eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

4/2022
vol. 14
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Sarcopenia does not limit overall survival after interstitial brachytherapy for breast cancer liver metastases

Maximilian Thormann
1
,
Franziska Heitmann
1
,
Christine March
1
,
Maciej Pech
1
,
Peter Hass
2
,
Alexey Surov
1
,
Robert Damm
1
,
Jazan Omari
1

1.
University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
2.
Clinic for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
J Contemp Brachytherapy 2022; 14, 4: 364–369
Online publish date: 2022/08/31
Article file
- Sarcopenia does.pdf  [0.22 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Purpose

Interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) has been established as a viable alternative to other loco-regional thermal ablative techniques, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies. It may be applied in cases, where liver lesions are near critical structures or > 3 cm in size. In breast cancer, safety and efficacy of iBT have been established in several studies, showing a high-rate of local tumor control and low complication rates [1, 2]. About 50% of patients with metastatic breast cancer develop liver metastases [3, 4]. Overall survival in this patient’s group is low [5]. Surgical resection or local ablation methods can be offered to a sub-group of patients with metastatic disease limited to the liver [4, 6]. Locally ablative treatments of oligo-metastatic breast cancer may improve survival, and may be applied with a curative intent in selected cases [7-9].
To select proper patients for locally ablative therapies, finding factors that influence prognosis is essential. There has been increasing evidence that sarcopenia, as defined by loss of muscle mass and strength, plays an important role in clinical outcomes in patients with various diseases. Sarcopenia can severely affect cancer patients, as negative protein balance, reduced food intake, and decreased physical activity can lead to progressive muscle loss [10, 11]. Sarcopenia has also been identified as a poor prognostic marker for numerous oncologic diseases. For malignancies, such as non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric, esophageal, pancreatic cancer, and lymphoma, sarcopenia was associated with worse overall survival [12-16]. In a meta-analysis, patients with sarcopenia showed higher dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) [17].
For breast cancer, sarcopenia has been shown to correlate with an increased mortality and treatment toxicity in non-metastatic and metastatic breast cancers [18-25]; however, the data is rarely compared with other common cancers [26]. The influence of sarcopenia on non-surgical local treatments in breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) is unknown to date. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of sarcopenia on overall survival of patients undergoing iBT for BCLM. We applied psoas muscle index (PMI) for measurements of sarcopenia. Additionally, psoas muscle density and skeletal muscle gauge (SMG) were calculated.

Material and methods

Study design
From our database, we retrospectively identified 97 patients with breast cancer liver metastases, who received iBT at our institution from 2006-2017. All 97 patients were seen at our department for follow-up visits every 3-6 months after therapy. Patients were followed up until 2020. The study was approved by a local ethics committee (145/21).
Inclusion criteria were:
– confirmed metastatic breast cancer with liver metastases;
– available CT scan including the psoas muscle on L3 level before treatment,
– available clinical data regarding overall survival (OS).
Exclusion criteria were:
– missing pre-treatment CT images;
– strong motion artifacts in CT scans;
– missing clinical data;
– missing body height.


Imaging analysis
All CT scans were obtained from a multidetector CT scanner (Canon Aquilion Prime, Otawara, Japan). Patients were positioned in a supine position. CT protocol was as follows: acquisition slice thickness of 1 mm with 5 mm reconstructions, tube voltage of 120 kV, automatic tube current modulation, pitch factor of 1.2, and collimation 1 mm.
We referred to the last available pre-treatment CT scan within three months prior to iBT. All CT measurements were performed by two experienced radiologists (MT and AS) with 3 and 16 years of experience, respectively. Both were blinded to the clinical course of patients. Measurements were performed on axial images at the mid-L3 level in soft tissue window (Window 45 to 250 HU) on a dedicated workstation (Infinitt PACS, version 3.0, Infinitt Healthcare, Korea). A line was drawn manually along contours of the psoas muscles on both sides, and bilateral areas as calculated by the software were added to obtain PMA (Figure 1). Muscle density was determined by the software for each psoas area and the mean was calculated for both sides. PMI was calculated by dividing PMA by patient’s body height. SMG was determined multiplying PMI with mean muscle density, as previously reported [27]. The parameter integrated both PMI and muscle density, and has been shown to be associated with outcomes in breast cancer patients [23, 27]. SMG units are cm2 × HU/m2, but were given as arbitrary units (AU) for simplicity. Sarcopenia was defined as PMI < 5.45 cm2/m2 for males, and < 3.85 cm2/m2 for females [10].

Statistical analysis
We used SPSS version 26 for statistical analysis. For continuous variables, mean and standard deviation as well as median and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. To assess the impact of psoas muscle composition on survival, we used a univariate Cox regression analysis. For factors with a significance value of p < 0.1, adjusted prognostic ability to predict overall survival was further assessed using a multivariate Cox regression, with forward selection. Odds ratios were presented together with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

Altogether, 60 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. The median age was 56 years. 27 patients (45%) had an skeletal muscle index (SMI) below the cut-off value, and were considered sarcopenic. The median time between CT scan and therapy was 1 day (range, 0-95 days). By the time of treatment, the primary breast tumor had been resected in 57 patients; 39 patients had received radiotherapy, 58 patients had received chemotherapy prior to iBT, and 31 patients had undergone systemic therapy with trastuzumab. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) of the liver had been performed in nine patients. The median tumor size was 2.9 cm. No major intervention-associated complications were observed. Baseline patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Overall survival
The median overall survival was 27 months (SD = 4.0 months) (Figure 2). In a univariate Cox regression, neither PMA (HR = 0.956, 95% CI: 0.855-1.068, p = 0.423), average density (HR = 1.028, 95% CI: 0.985-1.072, p = 0.207), nor SMG (HR = 1.002, 95% CI: 0.998-1.006, p = 0.440) were associated with overall survival. There was no influence of sarcopenia on OS (HR = 0.975, 95% CI: 0.532-1.787, p = 0.934). Also there was no proportional influence of PMI on OS (HR = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.701-1.290, p = 0.746). Regression results are presented in Table 2.

