eISSN: 1897-4317
ISSN: 1895-5770
Gastroenterology Review/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2009
vol. 4
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Evaluation of influence of oral treatment with probiotic and/or oral rehydration solution on course of acute diarrhoea in children

Mieczysława Czerwionka-Szaflarska
,
Sylwia Murawska
,
Grażyna Swincow

Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny 2009; 4 (3): 166–172
Online publish date: 2009/06/15
View full text Get citation
 

Introduction: Administration of oral rehydration solutions (ORS) is recommended in the treatment of acute diarrhoea. Supplementation with probiotics can positively influence the course of diarrhoea.
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of oral treatment with probiotic and/or oral rehydration solution in acute infectious diarrhoea.
Material and methods: One hundred and fifty children with acute infectious diarrhoea were included in this study (2-36 months old). After the initial rapid phase of intravenous rehydration children were randomized into 3 groups; each group had 50 patients. Children were given a solution of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) (group P) or oral rehydration solution (group ORS) or LGG in oral rehydration solution (group P + ORS), in a dose of 50 ml/kg b.w. Time of treatment, number of stools, and number of events of intravenously restored electrolyte and acid/base imbalances were measured.
Results: Treatment duration of the patients from group P + ORS was statistically significantly shorter than those from group ORS (3.71 vs. 5.0, p = 0.006). The number of stools given by patients during all the treatment was statistically significantly higher in group ORS than P (15 vs. 10.5, p = 0.025), and P + ORS (15 vs. 9.5, p = 0.01). The average number of stools given by patients during one day of treatment was statistically significantly lower in group P + ORS than ORS (2.58 vs. 3.67, p = 0.045). Acid/base imbalance was statistically significantly more often restored intravenously in patients from group ORS than P (17 vs. 8, p = 0.038). Patients from group P in relation to patients from group ORS statistically significantly more often demanded restoration of electrolytes (19 vs. 10, p = 0.047).
Conclusions:
1. Treatment with ORS in association with LGG in relation to treatment with ORS only reduces duration of diarrhoea and the number of stools.
2. Acid/base imbalances were less common in the group receiving LGG and LGG with ORS. However, electrolyte imbalances were less common in children receiving ORS and ORS with LGG.
keywords:

diarrhoea, probiotic, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, oral rehydration solution

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.