eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Videoforum Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


3/2018
vol. 13
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

The Surgical Apgar score and frailty as outcome predictors in short- and long-term evaluation of fit and frail older patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy – a prospective cohort study

Kinga Mastalerz, Jakub Kenig, Urszula Olszewska, Cyprian Michalik

Videosurgery Miniinv 2018; 13 (3): 350–357
Online publish date: 2018/05/21
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
Frailty increases the risk of poor surgical outcomes in the older population. Some intraoperative factors may also influence the final result and can be evaluated. The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) is a simple system predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity. However, the utility of the SAS remains unknown in fit and frail older patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to benign gallbladder diseases.

Aim
To evaluate the usefulness of the SAS in predicting 30-day morbidity and 1-year mortality in older fit and frail patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Material and methods
Consecutive patients (≥ 70 years) were enrolled in the prospective study. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) was used to diagnose frailty. Logistic regression was conducted to investigate the association between the scores and the outcomes.

Results
The study included 144 consecutive older patients with a median age of 76 (range: 70–91) years. The prevalence of frailty was 44.4%. The 30-day mortality and morbidity were 0% and 11.8%, respectively. The 1-year mortality was 6.3% and 7 out of 9 occurred in the frail group. SAS < 7 points was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day postoperative morbidity (OR = 5.1; 95% CI: 1.5–18.1). Age > 85 years (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2–16.4) and frailty (OR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.1–19.3) were predictors of 1-year mortality.

Conclusions
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in older fit and frail patients. The SAS, not age, turned out to be the most important predictor of 30-day morbidity. Frailty and age > 85 years were predictors of 1-year mortality. Older patients with SAS < 7 points should be followed meticulously in order to diagnose and treat potential complications early on.

keywords:

laparoscopic cholecystectomy, elderly, frailty, Surgical Apgar Score, older patients

references:
Nielsen LB, Harboe KM, Bardram L. Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients. Surg
Endosc 2014; 28: 171-7.
Robinson TN, Eiseman B, Wallace JI, et al. Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 449-55.
Kenig J, Wałęga P, Olszewska U, et al. Geriatric assessment as a qualification element for elective and emergency cholecystectomy in older patients. World J Emerg Surg 2016; 11: 36-43.
Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, et al. An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 201-8.
Nair A, Bharuka A, Rayani BK. The reliability of surgical Apgar score in predicting immediate and late postoperative morbidity and mortality: a narrative review. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2018; 9: 1-8.
Kenig J, Mastalerz K, Lukasiewicz K, et al. The Surgical Apgar score predicts outcomes of emergency abdominal surgeries both in fit and frail older patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018; 10: 54-9.
Katz S, Akpom CA. A measure of primary sociobiological function. Int J Health Serv 1976; 6: 493-7.
Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179-86.
Tomlinson BE, Roth M. The association between quantitative measures of dementia and senile change in cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiat 1968; 114: 797-11.
Watson YI, Arfken CL, Birge SL. Clock completion: an objective screening test for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 1235-40.
Brink TL, Yesavage JA, Lum O, et al. Screening test for geriatric depression. Clin Gerontol 1982; 1: 37-44.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-83.
Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini Nutritional Assessment: a practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts Res Gerontol 1994; 4 (Suppl 2): 15-60.
Curtis LH1, Østbye T, Sendersky V, et al. Inappropriate prescribing for elderly Americans in a large outpatient population. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1621-5.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-8.
Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 705-14.
American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24: 111.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13.
Hanley JA, Hajin-Tilaki KO. Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves: an update. Acad Radiol 1997; 4: 49-58.
Wildiers G, Heeren P, Puts M, et al. International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncology 2014; 32: 2595-11.
Mosquera C, Spaniolas K, Fitzgerald TL. Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection. Laparoscopic vs open surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 9544-53.
Michalik M, Dowgiałło-Wnukiewicz N, Lech P, Zacharz K. Surgery of the elderly in emergency room mode. Is there a place for laparoscopy? Videosurgery Miniinv 2017; 12: 115-9.
Strøyer S, Mantoni T, Svendsen LB. Evaluation of the Surgical Apgar Score in patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol 2017; 115: 186-91.
Wuerz TH, Regenbogen SE, Ehrenfeld JM, et al. The Surgical Apgar Score in hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 1119-26.
Lau D, Yee TJ, La Marca F, et al. Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score for patients who undergo surgery for spinal metastasis. Clin Spine Surg 2016; 30: 374-81.
Ettinger KS, Moore EJ, Lohse CM, et al. Application of the Surgical Apgar Score to microvascular head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 74: 1668-77.
Clark RM, Lee MS, Alejandro Rauh-Hain J, et al. Surgical Apgar Score and prediction of morbidity in women undergoing hysterectomy for malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136: 516-20.
Miki Y, Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, et al. Perioperative risk assessment for gastrectomy by Surgical Apgar Score. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21: 2601-7.
  
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe