eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Interview with Professor Janusz Skowronek
ABS 2015
3/2017
vol. 9
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

The usefulness of fleet rectal enemas on high-dose-rate intracavitary cervical cancer brachytherapy. A prospective trial

Ignacio Andres, Manuel Gutierrez-Perez, Maria Pilar Rodriguez-Vela, Roberto Berenguer, Marimar Sevillano, Manuel Aguayo, Meritxell Arenas, Angeles Rovirosa, Yashmina Murria-Perez, Sebastia Sabater

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9, 3: 224–229
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of rectal enemas on rectal doses during radical high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary cervical brachytherapy (BT).

Material and methods: Twenty patients suffering from cervical cancer and treated with external beam radiotherapy and HDR-BT were included in a prospective trial. The first brachytherapy fraction was considered the basal status, and patients were instructed to self-administer two rectal cleansing enemas before the second fraction. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) values were generated for the rectum and correlated with rectal volume variation. Brachytherapy was carried out with a Fletcher or Utrecht applicator.

Results: No significant rectal volume differences were observed between fractions with or without rectal enemas (without, 52.64 ± 15.92 cc; with, 53.16 ± 19.28 cc). There was a significant correlation between both rectal volumes

(r = 0.722, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in analyzed DVH parameters (median values: ΔD0.1cc, 4.17 vs. 3.61 Gy; ΔD1cc, 3.23 vs. 2.87 Gy; ΔD2cc, 2.9 vs. 2.54 Gy; ΔD5cc, 2.35 vs. 2.05 Gy, for no enema and enema fraction, respectively). No significant rectal volume differences nor DVH parameter differences were observed according the applicator type.

Conclusions: Our rectal enemas protocol prior to HDR-BT was ineffective in significantly modifying rectal DVH parameters. No differences were observed according to the type of applicator used.
keywords:

cervical brachytherapy, cervical cancer, dose-volume histogram, rectal enema

 
Quick links
© 2018 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe