Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2019
vol. 36
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Relative pitch area plays an important role in movement pattern and intensity in recreational male football

Saša Pantelić
1
,
Ante Rađa
2
,
Marko Erceg
2
,
Zoran Milanović
1, 3
,
Nebojša Trajković
4
,
Emilija Stojanović
1
,
Peter Krustrup
5, 6, 7
,
Morten B. Randers
5

1.
Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia
2.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia
3.
Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia
4.
Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
5.
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, SDU Sport and Health Sciences Cluster (SHSC), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
6.
Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, UK
7.
Department of Sports Science, Shanghai University of Sport, China
Biol Sport. 2019;36(2):119–124
Online publish date: 2019/01/14
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Recreational football has been shown to be an effective health-promoting activity, but it is still unclear how changes in game formats affect external and internal load. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of area per player in recreational small-sided football games. Ten recreational active male football participants (mean±standard deviation, age: 20.1±1.1 years; height: 182.2±7.4 cm; body mass: 75.9±9.8 kg) completed two sessions comprising 2x20 min of 5v5 football with 80 and 60 m2 per player, during which heart rate (HR) and movement pattern were measured. In 80 m2 , mean HR (167±9 vs. 160±10 b.p.m., P90%HRpeak was higher in 80 m2 than 60 m2 (45±14 vs. 29±16%, P=0.004, ES=1.07). Moreover, a higher number of sprints (8.0±4.8 vs. 3.0±1.3, P=0.014, ES=1.41) and a greater distance in the highest speed zones (>13, >16 and >20 km•h-1) were covered in 80 m2 than 60 m2 . Peak running speed was also higher in 80 m2 (24.3±1.7 vs. 22.3±1.4 km•h-1, P=0.011, ES=1.27), whereas no statistically significant differences were found in total distance covered, player load, or the accelerationdeceleration profiles. In conclusion, the internal and external loading was higher for recreationally active male football players when playing on a pitch with 80 m2 area per player compared to 60 m2
keywords:

Heart rate, GPS, High-intensity running, Sprinting, Soccer

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.