eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 39

Clinical immunology
Hypomethylation of interleukin 6 correlates with renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus

Chun Tang
Yun Li
Xiaojun Lin
Jinghua Ye
Weinian Li
Zhixiang He
Fangfei Li
Xiaoyan Cai

(Centr Eur J Immunol 2014; 39 (2): 203–208)
Online publish date: 2014/06/27
Article file
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease, characterized by a multitude of autoantibody production, complement activation and immune-complex deposition, which causes tissue and organ damage. The etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms of SLE have not been clearly elucidated. Cytokines have been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of SLE [1].
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that regulates the immune defense response. Interleukin 6 plays a central role in the transition from the acute to the chronic phase of the inflammatory process [2]. Elevated levels of IL-6 have been documented in a variety of autoimmune diseases, such as dermatomyositis [3], rheumatoid arthritis [4], inflammatory bowel disease [5], glomerular nephritis [6], and so forth. Methylation status change is one of the mechanisms of IL-6 deregulation. The hypomethylation levels of the CpG islands in the IL-6 promoters in lupus patients were significantly correlated to the IL-6 expression [7]. But the correlation between IL-6 methylation status and parameters of SLE patients is unknown.
In this study, we compared the expression of IL-6 between peripheral blood, PBMCs in SLE patients and in the control samples, in order to evaluate the application value of peripheral blood IL-6 expression in SLE. Furthermore, clinical and experimental significance (as the references reported [8, 9]) of IL-6 expression and methylation status of peripheral blood was evaluated.

Materials and methods

Patients and controls

Forty-one SLE patients and 20 healthy control subjects were recruited from Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from March to May 2013. In the SLE group, there were 37 females and 4 males; the mean of age was 34.1 ±16.6 years. In the control group, there were 14 females and 6 males; the mean of age was 32.6 ±14.1 years. All the control samples were collected from the physical examination center. The patients were diagnosed based on the Criteria of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) for SLE [10]. Approvals were obtained from the Ethics Committee of Jinan University, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Isolation of genomic DNA from peripheral blood and PBMCs and bisulfite DNA

Peripheral blood mononucleated cells (PBMCs) were isolated from peripheral blood obtained from SLE patients and healthy control subjects, by equilibrium centrifugation using Lymphoprep (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA from PBMCs or blood was prepared using the Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit Ver.3.0 (Takara, Dalian, China) also according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and integrity of DNA from tissues and cells were checked by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel and quantified spectrophotometrically. Genomic DNA (0.5 mg) extracted from the cells, tumor and the normal tissue specimens was subjected to bisulfite treatment using an Epitect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and stored at –20°C until further use.

Methylation-specific PCR

Methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) were conducted as described previously (Reed K). 2.5 U of Taq mix (Takara), 0.5 ml of 1 mM forward and reverse primers (forward methylated primer: 5’-GGAGGGGTAGGAGGGTA GAGTTATAC-3’, reverse methylated primer: 5’-AAAATAATCCCGATACAATACCGTT-3’, forward unmethylated primer: 5’-GGGGTAGGAGGGTAGAGTTATATGA-3’, reverse unmethylated primer: 5’-TAAAATAATCCCAATACAATACCATT-3’), was used in a 25 ml of total reaction volume. Here, 50 ng of bisulfite-treated DNA was used as the template of the PCR. The PCR cycles were as follows: at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 0.5 min, at 60°C for 2 min and at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Polymerase chain reaction products were separated on 1% agarose gels and analyzed by ethidium bromide staining.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Total RNA was extracted with TRIZOL (Invitrogen) from resected cells. One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed in a total volume of 20 µl with IMProm-IITM reverse transcriptase kit (Promega) by using oligo-dT primers, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using the ABI Prism 7500 real-time PCR system. The sequences of primers and probe used for specific IL-6 PCR amplification were as follows: 5’-CAAATTCGGTACATCCTC-3’ (primer forward), 5’- CTGGCTTGTTCCTCACTA-3’ (primer reverse). Thermal cycling conditions included activation at 95°C (10 min) followed by 40 cycles, each of denaturation at 95°C (15 sec) and annealing/elongation (1 min) at 60°C. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate with -actin (Applied Biosystems) as housekeeping gene, and the mean values of IL-10 were calculated. The cycle threshold (Ct) was used to calculate relative amounts of IL-6. Data were normalized for -actin levels by the 2-Ct method.

Measurement of blood parameters

Blood parameters including complement C3 (C3), complement C4 (C4), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), antinuclear antibody (ANA), immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgM, IgA were measured by standard methods. Measurement was done in triplicate. Clinical data were obtained from medical records on admission.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SD from at least three separate experiments. Multiple group comparisons were performed using ANOVA with a post hoc test for subsequent individual group comparisons. The difference in IL-6 promoter methylation status between SLE patients and the control group was examined by an independent sample t-test. The relationships between IL-6 methylation status, expression and clinicopathological parameters were examined by the 2-test. Results were considered significant when the p value (two sided) of ≤ 0.05 was obtained. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS13.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


The expression of IL-6 in peripheral blood could reflect the level in PBMCs of SLE A total of 41 SLE samples and 20 controls, positive for -actin reaction, were submitted to qRT-PCR. The peripheral blood IL-6 expression of SLE was higher than the control group (p < 0.01). The IL-6 in PBMCs of SLE was upregulated compared to the control group (p < 0.01). There is no significant difference of the IL-6 expression between PBMCs and peripheral blood in SLE (Fig. 1). So we considered that the expression of IL-6 in peripheral blood could reflect the level in PBMCs of SLE.

Interleukin 6 was hypomethylated in peripheral blood of SLE, the same as in PBMCs

We designed and validated MSP for IL-6 methylation within the region which included 13 CpGs. The methylation status of the IL-6 promoter was determined by MSP. Interleukin 6 was significantly hypomethylated in SLE patients (32/41) (Fig. 2B). In contrast, IL-6 was hypomethylated in 6 of 20 healthy controls (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2A). Then, we performed MSP to detect the methylation status of IL-6 promoter in PBMCs. Interleukin 6 was hypomethylated in 33 of 41 SLE patients’ PBMCs (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2C). Therefore, the methylation status of IL-6 in peripheral blood could reflect the methylation status in PBMCs of SLE.

Associations of peripheral blood IL-6 methylation status with clinical parameters of SLE patients

Considering the clinical characteristics, a significantly positive correlation was found between IL-6 hypomethylation and renal disorder (p = 0.010, Table 1). In addition, no correlation was found between IL-6 hypomethylation and sex, age, cardiac disorder, pulmonary inflammation, nervous system disorder, butterfly erythema, and arthritis.

Associations of peripheral blood IL-6 methylation status with laboratory parameters of SLE patients

Interleukin 6 hypomethylation was found negatively correlated with serum C3 (p = 0.020) and C4 p = 0.007, Table 2). No correlation was found between IL-6 hypomethylation and IgG, IgM, IgA, double-stranded DNA (ds-DNA), anti-nuclear ribonuclear protein antibody (anti-nRNP), anti-ribosomal P protein antibody (anti-rRNP), anti-Sjögren syndrome type A antibody (anti-SSA), anti-Sjögren syndrome type B antibody (anti-SSB), anti-Sm, anti-nucleosome antibody (AauA) or anti-histone antibody (Table 2).


Although the precise etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms of SLE are not entirely known, several factors have been proposed in the initiation and progression of SLE. Two important factors that are suggested to be involved are apoptosis imbalance and dysregulation of several cytokines. It is well known that overproduction of several cytokines such as IL-18 [8] and downregulation of several cytokines such as IL-21 [11] play a significant role in the pathogenesis of SLE. Accumulating studies have indicated that DNA methylation abnormalities play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of SLE [12]. Data demonstrated that patients with SLE had a significantly lower level of DNA methylation than the controls. The expression of both DNMT1 and MBD2 mRNA was significantly increased in SLE patients compared with the controls. It also showed a positive correlation between DNMT1 and MBD2 mRNA levels in patients with SLE [13].
Interleukin 6, a cytokine featuring redundancy and pleiotropic activity, contributes to host defense against acute environmental stress, while dysregulated persistent IL-6 production has been demonstrated to play a pathological role in various autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. High concentrations of IL-6 are found in the synovial fluid and sera of patients with RA [14]. Mi et al. verified that IL-6 was hypomethylated in T cells from SLE. High levels of IL-6 mRNA and protein expressions were detected in freshly isolated lymphocytes and hypomethylation of IL-6 promoter was detected in T cells from SLE patients [7]. We planned to investigate the difference of IL-6 hypomethylation status between peripheral blood and PBMCs in this study. And, we revealed that IL-6 was overexpressed and hypomethylated in peripheral blood from SLE patients. This result indicated that the expression and methylation status of IL-6 in peripheral blood could accurately reflect the information in PBMC from SLE patients. Then, we analyzed the association of peripheral blood IL-6 methylation status with clinical parameters of SLE patients. It has shown a significantly positive correlation between IL-6 hypomethylation and renal disorder. However, IL-6 hypomethylation was not related to sex, age, cardiac disorder, pulmonary inflammation, nervous system disorder, butterfly erythema or arthritis of SLE patients. The data obtained suggest that IL-6 may participate in renal disorder with SLE. At last, associations of peripheral blood IL-6 methylation status with laboratory parameters of SLE patients were statistically analyzed. Interleukin 6 hypomethylation correlated negatively with C3 and C4, but was not correlated with IgG, IgM, IgA, ds-DNA, anti-nRNP, anti-rRNP, anti-SSA, anti-SSB, anti-Sm, AauA or anti-histone antibody. The decrease in C3 and C4 indicates SLE flare [15]. In this study, it was explained that the IL-6 hypomethylation could predict SLE flare.
In conclusion, the detection of IL-6 methylation status in peripheral blood could reflect the status in PBMC with SLE. Interleukin 6 may play a role in renal disorder with SLE patients. Interleukin 6 could be considered as a new biomarker for predicting SLE flare.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This study was supported by the Guangdong Technology Foundation (2012B031800274).


1. Pan HF, Ye DQ, Li XP (2008): Type 17 T-helper cells might be a promising therapeutic target for systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 4: 352-353.
2. Iwanami K, Matsumoto I, Tanaka-Watanabe Y, et al. (2008): Crucial role of the interleukin-6/interleukin-17 cytokine axis in the induction of arthritis by glucose-6-phosphate isomerase. Arthritis Rheum 58: 754-763.
3. Yang M, Cen X, Xie Q, et al. (2013): Serum interleukin-6 expression level and its clinical significance in patients with dermatomyositis. Clin Dev Immunol 2013: 717808.
4. Yoshida Y, Tanaka T (2014): Interleukin 6 and rheumatoid arthritis. Biomed Res Int 2014: 698313.
5. Hur SJ, Kang SH, Jung HS, et al. (2012): Review of natural products actions on cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nutr Res 32: 801-816.
6. Gigante A, Gasperini ML, Afeltra A, et al. (2011): Cytokines expression in SLE nephritis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 15: 15-24.
7. Mi XB, Zeng FQ (2008): Hypomethylation of interleukin-4 and -6 promoters in T cells from systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Acta Pharmacol Sin 29: 105-112.
8. Hatef MR, Sahebari M, Rezaieyazdi Z, et al. (2013): Stronger correlation between interleukin 18 and soluble Fas in lupus nephritis compared with mild lupus. ISRN Rheumatol 2013: 850851.
9. Zhang WH, Pan HF, Zhao XF, et al. (2010): Anti-alpha-actinin antibodies in relation to new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Mol Biol Rep 37: 1341-1345.
10. Bertsias GK, Pamfil C, Fanouriakis A, Boumpas DT (2013): Diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus: has the time come? Nat Rev Rheumatol 9: 687-694.
11. Pan HF, Wu GC, Fan YG, et al. (2013): Decreased serum level of IL-21 in new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Rheumatol Int 33: 2337-2342.
12. Zhao S, Long H, Lu Q (2010): Epigenetic perspectives in systemic lupus erythematosus: pathogenesis, biomarkers, and therapeutic potentials. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 39: 3-9.
13. Liu CC, Ou TT, Wu CC (2010): Global DNA methylation, DNMT1, and MBD2 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 20: 131-136.
14. Wang J, Platt A, Upmanyu R, et al. (2013): IL-6 pathway-driven investigation of response to IL-6 receptor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ Open 3: e003199.
15. Miranda-Hernández D, Cruz-Reyes C, Angeles U (2013): Prognostic factors for treatment response in patients with lupus nephritis. Reumatol Clin 10: 164-169.
Copyright: © 2014 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe