ISSN: 1230-2813
Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology/Postępy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2020
vol. 29
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Case report

Differentiation of the first psychotic episode and autoimmune encephalitis with anti-NMDA receptor antibodies, using the EEG findings – case report and literature review

Adam S. Hirschfeld
1
,
Daniel Lubiński
1
,
Łukasz Szumerowicz
1

1.
Neurology Ward, The St. John Paul II HCP Medical Centre, Poznan, Poland
Adv Psychiatry Neurol 2020; 29 (1): 67-73
Online publish date: 2020/04/27
Article file
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

PURPOSE

The first-time psychosis incident may be a diagnostic challenge due to the lack of definite tests that initially verify the underlying cause and indicate further prognosis [1]. Considering that on average 70.56% [2] of patients with autoimmune encephalitis with antibodies against N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors have psychotic symptoms, the initial suspicion of “mental illness” in this group accounts for as much as 42-44% [3] of cases. Undoubtedly, therefore, this disease should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis.
Autoimmune encephalitis in some cases is provoked by a neoplastic lesion [4, 5] and its immediate removal is then the basis for treatment [4, 6]. The most common neoplastic change detected in 58% [7] of women with NMDARE is ovarian teratoma, constituting 90-98% [3, 8] of all diagnoses. In children and men, cancer is found only in 6% of cases [3]. Autoimmune encephalitis is defined as a set of symptoms resulting from the interaction of antibodies with surface antigens of nerve cells and synaptic connections. In contrast, paraneoplastic encephalitis is the effect of antibodies impact on specific intracellular onconeuronal proteins (e.g. Hu, Ma1, Yo, Ri). Thus, the accepted distinction is the result of the molecular pathomechanism which triggers the disease. NMDARE is therefore autoimmune encephalitis due to the fact that antibodies, both in the presence of and without neoplastic lesion, are directed to the surface subunit of the NMDA receptor. The same situation occurs in the cases of encephalitides with antibodies against the LGI1, Caspr2, AMPA, DPPX, GABA, mGluR5 and GlyR receptors [9, 10].
Over the past several years, we have been continually improving our understanding of NMDARE. We already know that shorter time of diagnosis with the inclusion of adequate treatment has an impact on the patient’s future prognosis [11-13]. However, one should not stop searching for a proper diagnosis; cases of patients treated unsuccessfully for 1.5 years due to catatonic schizophrenia are described, who were then diagnosed with NMDARE and a definite improvement was achieved with the use of targeted therapy [14]. Although we have a test confirming the presence of specific antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we are still struggling with a few difficulties. First and foremost is the waiting time for the test results, which often exceeds a dozen days or so. Next, depending on the material used for the assay, antibodies in the serum may be absent, so the diagnosis may be further extended.
The article describes the possibility of accelerating the suspicion of NMDARE based on the evaluation of the EEG study. We also describe the case of the patient, where we managed to advance treatment in this way. We draw attention to the often difficult initial differential diagnosis with the first-time psychosis incident.
The most common symptoms in the course of NMDARE include behavioural disturbances, psychosis, quantitative disturbances of consciousness, memory deficits, often agitation, high level of anxiety, speech problems including mutism, and in some cases catatonia [15]. Movement disorders are also characteristic – in particular, oromandibular dyskinesias, but those may occur parallel to or in the form of dyskinesias of other body parts. Dystonias, increased muscle tone or myoclonus are also observed [16]. In the course of the disease, epileptic seizures may occur. In NMDARE, instability of the autonomic nervous system is often observed in the form of fluctuations in arterial pressure, tachy- or bradycardia, cardiac arrhythmias or excessive salivation. Occurring even in 66% [3] of patients central hypoventilation episodes are often the cause of transfer of the patient to the intensive care unit. NMDARE estimates 1% of total admissions of young adults to intensive care units [4]. Disturbances in consciousness during the course of the disease are an unfavourable prognostic factor [13]. Up to 82-86% of patients report that the disease was preceded by prodromal symptoms of a viral-like infection, i.e. fever and headache [17].
The characteristic clinical manifestation of the syndrome is probably related to the dysfunction in fronto-striatal connections and prefrontal circuits [18]. It is suggested that this particular set of symptoms may be partly a result of over-representation of the NMDA receptor NR2B component in the prefrontal cortex [19]. It is also worth mentioning that the reports suggest participation, among others NR2C form of the NMDA receptor in the development of schizophrenia [20-22].

CASE DESCRIPTION

In their 19-year-old daughter, who was in good health until this point, the parents observed sudden growing behavioural changes. The first one was growing social withdrawal, strong feelings of anxiety, long periods of silence and frequent sleep problems. There were no mental illnesses in the family. Since the beginning of symptoms occurred during preparations for the secondary school certificate, the parents associated them with stress.
About a week after the manifestation of symptoms, the patient went to a psychiatrist who prescribed her olanzapine (20 mg/day). Due to the lack of treatment effect and further worsening of her condition after the next two weeks, she was admitted to the psychiatric ward with the suspicion of the first-time psychosis incident. Performed imaging studies of the central nervous system (CT and MRI with administration of contrast agent) showed only a 10 mm vascular change of the right frontal lobe. Despite the modification of antipsychotic treatment, the patient’s condition deteriorated. After 15 days, she was transferred to the intensive care unit due to breathing and swallowing problems and decline in contact – mutism.
During the stay in the intensive care unit, determination of anti-NMDAR antibodies from serum was ordered (waiting time 11 days). Within 3 days after symptomatic treatment, the patient’s general condition improved and she was transferred back to the psychiatric ward. After the neurological consultation, it was decided to transfer the patient to the neurological department. At the time of admission to the ward, the patient was conscious, lying still in a state of catatonia, with generalised increased muscle tone and pronounced oromandibular dyskinesias; she was unresponsive. Tachycardia and a tendency to fluctuate arterial pressure persisted. In addition, no other deviations in the neurological assessment were found. Immediate EEG and lumbar puncture were performed. In the general assessment of CSF, no clinically relevant deviations were detected and anti-NMDAR antibodies were determined (11 days waiting period). The EEG recording revealed the pathology of extreme delta brush (Figure 1A). On this basis, awaiting the results of NMDA receptor antibody determination, it was decided to initiate NMDARE treatment.
The patient was treated simultaneously with immunoglobulins (0.4 g/kg/day) and steroids (methylprednisolone 500 mg/day) in the intravenous form. After 5 days of infusions, immunosuppression was continued in the form of oral steroid therapy (methylprednisolone 32 mg/day). The day after completing the infusions cycle, we also received a positive result of the determination of anti-NMDA receptor antibodies tire from blood serum ordered in the intensive care unit (Table 1), which confirmed the diagnosis. At the same time, a gynaecological consultation took place; the pelvic ultrasound and pelvic MRI showed no pathology. We have also performed a number of additional tests to detect another potential trigger for antibody production (Table 2), but unfortunately we could not find it.
One week after the end of the infusions, the first signs of neurological improvement were observed – initially the patient was trying to soundlessly speak the words, she was also following with her eyes after the examiner. With subsequent days, a gradual improvement in contact and speech was visible – from speaking singular words to complex sentences. At the same time, the physiological muscle tone of the limbs was restored. During the entire period of stay in the ward, neurologopedic treatment and physiotherapy was carried. On the 26th day of stay at the neurological ward, the EEG did not reveal the extreme delta brush (EDB), however, the features of the abnormal record persisted (Figure 1B). Also, the level of antibodies against NMDA receptors in blood serum gradually decreased with successive determinations (Table 1). Finally, the patient was transferred to a neurological rehabilitation ward – in a balanced mood, walking alone, eating meals, using the mobile phone efficiently, without memory deficits (except for time of the disease), while maintaining a mild decrease in cognitive functions and speech problems – mainly discrete dysphonia and troubles with efficient articulation of words. Currently, 2 months after discharge from the neurological ward, the patient almost completely returned to full fitness; no symptoms of disease recurrence were observed.

