotransferase, PLT – platelets, APRI – aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index

The utility of APRI scores to predict ICH was investigated by ROC analysis, and cut-off values were determined. We found that using a cut-off value of 0.06 for the first trimester APRI score, the sensitivity was 42.6% and the specificity was 83.1%; using a cut-off value of 0.1 for the second trimester APRI score, the sensitivity was 57.4% and the specificity was 93.2%; and using a cut-off value of 13 for the third trimester APRI score, the sensitivity was 77.8% and the specificity was 98.3% (Table 3, Fig. 1).

Table 3

Specificity and sensitivity of APRI values in determining severity of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

ParameterAUCp 95% confidence intervalSensiti- vitySpecifi- city95% GAPPDNPD
Lower limitUpper limit
First-trimester APRI score > 0.060.6320.0130.5360.72142.683.129.2-56.869.761.2
Second-trimester APRI score > 0.10.806< 0.0010.7200.87457.493.243.2-70.888.670.5
Third-trimester APRI score > 0.130.912< 0.0010.8430.95777.898.364.4-88.097.782.9

[i] AUC – area under curve, PPD – positive predictive value, NPD – negative predictive value

Fig. 1

ROC curve of first-, second-, and third-trimester APRI score

/f/fulltexts/CEH/55238/CEH-10-55238-g001_min.jpg

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the efficacy of using the APRI score, a non-invasive and convenient method for predicting ICH. AST levels in the second and third trimesters were found to be significantly higher in ICH patients compared to control patients. APRI scores were significantly higher in all three trimesters.

In a previous study, adverse perinatal outcomes, including preterm delivery and low birth weight, were found to be statistically significantly more frequent in the ICH group compared to the control group. Many studies in the literature have reported that ICH is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes [9, 10]. Cui et al. performed a meta-analysis using data from women with ICH and found that adverse perinatal outcomes (e.g., preterm delivery) were more frequent in women with bile acids above 40 μmol/l. This study found no effect on the risk of stillbirth compared to women with low bile acids [11]. Another meta-analysis reported that perinatal mortality was increased in patients with bile acids higher than 100 μmol/l. However, the exact reason for this could not be determined because there were very few patient groups with bile acids higher than 100 μmol/l. It was emphasized that the causes of stillbirth should be investigated in the future with large case series. In the same study, serial bile acid monitoring was recommended to reduce stillbirths, and it was argued that the mode of pregnancy management should be determined according to the highest bile acid level [12].

It has been known for years that ICH is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Therefore, the diagnosis and management of this patient population are of great importance. The gestational age at delivery of these patients is still controversial. In one study, the prevalence of stillbirth for all bile acid groups was less than 1% before 35 weeks gestation. In the same study, it was found that there was no increase in stillbirth before 39 weeks gestation in singleton pregnancies with bile acid concentrations below 100 μmol/l; however, the prevalence of preterm delivery of 25.3% may have prevented late stillbirths [12]. In a meta-analysis, Lo et al. compared delivery at 36 weeks gestation with delivery at 35 weeks gestation to reduce perinatal death from ICH. They argued that the 36th week of gestation was the most appropriate delivery week, with life years adjusted for maternal and neonatal quality of life [13]. In our study, despite unfavorable perinatal outcomes, there was no perinatal death. We believe that this was due to the early identification of patients, early initiation of treatment, and planning of delivery at 37 weeks gestation.

Although the utility of APRI in predicting the development of ICH has been investigated in several studies, our knowledge is still limited due to the heterogeneous design of the studies and the relatively small number of cases [14].

Adverse perinatal outcomes due to intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) have been demonstrated in many studies. Chen et al. found an increased risk of preterm delivery and low birth weight, as well as a high rate of cesarean section in patients with ICP [15]. A meta-analysis clarified the adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with ICH and found that women with serum bile acids of 100 μmol/l or more had a significantly increased risk of stillbirth [12]. Brouwers et al. found that spontaneous preterm delivery, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and perinatal death were significantly more common in patients with severe ICH. The risk of stillbirth was found to be significantly higher in women with meconium-stained amniotic fluid than in controls [16]. Our findings are consistent with the literature. Fetal growth restriction and preterm delivery were statistically significantly higher in the ICH group, while gestational age at delivery and birth weight were significantly lower in the ICH group compared to the control group.

Early recognition and management of ICH may help in reducing maternal and fetal complications. Several protocols have been proposed for the management of ICH. While early studies focused on risk factors, more recent studies have emphasized the diagnosis and management of the disease. The use of biochemical markers such as APRI and NLP (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) as screening tests to predict ICH has been attempted. According to the results of a previous study, the APRI score calculated in the first trimester of pregnancy can be used as a predictor of ICH development in the third trimester [7]. APRI has also been studied to predict the development of HELLP syndrome and other liver diseases, such as hepatic fibrosis. According to the results obtained, the first-trimester APRI score (0.64 ±0.10) of women who developed HELLP syndrome in the third trimester of pregnancy was found to be significantly higher than the control group (0.40 ±0.12) (p < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of a cut-off value of 0.55 for the first trimester APRI score in predicting the development of HELLP syndrome in the third trimester were calculated to be 88.1% and 94.6%, respectively [17].