Discussion

Our study assessed the impact of sarcopenia on overall survival of patients undergoing iBT for breast cancer liver metastases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the association of sarcopenia with patients’ outcomes in non-surgical local treatments in metastatic breast cancers. We did not find an association between sarcopenia, psoas muscle density, or SMG with overall survival in our cohort.
Breast cancer is among the leading causes of cancer-related death in women around the world [25, 28]. Liver metastases are common in breast cancer patients, and significantly worsen survival if left untreated. While advanced stage breast cancer patients usually receive systemic therapy, studies have shown that a carefully selected group of breast cancer patients with liver metastases profit from loco-regional treatments, when compared to systemic therapy alone [3, 29, 30]. Non-surgical local treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and iBT are minimally invasive procedures and viable alternatives to resection, and are the first choice for unresectable liver metastases. Outcome’s prediction is an important parameter in interventional medicine, and a key step to individualized medicine. Sarcopenia is a complex syndrome and common in oncologic patients. Its’ etiology is diverse, including inflammation, disuse, and low nutritional intake [25]. Multiple studies have shown the influence of sarcopenia on treatment outcomes in cancer patients [31-33]. Sarcopenia has been identified as a poor prognostic marker in numerous cancers, including gastrointestinal tumors, lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and ovarian cancer [31-41]. It has been associated with increased post-operative complications, improved toxicity of systemic therapies, and decreased overall survival [17, 42-44]. Several meta-analyses among gynecological cancer patients showed an influence of sarcopenia on OS and progression-free survival (PFS). However, the definition of sarcopenia across the studies was not standardized [45-47].The relationship for some tumor entities is still undetermined [48].
It has been shown that sarcopenia as measured on CT scans is an important prognostic factor in non-metastatic breast cancer patients [18, 26, 49]. A recent meta-analysis showed that mortality in cancer patients increased with a decrease in lean mass [50]. In a meta-analysis including 81 studies, low lean mass was associated with an decreased OS across different definitions, including the international consensus of cancer cachexia and different cut-off points for skeletal muscle mass [51]. Huang et al. identified low PMI at the L4 level to be associated with overall survival and distant metastases-free survival before surgery [52]. Low skeletal muscle mass is therefore a relevant patient-related condition that warrants early detection for optimal prevention, prognostication, and management.
In metastatic breast cancer, the rate of sarcopenic patients has been reported to be as high as 45% in a recent meta-analysis [25]. An association with mortality was found for non-metastatic breast cancer, but not for metastatic sub-group. In other studies, sarcopenic patients with non-metastatic breast cancer had lower OS [18, 53]. Shachar et al. found an association between SMG and higher treatment-related toxicity, hospitalization, and time to treatment failure [23]. Aleixo et al. reported higher mortality and chemotherapy toxicity in breast cancer patients with low SMI [54]. In contrast, Rier et al. observed that low muscle density was associated with lower OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer, while SMI was not [21]. In a sub-analysis in a large meta-analysis by Au et al., overall mortality in breast cancer patients was not associated with sarcopenia. However, the analysis included only three studies. Measurement of lean mass was heterogeneous, with both bio-impedance analysis and computed tomography included. Sub-analyses for patients with metastases were not performed [50].
There are yet no studies investigating the influence of sarcopenia for breast cancer patients undergoing loco-regional therapies. For RFA, several studies showed that low pre-treatment PMI and SMI were associated with lower OS in HCC patients after RFA [55-57]. Similarly, a negative influence of sarcopenia as measured by PMI and SMI on OS was found in patients undergoing trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) and trans-arterial embolization (TAE) [58, 59].
In contrast to these data, sarcopenia did not affect overall survival after iBT in our cohort. This might suggest that iBT may be a reasonable therapeutic option in sarcopenic BCLM patients undergoing non-surgical local therapy. If sarcopenic patients do not show worse overall survival after iBT, this could be an important parameter in patients’ allocation. Factors that predict outcomes after iBT are still scarce, but no effect of clinical variables on outcomes has been reported. It has been shown that increasing tumor size and applied radiation affect local recurrence rate, while age and clinical variables, such as comorbidities, did not [60-62]. Repeated iBT treatments demonstrated the highest effect on overall survival in a study by Ricke et al. [61].
Our study indicates that screening for sarcopenia is important prior to BCLM therapy. Measuring skeletal muscle mass is a clinical useful tool that may influence treatment decision. Unlike other factors influencing survival, sarcopenia is modifiable. Screening via CT imaging is easy to integrate into clinical routine. Early identification of sarcopenia may induce multimodal interventions and improve patient outcomes. With more data available, it may also be worth considering using sarcopenia as an additional factor to allocate patients to specific treatment arms based on individual assessment. Our data show that sarcopenia is not a limiting factor in BCLM patients undergoing iBT. Additional comparative studies with surgical and other locally ablative procedures will be needed to evaluate whether this translates into an actual survival benefit. The percentage of sarcopenic patients in our cohort corresponds to those found in other studies, yet analyses with higher patient numbers will be needed to confirm our results and individualize therapy lines.
Our study has several limitations that need to be considered. It was a retrospective study at a single institution. Not all patients received a CT scan within 100 days prior to therapy, leading to exclusions and potential bias. We applied PMI as an indicator of sarcopenia; the effect of SMI or other measures of sarcopenia was not evaluated. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this was the largest study investigating the impact of sarcopenia on survival in patients undergoing locally ablative therapies for BCLM.
In conclusion, our retrospective analysis reveals that sarcopenic patients do not show decreased overall survival when undergoing iBT for BCLM. Neither investigated body composition parameter showed influence on survival time. Our results suggest that iBT may be considered as a treatment option for sarcopenic patients with BCLM. Matched cohort studies comparing iBT with other local treatment strategies are warranted.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1. Collettini F, Golenia M, Schnapauff D et al. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy ablation of breast cancer liver metastases: initial experience with 80 lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23: 618-626.
2. Wieners G, Mohnike K, Peters N et al. Treatment of hepatic metastases of breast cancer with CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy – a phase II-study. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100: 314-319.
3. Bale R, Putzer D, Schullian P. Local treatment of breast cancer liver metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11: 1341.
4. Cassera MA, Hammill CW, Ujiki MB et al. Surgical management of breast cancer liver metastases. HPB 2011; 13: 272-278.
5. Eng LG, Dawood S, Sopik V et al. Ten-year survival in women with primary stage IV breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 160: 145-152.
6. Lubrano J, Roman H, Tarrab S et al. Liver resection for breast cancer metastasis: does it improve survival? Surg Today 2008; 38: 293–299.
7. Cho SW, Kitisin K, Buck D et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is a feasible palliative locoregional therapy for breast cancer liver metastases. Int J Surg Oncol 2010; 2010: 1-8.
8. Kent CL, McDuff SGR, Salama JK. Oligometastatic breast cancer: where are we now and where are we headed? – a narrative review. Ann Palliat Med 2021; 10: 5954968-5955968.
9. Pagani O, Senkus E, Wood W et al. International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: can metastatic breast cancer be cured? JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 456-463.
10. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 489-495.
11. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019; 48: 16-31.
12. Camus V, Lanic H, Kraut J et al. Prognostic impact of fat tissue loss and cachexia assessed by computed tomography scan in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy. Eur J Haematol 2014; 93: 9-18.
13. Deng HY, Zha P, Peng L et al. Preoperative sarcopenia is a predictor of poor prognosis of esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32: doy115.
14. Karmali R, Alrifai T, Fughhi IAM et al. Impact of cachexia on outcomes in aggressive lymphomas. Ann Hematol 2017; 96: 951-956.
15. Mintziras I, Miligkos M, Wächter S et al. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are significantly associated with poorer overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 59: 19-26.
16. Sun G, Li Y, Peng Y et al. Can sarcopenia be a predictor of prognosis for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33: 1419-1427.
17. Surov A, Pech M, Gessner D et al. Low skeletal muscle mass is a predictor of treatment related toxicity in oncologic patients. A meta-analysis. Clin Nutr 2021; 40: 5298-5310.
18. Caan BJ, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Prado CM et al. Association of muscle and adiposity measured by computed tomography with survival in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4: 798-804.
19. Del Fabbro E, Parsons H, Warneke CL et al. The relationship between body composition and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer. Oncologist 2012; 17: 1240-1245.
20. Prado CMM, Baracos VE, McCargar LJ et al. Sarcopenia as a determinant of chemotherapy toxicity and time to tumor progression in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 2920-2926.
21. Rier HN, Jager A, Sleijfer S et al. Low muscle attenuation is a prognostic factor for survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line palliative chemotherapy. Breast 2017; 31: 9-15.
22. Shachar SS, Deal AM, Weinberg M et al. Body composition as a predictor of toxicity in patients receiving anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 3537-3543.
23. Shachar SS, Deal AM, Weinberg M et al. Skeletal muscle measures as predictors of toxicity, hospitalization, and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving taxane-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 658-665.
24. Villaseñor A, Ballard-Barbash R, Baumgartner K et al. Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: the HEAL study. J Cancer Surviv 2012; 6: 398-406.
25. Zhang XM, Dou QL, Zeng Y et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of mortality in women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer 2020; 20: 172.
26. Deluche E, Lachatre D, Di Palma M et al. Is sarcopenia a missed factor in the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer? Breast 2022; 61: 84-90.
27. Weinberg MS, Shachar SS, Muss HB et al. Beyond sarcopenia: characterization and integration of skeletal muscle quantity and radiodensity in a curable breast cancer population. Breast J 2018; 24: 278-284.
28. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 7-33.
29. Ruiz A, Castro-Benitez C, Sebagh M et al. Repeat hepatectomy for breast cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 Suppl 3: 1057-1066.
30. Ruiz A, van Hillegersberg R, Siesling S et al. Surgical resection versus systemic therapy for breast cancer liver metastases: results of a European case matched comparison. Eur J Cancer 2018; 95: 1-10.
31. Aleixo GFP, Shachar SS, Nyrop KA et al. Myosteatosis and prognosis in cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 145: 102839.
32. Simonsen C, de Heer P, Bjerre ED et al. Sarcopenia and postoperative complication risk in gastrointestinal surgical oncology. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 58-69.
33. Vergara-Fernandez O, Trejo-Avila M, Salgado-Nesme N. Sarcopenia in patients with colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8: 1188-1202.
34. Rinninella E, Cintoni M, Raoul P et al. Muscle mass, assessed at diagnosis by L3-CT scan as a prognostic marker of clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr 2020; 39: 2045-2054.
35. Shachar SS, Williams GR, Muss HB et al. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2016; 57: 58-67.
36. Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Tan BHL. Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 2019; 22: 10-22.
37. Yang M, Shen Y, Tan L et al. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2019; 156: 101-111.
38. Ubachs J, Ziemons J, Minis-Rutten IJG et al. Sarcopenia and ovarian cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019; 10: 1165.
39. Boshier PR, Heneghan R, Markar SR et al. Assessment of body composition and sarcopenia in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31: 1-11.
40. Bundred J, Kamarajah SK, Roberts KJ. Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 2019; 21: 1603-1612.
41. Wong A, Zhu D, Kraus D et al. Radiologically defined sarcopenia affects survival in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2021; 131: 333-341.
42. Deng HY, Hou L, Zha P et al. Sarcopenia is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45: 728-735.
43. Trejo-Avila M, Bozada-Gutiérrez K, Valenzuela-Salazar C et al. Sarcopenia predicts worse postoperative outcomes and decreased survival rates in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36: 1077-1096.
44. Xie H, Wei L, Liu M et al. Preoperative computed tomography-assessed sarcopenia as a predictor of complications and long-term prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406: 1775-1788.
45. Li YX, Xia WW, Liu WY. The influence process of sarcopenia on female cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47: 4403-4413.
46. Allanson ER, Peng Y, Choi A et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of sarcopenia as a prognostic factor in gynecological malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30: 1791-1797.
47. Sutton EH, Plyta M, Fragkos K et al. Pre-treatment sarcopenic assessments as a prognostic factor for gynaecology cancer outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2022. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.1038/S41430-022-01085-7.
48. McSharry V, Mullee A, McCann L et al. The impact of sarcopenia and low muscle attenuation on overall survival in epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27: 3553-3564.
49. Rossi F, Valdora F, Bignotti B et al. Evaluation of body computed tomography-determined sarcopenia in breast cancer patients and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2019; 21: 100154.
50. Au PCM, Li HL, Lee GKY et al. Sarcopenia and mortality in cancer: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2021; 7: S28-S33.
51. Li HL, Au PCM, Lee GKY et al. Different definitions of sarcopenia and mortality in cancer: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2021; 7: S34-S38.
52. Huang W, Zhang M, Wang W et al. Preoperative pectoralis muscle index predicts distant metastasis-free survival in breast cancer patients. Front Oncol; 12: 854137.
53. Deluche E, Leobon S, Desport JC et al. Impact of body composition on outcome in patients with early breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26: 861-868.
54. Aleixo GFP, Williams GR, Nyrop KA et al. Muscle composition and outcomes in patients with breast cancer: meta-analysis and systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177: 569-579.
55. Salman A, Salman M, Moustafa A et al. Impact of sarcopenia on two-year mortality in patients with HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2021; 8: 313-320.
56. Yeh WS, Chiang PL, Kee KM et al. Pre-sarcopenia is the prognostic factor of overall survival in early-stage hepatoma patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99: e20455.
57. Yuri Y, Nishikawa H, Enomoto H et al. Implication of Psoas Muscle Index on survival for hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radiofrequency ablation therapy. J Cancer 2017; 8: 1507-1516.
58. Lanza E, Masetti C, Messana G et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of survival in patients undergoing bland transarterial embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0232371.
59. Loosen SH, Schulze-Hagen M, Bruners P et al. Sarcopenia is a negative prognostic factor in patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatic malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11: 1503.
60. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2016; 27: 1386-1422.
61. Ricke J, Mohnike K, Pech M et al. Local response and impact on survival after local ablation of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma by computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol 2010; 78: 479-485.
62. Seidensticker R, Damm R, Enge J et al. Local ablation or radioembolization of colorectal cancer metastases: comorbidities or older age do not affect overall survival. BMC Cancer 2018; 18: 882.
Copyright: © 2022 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.