eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

1/2019
vol. 11
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Five-year outcome of ultrasound-guided interstitial permanent 125I seeds implantation for local head and neck recurrent tumors: a single center retrospective study

Ping Jiang, Junjie Wang, Weiqiang Ran, Yuliang Jiang, Suqing Tian, Haitao Sun

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11, 1: 28–34
Online publish date: 2019/02/28
Article file
- five-year.pdf  [0.71 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Purpose

Head and neck malignant neoplasms are common carcinomas worldwide. Among them, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide [1]. Surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy are the standard management for these patients. Despite progression in techniques of surgery and radiotherapy, locoregional relapses account for approximately 80% of treatment failure [2]. Second surgery and re-irradiation are rarely selected because of unacceptable morbidity and mortality; furthermore, there are no consensus guidelines for local recurrent tumors of head and neck.
Interstitial permanent low-dose-rate 125I seeds implantation, which is one of the most promising modalities of brachytherapy, has been successfully performed in many different malignant tumors in the past 15 years in China. We have previously reported results regarding 125I seeds implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma [3,4] under computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound guidance, in which the initial beneficial seed implantation was reported.
Ultrasound has higher sensitivity (96.8%) than palpation (73.3%) for detection of cervical lymph nodes [5]. It has gained recent popularity in maxillofacial imaging and to transcervically visualize the base of tongue tumors [6], as it is non-ionizing, non-invasive, and cost effective [7]. This study investigates the efficacy and feasibility of 125I seeds implantation under ultrasonography guidance of recurrent head and neck carcinomas and reports long-term results of local control rates, survival rates, and complications.

Material and methods

Patients

A total of 70 patients (median age, 60 years; range, 4-94 years) with a malignant mass in head and neck region were admitted between January 2004 and December 2014 at Peking University 3rd Hospital. Six patients were lost to follow-up and 64 met the inclusion criteria. In a total of 81 lesions of the head and neck, 125I seeds implantation was evaluated. Of the 81 lesions, 54 were cervical lymph node recurrence, and another 27 were local recurrence of primary or residual disease. Patient inclusion criteria were as follows: 1. Recurrent tumor confirmed by pathologic diagnosis; 2. External radiotherapy or surgery history; 3. Karnofsky performance status score ≥ 60; and 4. Complete follow-up data. Patients with intracranial tumors were excluded. Local recurrence, regional recurrence, or both were all defined as recurrence. The characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1.

Treatment process

The tumor volumes (mean volume, 8 cc; range, 2.5-320 cc) and maximum diameter (mean, 2.5 cm; range, 1-10 cm) were measured using CT scans at 5 mm intervals or ultrasound. 70 of 81 lesions had a pre-plan. The clinical target volume (CTV) included gross tumor volume (GTV) and extended margin of 0.5 cm. These tracings were digitized into a computer treatment planning system (TPS 3D-TPS treatment planning system; Beijing Fei Tian Industries, Inc.) and used to calculate the D90 (the doses delivered to 90% of the target volume defined by CT or ultrasonography [US] dose volume histogram’s [DVH]). The pre-plan showed D90 of 110-160 Gy (median, 130 Gy).
All patients underwent 125I seed implantation guided by ultrasonography (color doppler ultrasound with high frequency probe and guiding stabilization devices, Aloka-10; Figure 1 shows different types of probe and guiding stabilization devices). The procedure was done under local anesthesia. Then, interstitial needles (18-gauge) attached to ultrasound probe stabilization devices were inserted into the tumor with US real-time guidance; the needles exceeded 0.5 cm of GTV and kept each other in a parallel array of 0.5 cm apart. Precautions were taken to avoid puncture of large blood vessels. After all needles were inserted into the tumor, 125I seeds (Beijing Atom and High Technique Industries, Inc., Model 6711,T1/2: 59.4 days, energy level: 27.4-31.4 keV) were implanted using Mick applicator. The seeds were placed at 0.5 cm to 1 cm interval in the PTV (not GTV) and after implantation, each needle was removed. The median number of 125I seeds implanted was 20 (range, 3-89). The specific activity of 125I seeds ranged from 0.35 to 0.80 mCi per seed (median, 0.70 mCi).
Post-operative dosimetry was performed for all patients 24 hours later using 3-5 mm thick CT scans. The contoured images and sources were entered into TPS software. Isodose curves for each slice and DVH of the target were generated. The post-plan evaluation showed that D90 range was 90-160 Gy, with a median of 130 Gy.
Tumor response was firstly evaluated at 4 weeks, and then every 2-3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. The follow-up time was measured from the date of seed implantation. The median follow-up period was 14 months (range, 1-103.5 months). Complications were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Score. Tumor responses were documented according to the World Health Organization criteria. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Survival time was defined from the start of implantation to death, and time to tumor progression (TTP) was defined from the start of implantation to clinical or radiological progression of the disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to survival, and local control probabilities calculation and Cox regression was applied to univariate and multivariate analysis. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Among the 81 lesions, total response rate was 80.2%; 22 lesions showed complete remission (27%) and 43 showed partial remission (53%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor control rates were 75.2%, 73%, and 69.1%, respectively (Figure 2A). The results for cervical lymph node recurrence were better than those for local recurrence or residual disease of primary head and neck neoplasm. The 5-year local control rates were 72.7% and 39.9%, respectively (Figures 2B, C). As of the date of the last follow-up, 22 of 64 patients were still alive, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 57.4%, 31%, and 26.6%, respectively, with a median survival of 20 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cancer specific survival rates were 67%, 42.7%, and 36.6%, respectively (Figure 2D), with a median survival of 20.8 months. The results of local control were better if D90 ≥ 130 Gy (p = 0.03; Figure 2E).
Grade 4 side effects of skin ulceration were seen in two patients with cervical lymph node recurrence. One lesion was a progression of the disease and the patient died of pneumonia 8 months later; other patient had a partial response and died of local recurrence 8 months later. Grade 1 or 2 skin reactions were seen in 11 patients (17%) who had received external beam radiation. No bleeding and continuous pain were recorded, and none of the patients showed bone or soft tissue necrosis. There was a good cosmetic outcome in some patients (Figure 3).
We analyzed factors including age, gender, stage, lesions location, tumor size, D90, and recurrence interval time (Table 2). In univariate analysis, gender, lesion location, and D90 were prognostic factors of tumor local control (p = 0.004, 0.017, and 0.03, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that D90 is an independent prognostic factor for tumor local control (p = 0.015), and lesions recurrence location and time to tumor progression (TTP) were prognostic factors for survival (p = 0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively; Table 3).

