Ta strona używa pliki cookies, w celu polepszenia użyteczności i funkcjonalności oraz w celach statystycznych. Dowiedz się więcej w Polityce prywatności.
Korzystając ze strony wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies, zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki.
Akceptuję wykorzystanie plików cookies
Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Unveiling the gap: technical-tactical performance differences between main and qualifying draws in professional padel

Rafael Conde-Ripoll
1
,
Daniel Boullosa
2
,
Carlos D. Gómez-Carmona
3, 4, 5
,
Adrián Escudero-Tena
3

  1. Universidad Europea de Madrid. Department of Sports Sciences. Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Madrid, Spain
  2. Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Leon, Leon, Spain
  3. Research Group in Optimization of Training and Sports Performance (GOERD), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, Caceres, Spain
  4. Research Group in Training, Physical Activity and Sports Performance (ENFYRED), Department of Music, Plastic and Body Expression, University of Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain
  5. BioVetMed & SportSci Research Group, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
Biol Sport. 2025;42(4):97–106
Online publish date: 2025/04/28
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
This study aimed to investigate technical-tactical differences between main draw vs. qualifying draw matches in male and female professional padel players. Through systematic observation, data were collected from 39 matches (4,585 points) of the professional male qualifying draw (n = 9) and main draw (n = 13), and female qualifying draw (n = 8) and main draw (n = 9) during the 2023 World Padel Tour Finland Padel Open tournament. Using chi square analysis and corrected standardized residuals (CSR), the results showed significant differences between draws for final shot relative to the side of the play, serving efficiency and the type of final shot. Left side male players made more forced errors (CSR = 2.8) and fewer unforced errors (CSR = 3.2) in main draw compared to qualifying draw matches. While players were in the return game, both male and female players made a higher proportion of forced errors (CSR = 3.3; CSR = 2.7) and a lower proportion of unforced errors (CSR = 3.3; CSR = 2.3) in main draw compared to qualifying draw matches. Specific shot-type analysis revealed that male and female players made varying numbers of winners, forced errors and unforced errors with certain types of shots in the main vs. qualifying draw matches. These findings provide valuable insights for players and coaches to optimize their technical-tactical strategies based on the competition draw and match context.
keywords:

Racket sports, Performance analysis, Sex, Side of play, Efficiency, Phase, Shot type

 
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.