Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny

Determination of the approach of Polish gastroenterologists and surgeons to the diagnosis and treatment of complex cases of Crohn’s disease-related perianal fistulas

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, University Clinical Hospital, Poznan, Poland

  2. Department of General, Endocrinological Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

  3. PEX Sp. z o. o. Warsaw, Poland

  4. Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

  5. Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland

  6. Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin, Poland

  7. Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Military Medical Academy Memorial Teaching Hospital, Lodz, Poland

Gastroenterology Review

Online publish date: 2026/09/22
View full text

Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disorder that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract. CD-related perianal fistulas are difficult to treat and require coordinated surgical–medical care.

Aim

The aim of this study was to describe how Polish gastroenterologists and surgeons diagnose and manage complex perianal fistulas associated with Crohn’s disease during initial and subsequent lines of treatment, including surgical care.

Material and methods

A nationwide retrospective analysis was conducted, including a review of the medical records of
80 patients with complex perianal fistulas after failure of standard therapy, and surveys of 27 gastroenterologists representing the majority of centres involved in the B.32 programme and 12 colorectal surgeons (February–March 2023).

Results

In surveys, clinicians estimated that about 20% of their CD patients currently had a perianal fistula, while another 20% had a history of one; 24% of first fistulas reportedly preceded CD diagnosis, 36% occurred within 3 years, and 13% after > 10 years. Magnetic resonance imaging was the most frequently used imaging modality for complex fistulas. In the chart cohort, initial (“standard”) therapy most often combined azathioprine, antibiotics, metronidazole, and glucocorticoids (median duration 13 weeks). After failure, 80% received combined surgical–medical care; 91% received biologics as first or second post-failure therapy (infliximab n = 51/80, 63.8%; adalimumab n = 13/80, 16.3%; vedolizumab n = 3/80, 3.8%; ustekinumab n = 1/80, 1.3%). Surgeons most commonly performed abscess drainage, seton placement, and fistulectomy. Reported barriers included long waits for MRI and limited access to centres specialising in the treatment of perianal fistulas.

Conclusions

Management patterns vary and interdisciplinary coordination is inconsistent; structured care pathways and multidisciplinary clinics are needed in Poland.

Share
without publication fees