The livers of pregnant women undergo physiological and pathological changes, and changes in liver enzyme activity and secretion reflect changes in serum enzymatic activity. Therefore, there are many studies evaluating the activities of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) isoenzymes and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) in the serum of women with ICP. According to the analysis of these studies, ICP pregnancy is associated with statistically significantly elevated ADH I and total ADH activity. Additionally, total ADH activity has been found to be positively correlated with ALT, AST, and total bile acids [17-19].

In a study comparing ICH and control groups, Peker et al. found that APRI scores were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the ICH group in all trimesters. The cut-off values of APRI scores for predicting ICH in the first, second, and third trimesters were 0.101 (79.7% sensitivity, 79.6% specificity), 0.103 (78.4% sensitivity, 76.3% specificity), and 0.098 (72.5% sensitivity, 72% specificity), respectively [4]. Tolunay et al. found that the first-trimester APRI scores of ICH patients were significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. In ROC analysis, the cut-off value for the APRI score was determined to be 0.57, with 86.5% sensitivity and 77.3% specificity [7]. Similarly, in our study, the APRI score was found to be significantly higher in the ICH group compared to the control group in all trimesters (p = 0.028, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The ROC analysis cut-off values for the APRI score to predict ICH were 42.6% sensitivity and 83.1% specificity when the cut-off value for the first-trimester APRI score was 0.06, and the cut-off value for the second-trimester APRI score was 0.06; when 1 was taken as the cut-off value, 57.4% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity were found; and when the cut-off value for the third-trimester APRI score was 13, 77.8% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity were found, and it was found to be a good predictor.

Although the results of our study provide important statistical data, it has limitations such as retrospective design, being single-center, and having a limited number of patients.

In conclusion, the APRI score was positively associated with ICH in our population. Bile acids are not always an easy laboratory result to use and access. Therefore, our findings can be used as a basis for future studies aimed at the prediction and prevention of ICH and related complications.

Disclosures

This research received no external funding.

The study was approved by the Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine Local Ethics Committee (Approval No. 2024/87).

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Editorial Board for Clinical Updates in Women’s Health Care. Clinical updates in women’s health care summary: liver disease: reproductive considerations. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 236.

2 

Lee RH, Greenberg M, Metz TD, et al. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series# 53: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: replaces consult# 13, April 2011. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224: B2-B9.

3 

Arthuis C, Diguisto C, Lorphelin H, et al. Perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis during pregnancy: an 8-year case-control study. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0228213.

4 

Peker A, Tanaçan A, İpek G, et al. Role of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio in the prediction and prognosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A case-control study from a tertiary center. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2024; 164: 656-661.

5 

Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, et al. A simple non-invasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003; 38: 518-526.

6 

Lin ZH, Xin YN, Dong QJ, et al. Performance of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for the staging of hepatitis C-related fibrosis: an updated meta-analysis. Hepatology 2011; 53: 726-736.

7 

Tolunay HE, Kahraman NÇ, Varlı EN, et al. First-trimester aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index in predicting intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy and its relationship with bile acids: A pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 256: 114-117.

8 

Şaşmaz Mİ, Ayvaz MA, Dülger AC, et al. Aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index score for predicting HELLP syndrome. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 38: 459-462.

9 

Herrera CA, Manuck TA, Stoddard GJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 1913-1920.

10 

Shan D, Hu Y, Qiu P, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in women with twin pregnancy. Twin Res Hum Genet 2016; 19: 697-707.

11 

Cui D, Zhong Y, Zhang L, Du H. Bile acid levels and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017; 43: 1411-1420.

12 

Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2019; 393: 899-909.

13 

Lo JO, Shaffer BL, Allen AJ, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and timing of delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 2254-2258.

14 

Chang X, Lv C, Wang B, et al. The utility of PIR classification in predicting the on-treatment histological and clinical outcomes of patients with hepatitis B and advanced liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2024; 79: 425-437.

15 

Chen Y, Zhang H, Ning W, et al. The impact of intrahepatic cholestasis on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23: 16.

16 

Brouwers L, Koster MP, Page-Christiaens GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes associated with elevated bile acid levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 100.e1-7.

17 

Tolunay HE, Kahraman NC, Varli EN, et al. Can first-trimester AST to platelet ratio index scores predict HELLP syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2021; 31: 188-192.

18 

Jelski W, Piechota J, Orywal K, Mroczko B. The alterations in alcohol dehydrogenase activity in the sera of women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Anticancer Res 2020; 40: 1997-2001.

19 

Piechota J, Jelski W, Orywal K, Mroczko B. The comparison of total bile acid concentration and alcohol dehydrogenase activity as markers of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Acta Biochim Pol 2022; 69: 173-176.

20 

Piechota J, Jelski W, Orywal K, Mroczko B. The alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzyme (ADH I) as a marker of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 11071.

Copyright: © Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
 
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.