Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Effects of movement velocity in squat training with and without blood flow restriction

Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza
1, 2, 3
,
Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas
1, 4
,
Luis Rodiles-Guerrero
1, 5
,
Paula Costales-Muñoz
6
,
Miguel Sánchez-Moreno
1, 7
,
Irineu Loturco
8, 9, 10
,
Juan A León-Prados
6
,
Fernando Pareja-Blanco
1, 6

  1. Science-Based Training Research Group, Physical Performance and Sports Research Center (CIRFD), Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
  2. Faculty of Human Sciences and Education, Department of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
  3. ENFYRED Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, Department of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
  4. Physical Education and Sports Department, Cardenal Spinola CEU Andalucia University, Bormujos, Seville, Spain
  5. Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sport Sciences, University of Huelva, Spain
  6. Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports and Computers Sciences. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
  7. Department of Physical Education and Sports. University of Seville, Seville, Spain
  8. Nucleus of High Performance in Sport (NAR), São Paulo, Brazil
  9. Department of Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  10. University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Wales, United Kingdom
Biol Sport. 2026;43:1133–1147
Online publish date: 2026/04/13
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
This study compared the effects of four different resistance training (RT) programs that differed in the movement velocity [maximum (MaxV) vs. 50% of maximum voluntary velocity (HalfV)] and the blood flow condition [free (FF) vs. restricted (BFR)] on strength, neuromuscular, and hypertrophy adaptations. Fortysix resistance-trained males were randomly assigned to one of the four abovementioned protocols. Subjects followed an 8-week RT program, twice per week, with similar intensity (55%–65% 1RM), sets (3), and repetitions per set (10–6) in the full-squat (SQ) exercise. Before and after the RT program, they were evaluated for: 1) muscle size of the vastus lateralis; 2) vertical jump; 3) maximal isometric contraction; 4) progressive loading test; and 5) fatigue test, in SQ. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was assessed during all SQ tests. All protocols exhibited significant gains in strength-derived parameters without significant differences between groups. A BFR × VEL × time interaction (p = 0.05) was observed for countermovement jump, with improvements in the HalfV-BFR and MaxV-FF protocols. A VEL × time interaction (p = 0.03) was found for the EMG amplitude under light loads, since HalfV-BFR increased its values. MaxV-BFR and HalfV-FF induced greater hypertrophy in the distal region of the vastus lateralis (BFR × VEL × time interaction, p = 0.04), with MaxV-BFR producing the greatest gains in all sections. Both MaxV-FF and HalfV-BFR increased CMJ height. HalfV-BFR also increased neuromuscular activity against light loads. MaxV-BFR and HalfV-FF evoked higher hypertrophy in muscle size, with the greatest gains in muscle size with MaxV-BFR.
keywords:

Velocity-based training, Intentionality, Maximal velocity, Arterial occlusion pressure, Neural adaptations, Structural adaptations

 
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.