eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 62

Single nucleotide polymorphism in DNA base excision repair genes XRCC1 and hOGG1 and the risk of endometrial carcinoma in the Polish population

Hanna Romanowicz-Makowska
Beata Smolarz
Amer Houli
Krzysztof Szyłło

Pol J Pathol 2011; 2: 89-94
Online publish date: 2011/08/18
Article file
- Single nucleotide.pdf  [0.08 MB]
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Endometrial cancer is one of the most common malignant neoplasms which appear in the uterine body. About 80% of cases are diagnosed after menopause. The highest incidence, estimated at 57-58 years, is moving to the 6th and 7th decade of life at present. Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common female carcinoma [1, 2].

Endometrial cancer oncogenesis is not a fully recognized process regarding many risk factors. Neoplasm genesis is a multi-stage process. Carcinogenic factors influencing our organism mostly do not cause neoplasm development directly, but they induce genesis of endogenous intermediates, for example reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) or substances oxidized by ROI. These substances may damage the DNA structure and cause point or chromosomal mutations. Some of these mutations lead to cell neoplastic transformation and in consequence to neoplasm development. At each of these stages there are actions of some endogenous or exogenous anticarcinogenic factors (e.g. vitamins A, C, E, glutathione, enzymes acting as free radical scavengers, DNA self-repairing structures).

For repair of oxidative DNA damage, human cells are supported by five DNA repair systems: direct reversal, mismatch repair, double-strand break repair, nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER) [3].

The human oxoguanine glycosylase 1 (hOGG1) and X-ray repair cross-complementing 1 (XRCC1) genes are key genes in the BER pathway [3, 4]. All oxidatively induced DNA lesions and single-strand breaks are repaired via the BER pathway [4]. XRCC1 and hOGG1 can be involved in the repair of DNA lesions, which are known to contribute to endometrial cancer.

There have been some reports about the relation between hOGG1 codon 326 and XRCC1 codon 399 polymorphisms and risk for several cancers [4-18].

The hOGG1 G>C transversion at position 1245 of the hOGG1 gene producing a Ser  Cys substitution at codon 326 (the Ser326Cys polymorphism) was associated with the risk of lung [7, 8], gastric [9] and larynx cancer [10]. On the other hand, hOGG1 326Cys allele plays a significant protective effect against breast cancer in European women [11].

The amino acid replacement of XRCC1-399Arg to Gln might lead to an increased risk of laryngeal, prostate, pancreatic, lung, breast, and oral carcinoma [12-18]. On the other hand, XRCC1 codon 399 polymorphism was reported to reduce the risk of bladder cancer [19].

Little is known about hOGG1 and XRCC1 polymorphism in endometrial cancer risk. In the available literature not many researchers have investigated the association of hOGG1 and XRCC1 polymorphism and endometrial carcinoma [20-22].

Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) and hOGG1 (Ser326Cys) and endometrial cancer.

Material and methods

Endometrial cancer patients

150 patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of endometrial cancer were included in the study. Table 1 shows characteristics of endometrial cancer subjects. Tumour tissues were obtained from women with endometrial carcinoma treated at the Department of Surgical Gynaecology, Institute of Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital during 2004-2009. The endometrial cancer tissue samples were fixed routinely in formalin and embedded in paraffin. All tumours were graded according to the criteria of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). DNA from normal endometrial tissue (n = 150) served as a control.

DNA isolation

Archival paraffin-embedded tumour sections on slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in ethanol and distilled water. DNA was extracted from material using commercially available QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) DNA purification kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Determination of hOGG1 genotype

Polymorphism Ser326Cys of the hOGG1 gene was determined by PCR-RFLP, using primers (5’-GGAAGGTGCTTGGGGAAT-3’ and 5’-ACTGTCACTAGTCTCACCAG-3’). The 25 l PCR mixture contained about 100 ng of DNA, 12.5 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mmol/l of dNTPs, 2 mmol/l of MgCl2 and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase. PCR products were electrophoresed in a 7% polyacrylamide gel (PAGE) and visualised by ethidium bromide staining. Only one 100-bp fragment was seen in subjects with the Cys/Cys genotype. In subjects with the Ser/Cys genotype, two bands of 100 and 200 bp were seen, whereas in those subjects homozygous for the Ser variant (Ser/Ser), only one 200-bp PCR fragment is seen. All PCR was carried out in a DNA Thermal Cycler (GeneAmp PCR System 2400; Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT, U.S.A.). After an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of amplification with denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 56°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec were performed, followed by a final extension step of 7 min at 72°C. The PCR product was digested overnight with 1 U of SatI at 37°C.

Determination of XRCC1 genotype

Genotypic analyses of the XRCC1 gene were carried out by multiplex PCR-RFLP, using primers for codon 399 (5’-TTGTGCTTTCTCTGTGTCCA-3’ and 5’-TCCTCCAGCCTTTTCTGATA-3’), which generate a fragment of 615 and 491 bp. Briefly, PCR was performed in 25 l reaction buffer containing 12.5 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mmol/l of dNTPs, 3 mmol/l of MgCl2, about 100 ng of DNA and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase. The PCR products were digested overnight with 10 U of MspI at 37°C.

For codon 399, the presence of two bands of 375 and 240 bp, respectively, identifies the wild-type Arg allele, while the uncut 615 bp band identifies the mutant Gln allele (indicative of the absence of the MspI cutting site).

Statistical analysis

For each polymorphism, deviation of the genotype frequencies in the controls from those expected under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using the standard 2-test. Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared by 2-tests. The genotypic-specific risks were estimated as odds ratios (ORs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by unconditional logistic regression. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be significant.


To verify the association of risk and the genetic change in the base excision repair (BER) pathway in endometrial cancer development, the polymorphisms of XRCC1 and hOGG1 in patients and control groups were analysed.

The results of the genotypes of XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) and hOGG1 (Ser326Cys) in the endometrial cancer and control groups are shown in Table II. It can be seen from the table that there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two investigated groups. The women with endometrial cancer showed an incidence of 52 and 48%, respectively, for the Arg and Gln allele of the XRCC1 gene, whereas the control group showed 65 and 34% for the same alleles. The frequencies of XRCC1-399Gln allele in the case group were higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). The variant 399Gln allele was significantly increased in endometrial cancer patients compared with the control group (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 0.99-1.95; p = 0.033) (Table II).

We did not find any significant differences for hOGG1 genotype frequencies in patients with cancer and controls (Table III). Additionally, there were no differences in the frequencies of alleles between both distributions (p > 0.05).

To understand whether the genetic polymorphisms of XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) and hOGG1 (Ser326Cys) increased the risk of endometrial cancer development, the different genotypes and the tumour grade evaluated according to FIGO criteria were compared (Table III).

The histological grade was evaluated in all cases (n = 150). 67 cases were grade I, 77 cases were grade II and 6 cases were grade III. Grade II and III were grouped together for the purposes of statistical analysis.

There were no significant differences between distributions of XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1- Ser326Cys genotypes in subgroups assigned to histological grades (p > 0.05) (Table IV).

No statistically significant differences were observed in the alleles or in the genotype frequencies of the XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys gene polymorphisms between risk factors of endometrial cancer such as body mass index (BMI), hormone replacement therapy (HRT), uterine bleeding, endometrial transvaginal ultrasound, diabetes and hypertension and the women with endometrial cancer.


The present study examined whether polymorphism in XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys gene is related to the development of endometrial cancer. In our present study, the polymorphism of X-ray repair cross complementary 1 (XRCC1), a major gene in the BER system, is associated with endometrial cancer, but the polymorphism of hOGG1 is not associated.

Although there are other SNPs in the XRCC1 gene, the three XRCC1 polymorphisms (Arg194Trp, Arg280His and Arg399Gln) have been evaluated as risk factors for cancers in a number of studies.

It was suggested that SNPs in the XRCC1 gene may alter the ability of XRCC1 to repair damaged DNA, especially SNPs at codon 399.

The XRCC1-Arg399Gln gene polymorphism has been studied as a risk factor for various cancers. XRCC1-Arg399Gln has been associated with increased risk for lung cancer [23, 24], head and neck cancer [25] and possibly stomach cancer [26].

In contrast, no increased risk was observed for bladder cancer [27], oesophageal cancer [28] and non-melanoma skin cancer [29].

In breast cancer no association between the XRCC1-399 Gln/Gln genotype and this carcinoma was found [30]. However, other studies showed an increased risk of breast cancer with this polymorphism [31-33].

In the literature little is known about XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism in endometrial cancer risk.

Only De Ruyck et al. showed that SNPs in XRCC1 with a combination of different polymorphisms in DNA repair genes (XRCC3 and hOGG1) is associated with an enhanced clinical radiosensitivity in endometrial cancer patients treated with late radiotherapy (RT) [21].

In our work the 399Gln allele was associated with an increased risk for the development of endometrial cancer compared with 399Arg. Our study demonstrated that the 399Gln allele may be a risk factor for this cancer in the Polish population. It is possible that the presence of the 399Gln allele is in linkage disequilibrium with another, so far unknown, mutation located outside the coding region in the XRCC1 gene, which may be of importance for the XRCC1 concentration in plasma.

However, in our study we did not find any association between hOGG1 gene Ser326Cys polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma occurrence. This is in line with the reports which indicate that the amino acid replacement of hOGG1-326Ser to Cys might lead to lack of association with risk of endometrial carcinoma [21, 22]. Krupa et al. suggested that the Ser326Cys polymorphism of the hOGG1 gene might not be directly involved in the development and/or progression of endometrial cancer in the Polish population; therefore, it may not be useful as an independent marker of this disease [22].

Moreover, we did not find any association of the SNPs in the patient group with cancer progression assessed by BMI, number of pregnancies, HRT, uterine bleeding, endometrial transvaginal ultrasound, diabetes and hypertension and the women with endometrial cancer.

Our results show that the polymorphism of the XRCC1 gene but not hOGG1 may be associated with the occurrence of endometrial cancer in Poland.

Therefore, we suggest that different DNA repair systems may play different roles in endometrial carcinoma. These repair systems could be the basis of future surveys. Further studies on the polymorphisms of other genes in NER, BER, or other DNA repair systems are necessary for the detection of a genetic predisposition to endometrial cancer formation and for the investigation of the roles of NER, BER, or other DNA repair genes in cancer formation. In conclusion, XRCC1 Arg399Glu is correlated with endometrial carcinoma and might become a potential marker for the prediction of endometrial carcinoma susceptibility. It also provides valuable insight into the pathogenesis of endometrial carcinoma.


 1. Sorosky JI. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 436-447.  

2. Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zatoński W. Corpus uteri cancer. In: Zatoński W (ed.). Cancer in Poland in 2006. Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention. Warszawa 2008; 30-32.  

3. Wood RD, Mitchell M, Sgouros J, Lindahl T. Human DNA repair genes. Science 2001; 291: 1284-1289.  

4. Sreeja L, Syamala VS, Syamala V, et al. Prognostic importance of DNA repair gene polymorphisms of XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XPD Lys751Gln in lung cancer patients from India. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008; 134: 645-652.  

5. Dufloth RM, Arruda A, Heinrich JK, et al. The investigation of DNA repair polymorphisms with histopathological characteristics and hormone receptors in a group of Brazilian women with breast cancer. Genet Mol Res 2008; 7: 574-582.  

6. Yen CY, Liu SY, Chen CH, et al. Combinational polymorphisms of four DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, and XRCC4 and their association with oral cancer in Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med 2008; 37: 271-277.  

7. Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Lum-Jones A, et al. Association of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11: 409-412.  

8. Okasaka T, Matsuo K, Suzuki T, et al. hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and risk of lung cancer by histological type. J Hum Genet 2009; 54: 739-745.  

9. Canbay E, Agachan B, Gulluoglu M, et al. Possible associations of APE1 polymorphism with susceptibility and HOGG1 polymorphism with prognosis in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2010; 30: 1359-1364.

10. Pawlowska E, Janik-Papis K, Rydzanicz M, et al. The Cys326 allele of the 8-oxoguanine DNA N-glycosylase 1 gene as a risk factor in smoking- and drinking-associated larynx cancer. Tohoku J Exp Med 2009; 219: 269-275.

11. Yuan W, Xu L, Feng Y, et al. The hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 122: 835-842.

12. Yang Y, Tian H, Zhang ZJ. Association of the XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms with the risk of laryngeal carcinoma. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi 2008; 25: 211-213.

13. Burri RJ, Stock RG, Cesaretti JA, et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in SOD2, XRCC1 and XRCC3 with susceptibility for the development of adverse effects resulting from radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiat Res 2008; 170: 49-59.

14. McWilliams RR, Bamlet WR, Cunningham JM, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, smoking, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma risk. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 4928-4935.

15. Wang Z, Xu B, Lin D, et al. XRCC1 polymorphisms and severe toxicity in lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in Chinese population. Lung Cancer 2008; 62: 99-104.

16. Sreeja L, Syamala VS, Syamala V, et al. Prognostic importance of DNA repair gene polymorphisms of XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XPD Lys751Gln in lung cancer patients from India. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008; 134: 645-652.

17. Dufloth RM, Arruda A, Heinrich JK, et al. The investigation of DNA repair polymorphisms with histopathological characteristics and hormone receptors in a group of Brazilian women with breast cancer. Genet Mol Res 2008; 7: 574-582.

18. Yen CY, Liu SY, Chen CH, et al. Combinational polymorphisms of four DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, and XRCC4 and their association with oral cancer in Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med 2008; 37: 271-277.

19. Shen M, Hung RJ, Brennan P, et al. Polymorphisms of the DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, interaction with environmental exposures, and bladder cancer risk in a case-control study in northern Italy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 1234-1240.

20. De Ruyck K, Wilding CS, Van Eijkeren M, et al. Microsatellite polymorphisms in DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC3 and XRCC5 in patients with gynecological tumors: association with late clinical radiosensitivity and cancer incidence. Radiat Res 2005; 164: 237-244.

21. De Ruyck K, Van Eijkeren M, Claes K, et al. Radiation-induced damage to normal tissues after radiotherapy in patients treated for gynecologic tumors: association with single nucleotide polymorphisms in XRCC1, XRCC3, and OGG1 genes and in vitro chromosomal radiosensitivity in lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 1140-1149.

22. Krupa R, Sobczuk A, Popławski T, et al. DNA damage and repair in endometrial cancer in correlation with the hOGG1 and RAD51 genes polymorphism. Mol Biol Rep 2011; 38: 1163-1170.

23. Divine KK, Gilliland FD, Crowell RE, et al. The XRCC1 399 glutamine allele is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the lung. Mutat Res 2001; 461: 273-278.

24. Zhou W, Liu G, Miller DP, et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2, smoking, and lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 359-365.

25. Kowalski M, Przybylowska K, Rusin P, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in DNA base excision repair gene XRCC1 and the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2009; 13: 28-37.

26. Shen H, Xu Y, Qian Y, et al. Polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene XRCC1 and risk of gastric cancer in a Chinese population. Int J Cancer 2000; 88: 601-606.

27. Stern MC, Umbach DM, Lunn RM, Taylor JA. DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphisms, smoking, and bladder cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 2001; 10: 125-131.

28. Lee SG, Kim B, Choi J, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of XRCC1 and risk of gastric cancer. Cancer Lett 2002; 187: 53-60.

29. Nelson HH, Kelsey KT, Mott LA, Karagas MR. The XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism, sunburn, and non-melanoma skin cancer: evidence of gene-environment interaction. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 152-155.

30. Smith TR, Miller MS, Lohman K, et al. Polymorphisms of XRCC1 and XRCC3 genes and susceptibility to breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2003; 190: 183-190.

31. Figueiredo JC, Knight JA, Briollais L, et al. Polymorphisms XRCC1-R399Q and XRCC3-T241M and the risk of breast cancer at the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13: 583-591.

32. Han J, Hankinson SE, Ranu H, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study. Carcinogenesis 2004; 25: 189-195.

33. Han J, Hankinson SE, Zhang SM, et al. Interaction between genetic variations in DNA repair genes and plasma folate on breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13: 520-524.

Address for correspondence

Beata Smolarz

Laboratory of Molecular Genetics,

Department of Pathology,

Institute of Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital,

Rzgowska 281/289,

93-338 Łódź, Poland

tel. +48 42 271 20 71

e-mail: smolbea@wp.pl
Copyright: © 2011 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe