eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
5/2013
vol. 17
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Review paper

The role of postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients

Małgorzata Zarzycka
,
Ewa Ziółkowska
,
Tomasz Wiśniewski
,
Wiesława Windorbska
,
Agnieszka Żyromska
,
Zbigniew Wolski

Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2013; 17 (5): 413–420
Online publish date: 2013/10/11
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients with unfavorable prognostic factors.

Material and methods: In the years 2002–2008, 121 consecutive prostate cancer patients underwent radical prostatectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. The median dose was 64 Gy (range: 60–72 Gy). Biochemical and clinical progression-free survival were estimated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze clinicopathological variables associated with treatment failure.

Results: The median follow-up was 27 months. Three-year bPFS was 72%. On univariate analysis it was influenced by: extracapsular tumor extension (60% vs. 75%, p = 0.0232), seminal vesicles invasion (52% vs. 85%, p = 0.00041), Gleason score  7 (65% vs. 86%, p = 0.044) and the use of hormonal therapy (50% vs. 80%, p = 0.0058). On multivariate analysis bPFS was associated with: TNM stage (HR = 3.19), postoperative hormonal therapy (HR = 2.6), total irradiation dose (HR = 0.82) and the maximum pretreatment level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (HR = 0.95). Three-year cPFS was 84%. On univariate analysis it was influenced by: preoperative PSA level > 10 ng/ml (75% vs. 90%, p = 0.04), vascular-nerve bundles involvement (63% vs. 88%, p = 0.0031), adjacent organs infiltration (50% vs. 85%, p = 0.018) and the use of postoperative hormonal therapy (62% vs. 90%, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis cPFS was associated with: TNM stage (HR = 2.68), postoperative hormonal therapy (HR = 3.61) and total irradiation dose (HR = 0.78).

Conclusions: Postoperative radiotherapy in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors provides good biochemical and local control. Total irradiation dose and postoperative hormonal therapy are important treatment factors influencing prognosis.
keywords:

prostate carcinoma, radical prostatectomy, postoperative radio­the­rapy

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.