eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2023
vol. 27
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Treatment outcomes of EGFR-TKI with or without locoregional brain therapy in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Do Mai Linh
1, 2
,
Tran Huy Thinh
3
,
Nguyen-Van Hieu
1
,
Nguyen Minh Duc
4

  1. Department of Oncology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  2. Department of Medical Oncology 1, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
  3. Department of Biochemistry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  4. Department of Radiology, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2023; 27 (2): 71–79
Online publish date: 2023/07/11
Article file
- Treatment outcomes.pdf  [0.34 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Among the most common cancers, lung cancer is a malignant disease with high morbidity and mortality. According to GLOBOCAN, there were 2.2 million new cases and 1.76 million deaths worldwide in 2020 [1]. Treatment of lung cancer is based on histopathology, molecular biological characteristics, disease stage, performance status (PS), and individual financial condition. Most lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). For this type of histopathology, when the disease is in the late stage, systemic treatments are preferred, to prolong the survival time and improve the quality of life of the patient [2]. In accordance with developments in molecular biology, many gene mutations have been identified that are associated with the pathogenesis of lung cancer, of which the most common are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), including erlotinib, are an effective first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, with many advantages over chemotherapy [35].

According to epidemiological statistics in Vietnam, about 80% of newly diagnosed lung cancer cases are at stages III and IV, with distant metastases [6]. Brain metastasis is common in advanced NSCLC, occurring at the rate of approximately 25–40% during disease progression. NSCLC patients with brain metastases typically have poor prognosis, with a short median survival of 1–5 months if left untreated; they may receive symptomatic treatment with glucocorticoid therapy alone or whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). An important factor leading to the poor prognosis of lung cancer patients with brain metastases is the drug’s inability to cross the blood-brain barrier to reach the tumour [79].

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in the treatment of NSCLC. The identification of gene mutations that promote the proliferation of NSCLC cells, such as EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, RET, and MET, has led to the development of novel targeted therapies. It is especially important to mention that EGFR-TKIs have demonstrated superior effectiveness in EGFR-mutant patients, including higher response rates, longer survival time, and fewer adverse reactions, compared with traditional chemotherapy [35, 1012]. These drugs have a small molecular weight, which leads to improved effectiveness when treating metastatic brain lesions, due to their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. In addition, evidence has shown that EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients are more likely to develop brain metastases, at a rate of 44–63% [13, 14]. Therefore, the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases is a topic that should be explored and discussed.

We conducted this study to address the shortage of studies on the effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs with or without locoregional treatment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

Material and methods

This study was conducted in patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases. The patients received 150 mg of erlotinib daily as first-line treatment at the Vietnam National Cancer Hospital from April 2019 to October 2022.

The research was conducted solely for the purpose of improving the effectiveness of treatment. The treatment regimen has been proven effective in many clinical trials around the world, and it has been approved by the FDA and is recommended in international and Vietnamese guidelines. All procedures involving participants were performed in accordance with the institutional and/or national research committee’s ethical standards, and personal information was kept confidential. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Hanoi Medical University Institutional Review Board (IRB-VN01001 approval no. NCS30/HMU-IRB). Informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee of Hanoi Medical University due to the study’s retrospective nature and the fact that the analysis used anonymous clinical data.

Treatment modalities included γ knife surgery (GKS), WBRT, and brain surgery. The treatments were approved by a multi-disciplinary team of oncologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and radiologists. The evaluation criteria for treatment decisions included the number of lesions, the location and size of the metastatic brain lesions, age, PS, and other individual factors in most patients. Other combination therapies included treatment for bone metastases (e.g. radiotherapy to relieve pain and prevent compression, bone resorption inhibitors), radiotherapy to prevent mediastinal compression, and symptomatic treatment (i.e. analgesia, anti-cerebral oedema treatment, and anticonvulsants). The patients underwent clinical assessment during treatment. If symptoms improved or stabilized and undesirable effects were absent or acceptable, the patient continued treatment and follow-up. Every 2–3 months or following abnormal clinical events, computed tomography of the chest and abdomen were performed. Brain lesions were monitored through brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the duration of the MRI depended on the specific patient, as indicated by the doctors (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Representative computed tomography and magnetic resonance images of a non-small cell lung cancer patient: tumour was detected in the upper right lung (red arrow) (A, B), brain metastases (white arrow) (C, D, E)

/f/fulltexts/WO/51059/WO-27-51059-g001_min.jpg

Patient characteristics, including clinical and laboratory characteristics, age, gender, PS, histopathology, type of EGFR mutation, central nervous system (CNS) symptoms, number and size of metastatic brain lesions, combination locoregional brain therapy, survival time, and adverse reactions during treatment, were collected.

Statistical analysis

Data were collected through medical records, and the collected data were processed to produce medical statistics using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Quantitative variables are presented as mean and standard deviation. To compare the difference between 2 mean values, Student’s t-test was used if the distribution was normal, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used if the distribution was not normal. Qualitative variables are presented as percentages. To compare the differences between the 2 rates, the χ2 test was used if less than 20% of expected frequencies were ≤ 5 and there were no cells with expected frequency < 1; Fisher’s exact test was used if more than 20% of the expected frequencies were 5 or there were cells with frequency < 1. Survival time was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare the difference in survival likelihood with relevant factors. To evaluate the independent factors affecting the dependent variables, multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. The difference was statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hanoi Medical University (accession no. NCS30/HMU-IRB).

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee of Hanoi Medical University due to the study’s retrospective nature and because the analysis used anonymous clinical data.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy concerns but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

RESULTS

Patient population

In our study, 72 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases received erlotinib 150 mg daily as first-line treatment. Table 1 summarizes the patients’ characteristics (clinical and laboratory). Of the 72 patients, 34 were female (47.2%), the mean age was 56.8 years, 60 patients (83.3%) had PS 0–1, 44 patients (61.1%) had never smoked, and 100% of the histopathology results were adenocarcinoma. Forty-one patients (56.9%) had 1-–3 brain lesions, and 31 patients (43.1%) had 4 or more brain lesions. Thirty patients (41.7%) had CNS symptoms. Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletion was present in more than 80.6% (n = 58) of patients. When the disease progressed, 34 patients (70.8%) developed the acquired mutation T790M and received the third-generation EGFR-TKI (osimertinib) as second-line treatment (Table 1).

Table 1

Patient characteristics

CharacteristicTOTAL
(n = 72)
EGFR-TKI plus local treatment for brain metastases (%) (n = 50)EGFR-TKI alone (%)
(n = 22)
p-value
Gender
Female34 (47.2)24 (48)10 (45.5)0.523
Male38 (52.8)26 (52)12 (54.5)
Age (years)
< 6558 (80.6)40 (80)18 (81.8)0.567
≥ 6514 (19.4)10 (20)4 (18.2)
X ±SD56.8 ±9.756.34 ±9.557.8 ±10.10.566
Smoking
No44 (61.1)34 (68)10 (45.5)0.062
Yes28 (38.9)16 (32)12 (54.5)
PS (ECOG)
0 or 160 (83.3)38 (76)22 (100)0.008
≥ 228 (16.7)12 (24)0 (0)
EGFR mutation
Del 1958 (80.6)40 (80)18 (81.8)0.349
L858R10 (13.9)8 (16)2 (9.1)
Others4 (5.6)2 (4)2 (9.1)
Number of brain metastases
1–341 (56.9)19 (38)22 (100)0.000
≥ 431 (43.1)31 (62)0 (0)
Local treatment modality for brain metastases
GKS32 (44.4)32 (64)0 (0)0.000
WBRT16 (22.2)16 (32)0 (0)
Others2 (2.8)2 (4)0 (0)
None22 (30.6)0 (0)22 (100)
CNS symptoms
No42 (58.3)22 (44)20 (90.9)0.000
Yes30 (41.7)28 (56)2 (9.1)
T790M
Positive14 (29.2)12 (35.3)2 (14.3)0.133
Negative34 (70.8)22 (64.7)12 (85.7)

[i] CNS – central nervous system, ECOG – Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale, EGFR-TKI – epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, GKS – γ knife surgery, PS – performance status, WBRT – whole-brain radiation therapy

Twenty-two patients (30.5%) received EGFR-TKI monotherapy, and the other patients received EGFR-TKI plus locoregional brain treatment, including 32 patients who received GKS, 16 patients who received WBRT, and 2 patients who received both GKS and WBRT after brain surgery. In the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group, 14/22 patients had disease progression after being treated with erlotinib. 2/14 patients had T790M positive, then they were given osimertinib and closely monitored for brain lesions. The remaining 12 patients received chemotherapy, and 3 of them had gamma knife surgery. Patients who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy had significantly better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale (ECOG) PS (p = 0.008), fewer CNS symptoms (90.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.0001), and fewer brain metastases (p = 0.0001) than those who received locoregional treatments (Table 1). Patients who received WBRT had more brain metastases than those who received GKS (Table 2).

Table 2

Characteristics of patients based on locoregional treatment modalities

CharacteristicGKSWBRTp-value
Gender
Female14 (43.8)10 (62.5)0.179
Male18 (56.2)6 (37.5)
Age (years)
< 6524 (75)14 (87.5)0.271
≥ 658 (25)2 (12.5)
Smoking
No22 (68.8)10 (62.5)0.452
Yes10 (31.2)6 (37.5)
PS (ECOG)
0 or 128 (87.5)10 (62.5)0.054
≥24 (12.5)6 (37.5)
EGFR mutation
Del 1926 (81.2)12 (75)0.317
L858R4 (12.5)4 (25)
Others2 (6.2)0 (0)
Number of brain metastases
12 (6.2)0 (0)0.007
2–316 (50)1 (6.2)
4–1014 (43.8)(81.2)
> 100 (0)2 (12.5)
CNS symptoms
No22 (68.8)0 (0)0.000
Yes10 (31.2)16 (100)
T790M
Positive8 (36.4)2 (20)0.310
Negative14 (63.6)8 (80)

[i] CNS – central nervous system, ECOG – Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale, EGFR – epidermal growth factor receptor, GKS – γ knife surgery, PS – performance status, WBRT – whole-brain radiation therapy

Treatment results

The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the cohort were 11 months and 25 months, respectively (Fig. 2). The median time to CNS progression was 13.9 months in 48 patients, with progression determined by brain MRI. Of these 48 patients, 32 received GKS and 16 received WBRT. The median OS was significantly longer for patients who harboured the exon 19 deletion mutation than for those who had other mutations (26 months vs. 15 months, p = 0.023). There was no significant difference in the median OS or PFS between patients who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy and those who received EGFR-TKI plus locoregional treatments (26 vs. 24 months, p = 0.33; and 12 vs. 10 months, p = 0.696, respectively). Median PFS was significantly longer for patients who had ECOG PS 0 to1 compared with those who had ECOG PS of 2 (15 vs. 7 months, p = 0.039) (Table 3). Patients with T790M mutation after EGFR-TKI resistance had significantly longer median OS than those without the mutation (41 vs. 23 months, respectively, p = 0.0001) (Fig. 3). Other clinical and laboratory characteristics did not influence PFS or OS. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients who received GKS and those who received WBRT. Patients with longer time to CNS progression had significantly longer median OS, R2 = 0.89 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2

Progression-free survival of all patients (A), overall survival of all patients (B)

/f/fulltexts/WO/51059/WO-27-51059-g002_min.jpg
Table 3

Progression-free survival and overall survival of all patients

Prognostic factorsPFS (months)p-valueOS (months)p-value
Gender
Female140.798250.557
Male821
Age (years)
> 65100.639250.231
≥ 651718
Smoking
No120.402260.766
Yes813
PS (ECOG)
0 or 1150.039260.060
2714
EGFR mutation
Del 19140.160260.023
Other915
Number of brain metastases
1160.602280.791
≥ 21024
1–3120.752240.826
≥ 4925
1–10120.372240.971
> 10625
Treatment modality for brain metastases
Locoregional treatment120.696260.33
EGFR-TKI monotherapy1024
CNS symptoms
No110.448260.571
Yes1124
T790M
Positive100.055410.000
Negative1623

[i] CNS – central nervous system, ECOG – Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale, EGFR-TKI – epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, OS – overall survival, PFS – progression-free survival, PS – performance status

Fig. 3

Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of each group: PFS and OS of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with locoregional treatment for brain metastases vs. EGFR-TKI monotherapy (A, B), PFS and OS of patients with T790M (–) vs. T790M (+) (C, D)

/f/fulltexts/WO/51059/WO-27-51059-g003_min.jpg
Fig. 4

Relationship between time to central nervous system progression and overall survival

/f/fulltexts/WO/51059/WO-27-51059-g004_min.jpg

Discussion

This study evaluated the treatment results of EGFR- mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases for whom EGFR-TKI alone or in combination with locoregional treatment was indicated as the first-line therapy at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam. The median PFS, OS, and time to CNS progression in our study were in line with other studies. In addition, we found that the exon 19 deletion is a good prognostic factor for patients, resulting in longer survival time compared with other mutations [1518].

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor combined with locoregional treatment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases is controversial. Although many retrospective studies reported contradictory results [1928], some meta-analyses suggest that combination therapy can improve OS [29, 30]. First, many studies have reported high radio sensitivity of EGFR-mutant NSCLC [27, 30]. Second, radiation can affect the blood-brain barrier, which leads to an increase in TKI permeability, contributing to the effectiveness of the treatment [19, 2830].

In clinical practice, studies have shown that the EGFR-TKI plus GKS combination prolongs OS compared with the EGFR-TKI plus WBRT combination [29, 30]. Although patients who receive WBRT have larger and more numerous brain metastases and poorer PS, there is no difference regarding PFS or OS between them and patients who do not receive WBRT. These results suggest that WBRT may be an option for patients who are no longer indicated for stereotactic radiosurgery.

In contrast with previous studies that demonstrated the benefit of the combination of EGFR-TKI with brain locoregional brain treatment, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the 2 groups in our study. The results could be explained by the higher percentage of asymptomatic patients with brain metastasis BM in the EGFR-TKI alone group and the lack of a substantial difference in outcomes between the EGFR-TKI alone group and the local treatment group in patients who did not exhibit CNS symptoms. Other retrospective studies have investigated the advantages of combining locoregional brain therapy with EGFR-TKI; however, comparing these studies to the current one is challenging because some of them focused on patient cohorts treated with WBRT alone or included patients who had been on second- or third-generation EGFR-TKI, which influenced the treatment results [22, 24, 26, 27].

In our study, patients who progressed after receiving first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment because of the appearance of a T790M acquired resistance mutation had significantly better survival outcomes than patients with other mutations. The reason for this is that all these cases continued to be treated with osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI. This is consistent with studies around the world that reported superior effectiveness of third-generation EGFR-TKI compared with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs regarding clinical response rate, PFS, and OS; furthermore, the third-generation EGFR-TKI is especially effective in patients with brain metastases [12]. In the FLAURA trial, which compared osimertinib to gefitinib or erlotinib, in the subgroup of patients with CNS lesions at baseline the median CNS PFS (counting only CNS progression or death as events) was not reached for osimertinib and was 13.9 months for earlier generation EGFR – tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The objective response rate was 66% with osimertinib vs. 43% with gefitinib or erlotinib (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2–5.2; p = 0.011). Therefore, first-line treatment with osimertinib is the best option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients according to the guidelines. Nowadays, in countries where third-generation TKI is available, the use of first-generation TKI in brain metastases should be discouraged due to concerns about its ability to penetrate brain parenchyma. However, in Vietnam, osimertinib is not reimbursed by the Health Insurance Fund; it remains unaffordable for most patients because of the high price, while first-generation EGFR-TKI has been reimbursed 50% by the Health Insurance Fund for over 10 years. Therefore, in actual clinical practice in our country, first-line treatment with a first-generation EGFR-TKI is a more affordable option and is more feasible for patients pursuing long-term treatment.

Our study is one of the first to evaluate the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI treatment with and without locoregional brain treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases in a large central facility with a sufficiently long follow-up. Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI; however, there was heterogeneity in their study populations, including in the use of first-, second-, and third-line treatments or multiple EGFR-TKIs. Therefore, the results of this study accurately reflect the treatment results in practice in Vietnam. Doctors can reference the findings of this study when choosing treatment options in clinical practice.

Our study has several limitations. First, it was a retrospective study that was conducted in only one facility, and the sample size was not sufficiently large. Second, due to the retrospective nature of the study, we were unable to investigate all the events during treatment, namely CNS symptoms, such as neurocognitive dysfunction, and their impact on quality of life. Finally, because brain scans are performed according to the doctor’s discretion, in many cases, the time to CNS progression could not be accurately assessed.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that EGFR-TKI with or without locoregional therapy is effective for treating advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases, significantly improving the prognosis in patients with exon 19 deletion.

Notes

[4] Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249.

2 

Riessk J. Shifting paradigms in non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving therapeutic landscape. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19 Suppl: 390-397.

3 

Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 947-957.

4 

Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 239-246.

5 

Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 141-151.

6 

Van Thuan T, Anh PT, Van Tu D. Cancer control in Vietnam: where are we now. Cancer control 2016; 99.

7 

Langer CJ, Mehta MP. Current management of brain metastases, with a focus on systemic options. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 6207-6219.

8 

Rybarczyk-Kasiuchnicz A, Ramlau R, Stencel K. Treatment of brain metastases of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 593.

9 

Khuntia D, Brown P, Li J, Mehta MP. Whole-brain radiotherapy in the management of brain metastasis. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1295-1304.

10 

Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3798-3807.

11 

Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: iv192-iv237.

12 

Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, et al. Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 41-50.

13 

Hendriks LE, Smit EF, Vosse BA, et al. EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients: more prone to development of bone and brain metastases? Lung Cancer 2014; 84: 86-91.

14 

Bhatt VR, Kedia S, Kessinger A, Ganti AK. Brain metastasis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3162-3164.

15 

Magnuson WJ, Lester-Coll NH, Wu AJ, et al. Management of brain metastases in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective multi-institutional analysis. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 1070-1077.

16 

Choi YW, Jeon SY, Jeong GS, et al. EGFR exon 19 deletion is associated with favorable overall survival after first-line gefitinib therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Am J Clin Oncol 2018; 41: 385-390.

17 

Jiang H, Zhu M, Li Y, Li Q. Association between EGFR exon 19 or exon 21 mutations and survival rates after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2019; 11: 301-308.

18 

Iuchi T, Shingyoji M, Sakaida T, et al. Phase II trial of gefitinib alone without radiation therapy for Japanese patients with brain metastases from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2013; 82: 282-287.

19 

Saruwatari K, Ikeda T, Saeki S, et al. Upfront cranial radiotherapy followed by erlotinib positively affects clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases. Anticancer Res 2019; 39: 923-931.

20 

Chen H, Wu A, Tao H, et al. Concurrent versus sequential whole brain radiotherapy and TKI in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with brain metastasis: a single institution retrospective analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e13014.

21 

Sung S, Lee SW, Kwak YK, Kang JH, Hong SH, Kim YS. Intracranial control and survival outcome of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alone versus TKI plus radiotherapy for brain metastasis of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. J Neurooncol 2018; 139: 205-213.

22 

Liu S, Qiu B, Chen L, et al. Radiotherapy for asymptomatic brain metastasis in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non-small cell lung cancer without prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment: a retrospective clinical study. Radiation Oncology 2015; 10: 118.

23 

An N, Wang H, Li J, et al. Therapeutic effect of first-line EGFR-TKIs combined with concurrent cranial radiotherapy on NSCLC patients with EGFR activating mutation and brain metastasis: a retrospective study. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12: 8311-8318.

24 

Chen Y, Wei J, Cai J, Liu A. Combination therapy of brain radiotherapy and EGFR-TKIs is more effective than TKIs alone for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastasis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 793.

25 

Chen Y, Yang J, Li X, et al. First-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor alone or with whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci 2016; 107: 1800-1805.

26 

Ke SB, Qiu H, Chen JM, Shi W, Chen YS. Therapeutic effect of first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) combined with whole brain radiotherapy on patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases. Curr Med Sci 2018; 38: 1062-1068.

27 

Wang W, Song Z, Zhang Y. Efficacy of brain radiotherapy plus EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients who develop brain metastasis. Arch Med Sci 2018; 14: 1298-1307.

28 

Zhu Q, Sun Y, Cui Y, et al. Clinical outcome of tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone or combined with radiotherapy for brain metastases from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oncotarget 2017; 8: 13304-13311.

29 

Du XJ, Pan SM, Lai SZ, et al. Upfront cranial radiotherapy vs. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone for the treatment of brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 1465 patients. Front Oncol 2018; 8: 603.

30 

Wang C, Lu X, Lyu Z, Bi N, Wang L. Comparison of up-front radiotherapy and TKI with TKI alone for NSCLC with brain metastases and EGFR mutation: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2018; 122: 94-99.

Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.