eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 40

Experimental immunology
Spatio-temporal expression of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) mIgD and its immune response to Aeromonas hydrophila

Hu Xia
Kang Wu
Wanjing Liu
Weimin Wang
Xuezhen Zhang

(Centr Eur J Immunol 2015; 40 (2): 132-141)
Online publish date: 2015/08/03
Article file
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero


In all species that possess Igs, the only class of antibody universally found is IgM, which has been well characterized at both the protein and molecular levels and is considered to be the predominant teleost serum Ig [1, 2]. However, there are considerably fewer reports about the teleost homolog(s) of IgD, which was initially discovered in humans from serum of a myeloma patient [3]. For about 30 years, IgD was considered to be a relatively recently evolved class of immunoglobulins as it had been described only in primates and rodents [3-6].
However, in 1997, a new immunoglobulin H-chain gene with some homology to mammalian IgD was cloned from the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus L. [7]. Since then, IgD genes, albeit with some diversity, have been identified in a large number of species, including Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar [8], Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua L. [9], Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus [10] and grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella [11]. The discoveries of an IgD-like gene in teleost species have changed the evolutionary view, and suggest that the gene existed early in vertebrate evolution.
The role of IgD in teleost in vertebrate immune systems is not fully understood. In channel catfish, transcripts encoding both membrane and secreted IgD have been identified [7]. The IgD heavy chain cDNA clones existed only as the membrane form in both Atlantic salmon and Atlantic cod [8, 9]. In most species, the IgD-encoding gene (Cδ) is located downstream of the IgM-encoding gene (C) and is co-expressed with IgM on the surface of the majority of mature B cells before antigenic stimulation [12]. IgD seems to play an important role as an antigen receptor optimized for efficient recruitment of B cells into antigen-driven responses [8].
The structures of teleost IgD genes are different from those of mammals. Human IgD has three constant domains, while there are only two constant domains in the mouse; further, both human and mouse delta constant regions have a flexible hinge region [13]. In contrast, there is no hinge region and there are seven constant domains for both catfish and salmon IgD [7, 8]. The initial discovery of IgD in teleosts also found that IgD was a chimeric protein containing a Cμ1 domain followed by a number of Cδ domains [7]. This chimeric structure was later found in grass carp [11], Atlantic salmon [8] and Atlantic cod [9]. Until now, no complete fish IgD heavy chain without Cμ1 has been reported. In addition, the structure of the fish IgD gene is different in various species. For instance, a duplication of domains δ2-δ3-δ4 has been reported in grass carp [11], salmon [8], halibut [14] and catfish [15], but not in flounder [10]. Further, in cod, domains δ3-δ6 are absent, and there is a tandem duplication of domains δ1 and δ2 [9].
So far, the information obtained indicates that teleosts do not share a common IgD structure. To further our understanding of the immune development of teleosts, it is important to obtain more information on this gene in additional fish species from different families. Megalobrama amblycephala, commonly known as blunt snout bream or Wuchang fish, belongs to Megalobrama, Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes, Actinopterygii. As a species in Cyprinidae, the largest family of freshwater fish, M. amblycephala is closely related to the commonly known fish such as zebrafish (Danio rerio) and carp. Although the gene encoding IgD has been identified in bony fish by database mining, the biological functions of IgD is yet unknown in Megalobrama amblycephala. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to isolate and to characterize the IgD gene in blunt snout bream, Megalobrama amblycephala, which is an economically important freshwater fish species in the aquaculture industry in China. In addition, to understand the fish immune system, we examined the spatio-temporal expression of mIgD and investigated the immune response of the mIgD gene after Aeromonas hydrophila infection in M. amblycephala.

