eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

1/2011
vol. 3
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:

Clinical Investigations
Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath® 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate 125I seed implants: phase I/II study

Samuel T. Chao
,
Kenneth Angermeier
,
Eric A. Klein
,
Chandana A. Reddy
,
James C. Ulchaker
,
Andrew Stephenson
,
Steven Campbell
,
Jay P. Ciezki

J Contemp Brachyther 2011; 3, 1: 18-22
Online publish date: 2011/03/31
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Purpose : To study the feasibility/toxicity of urethral stenting with the Memokath® 028SW stent in patients undergoing prostate implant (PI) for prostate adenocarcinoma.

Material and methods : An Investigational Device Exemption from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and institutional review board (IRB) approval were obtained. Twenty patients enrolled. Baseline American Urological Association (AUA) score was obtained prior to PI. Follow-up information was obtained with weekly phone calls for the first 12 weeks and biweekly calls for the next 12 weeks to assess toxicity and AUA score. Removal of the stent was planned at six months after PI, or earlier due to excessive toxicity/patient request.

Results : Median age was 66.5 years. The median prostate volume was 39 cc (range: 10-90). The median baseline AUA score was 7.5 (range: 1-21). Three patients required intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) within 3 days after PI. No patients required ISC beyond day 3 after PI. The median duration of ISC was 1 day (range: 1-2). AUA scores returned to baseline values 6 weeks after PI. The week 6 AUA score was 10 (range: 4-16). Seven patients (35%) underwent early removal because of patient preference. The reasons were: incontinence (n = 3), discomfort (n = 2), hematuria (n = 1), and obstructive symptoms (n = 1). The median time of stent removal in these patients was 13.9 weeks (range: 0.9-21.4). Thirteen patients (65%) had ISC and/or urinary catheterization post stent removal. Median time for ISC use was 10 days (range: 1-90).

Conclusions : Urethral stenting with Memokath® in patients undergoing PI was feasible, but resulted in relatively high rate of urinary incontinence and discomfort. Given the adverse effects experienced by patients of this study, further studies should focus only on patients with highest risk of urinary obstruction from PI or those with obstruction needing ISC.
keywords:

urethral stent, prostate brachytherapy, prostate cancer, urethral obstruction

 
Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe