Ta strona używa pliki cookies, w celu polepszenia użyteczności i funkcjonalności oraz w celach statystycznych. Dowiedz się więcej w Polityce prywatności.
Korzystając ze strony wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies, zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki.
Akceptuję wykorzystanie plików cookies
Gastroenterology Review
eISSN: 1897-4317
ISSN: 1895-5770
Gastroenterology Review/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

Open access

without publication fees
2/2025
vol. 20
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Original paper

Solid pancreatic lesions: etiology, morphology and utility of macroscopic on-site evaluation in predicting good yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy

Abbas Ali Tasneem
1
,
Taha Yaseen
1
,
Syed Mudassir Laeeq
1
,
Zain Majid
1
,
Nasir Hassan Luck
1

  1. Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
Gastroenterology Rev 2025; 20 (2): 192–198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2025.151850
Online publish date: 2025/06/06
Article file
- Solid pancreatic (1).pdf  [0.10 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Low G, Panu A, Millo N, Leen E. Multimodality imaging of neoplastic and nonneoplastic solid lesions of the pancreas. Radiographics 2011; 31: 993-1015.
2. Pancreatic cancer – statistics (2023) Cancer. Net. Available at: https;//www.cancer.net/cancer-types/pancreatic-cancer/statistics (Accessed: 25 January 2024).
3. Sundaram S, Chhanchure U, Patil P, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) versus macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: a paired comparative analysis using newer-generation fine needle biopsy needles. Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36: 340-6.
4. Buxbaum J, Ko C, Varghese N, et al. Qualitative and quantitative contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound improves evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 917-25.e4.
5. Santo E, Bar-Yishay I. Pancreatic solid incidentalomas. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6 (Suppl 3): S99-103.
6. Fabbri C, Fuccio L, Fornelli A, et al. The presence of rapid on-site evaluation did not increase the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions with core needle. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 225-30. 
7. Titan AL, Norton JA, Fisher AT, et al. Evaluation of outcomes following surgery for locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e2024318.
8. Sperti C, Moletta L, Patanè G. Metastatic tumors to the pancreas: the role of surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 6: 381-92..
9. Pan B, Lee Y, Rodriguez T, et al. Secondary tumors of the pancreas: a case series. Anticancer Res 2012; 32: 1449-52.
10. Facchinelli D, Boninsegna E, Visco C, Tecchio C. Primary pancreatic lymphoma: recommendations for diagnosis and management. J Blood Med 2021; 12: 257-67.
11. Sakaguchi K, Kuroda Y, Sugo H, et al. [Spindle cell type anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas: review of 27 Japanese case reports]. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 2020; 117: 430-6.
12. Luchini C, Pea A, Lionheart G, et al. Pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells is genetically similar to, but clinically distinct from, conventional ductal adenocarcinoma. J Pathol 2017; 243: 148-54.
13. Siddeek RAT, Gupta A, Singla T, et al. Pancreatic tuberculosis mimicking as pancreatic malignancy: surgeon’s dilemma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2023; 66: 614-7.
14. Kovacevic B, Toxværd A, Klausen P, et al. Tissue amount and diagnostic yield of a novel franseen EUS-FNB and a standard EUS-FNA needle-A randomized controlled study in solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 319-25.
15. Wong T, Pattarapuntakul T, Netinatsunton N, et al. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20: 215.
16. Mangiavillano B, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 129-37.
17. Mohan BP, Madhu D, Reddy N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling by macroscopic on-site evaluation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 909-17.
Copyright: © 2025 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.