eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

3/2003
vol. 28
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 

The in vivo effect of Echinacea purpurea succus on various functions of human blood leukocytes

Beata Białas-Chromiec
,
Beata Kapałka
,
Dorota Radomska-Leśniewska
,
Ewa Skopińska-Różewska
,
Ewa Sommer
,
Irena Sokolnicka
,
Małgorzata Filewska
,
Urszula Demkow

Centr Eur J Immunol 2003; 28 (3): 126–130
Online publish date: 2004/05/04
Article file
- The in vivo.pdf  [0.07 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 
Introduction


Echinacea purpurea and Echinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae family) belong to the most important herbal remedies with immunostimulatory properties. Commonly called the purple coneflower, Echinacea is also a favorite garden plant.
These medicinal plants originate from the North American continent, where they have been used by the Indians for centuries in folk medicine for curing burns, snake bites, severe colds, and all kinds of pains and infections. Later, Echinacea was adopted by white settlers. Between 1887-1895 Echinacea was introduced to Americans by pharmacists John King and John Uri Lloyd and at beginning of the 20-th century, it had become the best-selling tincture in the United States [1, 2]. By 1895 Echinacea products had become available in Germany. In the late 1930s, Gerhard Madaus started commercial cultivation of Echinacea purpurea in Germany. The majority of pharmacological and clinical studies performed since 1939 have involved fresh juice of the flowering Echinacea purpurea [3].
The name Echinacea is derived from the Greek word „echinos” (hedgehog) and refers to the prickly, conical receptacle of the plants. Many compounds of Echinacea extracts (polysaccharides, alkamides, polyphenols, glycoproteins) posses immunomodulatory, anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory activity [4, 5]. Echinacea is one of the most powerful and effective remedies against many kinds of bacterial and viral infections. A lot of papers describe, on experimental models, stimulation by Echinacea extracts of various parameters of cellular and humoral immunity [6-13].
Different species of Echinacea, the part of the plant processed and the processing procedure are variables influencing its effectiveness and mode of action. However, many experts consider the fresh-pressed juice of Echinacea purpurea to be the best preparation, having the greatest level of clinical support.
Despite this statement and widespread use, the clinical value of Echinacea products is still questioned. Placebo-controlled randomized studies of the effect of high doses given for long time gave negative results [14-17]. On the other hand, clinical studies of short-term therapeutic administration in respiratory tract infections, or of topical application in skin diseases, were promising [18-25]. In our previous studies performed in mice we have found that Echinacea purpurea preparations may vary in their immunomodulatory effect, and some of them suppressed lymphocyte reactivity to mitogen PHA in doses recommended by producers, being stimulatory in lower doses [26, 27]. It was in agreement with the results of Coeugniet et al [23] performed in humans. So, we believe that it is very important to determine proper dose of each new Echinacea product before introducing it to human therapy.
The aim of our present study was to evaluate the effect of succus Echinacea purpurea originated from Slovenia (IMMUNAL drops), given for 7 days to healthy human volunteers in dose recommended by producer, on various parameters of cellular immunity mediated by blood leukocytes.


Material and methods


Study was performed in 17 healthy male volunteers, 22-35 years old. Blood from cubital vein was obtained twice, before and after 7-days treatment.

The following materials were studied:
1. IMMUNAL drops, (LEK), 6 ml daily (Lot. 000172501C, caffeic acid deriv. 5.47 mg%, 9 persons).
2. Placebo, 1 tablet daily (sample 58/01, 8 persons).

The following immunological parameters were studied:
– Proliferative activity of blood mononuclear cells (MNC) stimulated by mitogen PHA [28, 29]. Briefly: MNC were isolated from heparinized blood on Lymphoprep gradient, washed thrice with PBS, resuspended in culture medium (RPMI 1640 (Difco) enriched with L-glutamine, FCS and antibiotics) at a concentration of 2x106/ml and cultured in microplates with PHA at concentration 0, 1, 2 or 5 mcg/ml. Following 48 h incubation at 37oC in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere, 0.2 uCi of tritiated thymidine was added for the next 18 hours. Afterwards, the cultures were harvested using multiple sample harvester (Scatron, Norway) and the incorporated radiolabel was counted using liquid scintillation counter (Rack-Beta, LKB, Sweden). Mean of quadriplicate count was calculated and expressed as counts per minute (cpm).
– Angiogenic activity of blood MNC (human leukocyte-induced angiogenesis, HLIA assay) according to [30, 31]. Briefly: MNC isolated as above were resuspended in Parker medium and injected intradermally into 6-7 weeks old female inbred Balb/c mice (5x105 cells in 0.05 ml per inoculum). Before performing injections the mice were anaesthetized with 3,6% chloralhydrate (0,1 ml per 10 g of body weigh). Both flanks of each mouse were finely shaved with razor blade, on each flank we localized 2-3 injections. Cell suspensions were supplemented with 0.05 ml/ml 0,01% trypan blue in order to facilitate recognition of injection sites later on. After 72 hours mice were killed (Morbital) their skin was separated from underlying tissues, injection sites were localized on the inner side of skin, and newly-formed blood vessels were counted in dissecting microscope at 6x magnification. Identification was done according to the criteria proposed by Sidky and Auerbach (tortuosity and divarications).
– Chemiluminescent (CL) activity of blood granulocytes, according to [32]. Briefly: 0.05 ml of heparinized blood was diluted 1: 4 with PBS supplemented with 0.1% of glucose and 0.1% of BSA. 0.05 ml of such diluted blood was added to 0.2 ml of luminol solution (10-5 M) in PBS and placed in the scintillation counter (Rackbeta 1218, LKB Wallac) in the „out of coincidence” mode for spontaneous CL measurement. Then, cells were activated by addition of 0.02 ml of fMLP (Sigma) in final concentration 10-7 M. Chemiluminescence of stimulated cells was then measured for 15 min. The results were calculated as maximal CL value (in cpm) for 1000 granulocytes.
– Analysis of blood mononuclear cells subpopulations was done by monoclonal antibody staining of CD4+ (T helper/inducer lymphocytes), CD8+ (T suppressor/cytotoxic lymphocytes), and CD19+ (B lymphocytes), using DAKO APAP KIT System 40, USA, in Lymphoprep- isolated blood mononuclear cell suspensions, according to producer instructions.
Statistical analysis of results was performed by Student t test.


Results


Table 1 presents the effect of IMMUNAL drops on proliferative activity of blood MNC in mitogen- stimulated cell cultures. In this test system, we observed statistically significant increase of stimulatory index, calculated by dividing values of cultures with mitogen by values of mitogen-free cultures. Placebo had no effect (Table 2).
Table 3 presents the results of experiments performed for estimating angiogenic activity of blood MNC, chemiluminescent activity of granulocytes and CD4/CD8 lymphocyte ratio. Significant (granulocytes activity) and highly significant stimulation (blood MNC) was observed in comparison to the values obtained before treatment. In placebo group, no stimulation was observed. MNC of persons treated with IMMUNAL drops presented significantly higher CD4/CD8 lymphocyte ratio after treatment, in comparison to the values of placebo as well as to the values obtained before treatment. Also T/B lymphocytes ratio was significantly higher after treatment (10.7 se: 1.2) than before treatment (6.1 se: 0.56), with no difference in placebo group.


Discussion


In our present study we focused on the effect of IMMUNAL drops on 4 important parameters of cellular immunity in human, mediated by blood granulocytes and mononuclear leukocytes (lymphocytes and monocytes). We obtained good stimulation of all parameters studied using daily dose recommended by producer (6 ml) given for 7 days.
The response of lymphocytes to the plant mitogen, PHA, represents an in vitro correlate of an in vivo immunological response and involves various subpopulations of mononuclear leukocytes. We suppose, that IMMUNAL drops may be used as a drug of choice in persons presenting lowered T-cell mediated immunity.
The human leukocyte-induced angiogenesis (HLIA) test is used in the laboratory diagnostics for evaluation of total reactivity of the subject’s cellular immune system. Activated lymphocytes and monocytes release large spectrum of cytokines and growth factors, among them factors possessing angiogenic activity. These factors are important in various neovascular processes, including wound repair, fractures healing, healing of ischaemic heart and brain disease, e.t.c.
IMMUNAL drops increased angiogenic potential of mononuclear leukocytes of treated persons, what suggests, that IMMUNAL may be used as a complementary drug in these pathological conditions.
Very important are the results obtained in granulocytes chemiluminescence test. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) provide the first line of defense against microbial pathogens. The main bactericidal mechanism of these cells is oxygen-dependent. The most important event in the killing process is the generation of the series of reactive oxygen species during the oxidative burst. This process leads to the emission of light proportional to free radical quantity – measured as chemiluminescence (CL). CL is widely accepted as a modality for the assessment of overall PMN metabolism.
The present study shows that treatment with IMMUNAL drops significantly increased this parameter of nonspecific cellular immunity.
The Comission E of the German Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices approves several Echinacea preparations for use in colds and other upper respiratory tract infections. We suppose, that Echinacea purpurea succus may have wider application. Stimulation by this drug of granulocytes activity may be important for fighting many bacterial and viral infections in various body organs, not only of respiratory tract ailments. Stimulation of angiogenic growth factors release by mononuclear leukocytes opens new promising fields of application of Echinacea in ischemic diseases, disturbed healing processes, chronic infections of bones, chronic ulcerations e.t.c. Our earlier studies revealed, that some antibiotics (for example clindamycin) combined with some herbal immunomodulators (aloe extract, peat preparation) exerted synergistic stimulatory effect in HLIA test [33]. As clindamycin is often used in patients with bones infections, it would be interesting to check whether such type of synergy and better clinical results might be obtained by adding Echinacea purpurea succus to the therapy regimen of these patients. Echinacea preparations, given for 7-10 days are safe drugs. Toxicity studies in rats gave negative results [34]. Contraindications are controversial. There are no medical reports of Echinacea administration worsening autoimmune diseases, and western medical herbalists use Echinacea in various autoimmune conditions. The contraindications in tuberculosis and AIDS are also speculative. There are even reports (although not controlled) of successful use of Echinacea in tuberculosis [35].


References


1. Awang DVC (1999): Immune stimulants and antiviral botanicals: Echinacea and Ginseng. In: Perspectives on new crops and new uses. Ed J. Janick ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, 450-456. also: www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/proceedings1999/v4-450.html
2. McLaughlin G (1992): Echinacea. Aust J Med Herbalism 4: 104-111.
3. Bauer R and Wagner H (1988): Echinacea Der Sonnehut Stand der Forschung. Zeitschriftfur Phytotherapie 9: 151-159. 1991. Echinacea Species as Potential Immunostimulatory Drugs. Pp. 253-322 in Wagner H and Farnsworth NR (eds). Economic and Medicinal Plant Research. Vol 5. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press.
4. Facino RM, Carini M, Aldini G, et al. (1995): Echinacoside and caffeoyl conjugates protect collagen from free radical – induced degradation: A potential use of Echinacea extracts in the prevention of skin photodamage. Planta Med 61: 510-514.
5. Clifford LJ, Nair MG, Rana J, Dewitt DL (2002): Bioactivity of alkamides isolated from Echinacea purpurea (L) Moench. Phytomedicine 9: 249-253.
6. Goel V, Chang CH, Slama JV, et al. (2002): Alkylamides of Echinacea purpurea stimulate alveolar macrophage function in normal rats. International Immunopharmacology 2: 381-387. www. elsevier. com/locate/intimp
7. See DM, Broumand N, Sahl L, Tilles JG (1997): In vitro effects of Echinacea and ginseng on natural killer and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity in healthy subjects and chronic fatigue syndrome or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. Immunopharmacology 35: 229-235.
8. Melchart D, Clemm C, Weber B, et al. (2002): Polysaccharides isolated from Echinacea purpurea herba cell cultures to counteract undesired effects of chemotherapy-a pilot study. Phytother Res 16: 138-142.
9. Roesler J, Steinmüller C, Kiderlen A, et al. (1991): Application of purified polysaccharides from cell cultures of the plant Echinacea purpurea to mice mediates protection against systemic infections with Listeria monocytogenes and Candida albicans. Int J Immunopharmar 13: 27-37.
10. Schimmel KCH and Werner GT (1981): Nonspecific enhancement of intrinsic resistance to infection by Echinacin®. Ther d Gegenw 120: 1065-1076.
11. Burger RA, Torres AR, Warren RP, et al. (1997): Echinacea-induced cytokine production by human macrophages. Int J Immunopharmacol Jul 19, 7: 371-379.
12. Luettig B, Steinmuller C, Gifford GE, et al. (1998): Macrophage activation by the polysaccharide arabinogalactan isolated from plant cell cultures of Echinacea purpurea. J Natl Cancer 81 (9): 669-675.
13. Skopińska-Różewska E, Wojtasik E. Immunotropowe działanie jeżówek (Echinacea purpurea, Echinacea pallida, Echinacea angustifolia). In: Wpływ substancji naturalnych na układ odpornościowy, Ed E Skopińska-Różewska: Fundacja Pomocy Zdrowiu – Medycyna Naturalna, Warszawa 2002; 32-42.
14. Barrett BP, Brown RL, Locken K, et al. (2002): Treatment of the common cold with unrefined Echinacea. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 137: 939-946.
15. Schwarz E, Metzler J, Diedrich JP, et al. (2002): Oral administration of freshly expressed juice of Echinacea purpurea herbs fail to stimulate the nonspecific immune response in healthy young men: results of double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. J Immunol 25: 413-420.
16. Melchart D, Walther E, Linke K, et al. (1998): Echinacea root extracts for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections. Arch Farm Med 7: 541-545.
17. Grimm W, Müller HH (1999): A randomized controlled trial of the effect of fluid extract of Echinacea purpurea on the incidence and severity of colds and respiratory infections.
Am J Med 106: 138-143.
18. Brinkeborn RM, Shah DV, Degenring PH (1999): Echinaforce and other Echinacea fresh plant preparations in the treatment of the common cold. A randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Phytomedicine 6: 1-6.
19. Hoheisel O, Sandberg M, Bertram S, et al. (1997): Echinagard treatment shortens the course of the common cold: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur J Clin Res 9: 261-268.
20. Scaglione F, Lund B (1995): Efficacy in the treatment of the common cold of a preparation containing an Echinacea extract. Int J Immunotherapy 11: 163-166.
21. Kim LS, Waters RF, Burkholder PM (2002): Immunological activity of larch arabinogalactan and Echinacea: a preliminary, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Altern Med Rev 7: 138-149.
22. Binns SE, Hudson J, Merali S, Arnason JT (2002): Antiviral activity of characterized extracts from Echinacea sp (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) against herpes simplex virus (HSV). Planta Med 68: 780-783.
23. Coeugniet EG, Elek E (1987): Immunomodulation with Viscum album and Echinacea purpurea extracts. Onkologie
10: 27-33.
24. Viehmann P (1978): Results of treatment with an Echinacea-based ointment. Erfahrungsheilkunde 27: 353-358.
25. Coeugniet E, Kuhnast R (1986): Recurrent Candidiasis: Adjuvant immunotherapy, with different formulations
of Echinacin. Therapiewochie 36: 3352-3358.
26. Skopińska-Różewska E. Wpływ Immunalu na odporność komórkową i humoralną. Ed. Lek Polska: 2002, 5-16.
27. Sokolnicka I, Skopińska-Różewska E, Strzelecka H, et al. (2001): Adaptacja testów biologicznych do oceny aktywności preparatów jeżówki purpurowej (Echinacea purpurea). Badania in vivo. Terapia 9/3 z. 2: 38-42.
28. Wojtulewicz-Kurkus J, Skopińska-Różewska E, Nowaczyk M, Podobińska I (1981): The effect of ampicillin on the response of human lymphocytes to PHA. Arch Immun Ther Exper
29: 361-368.
29. Chorostowska-Wynimko J, Kleniewska D, Sokolnicka I, et al. (1995): Lymphocyte mitogen-induced proliferation in patients with allergic rhinitis. Arch Immun Ther Exper 43: 217-220.
30. Sidky Y, Auerbach R (1975): Lymphocyte-induced angiogenesis, a quantitative and sensitive assay of the graft-versus-host reaction. J Exp Med 141: 1084-1093.
31. Majewski S, Skopińska-Różewska E, Jabłońska S, et al. (1985): Modulatory effect of sera from scleroderma patients on lymphocyte-induced angiogenesis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 10: 1133-1138.
32. Wójcik JK, Derentowicz P, Garliński P, Roszkowski W (1987): Effect of hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone and dexamethasone on the chemiluminescence of peripheral blood neutrophils. Pneumonol Pol 55: 154-158.
33. Radomska-Leśniewska D, Demkow U, Sokolnicka I, Chorostowska-Wynimko J (2001): Combined effects of antibiotics and immunomodulators on lymphocyte-induced angiogenesis. Terapia 9/ 3 z. 2: 10-13.
34. Mengs U, Clare CB, Poiley JA (1991): Toxicity of Echinacea purpurea. Acute, subacute and genotoxicity studies. Arzneimittelforschung 41 (10): 1076-1081.
35. Bergner P (1997): The healing Power of Echinacea and Goldenseal. Rocklin, CA. Prima Publishing, USA.


Correspondence: prof. Ewa Skopińska-Różewska, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics and Immunology, National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Płocka 26, 01-138 Warsaw, Poland.







Copyright: © 2004 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
FEATURED PRODUCTS
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe