eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


 
3/2022
vol. 21
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

The effect of transcranial photobiomodulation on cognitive function and attentional performance of older women with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial

Shahab Papi
1
,
Hamid Allahverdipour
2
,
Ali Jahan
3
,
Iman Dianat
4
,
Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
5
,
Maryam Moghadam Salimi
6

1.
Department of Public Health, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
2.
Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3.
Department of Speech Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4.
Department of Occupational Health and Ergonomics, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5.
Department of Statistic and Epidemiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
6.
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Menopause Rev 2022; 21(3): 157-164
Online publish date: 2022/09/28
Article file
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

One of the most common difficulties in older adults is cognitive impairment, which develops gradually. Physical activity [1], smoking [2], and eating habits are some of the factors influencing the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, such disorders as diabetes mellitus [3] and hypertension [4], which are more common in older women [1, 5], have been linked to the severity of MCI. Aging brings about a variety of physiological and anatomical changes.

Mild cognitive impairment development is linked to neurodegenerative illnesses, a reduction in brain cerebrovascular oxygenation, and a change in glucose metabolism as people get older [6]. In older adults, atherosclerosis and inflammatory processes play a role in metabolic dysfunction [7]. Also, in neuronal populations, mitochondrial dysfunction impacts energy generation and oxidative capacity. As a result, aging reduces the production of adenosine triphosphate and oxidative phosphorylation [8]. According to studies, brain toxicity and mitochondrial dysfunction can cause neurodegenerative disorders and MCI progression [9, 10].

Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) is a recently discovered neuro-interventional technique. In this technique, the light in red and near-infrared spectrums is emitted, which can penetrate the underlying cortical regions of the scalp [11]. By modulating mitochondrial function and enhancing regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), the tPBM targets the biological function of brain tissue while maintaining its physiological benefits. It also produces antioxidants and anti-apoptotic molecules, which protect the cells from harm [12, 13]. As a result, light therapy has been recognized as a viable treatment option for underlying age-related biological alterations. Regarding the positive effects of tPBM in age-related cognitive and clinical disorders, studies show that it could improve frontal cognitive performance in healthy older adults; in addition, it increases CBF and improves executive function [1418].

One of the essential cognitive capacities compromised during age-related MCI is attentional function [19]. The individuals’ daily tasks, such as driving, are hampered by a lack of attentional performance, which impairs physical and mental function, as well as postural balance [20]. Mild cognitive impairment and attentional performance disruption are more common in older females [21, 22], so they have slower reaction times and make repeated errors when doing psychomotor attentional tasks [23]. Females may be more susceptible to inattentive signs and their consequences [24]. According to the evidence, in both young and senior age groups, female gender is connected with all parameters of low sustained attention and cognitive processing speed [25]. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the effect of multi-session tPBM on cognitive capacities and attentional function of older women with MCI.

Material and methods

Participants and procedure

This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 42 elderly women with MCI in Tabriz, Iran from September to December 2020. The patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups of real (tPBM) and sham. Using the random block approach, the participants were recruited from the older women referred to the centres providing health facilities to older people. Random allocation software was used to generate the random sequence [26]. Other demographic information, including age, education, daily physical activity, psychological and cognitive status, and history of diseases, was obtained from the medical charts of the patients.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: women over 60 years old with little cognitive impairment, normal or corrected vision, and without use of hearing aids. The exclusion criteria were as follows: history of severe cardiovascular, neurological, or psychological problems, communication impairments, and neuromuscular pain or disability, particularly in the trunk and upper extremities. Also, participants who did not finish their experimental process were excluded from the study.

Manipulation procedure

The research was carried out in 3 stages as follows:

  • stage 1 (pre-interventional cognitive assessment): in this stage, we employed the MMSE and the Go/No-Go attentional test to measure the severity of cognitive impairment and attentional status, respectively,

  • stage 2 (intervention): in this stage, the tPBM intervention was performed,

  • stage 3 (post-intervention): in this stage, we re-evaluated the cognitive status and attentional performance (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Experimental design of the study. A) The photobiomodulation session for real and sham groups, B) procedures for photobiomodulation and sites of photobiomodulation according to the International 10–20 system

MMSE – mini-mental state examination, tPBM – transcranial photobiomodulation

/f/fulltexts/PM/47887/MR-21-47887-g001_min.jpg

Stage 1: pre-intervention

Evaluation of the cognitive impairment

The mini-mental state examination cognitive test was used to assess the cognitive status. The total score range for the MMSE test is 0–30 [27]. Foroughan et al. (2008) tested and confirmed the validity and reliability of the MMSE test, with specificity and sensitivity of 84% and 90%, respectively. A mini-mental state examination score of less than 21 indicated cognitive impairment [28].

Assessment of attentional status

In this investigation, the psychomotor Go/No-Go attentional task was utilized to assess the effect of tPBM on the right frontal pole of the brain. This region is in charge of maintaining attention [29]. The Go/No-Go task is a complicated psycho-behavioural technique in which 2 distinct Go and No-Go conditions are presented. The subject was required to answer as rapidly and precisely as possible to a prepared Go stimulus when it appeared on the screen. It was explained that the participants should not respond to the stimuli in No-Go scenarios. The Go condition appeared in 80% of trials, while the No-Go condition appeared in 20%. For the task presentation in this investigation, we employed Psytask software (Mitsar, Moscow, Russia). The Go/No-Go assignment was used for 10 minutes, with a total of 250 criteria completed. Each Go and No-Go condition lasted 2400 milliseconds, with 100-millisecond stimulus and 200-millisecond inter-stimulus periods. Figure 2 depicts the features of the task [30].

Fig. 2

Go/No-Go task. A) Go condition: sequential presentation of two large grey squares containing a small green circle in the upper part of the screen [Up (200, 100), Up (1300, 100)] with 700 ms after trial interval, B) No-Go condition: sequential presentation of two large grey squares containing 2 small green circles. In the first presentation, the small green circle was at the top and the second circle was presented at the bottom [Up (200, 100), Bottom (1300, 100)], with 700 ms after trial interval

/f/fulltexts/PM/47887/MR-21-47887-g002_min.jpg

The participants were requested to sit in a chair with their backs to the screen (15 inch) panel at a distance of 70 cm. They were instructed to hit the reply button (computer-connected microswitch) with their index finger as rapidly as possible to answer to the target. All participants rehearsed the task for 2 minutes before beginning the experiment, to become familiar with the method. They were then instructed to respond to the Go stimulus as soon as it appeared and to ignore the No-Go trials.

The following variables could be learned through using the Go/No-Go task:

  • the reaction time to the target (RTT): this metric is used to determine the average response time for correct responses,

  • percentage of correct trials (PCT): this variable is calculated by dividing the number of correct responses by the total number of potential answers for each task level,

  • attentional performance assessment by calculating an efficiency score (ES) using the following equation: ES = (PCT/RTT) × 100.

According to the algorithm, this variable balances the response accuracy and response time, implying that people who answer more often correctly and faster have a higher ES value. Furthermore, individuals with lower ES values were those who replied faster and more accurately, or responded faster and less accurately. Individuals who processed the information with less speed and precision obtained the lowest score.

Stage 2 (intervention)

In this study, tPBM was used for 5 daily sessions (in compliance with Circadian Rhythms 9–12 a.m.). We used an 850-nm multi-array LED device (20 NIR LEDs, total power: 400 mW, power density: 285 mW/cm2, energy density: 42.75 J/cm2, total dose delivered to the scalp: 60 J [400 mw 2.5 min], area of irradiation: 1.4 cm2, peak wavelength: 850 nm, max: 870 nm, spectral bandwidth: 30 nm, spectral bandwidth: 30). The Lumix3 calibrator was used to calibrate the device’s output power (Lumix3, Italy). The forehead region was irradiated in a 4 cm2 area. The beam source was 2 cm2 away from the target forehead area. According to the usual EEG 10–20 technique, light was irradiated on the right frontal pole of the cortex (FP2) for 10 minutes [31, 32]. This part of the brain is in charge of higher-order cognitive functions like alertness and attention. The real group received tPBM for 10 minutes in 5 sessions. Each minute, the sham group was only exposed to a small amount of light for 30 seconds.

Stage 3 (post-intervention)

To assess the effect of the tPBM, cognitive impairment and the attentional Go/No-Go task were used again after the intervention. The workflow is depicted in Figure 3.

Fig. 3

The flow diagram chart of the study

/f/fulltexts/PM/47887/MR-21-47887-g003_min.jpg

Ethical considerations

This randomized controlled trial was registered at the Iranian clinical trials registry (IRCT20171031037124N2). In addition, the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol (IR.TBZMED.REC.1398.1054). The participants were free to leave the study at any time.

Statistical analysis

The Shapiro-Wilks test was used to assess the normality of data. Before the intervention, the 2 groups were compared using an independent t-test. To check the changes before and after the intervention, a paired t-test was performed. In the presence of covariate variables, such as education (primary, secondary, university), marital status (married, single), physical activity (less than 30 minutes), age, and body mass index (BMI), analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was employed to check if the ES (PCT/RTT) and MMSE improved after the intervention. To do so, the following settings were used after the intervention, the ES (PCT/RTT) levels and MMSE were considered and the educational level, marital status, physical activity, age, and BMI were considered as variables.

A t-test with a significance level of 0.05 was used for post-hoc analysis. SPSS 25 was used for statistical analysis (Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Table 1 shows the results of the demographic variables in the 2 groups. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, BMI, marital status, physical activity, and education. Table 1 shows the results of the χ2 and independent-samples t-tests used to compare the levels of qualitative and quantitative demographic factors.

Table 1

General characteristics of participants in both groups

ParametersReal n (%)Sham n (%)Statisticp-value
Marital statusMarried17 (81.8)14 (66.6)X2 = 2.40.21
Single4 (18.2)7 (33.4)
Physical activityLess than 30 minutes9 (40.9)14 (66.6)X2 = 3.90.06
More than 30 minutes12 (59.1)7 (33.4)
EducationElementary6 (27.3)5 (21.7)X2 = 3.80.15
Diploma12 (59.1)9 (41.2)
University3 (13.6)7 (37.1)
Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
Age61.95 (2.21)64.13 (4.73)t = –1.9610.056
BMI27.87 (4.46)27.58 (4.52)t = 0.2180.829

[i] BMI – body mass index, SD – standard deviation

Cognitive status

Prior to the intervention, there was no significant difference in the mean total MMSE score between the real and sham groups (p = 0.54). Also, according to the results of ANCOVA, none of the confounding variables had a significant effect on the MMSE score. There was a significant interaction between group × time F (1, 40) = 20, p < 0.001, h2 = 0.33). According to the results of post-hoc paired-samples t-test, the mean MMSE significantly increased in the real group (t = 15.9; p = 0.001; d = 9.3) but did not change significantly in the sham group (t = 0.7; p = 0.81, d = 0.3). Furthermore, the partial Eta coefficient indicated that intervention was responsible for 33% of the variable changes in response (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Mean of the mini-mental state examination results in the real and sham groups

/f/fulltexts/PM/47887/MR-21-47887-g004_min.jpg

Attentional performance

Reaction time to the target

Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the mean total RTT score between the real and sham groups (p = 0.30). The results of the ANCOVA on the RTT score revealed that none of the confounding variables had a significant effect on the RTT score. The findings revealed a substantial interaction between group × time F (1, 40) = 17, p < 0.001, h2 = 0.38). The results of paired-samples t-test revealed that while the mean RTT significantly decreased in the real group (t = 4.8; p = 0.001; d = –37.4), it did not change significantly in the sham group (p = 0.7). In other words, the intervention was successful in reducing the average RTT. Furthermore, according to the partial Eta coefficient, 38% of the variables changed in the study (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Mean reaction time to the target in the real and sham groups

/f/fulltexts/PM/47887/MR-21-47887-g005_min.jpg

Percentage of correct trials

There was no significant difference in the mean total PCT score between the real and sham groups before the intervention (p = 0.24). The results of the ANCOVA on PCT score revealed that none of the confounding variables had a significant effect.

Also, the findings revealed a significant relationship between group × time F (1, 40) = 13, p < 0.001, h2 = 0.31). According to the results of paired-samples t-test, while the mean PCT significantly increased in the real group (t = 2.67; p = 0.015; d = 6.3), it did not change significantly in the sham group (p = 0.59). In other words, the intervention was successful in increasing the average PCT. Furthermore, according to the partial Eta coefficient, the intervention changed 31% of the variables (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

Mean percentage of correct trials in the real and sham groups

/f/fulltexts/PM/47887/MR-21-47887-g006_min.jpg

Efficiency score

Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the mean overall ES between the real and sham groups (p = 0.14). The results of the ANCOVA on the ES score revealed that none of the confounding variables had a significant effect.

The findings revealed a significant association between group × time interaction F (1, 40) = 19, p < 0.001, h2 = 0.32). According to the results of paired-samples t-test, while the real group had a significant increase in the mean ES t = 5.3, p < 0.001, d = 0.034), the sham group had no significant change in this regard (p = 0.33). In other words, the intervention significantly increased the average ES. Furthermore, according to the partial Eta coefficient, the intervention changed 32% of the variables (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7

Mean efficiency score in the real and sham groups

/f/fulltexts/PM/47887/MR-21-47887-g007_min.jpg

Discussion

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tPBM on cognitive function and attentional performance in older women with MCI. The findings showed that 5 sessions of tPBM over the right prefrontal cortex (rPFC) improved cognitive capacities and attentional performance in elderly women.

The cognitive function was tested using an MMSE questionnaire. The results showed that after 5 sessions of tPBM, the cognitive score improved, which was consistent with previous studies reporting that tPBM was useful in enhancing cognitive functioning in healthy elderly adults and in clinical situations [15]. Research has shown that tPBM can improve cognitive function in individuals with neurodegenerative diseases such Alzheimer’s disease [33], dementia, Parkinson’s disease [34], and chronic traumatic brain injury [35]. According to Chan et al. (2019), cognitive performance and mental plasticity increased in healthy older adults following a single session with 870-nm tPBM [14]. These studies highlighted memory improvement [36], attention retention [17], and executive functioning [14, 17]. Furthermore, according to the evidence, tPBM improved dementia patients’ behaviour and cognitive performance, as well as insomnia [37], anxiety, and violent behaviours [38].

This study also demonstrated that the intervention significantly decreased the reaction time, which was consistent with the studies [39, 40], reporting that cognitive abilities significantly improved in participants receiving the treatment. In their study, individuals who underwent tPBM had a faster reaction time (measured by the psychomotor vigilance test). According to another study by Chan et al., tPBM improved the cognitive function of the elderly people, and only the mean reaction time significantly changed in the experimental group [14].

In our study, the PCT was also improved. The improved attention and motor skills in response to the proper stimulus are indicated by a higher PCT score. As this score rises, the performance of the irradiated area in controlling the inhibition of response to the requested task may improve; this has been supported in some previous research [39, 40]. In the study by Holmes et al. [41], psychomotor performance improved and patients showed faster reaction times and a higher number of accurate experiments after tPBM treatment.

In our study, 5 sessions of tPBM in the real group improved ES through enhancing attentional performance on the Go/No-Go task. The ES was estimated by combining the individual’s reaction time to target trials with their ability to avoid reacting to non-target conditions. Since the ES improved after tPBM, it was assumed that this modality could be a good candidate for improving psychomotor and cognitive function in older women [39, 40]. The effect of tPBM on the PFC appears to activate the neuronal population and improve the individual’s behaviour. In Go trials, this modality increased performance by speeding up the motor RTT and relaying the PFC’s inhibitory role in preventing non-target responses [39, 40]. Similar previous studies have demonstrated that tPBM improves cognitive and motor skills. In healthy young adults, the right PFC tPBM has been shown to improve memory and attention [40, 42]. In the study by Fekri et al. (2019), motor performance improved following tPBM [43]. Some electroencephalographic studies have reported changes in absolute power and functional connectivity of the brain. The results of these investigations have been interpreted in favour of the tPBM’s positive effects on brain electrical activity [39, 44]. Previous studies have indicated changes in executive performance, such as lock drawing, instantaneous recall, praxis memory, visual attention, and task switching (trials A&B), as well as improvements in EEG electrical patterns. Near-infrared light has also been shown to improve a variety of cognitive abilities, including learning and memory [36], continuous attention [14] and executive functions [17], by regulating mitochondrial function [45], improving CBF [12], and decreasing bioenergetics functions of neural populations [46].

The neuroinflammatory response [47, 48] and modulation of transcription factors in the intervention group may also play a role in the improvement of cognitive capacities following 5 sessions of tPBM. These effects were identified in previous studies after using the tPBM for a long time [49].

In this study, the sham group showed no significant change in cognitive ability or attentional performance. Hence, the favourable effects of tPBM on brain functioning can improve the cognitive skills in the tPBM group.

Conclusions

The current study indicated a beneficial effect of light treatment by using 5 sessions of tPBM on the rPFC with an 850-nm LED source, which consequently improved the cognitive capacity and attentional performance of older women with MCI. The benefits of a 5-session light treatment could be attributed to its immediate and long-term effects on brain tissue, which could be suggested to professionals in the field of geriatrics and neurology to improve cognitive capacity during older age.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the managers of the health centres and the older adults in Tabriz and all the participants for their sincere collaboration.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interests.

References

1 

Ren L, Zheng Y, Wu L, et al. Investigation of the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its risk factors within the elderly population in Shanghai, China. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 1-9.

2 

Conti AA, McLean L, Tolomeo S, Steele J, Baldacchino A. Chronic tobacco smoking and neuropsychological impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019; 96: 143-154.

3 

Rovner BW, Casten RJ, Piersol CV, et al. Improving glycemic control in African Americans with diabetes and mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68: 1015-1022.

4 

Mehra A, Suri V, Kumari S, Avasthi A, Grover S. Association of mild cognitive impairment and metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension. Asian J Psychiat 2020; 53: 102185.

5 

Laws KR, Irvine K, Gale TM. Sex differences in cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. World J Psychiatry 2016; 6: 54-65.

6 

Nyberg L, Bäckman L. Cognitive aging: a view from brain imaging. New frontiers in cognitive aging. Oxford University Press 2004, 135-159.

7 

Erdő F, Denes L, de Lange E. Age-associated physiological and pathological changes at the blood-brain barrier: a review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017; 37: 4-24.

8 

Desler C, Hansen TL, Frederiksen JB, Marcker ML, Singh KK, Juel Rasmussen L. Is there a link between mitochondrial reserve respiratory capacity and aging? J Aging Res 2012; 2012.

9 

Cenini G, Voos W. Mitochondria as potential targets in Alzheimer disease therapy: an update. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10: 902.

10 

Cadonic C, Sabbir MG, Albensi BC. Mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Nneurobiol 2016; 53: 6078-6090.

11 

Rojas JC, Gonzalez-Lima F. Low-level light therapy of the eye and brain. Eye Brain 2011; 3: 49-67.

12 

Uozumi Y, Nawashiro H, Sato S, Kawauchi S, Shima K, Kikuchi M. Targeted increase in cerebral blood flow by transcranial near-infrared laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 2010; 42: 566-576.

13 

Salgado S, Parreira R, Ceci L, de Oliveira L, Zangaro R. Transcranial light emitting diode therapy (TCLT) and its effects on neurological disorders. J Bioeng Biomed Sci 2015; 5: 1-5.

14 

Chan AS, Lee TL, Yeung MK, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation improves the frontal cognitive function of older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 34: 369-377.

15 

Salgado AS, Zângaro RA, Parreira RB, Kerppers II. The effects of transcranial LED therapy (TCLT) on cerebral blood flow in the elderly women. Lasers Med Sci 2015; 30: 339-346.

16 

Hwang J, Castelli DM, Gonzalez-Lima F. Cognitive enhancement by transcranial laser stimulation and acute aerobic exercise. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31: 1151-1160.

17 

Blanco NJ, Maddox WT, Gonzalez-Lima F. Improving executive function using transcranial infrared laser stimulation. J Neuropsychol 2017; 11: 14-25.

18 

Vargas E, Barrett DW, Saucedo CL, et al. Beneficial neurocognitive effects of transcranial laser in older adults. Lasers Med Sci 2017; 32: 1153-1162.

19 

Burmester B, Leathem J, Merrick P. Subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive function in aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent cross-sectional findings. Neuropsychol Rev 2016; 26: 376-393.

20 

Van Gerven PW, Guerreiro MJ. Selective attention and sensory modality in aging: curses and blessings. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10: 147.

21 

Edebol H, Helldin L, Norlander T. Measuring adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using the quantified behavior test plus. Psych J 2013; 2: 48-62.

22 

Retz-Junginger P, Rösler M, Jacob C, Alm B, Retz W. Gender differences in self-and investigator-rated psychopathology in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord 2010; 2: 93-101.

23 

Stibbe T, Huang J, Paucke M, Ulke C, Strauss M. Gender differences in adult ADHD: cognitive function assessed by the test of attentional performance. PloS One 2020; 15: e0240810.

24 

Williamson D, Johnston C. Gender differences in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a narrative review. Clin Psychol Rev 2015; 40: 15-27.

25 

O’Halloran AM, Finucane C, Savva GM, Robertson IH, Kenny RA. Sustained attention and frailty in the older adult population. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2014; 6: 147-156.

26 

Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004; 4: 26.

27 

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198.

28 

Foroughan M, Jafari Z, Shirin Bayan P, Ghaem Magham Farahani Z, Rahgozar M. Validation of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) in the elderly population of Tehran. Adv Cogn Sci 2008; 10: 29-37.

29 

Zhang M, Nathaniel U, Savill N, Smallwood J, Jefferies E. Intrinsic connectivity of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex predicts individual differences in controlled semantic retrieval. Neuroimage. 2022; 246: 118760.

30 

Forster KI, Forster JC. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003; 35: 116-124.

31 

Sanei S, Chambers J. Introduction to EEG. EEG Signal Process 2007: 1-34.

32 

Bludau S, Bzdok D, Gruber O, et al. Medial prefrontal aberrations in major depressive disorder revealed by cytoarchitectonically informed voxel-based morphometry. Am J Psychiatry 2016; 173: 291-298.

33 

De Taboada L, Yu J, El-Amouri S, et al. Transcranial laser therapy attenuates amyloid-β peptide neuropathology in amyloid-β protein precursor transgenic mice. J Alzheimers Dis 2011; 23: 521-535.

34 

Oueslati A, Lovisa B, Perrin J, et al. Photobiomodulation suppresses alpha-synuclein-induced toxicity in an AAV-based rat genetic model of Parkinson’s disease. PloS One 2015; 10: e0140880.

35 

Ando T, Xuan W, Xu T, et al. Comparison of therapeutic effects between pulsed and continuous wave 810-nm wavelength laser irradiation for traumatic brain injury in mice. PloS One 2011; 6: e26212.

36 

Blanco NJ, Saucedo CL, Gonzalez-Lima F. Transcranial infrared laser stimulation improves rule-based, but not information-integration, category learning in humans. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2017; 139: 69-75.

37 

Chao LL. Effects of home photobiomodulation treatments on cognitive and behavioral function, cerebral perfusion, and resting-state functional connectivity in patients with dementia: a pilot trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2019; 37: 133-141.

38 

Saltmarche AE, Naeser MA, Ho KF, Hamblin MR, Lim L. Significant improvement in cognition in mild to moderately severe dementia cases treated with transcranial plus intranasal photobiomodulation: case series report. Photomed Laser Surg 2017; 35: 432-441.

39 

Jahan A, Nazari MA, Mahmoudi J, Salehpour F, Salimi MM. Transcranial near-infrared photobiomodulation could modulate brain electrophysiological features and attentional performance in healthy young adults. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 34: 1193-1200.

40 

Barrett DW, Gonzalez-Lima F. Transcranial infrared laser stimulation produces beneficial cognitive and emotional effects in humans. Neurosci 2013; 230: 13-23.

41 

Holmes E, Barrett DW, Saucedo CL, O'Connor P, Liu H, Gonzalez-Lima F. Cognitive enhancement by transcranial photobiomodulations is associated with cerebrovascular oxygenation of the prefrontal cortex. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 1129.

42 

Moghadam HS, Nazari MA, Jahan A, Mahmoudi J, Salimi MM. Beneficial effects of transcranial light emitting diode (LED) therapy on attentional performance: an experimental design. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2017; 19.

43 

Fekri A, Jahan A, Salimi MM, Oskouei AE. Short-term effects of transcranial near-infrared photobiomodulation on motor performance in healthy human subjects: an experimental singleblind randomized clinical trial. J Lasers Med Sci 2019; 10: 317.

44 

Ghaderi A, Jahan A, Akrami F, Salimi MM. Transcranial photobiomodulation changes topology, synchronizability, and complexity of resting state brain networks. J Neural Eng 2021; 18.

45 

Berman MH, Halper JP, Nichols TW, Jarrett H, Lundy A, Huang JH. Photobiomodulation with near infrared light helmet in a pilot, placebo controlled clinical trial in dementia patients testing memory and cognition. J Neurol Neurosci 2017; 8: 176.

46 

Mochizuki-Oda N, Kataoka Y, Cui Y, Yamada H, Heya M, Awazu K. Effects of near-infra-red laser irradiation on adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate contents of rat brain tissue. Neurosci Lett 2002; 323: 207-210.

47 

Zhang Q, Zhou C, Hamblin MR, Wu MX. Low-level laser therapy effectively prevents secondary brain injury induced by immediate early responsive gene X-1 deficiency. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014; 34: 1391-401.

48 

Moreira MS, Velasco IT, Ferreira LS, et al. Effect of phototherapy with low intensity laser on local and systemic immunomodulation following focal brain damage in rat. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2009; 97: 145-151.

49 

De Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2016; 22: 348-364.

Copyright: © 2022 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.