eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

1/2021
vol. 13
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
abstract:
Original paper

Use of deformable image registration techniques to estimate dose to organs at risk following prostate external beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Marie Vozzo
1
,
Joel Poder
2, 3
,
Johnson Yuen
2, 4, 5
,
Joseph Bucci
2
,
Annette Haworth
1

1.
School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
2.
St George Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, Australia
3.
Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
4.
South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
5.
Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13, 1: 72–79
Online publish date: 2021/02/18
View full text
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Introduction
The purpose of this investigation was to examine differences in estimates of accumulated rectal dose when using deformable image registration (DIR) compared with rigid image registration (RIR) methods, and parameter addition methods for combined transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatments of prostate cancer.

Material and methods
In this retrospective study, data from 10 patients who had previously received HDR-BT in one 15 Gy fraction, followed by 46 Gy EBRT in twenty-three fractions were used. To estimate total combined dose to the rectum, dose accumulation using both DIR and RIR methods were compared with parameter addition methods, which assume the same region of rectal anatomy receives the maximum dose from both treatment modalities. For both rigid and deformable image registration techniques, the quality of image registration was evaluated through metrics, including mean distance to agreement and dice similarity coefficient of prostate contours. Total D1cc and D2cc for the rectum was calculated and compared using each method.

Results
The parameter addition methods predicted the highest accumulated dose to the rectum. On average, the predicted D2cc dose was higher than that calculated by the DIR method by 6.59 Gy EQD2 (range, –3.03 to 13.68 Gy EQD2) for partial parameter addition (PPA), and 4.88 Gy EQD2 (range, –3.41 to 11.97 Gy EQD2) for the full parameter addition (FPA) methods. Similarly, RIR predicted higher average doses compared with DIR, with a difference of 3.46 Gy EQD2 (range, –5.50 to 7.90 Gy EQD2). The results showed a significant difference between DIR and parameter addition methods for dose estimation.

Conclusions
This retrospective study demonstrates significant differences in accumulated rectal dose prediction using different image registration methods. Each method has limitations in its application, and when used with real-time HDR-BT dose planning, awareness of these limitations is essential.

keywords:

brachytherapy, prostate cancer, deformable image registration, dose accumulation

 
Quick links
© 2021 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe