eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

1/2019
vol. 11
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Subdermal injection of hyaluronic acid to decrease skin toxicity from radiation delivered with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cancer patients

Yuan Yuan, Zhang Ying, Dai Jianjian, Lin Qi, Xu Ruicai, Geng Baocheng, Han Mingyong

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11, 1: 14–20
Online publish date: 2019/02/06
Article file
- subdermal.pdf  [0.48 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Purpose

Percutaneous computer tomography (CT)-guided brachytherapy using permanent implants of I-125 seeds has been recently proposed as an effective treatment strategy for many malignant tumors such as prostate cancers [1,2] and nasopharyngeal carcinomas [3]. Compared with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy has the ability to deliver a higher dose of irradiation to the tumor target while sparing normal tissues adjacent to the tumor lesion [4,5]. For low-dose-rate brachytherapy, the organs at risk (OARs) are the adjacent organs. To decrease the toxicity to the OARs from radiation delivered with brachytherapy, previous studies injected hyaluronic acid (HA) into the anterior perirectal fat of prostate cancer patients to decrease the dose to the rectum [6,7]. HA is also already used as a protective agent for at-risk organs in high-dose-rate brachytherapy [8,9]. In this study, we chose patients with a subcutaneous metastatic tumor, whose skin was the organ at risk. Hyaluronic acid was percutaneously injected into the right position after I-125 implantation, in order to increase the distance between the skin and the radioactive source. Finally, dosimetry of target volume and skin were evaluated before and after HA injection. Complications associated with the procedure, dermal toxicity, and the stability of HA were followed up. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility to increase the distance between the skin and the radioactive source by HA injection, and to reduce the dose to the skin during low-dose-rate (LDR) treatment.

Material and methods

Patients

Between August and December 2017, a total of 11 patients with a subdermal malignant tumor were enrolled. The enrollment criteria were as follows: histologically confirmed malignant tumor, subdermal malignant tumor visible on CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), leukocyte count of 3.5 × 109 cells/l or higher, red blood cell count of 3.0 × 1012 cells/l or higher, platelet count of 80 × 109 cells/l or higher in peripheral blood, the partial thromboplastin time less than 50 s, the liver and kidney function within the normal range, the Karnofsky physical scores of ≥ 60.
The patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The 11 patients comprised of 10 males and 1 female, with median age of 61 (range, 51-78). The cases included the following primary cancer sites: lung cancer – 5 cases, gastric cancer – 1 case, mesothelioma – 1 case, lymphoma – 2 cases, melanoma – 1 case, and 1 case of unknown cancer. The locations for I-125 implantation were the chest wall for 4 cases, the neck for 3 cases, the back for 1 case, the abdominal wall for 1 case, the arm for 1 case, and the groin for 1 case. All patients received combined treatment with chemotherapy and no radiotherapy.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong University School of Medicine, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

I-125 brachytherapy

I-125 seeds that were used in the procedures were produced by HTA Co., Ltd. in Beijing, China. Each I-125 seed was a single source, which was 4.5 mm long and 0.8 mm in diameter, and its radioactivity was 2.2-2.96 × 107 Bq. The prescription dose was 100-120 Gy. I-125 seeds were implanted into the tumor target according to the brachytherapy treatment planning system (BTPS) one by one. Once I-125 seeds were delivered into the tumor lesion, a CT scan was repeated to delineate the tumor and reconstruction source position, and display the dose distribution.

Hyaluronic acid injection

Hyaluronic acid was provided by Bloomage Freda Biopharm Co., Ltd. in Jinan, China. It is widely used in the medical field due to its biocompatibility and biodegradability [7,10,11]. After CT-guided seed implantation, the needle tip was placed in the space such that the OAR receives a significant overdose. At that point, the needle was connected to a syringe containing HA. After ensuring that the needle was not in a vessel, HA was injected within the space between the tumor and skin. The total amount of hyaluronic acid was decided by actual new space according to intraoperative planning. To decrease puncture injury, HA was injected through needles, by which the I-125 seeds were released, before the needle tip was removed out of skin. However, if the needle passage for HA injection was different from the passage used for seed implantation, we would make another puncture to create a passage for HA injection. This needle was only for HA injection. We recorded the amount of this kind of needles as a part of our results.

Magnetic resonance imaging protocol and image evaluation

MRI examinations were performed on a 3.0-T clinical system (Ingenia, Philips, The Netherlands), with a 32-channel ds Torso coil, and the following imaging sequences were acquired: T1-weighted (TR/TE1/TE2 = 166/1.15/2.3 ms; acquisition matrix = 376 × 235; NSA = 1; field of view = 425 × 372 mm; slice thickness = 6 mm, flip angle = 53°), and T2-weighted (TR/TE = 2725/78 ms; acquisition matrix = 296 × 296; NSA = 1; field of view = 400 × 400 mm; slice thickness = 6 mm, flip angle = 90°).

Brachytherapy treatment planning system

The brachytherapy treatment planning system (BTPS) used in this study was the seeds implanting brachytherapy system provided by the Image Processing Center of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, in Peking, China. Its calculation algorithm is based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group No. 43 Report.

Post-implant dosimetry

We routinely performed postoperative dosimetric verification for each patient. The CT images obtained immediately after seed implantation was transferred to the BTPS. First, we outlined the gross tumor volume as GTV. Then, clinical target volume (CTV) was generated by adding a margin of 5-mm to gross tumor volume (GTV) in all directions. The CTV was equal to the target volume [12,13,14]. We outlined a 2-mm thick contour below the skin surface standing for skin [15]. Based on the recommendations of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) [16], the tumor volumes, the D90 (the dose delivered to 90% of the target volume), and V100 (the percentage of the target volumes receiving 100% of the prescription dose) values were calculated through the BTPS both pre- and post-HA injection as well as the OAR-Max (0.1 cc of skin receiving the highest dose) and OAR-Mean (the mean skin dose) values. The isodose curves for each slice and the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the target were generated by the BTPS.

Follow-up

All patients were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months post-HA injection. The radiation morbidity of skin was assessed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria (Table 2) [17].

Statistical analysis

The D90, V100, OAR-Max, and OAR-Mean values (pre- and post-HA injection) were documented at the end of the present study, as were the complications. The statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). We chose one-tailed paired t-test for the comparison of dosimetric parameters before and after HA injection. A p value of less than 0.05 was defined as significant.

Results

New space between tumor and skin following hyaluronic acid injection

For the patients, the mean volume of HA injection was 4.2 ml (range, 1.6-8.0 ml) and the mean new space after HA injection was 1.0 cm (range, 0.6-1.5 cm) (Table 3). Figure 1 illustrates the process of HA injection between tumor and skin. The patients’ MRIs before and after HA injection showed a newly formed space between tumor and skin. The technique of HA injection is additionally shown in Figure 1. The new space was measured on a CT image or MRI. There were 3 patients who were evaluated by MRI, 7 patients by CT scan, and 1 patient who accepted MRI in first month, and then CT scan.

Dosimetric outcomes before and after hyaluronic acid injection

To assess the effect of HA injection on tumor’s dose coverage and radiation exposure to skin, D90 and V100 of CTV were calculated as well as OAR-Max and the OAR-Mean. The mean CTV V100 prior to HA injection was 91.18% (range, 69.6-100%). The mean V100 after HA injection was 91.17% (range, 70.7-100%). The mean D90 prior to HA injection was 142.47 Gy (range, 65.96-208.52 Gy). The mean D90 after HA injection was 141.44 Gy (range, 70.66-213.02 Gy). There were no significant differences in V100 and D90 of tumor before and after HA injection (p = 0.50, p = 0.39, respectively). The mean OAR-Max (skin) and OAR-Mean (skin) prior to HA injection were 100.66 Gy and 49.20 Gy, respectively, while the mean skin OAR-Max and OAR-Mean post-HA injection were 61.20 Gy and 17.27 Gy, respectively. The post-HA injection values were both significantly lower than the pre-HA injection values (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively). Table 4 presents dosimetric parameters of the target tumor and skin before and after HA injection. Figure 2 shows the DVH curve for Patient 1.

Follow-up

By the end of April 2018, the follow-up time was 1-6 months, and the average time was 3.36 months. Side effects related to the injection or the compound itself were not observed. Upon follow-up imaging, the substance could hold its shape and position stably and lasted for 6 months (Figure 3).

Discussion

Brachytherapy is an important treatment modality for many malignant tumors. The advantages of brachytherapy include the enhancement of irradiation at the tumor target and the reduction of irradiation of normal peritumor tissues. Previous studies [18,19] demonstrated improved results with increasing radiation doses in malignant tumors treated with brachytherapy; however, dose increase at the tumor target could also lead to a higher probability of side effects at adjacent normal tissues and organs.
Recent work has aimed to decrease OARs irradiation doses in patients treated with radiation therapy. These studies [20,21,22,23] showed that HA injection formed a new space between the tumor target and OARs, which could reduce radiation doses to OARs (such as the rectum) during brachytherapy. In this study, we showed that with HA injection, the new space between tumor and skin (a mean size of 1.0 cm) could be created in patients treated with LDR brachytherapy.
We further assessed the effect of the new space resulting from HA injection on the dose coverage of the tumor and skin. Our results showed that the D90 and V100 of the tumor target were not significantly different; however, OAR-Max and OAR-Mean of skin decreased significantly when compared with the pre-HA injection parameters. A previous study [24] obtained data from thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements and demonstrated a statistically significant decrease after HA injection in the mean Dmax and mean Dmean to the rectum in HDR brachytherapy. Our results were in line with these results and showed that the dose coverage to the OAR (skin) was significantly decreased due to the new space resulting from HA injection, while the dose on the tumor target has not significantly changed.
The side effects of hyaluronic acid injection were evaluated during follow-up; side effects related to either the injection or the compound itself were not observed. This procedure does not cause more pain, but it does increase the needle passages and operating time, which increases the risk of punctures and medical costs.
There are several limitations to this study, including relatively small number of patients and short time of follow-up. In addition, the volume of HA used to create the space was not defined.
Further study is needed to fully assess the benefit gained by decreased skin toxicity. This technique also offers a possible method of protection for adjacent normal organs or tissues, while delivering high treatment doses with LDR brachytherapy to obtain better tumor control.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that a new space between tumor and skin could be obtained with hyaluronic acid injection in patients with a subdermal tumor, and this new space could significantly decrease the skin dose in LDR brachytherapy. This method offers the possibility of preventing the delivery of high-dose radiation to adjacent normal tissues during cancer treatment.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Bloomage Freda Biopharm Co., Ltd. for providing the hyaluronic acid.

Disclosure

Authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1. Hinnen KA, Battermann JJ, van Roermund JG et al. Long-term biochemical and survival outcome of 921 patients treated with I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76: 1433-1438.
2. Taira AV, Merrick GS, Butler WM et al. Long-term outcome for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79: 1336-1342.
3. Yan H, Mo Z, Xiang Z et al. CT-guided (125)I brachytherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer 2017; 8: 2104-2113.
4. Li W, Guan J, Yang L et al. Iodine-125 brachytherapy improved overall survival of patients with inoperable stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer versus the conventional radiotherapy. Med Oncol 2015; 32: 395.
5. Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C et al. Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4833-4839.
6. Prada PJ, Jimenez I, Gonzalez-Suarez H et al. High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy in one fraction and transperineal hyaluronic acid injection into the perirectal fat for the treatment of favorable stage prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results. Brachytherapy 2012; 11: 105-110.
7. Prada PJ, Gonzalez H, Menéndez C et al. Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in the anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer patients. Brachytherapy 2009; 8: 210-217.
8. Laliscia C, Delishaj D, Fabrini MG et al. Acute and late vaginal toxicity after adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy in patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer: is local therapy with hyaluronic acid of clinical benefit? J Contemp Brachytherapy 2016; 8: 512-517.
9. Kishi K, Sonomura T, Shirai S et al. Critical organ preservation in reirradiation brachytherapy by injectable spacer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75: 587-594.
10. Amirian J, Van TTT, Bae SH et al. Examination of in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of alginate-hyaluronic acid microbeads as a promising method in cell delivery for kidney regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 2017; 105: 143-153.
11. Iturriaga V, Bornhardt T, Manterola C et al. Effect of hyaluronic acid on the regulation of inflammatory mediators in osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46: 590-595.
12. Li R, Zhang Y, Yuan Y et al. Dosimetric comparison of CT-guided iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of NSCLC. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0187390.
13. Li R, Ying Z, Yuan Y et al. Comparison of two iodine-125 brachytherapy implant techniques for the treatment of lung tumor: Preplanning and intraoperative planning. Brachytherapy 2018; 18: 87-94.
14. Huo X, Huo B, Wang H et al. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided permanent (125)I implantation as therapy for pulmonary metastasis. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10: 132-141.
15. Gifford KA, Pacha O, Hebert AA et al. A new paradigm for calculating skin dose. Brachytherapy 2013; 12: 114-119.
16. Bittner NH, Orio PF, 3rd, Merrick GS et al. The American College of Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2017; 16: 59-67.
17. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 1341-1346.
18. Bijlard E, Verduijn GM, Harmeling JX et al. Optimal high-dose-rate brachytherapy fractionation scheme after keloid excision: a retrospective multicenter comparison of recurrence rates and complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100: 679-686.
19. Baliga S, Garg MK, Fox J et al. Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases: a systematic review with tumour control probability modelling. Br J Radiol 2017; 90: 20160666.
20. Boissier R, Udrescu C, Rebillard X et al. Technique of injection of hyaluronic acid as a prostatic spacer and fiducials before hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urology 2017; 99: 265-269.
21. Pinkawa M. Current role of spacers for prostate cancer radiotherapy. World J Clin Oncol 2015; 6: 189-193.
22. Pinkawa M, Klotz J, Djukic V et al. Learning curve in the application of a hydrogel spacer to protect the rectal wall during radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Urology 2013; 82: 963-968.
23. Rao AD, Feng Z, Shin EJ et al. A novel absorbable radiopaque hydrogel spacer to separate the head of the pancreas and duodenum in radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99: 1111-1120.
24. Prada PJ, Fernandez J, Martinez AA et al. Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with intensity modulated brachytherapy or EBRT for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69: 95-102.
Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe