eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

3/2019
vol. 11
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Whole-gland salvage treatment for recurrent prostate cancer after initial definitive radiotherapy: A case series of 125I brachytherapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Shinya Sutani
,
Atsunori Yorozu
,
Kazuhito Toya
,
Toru Nishiyama
,
Choichiro Ozu
,
Yasuto Yagi
,
Ken Nakamura
,
Shiro Saito

J Contemp Brachytherapy 2019; 11, 3: 201–206
Online publish date: 2019/06/23
Article file
- Whole-gland salvage.pdf  [0.35 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

Purpose

Radiotherapy is a potentially curative treatment modality for patients with prostate cancer. However, depending on the individual risk factors and comorbidities, 10-40% of patients experience a biochemical recurrence within 10 years [1,2,3]. Patients with localized recurrence following definitive radiotherapy may be cured with a salvage treatment, such that the adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy may be avoided or postponed. Several previous studies have described their experiences with this treatment modality and have indicated promising results for salvage treatments [4]. Salvage brachytherapy (BT) and radical prostatectomy are included as possible treatment options for patients with local recurrence according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines [5]. However, data on long-term outcomes after salvage BT are still relatively sparse [6,7,8,9,10]. In order to provide an adequate guidance to patients who may qualify for salvage therapy, more data on treatment results are required.

In Japan, the use of the iodine-125 (125I) seed source was approved in July 2003, and the public health insurance program began to cover the cost of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in April 2012. Brachytherapy and RARP became standard options for initial treatment in 2003 and 2012, respectively, and are gradually beginning to be used in the salvage setting. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the largest case series of salvage BT and salvage RARP reported from Japan to date. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe our experience with whole-gland salvage BT and salvage prostatectomy among patients with pathology-proven, locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary definitive radiotherapy.

Material and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with local recurrence only and received whole-gland salvage treatment at our institution between February 2010 and July 2017. We identified 18 patients who met these criteria. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Primary definitive external beam X-ray radiotherapy (EBRT) consisted of a median dose of 76 Gy (range, 72-76 Gy), and carbon-ion therapy consisted of a dose of 57.6 GyE. All patients underwent transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) using the standard 125I BT template with a 5 × 5 mm grid and were diagnosed with pathology-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer. The patients underwent various forms of examination, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bone scintigraphy, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and had no evidence of regional or distant recurrence. MRIs consisted of T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging with or without contrast-enhanced imaging. 11C-choline, 11C-acetate, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have not been approved as PET-CT tracers in Japan. Treatment strategies were determined based on individual patient preference and physician judgment. Salvage BT was not recommended for patients who experienced grade ≥ 3 genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity or had residual grade ≥ 2 GU or GI toxicity after initial radiotherapy. Twelve patients received 125I BT and six patients underwent non-nerve-sparing salvage RARP. One patient in the BT group received 9 months of hormone therapy at the judgement of the treating physician. An intra-operative planning protocol was implemented using VariSeed Software (Varian Medical System Inc.). The prescribed radiation dose was 110 Gy, and the dose to 90% of the prostate (D90) was aimed at 120% of the prescribed dose. 125I seeds, model 6711 (GE Healthcare) or STM 1251 (Bard Medical Division), were used for BT. For patients who received a second BT, an alternative seed type was selected to distinguish the newly administered seeds from the original seeds. Post-implant CT-based dosimetry was performed at day 30 after implantation. The dosimetric data for patients undergoing salvage BT are presented in Table 2. We performed obturator lymph node dissection in five out of six patients and found no lymph node metastases.

