eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

vol. 10
Original paper

Reduction of applicator displacement in MR/CT-guided cervical cancer HDR brachytherapy by the use of patient hover transport system

Megan Andrew, Yusung Kim, Timothy Ginader, Brian J. Smith, Wenqing Sun, Dongxu Wang

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10, 1: 85–90
Online publish date: 2018/02/26
View full text
Get citation
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
To quantify the reduction of relative displacement between the implanted intracavitary applicator and the patient bony anatomy, due to the use of a hover transport system during the patient transports between the imaging table and the treatment table.

Material and methods
The displacement of the applicator inside the patient was measured by comparing the distance between the tip of the tandem and the pubic bone on X-ray radiography images taken before and after moving a patient to magnetic resonance/computed tomography imaging. Displacements were evaluated for 27 fractions of treatment using hover transport and 185 fractions of treatment using manual transport.

The use of hover transport system reduced the percentage of fractions with displacements greater than 5 mm from 22.7% to 7.4%. The reduction of applicator displacement using hover transport is statistically significant, compared to the manual transport method (p-value 0.0086; mean displacement 3.41 mm [95% CI: 2.96-3.97] for manual transport, and 2.27 mm [95% CI: 1.71-2.97] for hover transport fractions).

This study indicates that the hover transport system is effectively reducing displacement between tandem and patient bony anatomy during patient transports. The potential improvement in dosimetric accuracy due to this reduction warrants further study.


applicator displacement, cervical cancer, HDR, MRI-guided

Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. American Cancer Society, Atlanta 2016.
Nag S, Erickson B, Thomadsen B et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 48: 201-211.
Coia L, Won M, Lanciano R et al. The patterns of care outcome study for cancer of the uterine cervix. Results of the Second National Practice Survey. Cancer 1990; 66: 2451-2456.
Hanks GE, Herring DF, Kramer S. Patterns of care outcome studies results of the national practice in cancer of the cervix. Cancer 1983; 51: 959-967.
Lanciano RM, Won M, Coia L et al. Pretreatment and treatment factors associated with improved outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a final report of the 1973 and 1978 patterns of care studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 20: 667-676.
Montana GS, Hanlon A, Brickner T et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: patterns of care studies: review of 1978, 1983, and 1988-1989 surveys. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 32: 1481-1486.
Montana GS, Martz KL, Hanks GE. Patterns and sites of failure in cervix cancer treated in the USA in 1978. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 20: 87-93.
Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, van Limbergen E et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005; 74: 235-245.
Dimopoulos JC, Petrow P, Tanderup K et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2012; 103: 113-122.
Hellebust TP, Kirisits C, Berger D et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group: considerations and pitfalls in commissioning and applicator reconstruction in 3D image-based treatment planning of cervix cancer brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2010; 96: 153-160.
Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, van Limbergen E et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO Working Group (II): Concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy – 3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol 2006; 78: 67-77.
Pham H, Chen Y, Rouby E et al. Changes in high-dose-rate tandem and ovoid applicator positions during treatment in an unfixed brachytherapy system. Radiology 1998; 206: 525-531.
Tanderup K, Hellebust TP, Lang S et al. Consequences of random and systematic reconstruction uncertainties in 3D image based brachytherapy in cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2008; 89: 156-163.
Grigsby PW, Georgiou A, Jeffrey F et al. Anatomic variation of gynecologic brachytherapy prescription points. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 27: 725-729.
Bou-Zeid W, Bauer C, Kim Y et al. Clinical validation of a real-time applicator position monitoring system for gynecologic intracavitary brachytherapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2016; 2: 045008.
Schindel J, Zhang W, Bhatia SK et al. Dosimetric impacts of applicator displacements and applicator reconstruction-uncertainties on 3D image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2013; 5: 250-257.
Karlsson L, Thunberg P, With A et al. 3D image-based adapted high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer with and without interstitial needles: measurement of applicator shift between imaging and dose delivery. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9: 52-58.
Dumane V, Yuan Y, Sheu R et al. Computed tomography- based treatment planning for high-dose-rate brachytherapy using the tandem and ring applicator: influence of applicator choice on organ dose and inter-fraction adaptive planning.
J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9: 279-286.
Yin G, Wang P, Lang J et al. Dosimetric study for cervix carcinoma treatment using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compensation based on 3D intracavitary brachytherapy technique. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8: 221-232.
Carvalho H, Mendez L, Stuart S et al. Implementation of image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for patients with uterine cervix cancer: a tumor volume kinetics approach. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8: 301-307.
Soliman A, Owrangi A, Ravi A et al. Metal artefacts in MRI- guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer. J Contemp Bra­chy­the­rapy 2016; 8: 363-369.
Kim Y, Huang Y, Chesnut D et al. Applicator Displacements Due To Additional Scan For 3D Image-Guided Brachytherapy For Cervical Cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011; 99: S257-S258.
Tanderup K, Pötter R, Lindegaard JC et al. PTV margins should not be used to compensate for uncertainties in 3D image guided intracavitary brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2010; 97: 495-500.
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe