Pediatric Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism

Abstract

2/2025 vol. 31
Original paper

Complications of obesity in children and youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus

  1. Department of Clinical Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Provincial Specialist Children’s Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland
  2. Department of Pediatrics, Endocrinology, Diabetology with Cardiology Division, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2025; 31 (2): 44-51
Online publish date: 2025/07/14
View full text
Confronting perimenopausal women’s knowledge of coronary heart disease with their health behaviours. Controversial role of hormone replacement therapy in the protection of coronary heart disease

Introduction

Excess body weight has a negative impact on the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and is an additional risk factor for the development of chronic vascular complications, insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We compared and analyzed metabolic control, the incidence of insulin resistance and MAFLD in children and youths with T1D and excessive body weight (T1D-E) and those with T1D and normal body weight (T1D-N).

Material and methods

The study included 32 patients with T1D-N and 31 patients with T1D-E. Daily insulin requirement, estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR1, eGDR2), HbA1C%, lipid profile, vitamin D level, cIMT value, and MAFLD prevalence were compared in relation to body mass index (BMI) and BMI SD score (BMI-SDS).

Results

T1D-E patients compared to T1D-N had higher systolic (125.58 ±8.18 vs. 120.16 ±10.02 mmHg, p = 0.022) and diastolic blood pressure (78.19 ±7.03 vs. 73.94 ±7.95 mmHg, p = 0.028), triglyceride levels (118.19 ±71.20 vs. 71.31 ±18.76 mg/dl, p = 0.001) and waist circumference (p < 0.001). Lower eGDR values were noted in T1D-E vs. T1D-N: eGDR1: 5.16 ±1.33 vs. 6.96 ±1.32; eGDR2: 9.37 ±1.21 vs. 10.66 ±0.9 (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001). Vitamin D levels were lower and the incidence of MAFLD was higher in the T1D-E group (13% vs. 0%, p = 0.014). Patients with MAFLD had worse lipid profile results and higher cIMT values (0.48 vs. 0.43 mm, p = 0.4).

Conclusions

Excessive body weight in patients with T1D leads to elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance, and increases the risk of MAFLD. Patients with MAFLD have a higher future cardiovascular risk, expressed as an increased cIMT value.

Share
without publication fees