Material and methods

Fish and sampling

Healthy M. amblycephala of juvenile (body weight: 45-55 g) and adult fish (body weight: 400-500 g) were collected from the fish base of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China). Before experiments, fish were acclimatized in quarantine plastic tanks in aerated freshwater at 24 ±2°C for two weeks. After acclimation, each fish was anesthetized with MS-222 (Sigma, USA). To avoid individual differences, tissues were extracted from 30 juvenile and 30 adult M. amblycephala. Tissue samples (including head kidney, trunk kidney, liver, spleen, gill, intestine, muscle and brain) were immediately collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at –80°C until the RNA was extracted. To determine the expression of the mIgD gene in different developmental stages, samples were collected from unfertilized eggs, zygotes, 2-cell embryos, 4-cell embryos, 32-cell embryos, blastula, gastrula and prelarva. Due to the vast differences in the size amongst the developmental stages, samples totaling ~100 mg from six parents were pooled for each stage for RNA isolation. All samples were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and then stored at –80°C until RNA isolation. All the experimental procedures involving fish were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.

Challenge experiment

For the A. hydrophila challenge experiment in M. amblycephala, all the tested fishes (15 ±2 g) were inoculated by intraperitoneal injection. The bacteria A. hydrophila was isolated from diseased M. amblycephala in Dongxi Lake (Wuhan, China) by our laboratory. A single colony was cultured in LB medium at 28°C to mid-logarithmic growth. In a pre-challenge experiment prior to the challenge trial, the concentration 1 × 107 colony forming units/ml (CFU/ml) was determined as LD50. The treatment group was injected with 0.1 ml (1 × 107 CFU/ml) bacterial suspension per individual, while the control group was injected with the same volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2). After the treatment, the fish were returned to tanks with water temperature of 27 ±0.5°C. Thirty injected individuals (3 pools) from treated and control groups were randomly dissected at 4 h, 1, 3, 5, 14, and 21 d post injection. Thirty without injected fishes were sampled as a blank control (0 h). Fish were euthanized by exposure to 300 mg/l of MS-222 (Sigma, USA) before dissection, and tissues (including trunk kidney, spleen, gill and liver) were sampled, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and then stored at –80°C until RNA extraction.

RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Samples, including different tissues and embryos of different developmental stages, were homogenized using a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen; total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (TaKaRa, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was treated with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Japan) to avoid the contamination of genomic DNA. The quantity and quality of the RNA was determined using agarose gels and a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). First strand cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Cloning of full-length cDNA by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)

To amplify partial cDNA fragments of mIgD, amplified primers (Table 1) were designed based on conserved regions of reported Cyprinidae fish IgD sequences (Xiao et al., 2010). Using trunk kidney cDNA as the template, the main part of mIgD cDNA was amplified via PCR reaction. The mIgD cDNA fragment amplification conditions consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 56°C and 3 min at 72°C, and final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR fragments were ligated into pMD19-T vector (TaKaRa, Japan) and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5 competent cells. The positive clones were examined by PCR and sequenced commercially. The primer pairs used for 5’ RACE and 3’ RACE are listed in Table 1. The 5’ and 3’ ends of the mIgD were amplified using the 5’-/3’-Full RACE kit (TaKaRa, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Primers (Table 1) for 5’-RACE and 3’-RACE PCR were designed according to the sequence of the cDNA fragment determined as described above. The 5’ and 3’-RACE products were purified and ligated into pMD19-T vector (TaKaRa, Japan); then, several random clones were selected and sequenced commercially. The full-length mIgD cDNA sequence was compiled using DNAStar software. For confirmation, the full-length open-reading frame was amplified with specific primers (ORF-F and ORF-R, Table 1). The PCR reaction was performed using the trunk kidney cDNA with LA Taq (TaKaRa, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Sequence analysis

The amino acid sequence of mIgD gene was predicted using a translator program at open reading frame finder on NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html). The calculated molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point from the deduced amino acid sequence were obtained by the online software ProtParam (http://www. expasy.ch/cgi-bin/protparam). The protein domains were marked according to the UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) database. Phylogenetic analysis of the putative amino acid sequence of mIgD was carried out by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA 5.0 program, and the reliability of the estimated tree was evaluated by the bootstrap method with 1000 pseudo-replications.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Based on quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), expression patterns of mIgD were analyzed using cDNA from different tissues and embryos of different developmental stages of blunt snout bream.
Three reference genes, 18S rRNA, EF1a (elongation factor 1) and ACTB (-actin) were selected based on expression stability, and all primer sequences were described in Table 1. Products of the qRT-PCR primers (Table 1) were sequenced to confirm specificity. To select the reference genes with the most stable expression, the relative stability measure (M) of the reference genes was calculated by GeNorm (http://medgen.ugent.be/genorm/) as described in our previous studies [16]. The value M represents an average pairwise variation of a reference gene with all other reference genes and a lower M value corresponds to the higher expression stability [17]. According to this rule, the most stable gene was 18S rRNA in analysis samples. In addition, PCR amplification efficiency of 18S rRNA is much closer to mIgD.
The qRT-PCR was carried out in triplicate on a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR Detection System (QIAGEN, Dusseldorf, Germany) using the SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (TaKaRa, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total reaction volume of 20 μl contained 10 μl SYBR qPCR Mix, 1 μl of each primer (10 μM), 2 μl cDNA and 6 μl ddH2O. Real-time PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 94°C, 30 s at 54°C and 30 s at 72°C. The PCR reaction carried out without DNA sample was used as a negative control. The PCR specificity was verified by a melt-curve analysis. Gene expression values were calculated as fold-change in the target gene relative to the reference gene (18S rRNA): fold change = ECT, where CT = (Ct target gene – Ct 18S rRNA) [18].

Statistical analysis

All the data obtained from the real-time PCR were expressed as mean ± standard error (M ± SE) and subjected to a One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s test to determine differences among treatments. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, with p < 0.01 being considered highly significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0.


Analysis of nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of mIgD

The full-length cDNA of mIgD gene (GenBank accession no. KC894947) was 3313 bp, consisting of a 5’-untranslated region (5’-UTR, 119 bp), a 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR, 362 bp) and 2832 bp open reading frame (ORF), encoding a protein of 943 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of 103.89 kDa and theoretical isoelectric point of 7.49 (Fig. 1). The mIgD deduced an amino acid sequence of M. amblycephala shared amino acid identity with orthologous loci of other species: C. idella (81%); C. carpio (67%); Salmo trutta (47%); Ictalurus punctatus (41%); Salmo salar (41%); and O. mykiss (32%). 
M. amblycephala mIgD is composed of one variable domain (VH), one μ1 domain, seven constant domains (δ1-δ7) and one transmembrane domain (TM) (Fig. 1). Amino acid analysis of the mIgD revealed that there were 31 cysteine (Cys) residues, which might be involved for the formation of intra-domain and inter-domain disulfide bridges. In addition, 10 putative N-linked glycosylation sites (one in δ4, four in δ5, two in δ6 and three in δ7) were found in mIgD of M. amblycephala. 
The amino acid sequences of immunoglobulin from other species based on the closest homologues by running BLASTP search were taken for phylogenetic analysis. Multiple protein sequence alignment revealed that M. amblycephala mIgD was clustered with the homologues of other vertebrate species. The mIgD of M. amblycephala revealed high identity with the homologues of cyprinid fish, especially with C. idella (Fig. 2).

Spatio-temporal expression of M. amblycephala mIgD

In the present study, mIgD was determined in different embryo developmental stages (Fig. 3). The level of mIgD mRNA was highest in unfertilized eggs and decreased dramatically to a low point in the 2-cell through 32-cell stages. The level of mIgD mRNA then increased significantly from the blastula stage through the prelarva stage, although it never achieved the level seen in the unfertilized egg.
Transcriptional levels of mIgD were detected in juvenile and adult M. amblycephala. mIgD was expressed in head kidney, trunk kidney, spleen, liver, intestine, gill, brain and muscle of both juvenile and adult fish. For juvenile individuals, the expression of mIgD was mainly detected in the head kidney, trunk kidney, spleen and liver, with low levels in other tissues (Fig. 4). For adult individuals, the mIgD expression level was the highest in the head kidney, moderate in trunk kidney and muscle, and low in other tissues (Fig. 4). Compared with juvenile individuals, the expression level of mIgD in adult individuals was higher in head kidney and muscle, and lower in all other tissues (Fig. 4).

Expression of mIgD gene after A. hydrophila challenge

At 4 h, 1, 3, 5, 14 and 21 d post-challenge with A. hydrophila, the mRNA expression level of mIgD in trunk kidney, spleen, gill and liver of M. amblycephala was quantified by qRT-PCR (Fig. 5). Compared with the control group, the expression pattern of the mIgD gene was found first down-regulated at 4 h, then up-regulated and reached the peak at 5 d after injection in trunk kidney of the treatment group. In the spleen, the level of mIgD mRNA was found first down-regulated at 4 h and 1 d, then increased gradually and reached the peak at 21 d in the treatment group. In gill and liver, the expression pattern of mIgD gene was up-regulated by the challenge. Expression reached a peak at 14 d in gill and 21 d in liver. Changes in peak expression relative to the control group were most dramatic in gill (~16-fold) and liver (~80-fold), and lower in trunk kidney (~4.5-fold) and spleen (~3.5-fold). In trunk kidney, spleen and gill, the expression of the mIgD gene was down-regulated at 4 h in the control group compared to the blank control group (0 h).


M. amblycephala mIgD transcripts correspond to the membrane form and, just as in Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus [10] and mandarin fish, Siniperca chuatsi [19], are chimeric, with the inclusion of Cμ1, seven Cδ (Cδ1-Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4-Cδ5-Cδ6-Cδ7) exons and TM regions. This new H-chain gene from M. amblycephala is also homologous to the previously reported delta genes from catfish [7] and salmon [8], albeit with some diversity. The similarities with catfish and salmon IgD are sequence homology and the chimeric nature of its expression, as the δ1 domain is spliced to the μ1 domain which permits covalent association with light chains [7]. A previous genome-wide survey of the zebrafish [20, 21] was helpful in identifying the gene segments encoding antibodies in this animal model. Zebrafish IgD was also identified to be a chimeric immunoglobulin, with Cμ1 splicing to the third IgD exon (Cδ3.1), bypassing the first two IgD exons [18]. In bony fishes, the Vn-Dn-Jn-IGHZ-Dn-Jn-IGHM-IGHD pattern is present on IGH loci [21]. Previous studies about fish IgH show that the structure of IgD is remarkably heterogeneous among fish species (with frequent C-domain duplications), while IgM and IgZ appear to be more conserved [8, 22]. The backbones of many bony fish delta chains are comprised of seven Cδ domains, where a wide range of domain organization within fish lineages is observed. In the Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) [23] and stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) [24], the IGHD locus consists of the Cμ1-Cδ1-Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4-Cδ5-Cδ6-Cδ7-TM1-TM2 exons, in which the homology of domains CH2-CH5, CH3-CH6 and CH4-CH7 suggests that Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4 duplicated to generate Cδ5-Cδ6-Cδ7 [8, 24]. In Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), the duplications of Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4 have also been found [14, 25]. Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4 domains are repeated three times in Atlantic salmon IgHA [14] and catfish [25], but four times in Atlantic salmon IgHB [14]. However, the duplications of Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4 have not been found in M. amblycephala mIgD. Multiple protein sequence alignment revealed that M. amblycephala mIgD showed high identity with the homologues of cyprinid fish, especially with C. idella, while the mIgD of C. idella has a structure of Cδ1-(Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4)2-Cδ5-Cδ6-Cδ7-TM-UTR, with the repeat of Cδ2-Cδ3-Cδ4. It indicates that diversification of IgD may be due to germline changes that are species-specific, rather than due to different splicing patterns as described for IgM.
