eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 13
Short communication

Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal – new revision procedure in a patient with insufficient weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy

Radosław Cylke, Paweł Skrzypek, Paweł Ziemiański, Justyna Domienik-Karlowicz, Maciej Kosieradzki, Wojciech Lisik

Videosurgery Miniinv 2018; 13 (3): 407–411
Online publish date: 2018/06/25
View full text
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most popular and effective bariatric surgical procedures worldwide. The effect of LSG is mostly dependent on the restrictive mechanism, which makes it more vulnerable to failure. Failing of bariatric procedure is not uncommon and occurs in 6% to 23%. In case of weight loss failure, there are no hard recommendations on the choice of the redo procedure. One of the most novel options, introduced in 2007, relatively simple to perform following LSG is single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass. Herein we describe surgical technique and history of a patient with inadequate weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, who underwent single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass.

laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery, single-anastomosis duodenoileal

Weiner RA, Theodoridou S, Weiner S. Failure of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: further procedure? Obes Facts 2011; 4 Suppl 1: 42-6.
Rosenthal RJ; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, Baker RS, et al. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012; 8: 8-19.
Gumbs AA, Pomp A, Gagner M. Revisional bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 1137-45.
Laffin M, Karmali S. An update on bariatric surgery. Curr Obes Rep 2014; 3: 316-20.
Noel P, Nedelcu M, Nocca D, et al. Revised sleeve gastrectomy: another option for weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1096-102.
Nevo N, Abu-Abeid S, Lahat G, et al. Converting a  sleeve gastrectomy to a  gastric bypass for weight loss failure – is it worth it? Obes Surg 2018; 28: 364-8.
Carmeli I, Golomb I, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a  biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; 11: 79-85.
AlSabah S, Alsharqawi N, Almulla A, et al. Approach to poor weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: re-sleeve vs. gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 2302-7.
Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Shakeri-Leidenmühler S, et al. Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: indications and outcome. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 835-40.
Greenstein AJ, Jacob BP. Placement of a  laparoscopic adjustable gastric band after failed sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008; 4: 556-8.
Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a  review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017; 13: 1306-12.
Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, Saber AA. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a  systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 104-13.
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 1614-8.
Bennett JM, Mehta S, Rhodes M. Surgery for morbid obesity. Postgrad Med J 2007; 83: 8-15.
Langer FB, Shakeri-Leidenmühler S, Bohdjalian A, et al. Strategies for weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010; 20: 159-61.
Paluszkiewicz R, Kalinowski P, Wróblewski T, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the management of patients with morbid obesity. Videosurgery Miniinv 2012; 7: 225-32.
Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2017; 27: 1302-8.
Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A  matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two-year follow-up. Obes Surg 2017; 27: 454-61.
Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 2098-104.
Topart P, Becouarn G, Delarue J. Weight loss and nutritional outcomes 10 years after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg 2017; 27: 1645-50.
Homan J, Schijns W, Aarts EO, et al. Treatment of vitamin and mineral deficiencies after biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch: a  major challenge. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 234-41.
Suter M, Donadini A, Romy S, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: significant long-term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 267-73.
Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1304-8.23.
Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chen JC, et al. Revisional gastric bypass for failed restrictive procedures: comparison of single-anastomosis (mini-) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2018: 28: 970-5.
Moon RC, Gaskins L, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA. Safety and effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: 2-year result from a  single US institution. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 1571-1577.
Janik MR, Stanowski E, Paśnik K. Present status of bariatric surgery in Poland. Videosurgery Miniinv 2016; 11: 22-5.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe