Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Monitoring game load across quarters in professional basketball: positional differences and contextual effects

Shaoliang Zhang
1
,
Ming Li
1
,
Xing Wang
2
,
Enrique Alonso-Pérez-Chao
3
,
Pierpaolo Sansone
4
,
Jordan L Fox
5

  1. Athletic Performance and Data Science Laboratory (APDS), Division of Sports Science and Physical Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  2. School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
  3. Department of Physical Activity and Sports Science, University Alfonso X el Sabio, Villanueva de la Cañada, Spain
  4. Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, Italy
  5. Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Biol Sport. 2026;43:769–778
Online publish date: 2026/01/23
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
This study aimed to examine quarter-to-quarter variations in external and internal loads, the relationships between RPE and external loads, and the effects of contextual factors on external and internal loads in backcourt and frontcourt players. 16 professional male basketball players (8 backcourt, 8 frontcourt) from the Chinese National Basketball League were recruited. External load was quantified using Catapult S7 devices to record PlayerLoadTM (PL) and Inertial Movement Analysis (IMA) metrics, while internal load was assessed via rating of perceived exertion (RPE). From the first to the fourth quarter, frontcourt players displayed significant reductions in change of direction to the right (Q1: 0.48 ± 0.29 vs. Q4: 0.33 ± 0.16; p < 0.05) and explosive efforts (Q1: 1.49 ± 0.40 vs. Q4: 1.04 ± 0.35; p < 0.01). In contrast, backcourt players reported higher RPE (Q1: 4.28 ± 1.04 vs. Q4: 5.13 ± 1.05; p < 0.05) and recorded higher PL (Q1: 103.10 ± 44.59 vs. Q4: 123.21 ± 57.66; p < 0.01) in the fourth quarter. Frontcourt players showed higher RPE, PL, and PL · min−1, especially in the second quarter, but lower jump-related (IMA jump low, medium, total) and acceleration metrics than backcourt players. RPE correlated moderately to largely with PL and high-intensity jumps (r = 0.41–0.72, all p < 0.05). Backcourt players reported higher RPE in wins compared with losses (ES = 0.42; p < 0.05). These findings reveal notable positional differences in game load profiles, underscoring the need for context specific load management to optimize position-specific recovery.
keywords:

Basketball, External and internal loads, Game quarters, Playing position, Performance, Contextual factors

 
Quick links
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.