IgD was a new finding in teleosts, and it has seldom been studied with regard to its function [26]. The distribution of IgD transcripts in teleost organs has been examined in fugu (Takifugu rubripes), Atlantic cod and rainbow trout. In fugu, IgD was found to be expressed intensely in lymphoid tissues (i.e., PBL, spleen, head kidney and kidney) [27]. In Atlantic cod, IgD producing cells were evenly distributed throughout the hematopoietic tissues in head kidney and spleen, which suggested that cod IgD was mainly expressed as a B-cell receptor akin to IgD in mammals [28]. In rainbow trout, IgD-secreting plasma cells were found to be common in the kidney and spleen [29]. In this study, M. amblycephala mIgD was detected mainly in head kidney, trunk kidney and spleen in both juvenile and adult fish, which was consistent with the above reports. Moreover, in both juvenile and adult fish, M. amblycephala sIgM was highly expressed in head kidney, trunk kidney and spleen in our previous study [30]. It indicates that head kidney, trunk kidney and spleen are predominant immune organs.
In adult M. amblycephala, the expression level of mIgD was the highest in head kidney, with the expression almost entirely localized in head kidney. The head kidney, having morphological and functional aspects similar to the mammalian bone marrow, is a major hematopoietic organ and site of production of antibodies and other immune cells in teleost fish [31, 32]. The highest expression level of mIgD in the head kidney may be attributed to the first appearance in the head kidney of mIgD positive B-cells, which may be transported to other lymphoid organs [33]. Compared with adult fish, the expression of mIgD in juvenile fish was higher in the trunk kidney, spleen, liver, intestine, gill and brain. Thus, expression and tissue distribution patterns of M. amblycephala mIgD exhibit considerable variation between juvenile and adult fish.
In the present ontogeny study, mIgD mRNA was detected in zygotes, suggesting the possibility of maternal mRNA transfer into oocytes. Indeed, it was found that the level of mIgD mRNA was the highest in the unfertilized egg stage compared to other early developmental stages, which is similar to M. amblycephala sIgM [30]. In addition, the level of mIgD mRNA decreased dramatically from the unfertilized egg to zygote stage, reaching very low levels from the 2-cell to the 32-cell stages; by the prelarva stage, mIgD levels were much closer to those seen in the unfertilized egg. As such, it seems that the transcript of the mIgD gene is maternally transferred to eggs and degraded with embryonic development. Such phenomenon of maternal transfer has also been found in both sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) [34] and sea bream (Sparus aurata) [35]. Cell differentiation takes place in the blastula stage and generates the embryonic stem cell, which would proceed with immune organogenesis [36]. In the present study, the level of mIgD mRNA increased significantly from the blastula stage to prelarva, which might be attributed to the embryonic stem cell differentiation procedure.
The function of IgD in fish and mammals is not fully understood. Previous research indicated that fugu IgD may play an important role in the humoral immune system, as the expression pattern of IgD is similar to IgM [27]. In rainbow trout, the (mem)IgD(mem)(+)IgM(–) B lymphocyte subset expresses (mem)CCR7 and responds to viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus infections [37]. IgD is typically co-expressed with IgM by alternative splicing of a long primary mRNA transcript containing the rearranged VDJ exons and the Cμ and Cδ exons [38]. IgM knockout studies with mice have shown that IgD can largely substitute for IgM functions in B cells [39]. In this study, the expression patterns of mIgD in various tissues of M. amblycephala post A. hydrophila infection were in line with that of IgM [30, 40, 41]. Thus, mIgD may have an important role in the adaptive immune system, conferring protective functions against pathogens.
In M. amblycephala, mIgD mRNA in different organs exhibited various responses to A. hydrophila infection. It should be noted that, in the control group, the level of mIgD mRNA was down-regulated at 4 h in trunk kidney, spleen and gill of M. amblycephala; this down-regulation immediately after the injection procedure might be due to stress on the fish from having been handled and injected. On the other hand, in the treatment group, the level of mIgD mRNA reached a peak at 5 d and 14 d post infection with A. hydrophila in trunk kidney and gill, respectively, while mIgD mRNA expression reached a peak at 21 d in spleen and liver. Clearly, activation of immune response is a complicated and time-consuming process. For instance, in sea bass, the IgM level decreased during the first month post Vibrio anguillarum immunization, which was explained as the Ig being consumed through counteracting with antigen [42]. In our previous study, M. amblycephala MHC I transcripts were detected to decrease from 0 to 4 h after A. hydrophila injection in gill and liver [43]. Moreover, the level of sIgM mRNA was found significantly decreased at 4 h in trunk kidney, spleen and gill of M. amblycephala after A. hydrophila infection [30]. In this study, compared with the control group, the expression pattern of M. amblycephala mIgD gene was found down-regulated at 4 h after injection in trunk kidney and spleen. The early decrease is likely to be an adaptation rather than a deficiency of the immune system [42]. By comparison, the level of IgM mRNA significantly increased in blood cells of orange-spotted grouper after Vibrio alginolyticus challenge [44]. Further, in fugu (Takifugu rubripes), the expression of the IgD gene was intense in peripheral blood leucocytes (PBL) [27]. In the present study, after injection of A. hydrophila, the level of mIgD mRNA reached a peak at 14 d in gill (~16-fold), and then dropped back by 1/2 one week later, which is similar to the previous study [45]. After injection of Flavobacterium columnare, expression of IgD was significantly elevated at 1 and 2 weeks with 7.16 and 7.78-fold respectively in gill of mandarin fish, and then declined to the basal level one week later [45]. The different expression patterns of mIgD after the infection might be caused by different fish species or different bacteria. After stimulation with inactivated A. hydrophila strain T4, Chinese soft-shelled turtle IgD gene in peak expression relative to the control group were most dramatic in blood (~25-fold) [46]. The high expression levels of mIgD in the liver of challenged M. amblycephala is intriguing. The liver’s lymphocyte population is selectively enriched in natural killer and natural killer T cells, which play critical roles in first-line immune defense against invading pathogens [47]. Further, in humans, about 30% of the total blood passes through the liver every minute [48], carrying about 108 peripheral blood lymphocytes in 24 hours [49]. However, after Aeromonas hydrophila infection, the liver of treated M. amblycephala exhibited hepatorrhagia; thus, given the lack of identification for mIgD function, the significant increase in the level of mIgD mRNA may simply be a result of hepatorrhagia.
In conclusion, the full-length cDNA of M. amblycephala mIgD heavy chain has been cloned and characterized. Moreover, the spatio-temporal expression of mIgD was examined. Compared with adult M. amblycephala, the expression and tissue distribution patterns of mIgD in juvenile fish exhibit considerable variation. Finally, the immune response of the mIgD gene to A. hydrophila in M. amblycephala was also investigated; however, further research will be required to elucidate the function of mIgD and its mechanism in the immune response for teleosts.

This study is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2012MBDX004).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.


1. DuPasquier L, Flajnik M (1999): Origin and evolution of the vertebrate immune system. In: Fundamental Immunology. Paul WE (ed.). Academic Press, Philadelphia 1999; 605-607.
2. Bengten E, Wilson M, Miller N, et al. (2000): Immunoglobulin isotypes: structure, function, and genetics. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 248: 189-219.
3. Rowe DS, Fahey JL (1965): A new class of human immunoglobulins. J Exp Med 121: 171-184.
4. Abney ER, Parkhouse RM (1974): Candidate for immunoglobulin D present on murine B lymphocytes. Nature 252: 600-602.
5. Martin LN, Leslie GA, Hindes R (1976): Lymphocyte surface IgD and IgM in non-human primates. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 51: 320-329.
6. Ruddick JH, Leslie GA (1977): Structure and biologic functions of human IgD. XI. Identification and ontogeny of a rat lymphocyte immunoglobulin having antigenic cross-reactivity with human IgD. J Immunol 118: 1025-1031.
7. Wilson M, Bengten E, Miller NW, et al. (1997): A novel chimeric Ig heavy chain from a teleost fish shares similarities to IgD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 4593-4597.
8. Hordvik I, Thevarajan J, Samdal I, et al. (1999): Molecular cloning and phylogenetic analysis of the Atlantic salmon Immunoglobulin D gene. Scand J Immunol 50: 202-210.
9. Stenvik J, Jørgensen TØ (2000): Immunoglobulin D (IgD) of Atlantic cod has a unique structure. Immunogenetics 51: 452-461.
10. Hirono I, Nam BH, Enomoto J, et al. (2003): Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus IgD. Fish Shellfish Immunol 15: 63-70.
11. Xiao F, Wang Y, Yan W, et al. (2010) Ig heavy chain genes and their locus in grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella. Fish Shellfish Immunol 29: 594-599.
12. Blattner FR, Tucker PW (1984): The molecular biology of immunoglobulin D. Nature 307: 417-422.
13. White MB, Shen AL, Word CJ, et al. (1985): Human immunoglobulin D: genomic sequence of the delta heavy chain. Science 228: 733-737.
14. Hordvik I (2002): Identification of a novel immunoglobulin δtranscript and comparative analysis of the genes encoding IgD in Atlantic salmon and Atlantic halibut. Mol Immunol 39: 85-91.
15. Bengten E, Quiniou SMA, Stuge TB, et al. (2002): The IgH locus of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, contains multiple constant region gene sequences: different genes encode heavy chains of membrane and secreted IgD. J Immunol 169: 2488-2497.
16. Zhang J, Wei XL, Chen LP, et al. (2013): Sequence analysis and expression differentiation of chemokine receptor CXCR4b among three populations of Megalobrama amblycephala. Dev Comp Immunol 40: 195-201.
17. Tang R, Dodd A, Lai D, et al. (2007): Validation of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR normalization. Acta Biochim Biophys Sinica 39: 384-390.
18. Zimmerman AM, Moustafa FM, Romanowski KE, Steiner LA (2011): Zebrafish immunoglobulin IgD: unusual exon usage and quantitative expression profiles with IgM and IgZ/T heavy chain isotypes. Mol Immunol 48: 2220-2223.
19. Wang GL, Luo YP, Sun BJ, et al. (2010): Cloning and expression of immunoglobulin D heavy chain in mandarin fish, Siniperca chuatsi. J Fish Sci China 17: 1-10 [in Chinese].
20. Zimmerman AM, Yeo G, Howe K, et al. (2008): Immunoglobulin light chain (IgL) genes in zebrafish: Genomic configurations and inversional rearrangements between (V(L)-J(L)-C(L)) gene clusters. Dev Comp Immunol 32: 421-34.
21. Danilova N, Bussmann J, Jekosch K, Steiner LA (2005): The immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus in zebrafish: identification and expression of a previously unknown isotype, immunoglobulin Z. Nat Immunol 6: 295-302.
22. Savan R, Aman A, Sato K, et al. (2005): Discovery of a new class of immunoglobulin heavy chain from fugu. Eur J Immunol 35: 3320-3331.
23. Srisapoome P, Ohira T, Hirono I, Aoki T (2004): Genes of the constant regions of functional immunoglobulin heavy chain of Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Immunogenetics 56: 292-300.
24. Gambón-Deza F, Sánchez-Espinel C, Magadán-Mompó S (2010): Presence of an unique IgT on the IGH locus in three-spined stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and the very recent generation of a repertoire of VH genes. Dev Comp Immunol 34: 114-122.
25. Clem L, Miller N, Warr G, et al. (2006): Channel catfish immunoglobulins: repertoire and expression. Dev Comp Immunol 30: 77-92.
26. Flajnik MF (2005): The last flag unfurled? A new immunoglobulin isotype in fish expressed in early development. Nat Immunol 6: 229-230.
27. Saha NR, Suetake H, Kikuchi K, Suzuki Y (2004): Fugu immunoglobulin D: a highly unusual gene with unprecedented duplications in its constant region. Immunogenetics 56: 438-447.
28. Stenvika J, Schro/dera MB, Olsena K, et al. (2001): Expression of immunoglobulin heavy chain transcripts (VH-families, IgM, and IgD) in head kidney and spleen of the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Dev Comp Immunol 25: 291-302.
29. Ramirez-Gomez F, Greene W, Rego K, et al. (2012): Discovery and characterization of secretory IgD in rainbow trout: secretory IgD is produced through a novel splicing mechanism. J Immunol 188: 1341-1349.
30. Xia H, Wu K, Liu W, et al. (2014): Molecular cloning and expression analysis of immunoglobulin M heavy chain gene of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala). Fish Shellfish Immunol 40: 129-135.
31. Rombout JHWM, Joosten EPEM (1988): Immunology of fishes. In: Handbook of Vertebrate Immunology. Pastoret PP, Griebel P, Bazin H, Govaerts A (eds.). Academic Press. London; 1-43.
32. Press CM, Evensen O/ (1999): The morphology of the immune system in teleost fishes. Fish Shellfish Immunol 9: 309-318.
33. Huttenhuis HB, Romano N, Van Oosterhoud CN, et al. (2006): The ontogeny of mucosal immune cells in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Anat Embryol (Berl) 211: 19-29.
34. Picchietti S, Taddei AR, Scapigliati G, et al. (2004): Immunoglobulin protein and gene transcripts in ovarian follicles throughout oogenesis in the teleost Dicentrarchus labrax. Cell Tissue Res 315: 259-270.
35. Picchietti S, Abelli L, Buonocore F, et al. (2006): Immunoglobulin protein and gene transcript in sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) oocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol 20: 398-404.
36. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. (1998): Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Seience 282: 1145-1147.
37. Castro R, Bromage E, Abós B, et al. (2014): CCR7 is mainly expressed in teleost gills, where it defines an IgD+IgM– B lymphocyte subset. J Immunol 192: 1257-1266.
38. Chen K, Cerutti A (2010): New insights into the enigma of immunoglobulin D. Immunol Rev 237: 160-179.
39. Lutz C, Ledermann B, Kosco-Vilbois MH, et al. (1998): IgD can largely substitute for loss of IgM function in B cells. Nature 393: 797-801.
40. Raida MK, Buchmann K (2007): Temperature-dependent expression of immunerelevant genes in rainbow trout following Yersinia ruckeri vaccination. Dis Aquat Org 77: 41-52.
41. Zilberg D, Klesius PH (1997): Quantification of immunoglobulin in the serum and mucus of channel catfish at different ages and following infection with Edwardsiella ictaluri. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 58: 171-180.
42. Coeurdacier JL, Pépin JF, Fauvel C, et al. (1997): Alterations in total protein, IgM and specific antibody activity of male and female sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) sear following injection with killed Vibrio anguillarum. Fish Shellfish Immunol 7: 151-160.
43. Luo W, Zhang J, Wen JF, et al. (2013): Molecular cloning and expression analysis of major histocompatibility complex class I, IIA and IIB genes of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala). Dev Comp Immunol 42: 169-173.
44. Cui M, Zhang Q, Yao Z, et al. (2010): Immunoglobulin M gene expression analysis of orange-spotted grouper, Epinephelus coioides, following heat shock and Vibrio alginolyticus challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol 29: 1060-1065.
45. Tian JY, Sun BJ, Luo YP, et al. (2009): Distribution of IgM, IgD and IgZ in mandarin fish, Siniperca chuatsi lymphoid tissues and their transcriptional changes after Flavobacterium columnare stimulation. Aquaculture 288: 14-21.
46. Xu Z, Wang GL, Nie P (2009): IgM, IgD and IgY and their expression pattern in the Chinese soft-shelled turtle Pelodiscus sinensis. Mol Immunol 46: 2124-2132.
47. Racanelli V, Rehermann B (2006): The liver as an immunological organ. Hepatology 43: 54-62.
48. Sheth K, Bankey P (2001): The liver as an immune organ. Curr Opin Crit Care 7: 99-104.
49. Wick MJ, Leithauser F, Reimann J (2002): The hepatic immune system. Crit Rev Immunol 22: 47-103.
Copyright: © 2015 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe