Menopause Review
eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

The outcomes of laparoscopic surgeries for urinary bladder and vesicouterine pouch endometriosis in the Polish population

Krzysztof Szyłło
1
,
Tomasz Szaflik
1
,
Filip Gągorowski
2, 3
,
Kacper Pawlak
2, 3
,
Martyna Masternak
1
,
Filip Franciszek Karuga
1, 4

  1. Department of Gynaecology, Oncological Gynaecology and Treatment of Endometriosis, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
  3. Student Scientific Association of Oncological Gynecology and Endometriosis Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital – Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
  4. Department of Sleep Medicine and Metabolic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Menopause Rev 2025; 24(4)
Online publish date: 2025/12/19
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
Urinary bladder endometriosis (BE) is a rare but significant condition, which may co-occur with vesicouterine pouch endometriosis (EVUP). Our study examined the outcomes of laparoscopic surgeries for BE and EVUP.

Material and methods
Twenty-nine patients who underwent the laparoscopic treatment in our centre in 2017–2023 were included. The patients were divided into EVUP and BE groups. The data was taken by analysing detailed patients’ history/histories, which was/were taken at admission, follow-up was made 6 months after the surgery and in January 2024. Moreover, the patients filled in questionnaires regarding their pre- and postoperative symptoms using NRS scale.

Results
Patients with BE (n = 10) presented with symptoms of the following median intensity before vs. after surgery: dysmenorrhoea (5.5 IQR 0–10 vs. 0 IQR 0–2; p = 0.028), intermenstrual/intramenstrual pain (1 IQR 0–10 vs. 0 IQR 0–2; p = 0.043), dysuria (9 IQR 2–10 vs. 0 IQR 0–2; p = 0.005), dyschezia (0 IQR 0–9 vs. 0 IQR 0–0), and dyspareunia (0 IQR 0–8 vs. 0 IQR 0–2). Patients with EVUP (n = 8) presented with the following symptoms: dysmenorrhoea (8 IQR 4–10 vs. 0.5 IQR 0–6; p = 0.012), intermenstrual/intramenstrual pain (5 IQR 3–8 vs. 0 IQR 0–3; p = 0.012), dysuria (0 IQR 0–6 vs. 0 IQR 0–0), dyschezia (1.5 IQR 0–10 vs. 0 IQR 0–8), and dyspareunia (0.5 IQR 0–10 vs. 0 IQR 0–5).

Conclusions
Despite similar lesion locations, BE and EVUP symptoms differed significantly. Nevertheless, laparoscopic surgery was an effective treatment for both conditions.

keywords:

laparoscopy, endometriosis, gynaecology, pain assessment, urinary bladder

Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.