Table 1

Patient characteristics

BT(n = 12)RARP(n = 6)
Initial diagnosis
 Age* (years)66 (56-78)60 (55-69)
 PSA* (ng/ml)7.7 (4.5-24)7.7 (6.5-11.5)
 T stage
  1c24
  2101
  Unknown1
 GS
  ≤ 643
  3 + 462
   821
 Primary radiotherapy
  Seed73
  Seed + EBRT3
  EBRT21
  Carbon-ion therapy2
Salvage treatment
 Pre-salvage PSA* (ng/ml)3.3 (0.0-8.0)2.7 (1.7-5.5)
 GS
  ≤ 62
  3 + 431
  4 + 343
   81
  Unable to be graded22
 Interval to relapse* (mo)62 (40-98)57 (33-127)
 PSA doubling time* (mo)11 (4.7-18)12 (3-34)
 Total biopsy core31 (21-48)36 (24-44)
 Positive core1 (1-11)4 (1-10)
 MRI (yes/no)5/76/0
 ADT (yes/no)1/110/6
 ADT duration* (mo)9 (9-9)

* Data expressed as median (range)

† data expressed as numbers

PSA – prostate specific antigen, GS – Gleason score, EBRT – external beam X-ray radiotherapy, MRI – magnetic resonance imaging, ADT – androgen deprivation therapy

Table 2

Dosimetric parameters for salvage brachytherapy

Prostate
 D90 (Gy)131 (110-149)
 V100 (%)98 (90-100)
 V150 (%)54 (29-74)
Rectum
 V100 (cc)0.18 (0-0.6)
Urethra
 D30 (Gy)142 (121-174)

[i] Data expressed as median (range)

[ii] D90 – the dose delivered to 90% of the prostate; D30 – the dose delivered to 30% of the urethra; V100, V150 – the volume of the organ (prostate or rectum) receiving 100% (V100) or 150% (V150) of the prescribed dose

Clinical follow-up evaluations included symptoms assessment and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests at 3- to 4-month intervals. Post-salvage treatment GU and GI toxicities were graded according to CTCAE version 4.0. Late toxicities were defined as any symptom that occurred more than 12 months after the completion of salvage treatment. Duration of follow-up was measured from the time of the salvage treatment to the date of the last clinical evaluation.

Descriptive statistics were analyzed for patient characteristics and disease outcomes. PSA doubling time was calculated using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center calculation tool [11]. PSA failure was determined using the Phoenix definition (nadir + 2 ng/ml) following BT and a PSA level of > 0.2 ng/ml following RARP. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for calculating biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) rates. All analyses were performed using the R 3.4.3 statistical package (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.r-project.org/).

This study was approved by our institutional review board (IRB number: R18-143).

Results

Median follow-up times were 71 months (range, 19-92) and 11 months (range, 2-33) for the BT and RARP groups, respectively.

Salvage BT group

The median time to biochemical failure was 47 months, and the BRFS rates following salvage BT were 56% (95% CI: 33-94%) and 46% (95% CI: 25-88%) at 3 and 5 years, respectively (Figure 1).

Fig. 1

Prostate-specific antigen relapse-free rates after salvage brachytherapy

/f/fulltexts/JCB/37003/JCB-11-37003-g001_min.jpg

The frequency of GU toxicity is shown in Table 3. Changes in urine frequency and urgency were observed, along with hematuria, dysuria, and urethral stricture. Four patients (33%) developed acute grade 2, and one patient (8%) developed acute grade 3 GU toxicity. Of the four patients who developed acute grade 2 GU toxicity, three patients had their symptoms resolve, while one patient developed grade 3 urethral stricture. This patient received a urethral bougie for urethral stricture and subsequently developed grade 3 urinary incontinence. The patient who initially developed acute grade 3 urethral strictures received a urethral bougie, which resolved obstructive symptoms and precluded the occurrence of urinary incontinence. No patients developed grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity.

Table 3

Frequency of genitourinary toxicities

BT (n = 12)RARP (n = 6)
G24 (33%)4 (67%)
G32 (17%)0 (0%)

[i] Data expressed as numbers (percentages)

Salvage RARP group

Three patients (50%) out of a total of six experienced PSA failure, with a median follow-up of 11 months. Pre-salvage MRI staging and pathological outcomes are presented in Table 4. On pre-salvage MRI, no patients were suspected of having lesions that were of stage T3 or higher. However, three patients (50%) had stage pT3a lesions and two patients (33%) had stage pT3b lesions. The frequencies of GU toxicity are shown in Table 3. Four patients (67%) developed acute grade 2 urinary incontinence, while no patients developed grade 3 GU toxicity. Of the four patients who developed acute grade 2 urinary incontinence, two patients experienced a resolution of symptoms. No patients developed grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity.

Table 4

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging and pathological outcomes

MRI T staging
 1c3
 2a2
 2c1
Pathological stage
 pT2a1
 pT3a3
 pT3b2
Surgical Gleason score
 4 + 35
 4 + 51
Surgical margins
 Negative2
 Positive4

[i] Data expressed as numbers

A representative case is presented in Figure 2. This patient was a 70-year-old man with low-risk prostate cancer, who received BT but still progressed to PSA failure after 127 months. The PSA doubling time was 14.5 months. No recurrent lesions were identified on the pre-salvage MRI. A pathology examination subsequent to TTMB revealed that 9 of 37 cores were positive and GS 3 + 4. Biopsy cores targeting seminal vesicles (SVs) were also positive. This relapse was then treated with RARP. The pre-salvage treatment PSA was 2.56 ng/ml. The final pathology following RARP indicating an adenocarcinoma with Gleason score 4 + 3, ly1, V0, pn1, sv1, pT3b, and N0. Post-RARP PSA never decreased to < 0.02 ng/ml, and hormone therapy was initiated at 12 months after RARP.

Fig. 2

A patient treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP). A) No recurrent lesions were apparent on pre-salvage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and Gd-enhanced imaging). B) Sites of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) are represented in blue or red. Pathology following TTMB revealed 9 of 37 cores to be positive (red areas). The biopsy cores targeting seminal vesicles (SVs) were also positive. C) Gross appearance of a RARP specimen sliced by a standard method. Tumors are encircled in red. The final pathology from RARP confirmed the presence of SV invasion

/f/fulltexts/JCB/37003/JCB-11-37003-g002_min.jpg

Discussion

In this study, BRFS rates were 56% (95% CI: 33-94%) and 46% (95% CI: 25-88%) at 3 years and 5 years, respectively, following salvage BT, with 33% of patients experiencing grade 2 GU toxicity and 17% developing grade 3 GU toxicity. Several studies have reported outcomes after salvage BT, but the available data on salvage low-dose-rate BT with a median follow-up greater than 5 years are limited [6,7,8,9,10]. In a series of 49 patients treated with salvage BT, Grado et al. reported a 5-year BRFS rate of 34%, with a median follow-up of 64 months [6]. In a series of 17 patients, Beyer et al. described a 5-year BRFS rate of 53%, with a median follow-up of 62 months [7]. In a study with 37 patients, Burri et al. reported a 5-year BRFS rate of 65% and a cumulative incidence of adverse events (grade ≥ 3) of 11%, with a median follow-up of 86 months [8]. In a series of 31 patients, Moman et al. described a 5-year BRFS rate of 20%, with a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of 19% and a grade 3 GI toxicity rate of 6%, and a median follow-up of 9 years [9]. In a study including 69 patients, with a median follow-up of 5 years, Vargas et al. reported that 89.9% of patients received androgen suppression as a part of their salvage treatment, with a 5-year BRFS rate of 73.8% for non-castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients and 22% for CRPC patients, and a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of 8.7% [10]. Our findings for PSA control are similar to those reported in the literature.

Historical data at our institution showed that the 7-year actuarial toxicity rates after 125I BT for ≥ grade 3 GU and GI toxicity were 2% and 0.3%, respectively, in the initial curative treatment setting [12]. The frequency of GU toxicity in this study was to some extent higher, which might imply that it is difficult to maintain a low-risk of GU toxicity in whole-gland BT, while it is possible to keep the risk of GI toxicity low. Peters et al. suggested that RV100 (the volume of rectum receiving 100% of the prescribed dose) less than 0.35 cc was necessary for avoiding severe GI toxicities in salvage BT [13]. The median RV100 in this study was 0.2 cc, which may be one reason for fewer adverse events.

While previous studies have used a dose of 120-145 Gy in salvage 125I BT [7,8,14,15,16,17], no optimal prescription dose for salvage BT has been established. In this study, the prescribed radiation dose was 110 Gy of 125I, and the median prostate D90 was 131 Gy (range, 110-149 Gy), which was rather low compared to the dose used in previous studies. Nguyen et al. reported a promising 4-year BRFS rate of 70% after 125I salvage BT, with a prescribed dose of 137 Gy [14]. However, the actuarial rate of grade 3/4 GU or GI toxicity was 30% at 4 years. Rose et al. reported an increase in late GU/GI toxicity, with a higher D90 [15]. Crook et al. reported that V100 was the only factor associated with late grade 3 GU/GI toxicities, suggesting that there are regions that should be protected from the full dose in the salvage setting [16]. In the context of this trade-off relationship, priority is given to focal therapy and partial prostate boost, after specifying a lesion site as a strategy for enhancing the usefulness of treatment. Aaronson et al. reported on this approach, delivering 144 Gy to the recurrent lesion sites identified by MRI, while concurrently delivering 108 Gy to the remaining prostate gland. They analyzed 24 patients and reported a 3-year BRFS rate of 89.5%. Toxicities included one grade 3 rectal hemorrhage, five instances of grade 2 gross hematuria, one grade 2 urethral stricture, one grade 2 urinary incontinence, and two instances of grade 1 hematochezia [17].

In this study, no patients were suspected of having T3 or higher stage lesions based on pre-salvage MRI. Nevertheless, multifocal lesions were apparent in specimens drawn from patients treated with salvage RARP. However, all patients in the study underwent TTMB, which identified multiple positive cores among patients in the salvage RARP group. As such, the results of TTMB may be useful for discriminating multifocal lesions from unifocal lesions and warrant further evaluation in future studies.

As an alternative side effect mitigation measure, Hepp et al. reported on a successful case, in which a polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer was found to reduce the rectal dose in the salvage setting [18]. This strategy is promising and could lead to improved safety profiles for salvage treatment in the future.

In our study, three patients out of six (50%) experienced PSA failure following salvage RARP, with a median follow-up of 11 months. With pre-salvage MRI, no patients were suspected of having T3 or higher stage lesions; however, three patients (50%) had pT3a and two patients (33%) had pT3b stage lesions. These results demonstrated that it is difficult to evaluate T stage accurately after definitive radiotherapy.

In the past studies on salvage prostatectomy, it was reported that pathological stage T3 cases were not uncommon. In a multi-institute cohort of 404 patients undergoing salvage radical prostatectomy, the rate of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and extraprostatic extension (EPE) was 30% and 45%, respectively [19]. Takeda et al. examined 77 patients with local recurrence after radiotherapy and reported that the percentage of patients with a pre-salvage clinical classification of T3 was 10%. However, 42% of the surgical specimens in this study showed SVI, and 58% showed EPE [20].

A highly precise method of detecting SVI in preoperative biopsy samples has been reported [21], which may be of particular importance given the utility of biopsy including SV. SVI has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor for BRFS [21]. Therefore, it is considered useful to provide accurate diagnoses before counseling patients about expectations following salvage treatment.

This study has some limitations. It is a retrospective study with a relatively small number of patients. In addition, in the RARP group, the follow-up period was fairly short, because salvage RARP was introduced to Japan only recently. Furthermore, the treatment selection criteria and pre-salvage image evaluation were not uniform. Hence, although the findings reported here remain useful, as we report on long-term outcomes of salvage BT, further investigation is required. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the largest case series of salvage BT and salvage RARP reported from Japan so far, and is therefore worth reporting. Further research is needed in order to identify the specific patient population that is most likely to benefit from salvage treatment by considering clinical factors in addition to the imaging findings and TTMB results.

Conclusions

Whole-gland salvage BT is an effective treatment with an acceptable toxicity profile, although the frequency of GU toxicity is slightly higher than that observed during the initial treatment. Longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of salvage RARP and BT. The final pathology data from RARP implies that there is a room for improvement in diagnoses determined by MRI in the pre-salvage setting.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a Health Labor Sciences Research grant (H29-ICT-Ippan-002) from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan. We thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English editing.

Disclosure

Authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Michalski JM, Moughan J, Purdy J, et al. , authors. Effect of standard vs dose-escalated radiation therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0126 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018. 4:p. e180039

2 

Ito K, Saito S, Yorozu A, et al. , authors. Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018. 23:p. 1148–1159

3 

Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, et al. , authors. Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017. 98:p. 275–285

4 

Tetreault-Laflamme A, Crook J , authors. Options for salvage of radiation failures for prostate cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017. 27:p. 67–78

5 

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) , author. Prostate Cancer Version 4. 2018

6 

Grado GL, Collins JM, Kriegshauser JS, et al. , authors. Salvage brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure. Urology. 1999. 53:p. 2–10

7 

Beyer DC , author. Permanent brachytherapy as salvage treatment for recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1999. 54:p. 880–883

8 

Burri RJ, Stone NN, Unger P, et al. , authors. Long-term outcome and toxicity of salvage brachytherapy for local failure after initial radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010. 77:p. 1338–1344

9 

Moman MR, van der Poel HG, Battermann JJ, et al. , authors. Treatment outcome and toxicity after salvage 125-I implantation for prostate cancer recurrences after primary 125-I implantation and external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy. 2010. 9:p. 119–125

10 

Vargas C, Swartz D, Vashi A, et al. , authors. Salvage brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Brachytherapy. 2014. 13:p. 53–58

11 

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , author. Prostate cancer nomograms: PSA doubling time and PSA velocity. urihttp://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/psa-doubling-timehttp://www.mskcc.org/nomograms/prostate/psa-doubling-time (accessed 17 Dec 2018).

12 

Yorozu A, Kuroiwa N, Takahashi A, et al. , authors. Permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy as practiced in Japan: Outcomes of 1300 patients. Brachytherapy. 2015. 14:p. 111–117

13 

Peters M, Hoekstra CJ, van der Voort van Zyp JR, et al. , authors. Rectal dose constraints for salvage iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2016. 15:p. 85–93

14 

Nguyen PL, Chen MH, D’Amico AV, et al. , authors. Magnetic resonance image-guided salvage brachytherapy after radiation in select men who initially presented with favorable-risk prostate cancer: a prospective phase 2 study. Cancer. 2007. 110:p. 1485–1492

15 

Rose JN, Crook JM, Pickles T, et al. , authors. Salvage low-dose-rate permanent seed brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer: Association between dose and late toxicity. Brachytherapy. 2015. 14:p. 342–349

16 

Crook JM, Zhang P, Pisansky TM, et al. , authors. A Prospective phase 2 trial of transperineal ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG-0526). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. 103:p. 335–343

17 

Aaronson DS, Yamasaki I, Gottschalk A, et al. , authors. Salvage permanent perineal radioactive-seed implantation for treating recurrence of localized prostate adenocarcinoma after external beam radiotherapy. BJU Int. 2009. 104:p. 600–604

18 

Hepp R, Eggert T, Schabl G, et al. , authors. Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer persistence after brachytherapy: repeated use of a polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018. 10:p. 169–173

19 

Chade DC, Shariat SF, Cronin AM, et al. , authors. Salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a multi-institutional collaboration. Eur Urol. 2011. 60:p. 205–210

20 

Takeda T, Tin AL, Corradi RB, et al. , authors. Topography of prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy: a detailed mapping study of salvage radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 2018. 73:p. 488–490

21 

Meeks JJ, Walker M, Bernstein M, et al. , authors. Seminal vesicle involvement at salvage radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2013. 111:p. E342–347

Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2019 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe