Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


3/2017
vol. 34
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

Reliability and smallest worthwhile difference in 1RM tests according to previous resistance training experience in young women

Matheus Amarante do Nascimento
1, 2
,
Alex Silva Ribeiro
2
,
Camila de Souza Padilha
2
,
Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva
,
Jerry L. Mayhew
,
Marçal Guerreiro do Amaral Campos Filho
,
Edilson Serpeloni Cyrino

1.
Paraná State University – UNESPAR, Paranavaí campus, Paranavaí, PR, Brazil
2.
Metabolism, Nutrition, and Exercise Laboratory, Physical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, PR, Brazil
Biol. Sport 2017;34:279-285
Online publish date: 2017/10/23
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
The objective of this study was to determine the familiarization and smallest worthwhile difference (SWD) of one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests in detrained women according to their previous resistance training experience. Three groups of women with varying amounts of previous resistance training experience were recruited: Novice (n = 27, 1 to 6 months), Intermediate (n = 13, from 7 to 12 months), and Advanced (n = 20, 13 to 24 months). All participants performed four 1RM test sessions in the bench press (BP), squat (SQ), and arm curl (AC). A significant (p< 0.05) (group vs. time) interaction was observed in SQ suggesting that more experienced participants needed fewer 1RM test sessions to reach a stable load compared to the less experienced groups. Strength changes (p<0.05) observed in BP and AC occurred with no significant interaction for groups (p> 0.05), suggesting that experience had no impact on familiarization for these lifts. SWDs suggest that strength gains greater than 2-4% in these lifts would indicate a meaningful improvement in strength beyond random variation from trial to trial no matter the experience of the subject. Women with limited previous resistance training experience do not require more trials to reach load stabilization than those with more experience. Stability of 1RM loads for BP and AC may require only two sessions, while SQ may require at least three trials.
keywords:

Muscle strength, Exercise evaluation, Reliability, Neural learning, Female

 
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.