Discussion

In a retrospective analysis, we investigated the treatment results of 64 patients (81 lesions) with recurrent tumors of the head and neck who underwent permanent implantation of 125I seeds (from January 2004 to October 2014). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interstitial permanent low-dose-rate 125I seeds implantation under ultrasound guidance, and to report long-term treatment outcomes. We have, therefore, explored an alternative way to treat patients with local and regional recurrent head and neck malignant tumors.
Salvage surgery serves as the first therapeutic option for local or regional recurrence of head and neck carcinoma. It is particularly challenging based on the tissue impairment caused by the previous therapies and therefore has a high complication rate of > 90% [8], including fistulas and skin necrosis. Survival rates after salvage surgery vary from 20-45% in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers, and up to 82% in laryngeal cancers [8,9] but post-operative quality of life is reduced. Furthermore, few patients are suitable candidates for curative resection. In such cases, chemotherapy alone with a poor response rate (yielding a median survival between 5 and 9 months) has traditionally been considered, and the addition of cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy improves median survival to 11 months [10]. Re-irradiation is a potentially curative option for some patients. However, re-irradiation-induced toxicity is high, and patients must be cautiously selected, taking into account performance status, location and extension of recurrent disease, co-morbidities, current speech and swallowing function, the interval from the initial radiation therapy to recurrence, previously received doses to critical structures, and prior treatment toxicity. Nevertheless, several questions remain unanswered and long-term survival is infrequent [11]. Two phase II trials (RTOG96-10 and RTOG99-11) of re-irradiation concurrent chemotherapy reported a median survival of 8.5 and 12.1 months, respectively, and a 2-year survival rate of 25.9% but accompanied by high acute toxicity in both studies [12,13]. Our retrospective study showed promising results for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (57.4%, 31%, and 26.6%, respectively), with a median survival of 20 months and acceptable complications. We speculated that 125I seed implantation is an effective modality for this group of patients.
As a well-accepted option for re-irradiation, brachy­therapy plays an important role in the treatment of recurrent HNSCC [14]. Either low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) techniques can be applied as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiotherapy in nasopharynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, and lymph node recurrences [15,16]. A 5-year local control rate of 57-69% and a 5-year overall survival rate of 14-40% have previously been reported [17,18,19]. Brachytherapy has been used less often in recent years, as more studies investigated improved local control with concurrent chemoradiation. In this study, interstitial permanent low-dose-rate 125I seeds implantation as monotherapy was selected for local or regional recurrent tumors of the head and neck. The results showed totally response rate of 80.2%, and the 5-year local control of cervical lymph node recurrence of 72.7%. It was better than that of the primary head and neck local tumor recurrence or residual disease (39.9%). Of 81 lesions, eight lesions had progressive disease, and five of these eight lesions were cervical lymph node recurrences, whereas three lesions were residual disease of the primary after the first surgery. There is limited published literature regarding the relationship between prognosis and recurrent patterns of primary disease and cervical recurrence. In this study, we found that lesions recurrence location and TTP were prognostic factors for survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that D90 is an independent prognostic factors of local tumor control. Thus, we suggest that a prescription dose (D90) of ≥ 130 Gy may be associated with better local control, and patients with cervical recurrence may have improved survival.
Ultrasound-guided biopsy is routinely used in diagnosis or treatment for superficial lesions of the head and neck, and it can detect nodes even less than 2 mm in diameter, while CT and magnetic resonance imaging are less sensitive than ultrasound in detecting nodes of < 5 mm in diameter [20]. Owing to the challenging anatomical complex of the oropharynx such as the base of tongue, ultrasound offers significant advantages regardless of artifact and soft tissue definition compared with CT [6]. In this study, we performed seeds implantation by color Doppler ultrasound with a high frequency probe and guiding stabilization devices.
Our local results are promising and had good cosmetic outcomes. Two cases of grade 4 side effects of skin ulceration were seen in the cervical lymph node position. Both patients had had previous radiation and the recurrence lesion had invaded the subcutaneous tissues before seeds implantation. We summarized the merits of ultrasound-guided seeds implantation as follows: 1) real-time-guided; 2) no extra radiation dose exposure; 3) convenient and quick; 4) reproducible. The disadvantages include low image resolution and the fact that only two-dimensional images are available.

Conclusions

Interstitial permanent implantation of 125I seeds under ultrasound guidance is feasible, efficacious, and safe for refractory head and neck recurrences. It is a preferable option for patients with cervical lymph node recurrences or metastases from the head and neck, superficial maxillofacial region, and base of the tongue carcinomas. Tumor invading skin is a contraindication.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Yuliang Jiang, Suqing Tian, and Weiqiang Ran for their clinical contributions, Dr Haitao Sun for his suggestions of post-operative dosimetry, and also Junjie Wang for his critical review and suggestions.

Disclosure

Authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010; 127: 2893-2917.
2. Srivastava P, Kingsley PA, Srivastava H et al. Persistent post-radiotherapy pain and locoregional recurrence in head and neck cancer-is there a hidden link? Korean J Pain 2015; 28: 116-121.
3. Knappe M, Louw M, Gregor RT. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the assessment of cervical metastases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126: 1091-1096.
4. Zhu L, Jiang Y, Wang J et al. An investigation of 125I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 2013; 11: 60.
5. Baatenburg DJR, Rongen RJ, Lameris JS et al. Metastatic neck disease. Palpation vs ultrasound examination. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 689-690.
6. Blanco RG, Califano J, Messing B et al. Transcervical ultrasonography is feasible to visualize and evaluate base of tongue cancers. PLoS One 2014; 9: e87565.
7. Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1691-1699.
8. Sewnaik A, Keereweer S, Al-Mamgani A et al. High complication risk of salvage surgery after chemoradiation failures. Acta Otolaryngol 2012; 132: 96-100.
9. Zafereo ME, Hanasono MM, Rosenthal DI et al. The role of salvage surgery in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Cancer 2009; 115: 5723-5733.
10. de Mello RA, Gerós S, Alves MP et al. Cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study in a single comprehensive European cancer institution. PLoS One 2014; 9: e86697.
11. Cacicedo J, Navarro A, Alongi F et al. The role of re-irradiation of secondary and recurrent head and neck carcinomas. Is it a potentially curative treatment? A practical approach. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 40: 178-189.
12. Spencer SA, Harris J, Wheeler RH et al. Final report of RTOG 9610, a multi-institutional trial of reirradiation and chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2008; 30: 281-288.
13. Langer CJ, Harris J, Horwitz EM et al. Phase II study of low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with split-course concomitant twice-daily reirradiation in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 9911. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4800-4805.
14. Mazeron JJ, Ardiet JM, Haie-Meder C et al. GEC-ESTRO recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Radiother Oncol 2009; 91: 150-156.
15. Hoebers F, Heemsbergen W, Moor S et al. Reirradiation for head-and-neck cancer: delicate balance between effectiveness and toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81: e111-e118.
16. Puthawala A, Nisar SA, Gamie S et al. Interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy as a salvage treatment for recurrent head-and-neck cancers: long-term results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51: 354-362.
17. Langlois D, Hoffstetter S, Malissard L et al. Salvage irradiation of oropharynx and mobile tongue about 192 iridium brachytherapy in Centre Alexis Vautrin. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 14: 849-853.
18. Mazeron JJ, Langlois D, Glaubiger D et al. Salvage irradiation of oropharyngeal cancers using iridium 192 wire implants: 5-year results of 70 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13: 957-962.
19. Strnad V, Geiger M, Lotter M et al The role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in previously irradiated head-and-neck cancer. Brachytherapy 2003; 2: 158-163.
20. Ahuja A, Ying M. Grey-scale sonography in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: review of sonographic appearances and features that may help a beginner. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 38: 451-459.
Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe