1. Lam WW, Tang YM, Fong KN. A systematic review of the applications of markerless motion capture (MMC) technology for clinical measurement in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20:57.
2.
Lima YL, Collings T, Hall M, Bourne MN, Diamond LE. Validity and reliability of trunk and lower-limb kinematics during squatting, hopping, jumping and side-stepping using opencap markerless motion capture application. J Sports Sci. 2024; 42:1847–58.
3.
Whittaker JL, Booysen N, De La Motte S, et al. Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51:580–5.
4.
Cronström A, Creaby MW, Ageberg E. Do knee abduction kinematics and kinetics predict future anterior cruciate ligament injury risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21:1–11.
5.
Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33:492–501.
6.
Krosshaug T, Steffen K, Kristianslund E, et al. The vertical drop jump is a poor screening test for ACL injuries in female elite soccer and handball players: A prospective cohort study of 710 athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44:874–83.
7.
Thornton HR, Delaney JA, Duthie GM, Dascombe BJ. Developing athlete monitoring systems in team sports: Data analysis and visualization. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019; 14:698–705.
8.
Kanko RM, Laende EK, Strutzenberger G, et al. Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system. J Biomech. 2021; 122:110414.
9.
Wade L, Needham L, McGuigan P, Bilzon J. Applications and limitations of current markerless motion capture methods for clinical gait biomechanics. PeerJ. 2022; 10:e12995.
10.
Ino T, Samukawa M, Ishida T, et al. Validity of AI-based gait analysis for simultaneous measurement of bilateral lower limb kinematics using a single video camera. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23:9799.
11.
Martiš P, Košutzká Z, Kranzl A. A step forward understanding directional limitations in markerless smartphone-based gait analysis: A pilot study. Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24:3091.
12.
Jakob V, Küderle A, Kluge F, et al. Validation of a sensor-based gait analysis system with a gold-standard motion capture system in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21:7680.
13.
Ito N, Sigurðsson HB, Seymore KD, et al. Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now. J Sci Med Sport Plus. 2022; 1:100001.
14.
Song K, Hullfish TJ, Silva RS, Silbernagel KG, Baxter JR. Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements. J Biomech. 2023; 157:111751.
15.
Gamra MB, Akhloufi MA. A review of deep learning techniques for 2D and 3D human pose estimation. Image Vis Comput. 2021; 114:104282.
16.
Horsak B, Eichmann A, Lauer K, et al. Concurrent validity of smartphone-based markerless motion capturing to quantify lower-limb joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait. J Biomech. 2023; 159:111801.
17.
Cao Z, Hidalgo G, Simon T, Wei S-E, Sheikh Y. OpenPose: Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019; 43:172–86.
18.
Kanko RM, Laende EK, Davis EM, Selbie WS, Deluzio KJ. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture. J Biomech. 2021; 127:110665.
19.
Mathis A, Mamidanna P, Cury KM, et al. DeepLabCut: Markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:1281–9.
20.
Insafutdinov E, Pishchulin L, Andres B, Andriluka M, Schiele B. DeeperCut: A deeper, stronger, and faster multi-person pose estimation model. Comput Vis ECCV. 2016; 14:34–50.
21.
Toshev A, Szegedy C. DeepPose: Human pose estimation via deep neural networks. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2014:1653–60.
22.
Mündermann L, Corazza S, Andriacchi TP. The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006; 3:1–11.
23.
Horsak B, Prock K, Krondorfer P, et al. Inter-trial variability is higher in 3D markerless compared to marker-based motion capture: Implications for data post-processing and analysis. J Biomech. 2024a; 166:112049.
24.
Collings TJ, Devaprakash D, Pizzolato C, et al. Inclusion of a skeletal model partly improves the reliability of lower limb joint angles derived from a markerless depth camera. J Biomech. 2024; 170:112160.
25.
Uhlrich SD, Falisse A, Kidziński Ł, et al. OpenCap: Human movement dynamics from smartphone videos. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19:e1011462.
26.
Verheul J, Robinson MA, Burton S. Jumping towards field-based ground reaction force estimation and assessment with OpenCap. J Biomech. 2024; 166:112044.
27.
Turner JA, Chaaban CR, Padua DA. Validation of OpenCap: A low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks. J Biomech. 2024; 171:112200.
28.
Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45:596–606.
29.
Di Paolo S, Lopomo NF, Della Villa F, et al. Rehabilitation and return to sport assessment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Quantifying joint kinematics during complex high-speed tasks through wearable sensors. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21:2331.
30.
Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Thomas S, Hewett TE, Schmitt LC. Return-to-sport criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fail to identify the risk of second anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Athl Train. 2022; 57:937–45.
31.
Ulupınar S, Özbay S, Gençoğlu C, Ince I. Performance differences between Greco-Roman and freestyle wrestlers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2021; 35:3270–9.
32.
Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52:377–84.
33.
LeMense AT, Malone GT, Kinderman MA, Fedewa MV, Winchester LJ. Validity of using the load-velocity relationship to estimate 1 repetition maximum in the back squat exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2024; 38:612–9.
34.
Gençoğlu C, Ulupınar S, Özbay S, et al. Validity and reliability of “My Jump App” to assess vertical jump performance: A meta-analytic review. Sci Rep. 2023; 13:20137.
35.
Hooper P, Jutai JW, Strong G, Russell-Minda E. Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: A systematic review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008; 43:180–7.
36.
Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977:363–74.
37.
Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20:37–46.
38.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355.
39.
Mao P, Cai Z, He J, Chen X, Fan X. The relationship between attitude toward science and academic achievement in science: A three-level meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:784068.
40.
Assink M, Wibbelink CJ. Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. Quant Methods Psychol. 2016; 12:154–74.
41.
Cheung MW-L. Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychol Methods. 2014; 19:211.
42.
Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41:3.
43.
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010; 36:1–48.
44.
Ulupınar S, Arı U, Kishalı NF, et al. Comparing the effects of 25-minute electrical muscle stimulation vs. 90-minute full-body resistance training on body composition and strength: A 20-week intervention. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2025.
45.
Çabuk S, İnce İ. The acute effects of hip thrust and glute bridge exercises with different loads on sprint performance and horizontal force–velocity profile in adolescent soccer players: A post-activation performance enhancement approach. Eur J Sport Sci. 2025; 25:e12255.
46.
Zeng Z, Liu Y, Hu X, Tang M, Wang L. Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units on lower extremity kinematics during running: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2022; 8:86.
47.
Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. Breakthroughs Stat Methodol Distrib. Springer; 1970:66–70.
48.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2009.
49.
Wren TA, Isakov P, Rethlefsen SA. Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients. Gait Posture. 2023; 104:9–14.
50.
Linke D, Link D, Lames M. Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems (EPTS) under field conditions. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0199519.
51.
Kasiak PS, Wiecha S, Cieśliński I, et al. Validity of the maximal heart rate prediction models among runners and cyclists. J Clin Med. 2023; 12:2884.
52.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327:557–60.
53.
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315:629–34.
54.
Ulupınar S, Özbay S, Gençoğlu C, Hazır T. Low-to-moderate correlations between repeated sprint ability and aerobic capacity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Strength Cond J. 2023; 45:462–74.
55.
Ciuti G, Ricotti L, Menciassi A, Dario P. MEMS sensor technologies for human centred applications in healthcare, physical activities, safety and environmental sensing: A review on research activities in Italy. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15:6441–68.
56.
Horsak B, Kainz H, Dumphart B. Repeatability and minimal detectable change including clothing effects for smartphone-based 3D markerless motion capture. J Biomech. 2024b; 175:112281.
57.
Peng Y, Wang W, Wang L, et al. Smartphone videos-driven musculoskeletal multibody dynamics modelling workflow to estimate the lower limb joint contact forces and ground reaction forces. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 62:3841–53.
58.
Kakavand R, Ahmadi R, Parsaei A, Brent Edwards W, Komeili A. Comparison of kinematics and kinetics between OpenCap and a marker-based motion capture system in cycling. Comput Biol Med. 2025;192(Pt A):110295.
59.
Svetek A, Morgan K, Burland J, Glaviano NR. Validation of OpenCap on lower extremity kinematics during functional tasks. J Biomech. 2025; 183:112602.
60.
Schwartz C, Croisier J-L, Kaux J-F, Medina KG. Comparison of the lower limb kinematics obtained using an optoelectronic system and a markerless system. Multidiscip Biomech J. 2024; 49.
61.
McGinley JL, Baker R, Wolfe R, Morris ME. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009; 29:360–9.
62.
Wilken JM, Rodriguez KM, Brawner M, Darter BJ. Reliability and minimal detectible change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. Gait Posture. 2012; 35:301–7.
63.
Mauntel TC, Cameron KL, Pietrosimone B, Marshall SW, Hackney AC, Padua DA. Validation of a commercially available markerless motion-capture system for trunk and lower extremity kinematics during a jump-landing assessment. J Athl Train. 2021; 56:177–90.
64.
Tamura H, Tanaka R, Kawanishi H. Reliability of a markerless motion capture system to measure the trunk, hip and knee angle during walking on a flatland and a treadmill. J Biomech. 2020; 109:109929.
65.
Keller VT, Outerleys JB, Kanko RM, Laende EK, Deluzio KJ. Clothing condition does not affect meaningful clinical interpretation in markerless motion capture. J Biomech. 2022; 141:111182.
66.
Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006; 86:735–43.
Copyright: Institute of Sport. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
