Współczesna Onkologia

Abstract

4/2025 vol. 29
Original paper

Real-world outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in later lines of recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer – evidence from a rescue access program in Poland

  1. Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Kraków, Poland
  2. Department of Proliferative Diseases, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Łódź, Poland
  3. Comprehensive Cancer Centre and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland
  4. Department of Gynecological Oncology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
  5. Department of Oncology and Chemotherapy, Provincial Integrated Hospital, Elbląg, Poland
  6. Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Haematology Centre, Wrocław, Poland
  7. Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Kraków, Poland
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2025; 29 (4): 384–392
Online publish date: 2025/10/28
View full text
Confronting perimenopausal women’s knowledge of coronary heart disease with their health behaviours. Controversial role of hormone replacement therapy in the protection of coronary heart disease

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a therapeutic option for recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) following platinum-based chemotherapy. However, real-world data on their effectiveness and safety remain limited, particularly in Eastern Europe. This study evaluates the real-world outcomes of ICI monotherapy in pretreated patients with r/mCC.

Material and methods

This multicentre retrospective study included 39 patients with r/mCC who received ICI monotherapy (cemiplimab or pembrolizumab) after disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy in 5 reference centres in Poland. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoint was treatment safety. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models assessed prognostic factors, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

After a median follow-up of 8.8 months, the median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9–6.4), and the median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 7.3–14.5). The objective response rate was 23% (n = 9), while the DCR was 64% (n = 25). Immune checkpoint inhibitors were generally well tolerated, with thyroid dysfunction, anaemia, and hepatic toxicity being the most common adverse events (AEs). The discontinuation of treatment due to AEs occurred in only 5% of the patients (n = 2). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), particularly endocrine toxicities, were associated with significantly prolonged PFS (HR 0.2, 95% CI: 0.09–0.6, p = 0.001; HR 0.2, 95% CI: 0.06–0.6, p = 0.004, for the occurrence of irAEs and endocrine toxicities, respectively).

Conclusions

Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy demonstrated modest efficacy in pretreated patients with r/mCC, with a manageable safety profile and irAEs of predictive significance for PFS.

Share
without publication fees