Phlebological Review
eISSN: 1509-5738
ISSN: 1232-7174
Phlebological Review
Current issue Archive About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
1/2021
vol. 29
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

THE AWARENESS OF AIRLINE PASSENGERS ABOUT THE RISK OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS DURING AN AEROPLANE FLIGHT

Marcin Kucharzewski
1
,
Katarzyna Duda
2
,
Adrianna Doman
2
,
Marek Olesz
2
,
Waclaw Kuczmik
3
,
Tomasz Urbanek
3

1.
European Centre of Phlebology, Katowice, Poland
2.
Student`s Society of Science, Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Angiology, and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice
3.
Department of the General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Angiology, and Phlebology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice
Phlebological Review 2021, 29, 1: 26–31
Online publish date: 2021/06/01
Article file
- The Awareness.pdf  [0.10 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

INTRODUCTION

In series of publications, venous thrombosis associated with immobilization during travel is also called economy-class syndrome. The common name in the past as the economy-class band is now rarely used, inter alia due to the fact that the occurrence of thrombosis is not only related to air travel in less convenient economy-class conditions. The term was first used in 1977 by Semington and Stack [1]. Venous thromboembolism, clinically manifested as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is still the third cause of death among vascular diseases. The annual incidence worldwide is about 1–2 cases per 1000 in the adult population [2]. The link between long-term air travel and the possibility of venous thrombosis was first noticed in 1954 by Homans, who described two cases of flight-related thrombosis [3]. Currently, this topic is the subject of increasing discussions, the search for risk factors, and the implementation of prevention. However, it does not necessarily translate into an increase in knowledge among passengers. According to the results of the conducted studies, it is estimated that the risk of post-flight thrombosis (most often clinically asymptomatic) is 0.5–2.8% [4]. In 2019, based on statistical data obtained from the Internet (https://zbiam.pl/artykuly/transport-lotniczy-na-swiecie-w-2019-r), it was estimated that worldwide, commercial airlines carried just over 9 billion passengers. Compared to 2018, there was an increase of 3.4%. In Poland, based on data obtain from the Civil Aviation Authority (www.ulc.gov.pl/pl/regulacja-rynku/statystyki-i-analizy-rynku-transportu-lotniczego/3724-statystyki-wg-portow-lotniczych), around 49 million people travelled by plane in 2019. Compared to 2018, there was an increase of 7.2%. The course of thrombosis in at least 50% is asymptomatic or only slightly symptomatic, which causes frequent underestimation of the syndromes by patients (in the case of leg vein thrombosis, the percentage of asymptomatic patients seems to be even higher) [5]. The often uncharacteristic course of symptoms related to the development or already present thrombosis may be associated with pain and/or swelling of the limb. However, at this point, it should be emphasized that a number of other diseases can lead to similar problems, including chronic venous disease, which is relatively common in the adult population.
A number of factors related to airplane conditions and those directly related to the traveller are potentially responsible for the occurrence of venous thrombosis. Blood stasis, hypercoagulability, and endothelial damage are the 3 components of the Virchow Triad, which play an important role in the formation of blood clots in the vessels. The differences in conditions on board significantly affect the 3 above-mentioned factors. Oxygen hypobaria caused by lower atmospheric pressure leads to a decrease in blood saturation to 90% among healthy people. In the elderly and those with lung and heart diseases, blood saturation may drop even to 80% [6]. Hypoxia reduces the fibrinolytic activity of endothelial cells and damages platelets, which causes hypercoagulability and leads to the release of vascular relaxing factors, which slow down the flow. Air humidity in aircraft cabins is only 10–20% (comparable to desert conditions) and promotes rapid dehydration by evaporation [1, 6]. In addition, long-term immobilization reduces the flow in the lower limbs by up to 2/3, leading to blood stagnation. The risk factors for thrombosis related directly to the health of passengers include the following: female gender, age > 65 years, overweight, height > 185 cm, use of oral contraceptives, history of deep vein thrombosis, surgery during the preceding 4–6 weeks, flight, trauma, cancer, or current thrombophilia [7, 8].
The presence of individual risk factors significantly influences the overall risk of long-term immobilization during travel. The global assessment of the risk of venous thromboembolism in this population allows us to distinguish patients with a low, moderate, or high risk of thrombosis (Table 1) [1, 9–11]. Another important issue is flight duration. The risk of thrombosis among passengers on flights lasting less than 4 hours in relation to non-travellers is about 2 times higher (odds ratio [OR]: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.29–3.73) [12, 13]. Studies have shown that the increased risk of thrombosis persists not only during the flight, but also for at least 4 weeks after the flight [7]. For long flights (more than 12 hours as a single or as multiple flights), the risk of travel-related thrombosis is approximately 3 times higher (OR: 2.75; 95% CI: 1.44–5.28) [14]. Awareness of the problem of travel-related immobilization means that information related to this issue appear in some published guidelines on antithrombotic prevention [4, 15]. On the other hand, the level of awareness of this problem among potential air travellers, as well as other forms of travel associated with chronic immobilization, remains limited. It should also be noted that in the era of the Internet, easy flow and access to information, the education of plane passengers is a rare practice, among airlines and GPs. In an attempt to answer the question about the awareness of airline passengers in terms of the risk of deep vein thrombosis, as well as the symptomatology of the disease and the possibilities of its prevention, the study attempted to assess the knowledge of the above-mentioned population in the above-mentioned scope in a survey conducted at an international airport.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four hundred airline passengers took part in the study. An anonymous questionnaire was conducted with them. The inquiry was carried out at Katowice-Pyrzowice Airport with the consent of the airport authorities, between 15.02.2019 and 17.05.2019. The questionnaire consisted of 29 questions concerning knowledge about the disease, incl. symptoms, risk factors, and principles of prevention. Passengers were also asked about the connection between venous thrombosis and flight, the number of flights per year, the presence of possible symptoms in themselves, or the use of prophylaxis during the flight. There were 27 closed and 2 open-ended questions. The open ones were about giving the definition of ECS and traveller’s thrombosis. The respondents were aged 18–76 years, 56% of the respondents were women, and 44% were men. The aim of the study was to determine the level of knowledge and awareness of airline passengers regarding the relation between the flight and the occurrence of venous thrombosis.

RESULTS

Eighty-four per cent of the respondents correctly defined the term venous thrombosis. Women (94%) were more aware of this, while among men the percentage of correct answers was 74%. Only 1.75% of the respondents suffered from venous thrombosis, but 16% of the respondents had the disease in the family. The existence of a relationship between a long air trip and venous thrombosis was noted by 69% of respondents, and 17% could not explain it. Fifty-two per cent of respondents confirmed the influence of the long air travel on the increased risk of thrombosis, including the following: prolonged sitting in one position, which may be conducive to blood clots, flight duration, which increases the risk, and variation of pressures and conditions in the aircraft compared to those prevailing at sea level .The respondents were also asked a question about the symptoms that occur in the event of thrombosis. Among the 5 listed, the most commonly indicated symptoms of venous thrombosis were as follows: pain in the lower leg, swelling, swelling of the entire limb, increased warming of the limb, and discoloration of the limb-bruising. The percentage results among the respondents are presented in Figure 1.
Among the results, it is worth paying attention to the disproportion in knowledge between the two sexes. The correct answer to particular questions was provided by an average of 20% more women than men. In the next question, the lower leg problems reported by passengers in connection with air travel were assessed. Among the most common symptoms observed while traveling, the respondents reported lower leg pain (15.25%; 60.7% of which were women and 39.3% men) and swelling of the calf, reported by 13% of respondents (65.4% of whom were women and 34.6% were men). Less frequently reported symptoms were swelling of the entire limb – 5.25%, increased limb warming – 5.75%, and the rarest symptom – change in colour of the limb to bluish, reported by 2.25% of respondents. The next two questions were related to the passenger’s definition of both “economy-class syndrome” and “traveller’s thrombosis”. Economy-class syndrome (ECS) turned out to be a term unknown to almost 89% of respondents. The answers given by the respondents can be divided into 3 categories:
• the answer “I do not know” or no answer,
• an answer suggesting reduced flight comfort,
• a correct answer,
• i.e. the association of reduced space with limb immobilization and blood flow abnormalities which increase the chance of developing deep vein thrombosis (Fig. 2).
Also, the term “traveller’s thrombosis” turned out to be unknown to the majority of the respondents (Fig. 3). To the question about the possibility of taking preventive actions during a long flight by plane was answered by 51% of the respondents. Most of the respondents, from the group that answered correctly to the question (58%), indicated activities such as walking, moving during the flight, or stretching exercises, while 45% pointed out drugs, 13% mentioned aspirin, and low-molecular-weight heparin was indicated by 28% of the respondents. Compression products were mentioned as a preventive measure by 23% of those who answered this question, and only 5% indicated adequate hydration of the body (Fig. 4). Next question about prophylaxis concerned its use by the travellers themselves. Compression stockings were used by few responders (7.5%).
The respondents were also asked if they had ever heard that before a long flight, it is best to take a drug that suppresses clotting, e.g. an aspirin tablet or an anticoagulant injection. Aspirin was indicated by 34% of the respondents and an anticoagulant injection by 27%. The knowledge of prophylactic exercises against venous thrombosis was also asked. Twenty-two per cent showed knowledge in this area. Among the exercises they mentioned were the following: movement on the plane, stretching the legs, frequent change of sitting position, and contracting the calf muscles. The last part of the survey focused on passengers’ knowledge of potential risk factors for venous thromboembolic events (VTE). Eighty-eight per cent saw a link between thrombosis and obesity. Ninety per cent of people interviewed said that longer flight distance causes thrombosis to occur more often. The distribution of responses to individual time intervals is presented in Figure 5.
When asked whether intensive sports practice in the short term before the flight increases the risk of venous thrombosis, 44% of the respondents answered in the affirmative. Seventy-eight per cent of respondents qualified the surgery before the flight as a risk factor. Multiple flights in a short period of time were considered by 64% of respondents to increase the risk of thrombosis. Congenital coagulation disorders and neoplastic disease were considered by 76% and 61% of respondents as factors causing thrombotic disease, respectively. Respondents were also asked about drugs that increase the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Seventy-six per cent of them did not know what drugs contributed to the disease, and of the remaining group 48% reported that they were hormonal drugs, contraceptives, or hormone replacement therapy. The respondents’ knowledge about the influence of meals on the higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis was assessed. Sixty-one per cent answered that foods are a risk factor, with 84% saying that alcohol and/or coffee should be avoided. Only 86% were aware of adequate hydration in the prevention of thrombosis. Seventy-two per cent of respondents replied that the way of dressing reduces the risk of thrombosis, 48% of them indicated that “loose” clothing was the best. The last question was about the effect of growth on DVT; 41% of respondents replied that body height is important in causing the disease.

DISCUSSION

In the year 2001, the WHO suggested the probability of a connection between DVT and long-haul flights; however, it was not clearly proven due to a lack of relevant data. As a result, the WRIGHT Project (the WHO Research Into Global Hazards of Travel) was launched, and the outcome of the first phase was published in 2007. It proved that a long journey is a risk factor for DVT occurrence. The project provided results which stated that in the case of healthy people travelling for less than 4 hours, the risk is 1/6000. While with the extension of the time and number of flights, the risk increases to 1/1000. The analysis published so far confirms the existence of this dependence, and thus passengers should be informed about the risk factors and the principles of its prevention [16].
An unquestionable obstacle in the implementation of these recommendations is the lack of high-quality evidence resulting from evidence-based medicine, as well as the lack of special obligation from insurers and airlines to apply appropriate antithrombotic prevention rules while travelling by plane [15, 17]. The awareness among travellers about the connection between the onset of VTE symptoms and being on a flight is alarmingly low, and the lack of knowledge about risk factors and prevention is disturbing. The analysis of our research results showed that only 52% of passengers discern an association between long-term air travel and the onset of DVT. The knowledge of any preventive methods also oscillates around 50%, of which only 7.5% of passengers have ever used prophylaxis during the flight. These results show that despite the growing number of people travelling by plane, awareness of the risk of DVT remains low. The level of knowledge about the discussed issues among Polish travellers does not differ much from travelling French citizens. This is reflected in a study by the French Society of Phlebologists. Compared to the French citizens, understanding of the factors contributing to the risk of deep vein thrombosis, i.e. drinking, moving around onboard during the flight, and the type of clothing, was higher among our respondents. On the other hand, knowledge about the beneficial effects and the possibility of using compression therapy in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis turned out to be significantly less widespread among the surveyed Polish citizens (7%) compared to the French (77%). One third of the respondents knew the method of taking aspirin before a long flight, which according to the current recommendations is not a recommended practice, but only suggested in the absence of the other methods of pharmacological prophylaxis [18]. In the recommendations of the French Society of Angiology, 15% of the respondents declared the use of aspirin before the flight [18]. According to the document of Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine from the year 2001, the main risk factors which contribute to morbidity of VTE are: blood disorders affecting the tendency of clotting, and impaired blood clotting mechanism, such as a clotting factor abnormality, as well as cardiovascular diseases, current or past neoplastic disease, recent major surgery, recent trauma to the lower limbs or abdomen, previous episode of VTE or a positive family history, pregnancy, oestrogen therapy, including oral contraception, age over 40 years, and prolonged immobilisation. As can be seen from the results of the survey conducted at Katowice-Pyrzowice Airport, many of these factors remain unknown to the passengers travelling in our country, for example, the influence of drugs, especially oral contraceptives, or the influence of an active neoplastic disease. Factors related to a higher level of awareness among surveyed passengers turned out to be obesity, dehydration, and excessive alcohol intake.
The connection between the occurrence of DVT and long-haul flights was first observed by Homans in 1954, who described 2 passengers with the dependency mentioned previously herein [3]. This topic became a subject of research. In the research project LONFLIT 1 by Belcaro, 355 passengers with low risk and 389 passengers with high risk of deep vein thrombosis were followed. After 12 hours of flying within the span of 24 hours a Doppler ultrasound examination was performed. In the low-risk group, no signs of DVT were observed, whereas in the high-risk group, signs in ultrasound examination occurred among 2.8% of passengers. Those with low risk were not advised to use antithrombotic prophylaxis. This research demonstrate the importance of being familiar with risk factors, so it is possible to find passengers with high risk of occurrence of DVT and use pharmacological prevention among them [19]. According to the British Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery (BTS Guidelines), passengers should be divided into 3 groups in terms of risk of DVT after long-distance flight. DVT prophylaxis depends on the ascribed group – low, medium, and high risk. In the low-risk group recommended methods are stretching exercises, walks, and avoiding alcohol intake. For those in the medium-risk group compression therapy and alternatively low-molecular-weight heparin therapy are advised, and for high-risk patients compression therapy and LMWH [11]. Another research by Belcaro et al., LONFLIT 2, applied compression therapy in travellers. Among 833 passengers, 422 represented the control group, while 411 people used compression therapy up to 48 hours before the departure. Afterwards, within a 24-hour period including a 12-hour long-haul flight, Doppler ultrasound was performed. In the control group DVT signs were observed in 4.5% of patients, while in people using compression therapy only 0.24% presented changes in ultrasound examination suitable with DVT (1 person) [19]. The term economy-class syndrome is not known by the majority of plane travellers. This term is misleading according to the UK House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology guidelines; thus, they propose using the term flight-related DVT or traveller’s thrombosis instead [20]. In the year 2003, the American Public Health Association have esteemed awareness of passengers about the Economy-class syndrome. From 1000 people, only 10 (1%) responded to the question, while 5 (0.5%) replied with a valid response. The rest of the responders connected the term with economy-class flight. In comparison with present outcomes, we can observe slight enhancement. Twenty per cent of the surveyed applied to explain the definition, and 3% did it correctly. In the span of 16 years, the number of flights increased significantly, and so higher awareness about health problems in the journey is expected, and the research results should arouse concern.
According to the surveys, knowledge about DVT risk factors is continually low. It is worth mentioning that in the aspect of low acknowledgment in travellers, information given by airlines plays crucial role. Among Polish hauliers there is a lack of guidebooks about deep vein thrombosis and its prevention. Contentedly, worldwide, we can observe a trend of campaigns about DVT by airlines, for example in the United Kingdom and France. It should be noticed that such information is provided on the website of the Spanish government (Información Terapéutica Del Sistema Nacional De Salud) [21].

CONCLUSIONS

Despite easy access to the Internet and magazines, knowledge among the travellers remains low when it comes to the connection between deep vein thrombosis morbidity and flying, similarly in terms of prevention and risk factors. It is essential to undertake large-scale and systemic actions that could enhance the awareness of minimizing the risk of DVT.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Dusse LMS, Ferreira Silva MV, Gonçales Freitas L, Marcolino MS, das Graças Carvalho M. Economy class syndrome: what is it and who are the individuals at risk? Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2017; 39: 349-353.
2. Bagshaw M. The Air Transport Medicine Committee, Aerospace Medical Association Traveller’s Thrombosis: a Review of Deep Vein Thrombosis Associated with Travel. Aviat Space Environ Med 2001; 72: 848-851.
3. Homans J. Thrombosis of the leg veins due to prolonged sitting. N Engl J Med 1954; 250: 148-149.
4. Guyatt GH, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141: 7S-47S.
5. Schwarz T, Siegert G, Oettler W, et al. Venous thrombosis after long-haul flights. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2759-2764.
6. Assessing fitness to fly. Guidelines for health professionals from the Aviation Health Unit, UK Civil Aviation Authority, 2012; 5.
7. Kuipers S, Cannegieter SC, Middeldorp S, et al The absolute risk of venous thrombosis after air travel: a cohort of 8,755 employees of international organizations. PLoS Med 2007; 4: 1508-1514.
8. Kahn Sr, Lim W, Dunn AS, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. CHEST 2012; 14: e195S-226S.
9. Watson HG, Baglin TP. Guidelines on travel-related venous thrombosis. Br J Haematol 2010; 152: 31-34.
10. Schobersberger W, Toff WD, Eklöf B, et al. Traveller’s thrombosis: international consensus statement. Vasa 2008; 37: 311-317.
11. Ahmedzai S, Balfour-Lynn IM, Bewick T, et al. Managing passengers with stable respiratory disease planning air travel: British Thoracic Society recommendations. Thorax 2011; 66: i1-i30.
12. Scurr JH, Machin SJ, Bailey-King S, Mackie IJ, McDonald S, Smith PDC. Frequency and prevention of symptomless deep-vein thrombosis in long-haul flights: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1485-1489
13. MacCallum PK, Enid DA, Hennessy M, et al. Cumulative flying time and risk of venous thromboembolism. Br J Haematol 2011; 155: 613-619.
14. Perez-Rodriguez E, Jiménez D, Díaz G, et al. Incidence of air travel-related pulmonary embolism the Madrid-Barajas airport. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2766-2770.
15. Zawilska K, Bała M, Błędowski P, et al. Polskie wytyczne profilaktyki i leczenia żylnej choroby zakrzepowo-zatorowej – aktualizacja 2012. Pol Arch Med. Wewn 2012; 122: 3-76.
16. WHO Research Into Global Hazards of Travel (WRI GHT) Project – final report 2007 (https://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/publications/WRIGHT_INFORMATION/en/).
17. Schünemann HJ, Cushman AM, Burnett E, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients. Blood Adv 2018; 2: 3198-3225.
18. Cazaubon M, Belcaro G, Anastasie B, et al. Audit de la SFA sur les habitudes des patients lors des vols aériens vis-à-vis de la compression médicale. Angiol 2012; 1: 79-80.
19. Belcaro G, Geroulakos G, Nicolaides ANN, Myers KA, Winford M. Venous thromboembolism from air travel: the LONFLIT study. Angiol 2001; 52: 369-374.
20. Science and Technology – Fifth Report Session1999-2000 Publications on the internet Science and Technology Committee Publications House of Lords British parliament (https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/121/12101.htm).
21. Ruiz-Giménez Arrieta N, Suárez Fernández C. Tromboembolismo venoso y síndrome de la clase turista: medidas preventivas. Sist Nacional Salud 2007: 431; 118-125.
Copyright: © 2021 Polish Phlebological Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.