eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


3/2022
vol. 21
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Severity of climacteric symptomatology related to depression and sexual function in women from a private clinic

Alexandra Liñan-Bermudez
1
,
Jhony Chafloque-Chavesta
1
,
Pamela Leon Pastuso
1
,
Kiaraliz Huambachano Pinedo
2
,
John Barja-Ore
2

1.
Academic Department, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú
2.
Academic Department, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú
Menopause Rev 2022; 21(3): 165-169
Online publish date: 2022/09/28
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

The climacteric is a period of adaptation and transition to a non-reproductive stage, which includes the years before and after menopause. During this period, psychological and social factors influence the appearance of signs and symptoms, as well as the hormonal changes characteristic of climacteric [1]. The psychological and physical impact is frequent but at different levels in each woman.

In this period, sexual function is one of the most affected factors [2]. The risk of suffering sexual dysfunction triples. Desire, as well as arousal, are usually the most compromised components of sexuality [3]. In addition, mental health care is highly undervalued, although mood deterioration represents one of the most frequent reasons for consultation [4]. These problems have repercussions in the full development of the women’s well-being and, hence, on their quality of life [1].

The insufficient capacity to recognize or express the conflicts and discomforts increases the negative repercussions on the woman’s health [5]. In addition to this problem, a negative attitude towards these changes affects their proper management, even the search for professional support for specialized advice with an integrative approach [6]. Different investigations conclude that in women with severe symptoms, the chance of deterioration of sexual well-being increases [7], and that the depressive state is related to their sexual function [8].

The women and people around them need to understand that the climacteric is a natural transition, not a disease, and it requires a preventive and educational approach due to the social, physical, and mental vulnerability present in these years. The positive and negative experiences that women go through during the climacteric mainly impact the role they play in their work, family, and community.

Considering that the well-being of climacteric women still represents a challenge for public health, and so this study will be developed to determine the relationship between the severity of climacteric symptoms with depression and sexual function in women from a private clinic.

Material and methods

The descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out at the “Monteluz” clinic in the district of Carabayllo November–December 2021. The research was carried out after obtaining the approval of the institutional research Ethics Committee of the Sergio E. Bernales National Hospital (No. 21-0055) and the institutional authorization of the clinic.

Women between 40 and 65 years old, who had sexual relations with their partner, and who decided to participate voluntarily, were selected for this study. Meanwhile, those with chronic diseases, mental health problems (psychological or psychiatric), hormonal treatment in the last 6 months, and incomplete information were excluded from the research.

For the execution of the study, the women who agreed to participate signed an informed consent form. Confidentially, 3 instruments were used. The first was the female sexual function questionnaire 2 (FSM-2), made by Sánchez-Sánchez et al. [9], presenting 11 items with scores ranging of 1–4, and divided into 2 domains: evaluators of the sexual response and descriptive of sexual activity. This instrument was validated by experts to have good reliability (α = 0.919). The total score was obtained by adding the points of the items of the domain of evaluators of sexual response. A higher score reflects greater sexual dysfunction.

The second instrument applied was the menopause rating scale, which was developed by Heinemann [10] and currently has versions in different languages [11], with good validity and reliability in all countries [12]. This scale has 11 items distributed in 3 domains: somatic, psychological, and urogenital, with scores ranging of 0–4.

The total score was obtained by adding up the points of all the items. The higher the score, the more severe the symptomatology.

The last instrument was the Beck Depression Inventory adapted to Spanish by Sanz et al. [13], which has shown high general reliability (α = 0.091), as well as for the cognitive-affective (α = 0.086) and somatic-motivational (α = 0.081) domains [14]. It has 21 items that have a score of 0–3. They are distributed in the domains that were mentioned before. The total score was obtained by adding the points of all the items. A high score reflects a more severe depressive state.

Statistical analysis

The data were processed using the SPSS version 26 program. The mean and standard deviation were estimated for the numerical variables; the frequency and the percentage for the categorical ones. Data distribution was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Pearson and Spearman correlation test was used, with a significance level of less than 0.05.

Results

The mean age of the women was 49.1 ±5.6 years. Most were cohabiting (85%) and housewives (71.6%). 21.7% of the women had severe depression, 28.3% moderate, and 50% mild/medium. Sleeping alteration (1.73 ±0.88) and loss of appetite (1.63 ±0.73), as well as crying (1.42 ±1.10), were the most severe manifestations of depression. While suicidal thoughts (0.40 ±0.71), punishment (0.57 ±0.89), and the perception of inutility (0.40 ±0.71) were the least severe (Table 1).

Table 1

Indicators of depression in climacteric women

ParametersSeverity scaleX̄±SD
0123
Sadness27 (45.0)20 (33.3)11 (18.3)2 (3.3)0.80 ±0.86
Pessimism25 (41.7)19 (31.7)16 (26.7)0.85 ±0.82
Failures from the past29 (48.3)9 (15.0)20 (33.3)2 (3.3)0.92 ±0.97
Anhedonia12 (20.0)31 (51.7)14 (23.3)3 (5)1.13 ±0.79
Guilt24 (40.0)27 (45.0)7 (11.7)2 (3.3)0.78 ± 0.78
Punishment38 (63.3)14 (23.3)4 (6.7)4 (6.7)0.57 ±0.89
Self-esteem34 (56.7)15 (25.0)9 (15.0)2 (3.3)0.65 ±0.86
Self-criticism27 (45.0)17 (28.3)13 (21.7)3 (5.0)0.87 ±0.92
Suicidal thoughts42 (70.0)14 (23.3)2 (3.3)2 (3.3)0.40 ±0.71
Crying17 (28.3)13 (21.7)18 (30.0)12 (20)1.42 ±1.10
Agitation20 (33.3)20 (33.3)12 (20.0)8 (13.3)1.13 ±1.03
Loss of interest in activities24 (40.0)24 (40.0)11 (18.3)1 (1.7)0.82 ±0.79
Indecision24 (40.0)17 (28.3)16 (26.7)3 (5.0)0.97 ±0.93
Inutility35 (58.3)13 (21.7)11 (18.3)1 (1.7)0.63 ±0.84
Loss of energy16 (26.7)30 (50.0)11 (18.3)3 (5.0)1.02 ±0.81
Sleeping alteration5 (8.3)18 (30.0)25 (41.7)12 (20.0)1.73 ±0.88
Irritability26 (43.3)17 (28.3)13 (21.7)4 (6.7)0.92 ±0.96
Loss of appetite2 (3.3)25 (41.7)26 (43.3)7 (11.7)1.63 ±0.73
Loss of concentration26 (43.3)13 (21.7)19 (31.7)2 (3.3)0.95 ±0.94
Tiredness and fatigue14 (23.3)26 (43.3)16 (26.7)4 (6.7)1.17 ±0.86
Loss of sexual interest23 (38.3)16 (26.7)18 (30.0)3 (5.0)1.02 ±0.94

[i] X̄ – mean, SD – standard deviation

Fifty percent of the women presented moderate symptoms, 48.2% mild, and 1.7% severe. Sleep problems (1.05 ±0.99), physical and mental exhaustion (1.48 ±0.98), and vaginal dryness (1.45 ±1.26) were the most severe problems in the somatic, psychological, and urogenital domains, respectively. The symptoms with the highest proportion of women who did not report problems were those related to the heart (51.7%), hot flushes (38.3%), anxiety (33.3%), and depressive mood (28.3%) (Table 2).

Table 2

Severity of climacteric symptomatology according to domains

ParametersNone discomfortMild discomfortModerate discomfortSevere discomfortVery severe discomfortX̄ ±SD
Somatic
Hot flushes, sweating23 (38.3)26 (43.3)9 (15.0)2 (3.3)0.83 ±0.80
Heart discomfort31 (51.7)26 (43.3)3 (5.0)0.53 ±0.59
Sleep problems21 (35.0)20 (33.3)16 (26.7)1 (1.7)2 (3.3)1.05 ±0.99
Joint and muscular discomfort12 (20.0)37 (61.7)9 (15.0)2 (3.3)1.02 ±0.70
Psychological
Depressive mood17 (28.3)27 (45.0)11 (18.3)4 (6.7)1 (1.7)1.08 ±0.94
Irritability9 (15.0)40 (66.7)9 (15.0)2 (3.3)1.07 ±0.66
Anxiety20 (33.3)26 (43.3)9 (15.0)4 (6.7)1.00 ±0.95
Physical and mental exhaustion6 (10.0)32 (53.3)11 (18.3)9 (15)2 (3.3)1.48 ±0.98
Urogenital
Sexual problems18 (30.0)27 (45.0)9 (15.0)3 (5.0)3 (5.0)1.10 ±1.05
Bladder problems14 (23.3)29 (48.3)11 (18.3)3 (5.0)3 (5.0)1.20 ±1.02
Vaginal dryness13 (21.7)26 (43.3)10 (16.7)3 (5.0)8 (13.3)1.45 ±1.26

[i] X̄ – mean, SD – standard deviation

Most women presented severe sexual dysfunction regarding genital pain (60%) and vaginal penetration (55%). In 58.3% and 48.3% sexual desire and arousal were not affected, respectively. There was a high frequency of sexual activity (88.3%), although there was no or very low sexual satisfaction (63.3%). Confidence to communicate preferences to the partner was usual in 75% of the women (Table 3).

Table 3

Frequency of indicators of female sexual function according to domains

Sexual response evaluatorsSevere sexual dysfunction n (%)Moderate sexual dysfunction n (%)No sexual dysfunction n (%)
Desire13 (21.7)12 (20.0)35 (58.3)
Arousal19 (31.7)12 (20.0)29 (48.3)
Lubrication25 (41.7)22 (36.7)13 (21.7)
Pain36 (60.0)20 (33.3)4 (6.7)
Vaginal penetration33 (55.0)23 (38.3)4 (6.7)
Orgasm16 (26.7)21 (35.0)23 (38.3)
Low n (%)Medium n (%)High n (%)
Frequency of sexual activity3 (5.0)4 (6.7)53 (88.3)
No/very low n (%)Low n (%)Normal/high n (%)
Sexual satisfaction38 (63.3)16 (26.7)6 (10.0)
Descriptive of sexual activityLack n (%)Occasional n (%)Habitual n (%)
Anticipatory anxiety36 (60.0)13 (21.7)11 (18.3)
Initiative37 (61.7)19 (31.7)4 (6.7)
Confidence to communicate preferences to the partner10 (16.7)5 (8.3)45 (75.0)

Depression had a significant relationship with climacteric symptomatology (r = 0.755; p ≤ 0.001) and its domains. Meanwhile, the cognitive-affective domain was not associated with somatic symptomatology (rho = 0.245; p > 0.05). The urogenital domain had a positive relationship with depression (rho = 0.577; p ≤ 0.001) and a negative one with sexual function (rho = –0.385; p ≤ 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4

Correlation of climacteric symptomatology with depression and sexual function

ParametersClimacteric symptomatology
GlobalSomaticPsychologicalUrogenital
Depression0.755**0.313*0.698**0.577**
Cognitive-affective0.688**0.2450.695**0.492**
Somatic-motivational0.720**0.404**0.574**0.619**
Sexual function–0.2270.053–0.0640.385*

† Pearson correlation coefficient

‡ Spearman’s correlation coefficient

* p-value ≤ 0.05

** p-value ≤ 0.001

Discussion

The climacteric is a critical stage for women. They experience hormonal changes with different intensities, which affect their physical and emotional well-being. Although this is a natural process, it is a problem that requires a comprehensive, differentiated, and sustained approach, given the community impact it generates.

In the current study, mild/minimal depression (50%) was the most frequent. In comparison, Yanikkerem et al. [8] showed that 32% presented minimal symptoms. In addition, Duzgun et al. [15] showed that mild symptoms were the most frequent. On the other hand, this study shows that around 90% of women reported some level of severity in sleeping alteration, contrary to what was found by Humeniuk et al. [16], who indicated that 46% had no problems sleeping.

The reduction in the concentration of oestrogens and progesterone, high levels of testosterone [17], and changes in body composition [18, 19] are related to climacteric symptoms that variably affect women. The present study shows that half of the women suffered from moderate affectation, and a minimum proportion suffered from severe affectation. Studies such as those by Jonusiene et al. [20] and Cruz et al. [21] reported different findings because they reported that moderate and severe symptoms occurred in 21.6% and 36.5% of the women studied, respectively.

In addition to the hormonal changes presented at this stage of a woman’s life, the passing of the years generates sexual problems of various magnitudes [22]. Similarly to our results, Dąbrowska-Galas et al. [23] reported that dyspareunia and lubrication were some of the most affected domains. On the other hand, sexual desire and orgasm were the ones that presented the least impact during the climacteric, contrary to what was reported by Trento et al. [24].

If the climacteric symptoms are not fully managed, they can affect different areas of the woman’s development and even her closest environment. For Tsai et al. [25], somatic symptoms represented a risk factor for depressive syndrome in women. In this sense, the results of this study show that depression was directly related to the severity of climacteric symptoms, contrary to a study conducted in Turkey, which showed an indirect relation [15]. On the other hand, several studies showed that sexual function and climacteric symptoms were related [20, 2628], contrary to our research. Furthermore, similar information was found in the study by Eftekhar et al. [29] In their research, the urogenital and somatic symptoms were associated with sexual dysfunction.

There are certain limitations to the research. It was a non-random sample, so the results were not generalized to the entire population. In addition, due to the methodological design, there was no causal relationship between the variables.

Conclusions

In conclusion, climacteric symptomatology was related to depression. It was also linked to the somatic-motivational and cognitive-affective domains. In the latter case, somatic symptomatology did not show a significant relationship. In addition, urogenital symptomatology was correlated to sexual function. It is necessary to provide health services that address this stage of natural transition with a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach.

Acknowledgments

The study was approved by a research Ethics Committee.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Souza GE, Prates A, Lima de Oliveira F, et al. Quality of life in climacteric women assisted by primary health care. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0211617.

2 

Scavello I, Maseroli E, Di Stasi V, Vignozzi L. Sexual health in menopause. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 2019; 55: 559.

3 

Blümel JE, Araya MH, Riquelme OR, Castro DG, Sánchez EF, Gramegna SG. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in climacteric women. Influence of menopause and hormone replacement therapy. Rev Med Chile 2002; 130: 1131-1138.

4 

Palacios MS, Zambrano JS, Vallejo AB. Depression and sexuality in climacteric women treated at María Auxiliadora dispensary, province of Guayas, Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador. Recimundo 2019; 3: 832-849.

5 

Monsalve C, Reyes V, Parra J, Chea R. Therapeutic management of climacteric Symptomatology. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet 2018; 64: 43-50.

6 

Schneider HPG, Birkhäuser M. Quality of life in climacteric women. Climacteric 2017; 20: 187-194.

7 

Smith RL, Gallicchio L, Flaws JA. Factors affecting sexual function in midlife women: results from the midlife women’s health study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017; 26: 923-932.

8 

Yanikkerem E, Göker A, Çakır Ö, Esmeray N. Effects of physical and depressive symptoms on the sexual life of Turkish women in the climacteric period. Climacteric 2018; 21:160-116.

9 

Sánchez-Sánchez F, Ferrer-Casanova C, Ponce-Buj B, et al. Design and validation of the second edition of the Women’s Sexual Function Questionnaire, FSM-2. Med Fam SEMERGEN 2020; 46: 324-330.

10 

Heinemann LA, Potthoff P, Schneider HP. International versions of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 28.

11 

ZEG Berlín. An international scale for all women. Menopause Rating Scale 2022. Available from: https://zeg-berlin.de/expertise/diagnostics-tools/menopause-rating-scale/languages/.

12 

Heinemann K, Ruebig A, Potthoff P, et al. The menopause rating scale (MRS) scale: a methodological review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 45.

13 

Sanz J, Perdigón AL, Vázquez C. The spanish adaptation of Beck’s Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II): 2. Psychometric properties in the generalpopulation. Clin Health 2003; 14: 249-280.

14 

Estrada BD, Delgado C, Landero R, González MT. Psychometric properties of the BDI-II bifactorial model on mexican general population and university students. Univ Psychol 2015; 14: 125-136.

15 

Duzgun AA, Kok G, Sahin S, Guvenc G. Assessment of depression and sexual quality of life in postmenopausal women. Perspect Psychiatr Care, Wiley 2022.

16 

Humeniuk E, Bojar I, Gujski M, Raczkiewicz D. Effect of symptoms of climacteric syndrome, depression and insomnia on self-rated work ability in peri-and post-menopausal women in non-manual employment. Ann Agric Medio Ambiente Med 2019; 26: 600-605.

17 

Kaya C, Cengiz H, Yeşil A, Ekin M, Yaşar L. The relation among steroid hormone levels, lipid profile and menopausal symptom severity. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 38: 284-291.

18 

Cengiz H, Kaya C, Suzen Caypinar S, Alay I. The relationship between menopausal symptoms and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 39: 529-33.

19 

Alay I, Kaya C, Cengiz H, Yildiz S, Ekin M, Yasar L. The relation of body mass index, menopausal symptoms, and lipid profile with bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 59: 61-66.

20 

Jonusiene G, Zilaitiene B, Adomaitiene V, Aniuliene R, Bancroft J. Sexual function, mood and menopause symptoms in Lithuanian postmenopausal women. Climacteric 2013; 16: 185-193.

21 

Cruz EF, Nina VJS, Figuerędo ED. Climacteric symptoms and sexual dysfunction: Association between the blatt-kupperman index and the female sexual function index. Rev Bras Ginecol E Obstet 2017; 39: 66-71.

22 

Ptaszkowski K, Paprocka-Borowicz M, Słupska L, et al. Assessment of bioelectrical activity of synergistic muscles during pelvic floor muscles activation in postmenopausal women with and without stress urinary incontinence: a preliminary observational study. Clin Interv Aging 2015; 10: 1521-1528.

23 

Dąbrowska-Galas M, Dąbrowska J, Michalski B. Sexual dysfunction in menopausal women. Sex Med 2019; 7: 472-479.

24 

Trento SRSS, Madeiro A, Rufino AC. Sexual function and associated factors in postmenopausal women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021; 43: 522-529.

25 

Tsai KW, Lin SC, Koo M. Correlates of depressive symptoms in late middle-aged Taiwanese women: findings from the 2009 Taiwan National Health Interview Survey. BMC Womens Health 2017; 17: 103.

26 

Cabral PUL, Canário ACG, Spyrides MHC, Uchôa SAC, Eleutério JJr, Gonçalves AK. Determinants of sexual dysfunction among middle-aged women. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2013; 120: 271-274.

27 

Gozuyesil E, Gokyildiz S, Alan S. Sexual function and quality-of-life-related problems during the menopausal period. J Health Psychol 2018; 23: 1769-1780.

28 

Nazarpour S, Simbar M, Tehrani FR, Majd HA. The relationship between menopausal symptoms and sexual function. Women Health 2018; 58: 1112-1123.

29 

Eftekhar T, Dashti M, Shariat M, Haghollahi F, Raisi F, Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi A. Female sexual function during the menopausal transition in a group of Iranian women. J Fam Reprod Health 2016; 10: 52-58.

Copyright: © 2022 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.