COMMENT

Currently, the only method that always confirms the clinical diagnosis of NMDARE remains the detection of specific antibodies against the NMDA receptor GluN1 subunit in the CSF study [7]. Although blood serum testing is technically more easily available, false-negative results are found in 14-40.6% [7, 23] cases, also in the acute phase of the disease [24]. Considering, for example, the potential irreversible effects of hippocampal damage in the course of the disease [25], the waiting time for a test result may be decisive for a response to treatment. At the same time, the difficulties caused by the diversity of NMDARE clinical manifestations may not encourage early treatment.
Considering that the high doses of steroids, immunoglobulins or plasmapheresis [11] used in the first round of treatment are not free of side effects, caution may be warranted given the uncertain clinical picture. The first psychotic episode with manifesting catatonia certainly belongs to such situations [26]. Therefore, objective tests which could strengthen the suspicion of NMDARE and accelerate the implementation of adequate treatment are being sought all the time. The test, which turns out to be useful in this area, while remaining quite accessible and without additional risk, is EEG. It is accepted that EEG in patients with NMDARE is almost always abnormal (90-100%) [18, 23, 27, 28]. Compared to the incorrect EEG record found in the first psychotic episode in 20.4% [29] of cases, this test seems to be a valuable element of differential diagnosis. It should also be emphasised that the term abnormal record is not synonymous with the registration of a seizure activity. Moreover, although the clinical manifestation of seizure episodes is observed on average in 81% [2] patients in the course of NMDARE, they rarely constitute the initial symptom – 18.8-30.6% [18, 22]. Also, a wide range of movement disorders observed in patients with NMDARE may or may not be associated with epilepsy aetiology.
However, in NMDARE patients, EEG changes are often recorded the most common is non-specific, general slowing in EEG profile [4, 30, 31]. It can be also seen in patients with consciousness disturbances as an indicator of disorders of the ascending reticular activating system [23]. As a result of interaction of antibodies on NMDA receptors, the time of depolarisation of nerve cells is shortened and it comes to the occurrence of slow waves in EEG [23]. Also generalised rhythmic delta activity and excess beta activity are registered [32].
Since the association of EDB with NMDARE by Schmitt et al. in 2012 [33], the number of reports on the occurrence and very high specificity of this record pathology has been increasing [30, 34, 35]. It occurs in 16.1-30.4% [23, 33] people in the acute phase of NMDARE. EDB is the rhythmic delta activity at the frequency of 1-3 Hz with superimposed bursts of rhythmic 20-30 Hz beta activity [33]. As a result, a characteristic record is produced (Figure 1A). Similar EEG changes known as delta brush are seen in premature infants as a feature of the maturing nervous system [36]. EDB in the NMDARE course, however, distinguishes the lack of explicit influence of the sleep-wake cycle and that in most cases is synchronous. The registration of the EDB record is continuous and not related to movement symptoms, i.e. dystonias, dyskinesias or chorea movements [33].
The prognostic significance of EDB remains unclear. Some researchers consider EDB a specific, unfavourable prognostic factor [16, 18, 37]. However, there are studies suggesting a lack of correlation with the severity of the disease [25, 38]. Reports of rare cases of EDB without association with NMDARE, e.g. in critically ill patients monitored in the intensive care unit [39], and favourable course of the disease [34] should also be taken into account. Some note that the clinical improvement was achieved with the disappearance of EDB in the EEG record [37].
Moreover, one should remember about the influence of the antipsychotics drugs on the induction of abnormalities in the EEG record (clozapine 47.1%, olanzapine 38.5%, risperidone 28.0%) [40, 41] – none of these drugs was given in the neurological ward. In cases of clinical doubt, it is also suggested to use a continuous EEG record or its repetition, because a single 30-minute registration can be performed outside the period of characteristic changes [31].
It is also worth mentioning that MRI in patients with NMDARE shows abnormalities only in 30-46.8% of cases, which makes it overall a less sensitive test than EEG [7, 23]. However, it should be underlined that the highly specific for NMDARE extreme delta brush is less frequent than MRI changes. Changes in the CSF general examination present in up to 91% of patients remain non-specific [27]. Interestingly, 50% of patients have elevated levels of serum creatine kinase, which in certain situations may require differentiation with a neuroleptic malignant syndrome [34, 42].
In the context of abnormal brain bioelectrical activity, one should also remember about potential sleep disorders. In fact, in patients with autoimmune encephalitis, they occur relatively frequently. Up to 73% of them experience previously absent symptoms – from insomnia to somnambulism [43]. Our patient also experienced temporary insomnia. That is why this group of patients requires special care also during the night time.
The presence of EDB in the EEG study with the simultaneous clinical suspicion of NMDARE allows the acceleration of targeted therapy in anticipation of the determination of specific anti-NMDA receptor antibodies. The low cost, safety, relatively good availability and high specificity of EDB support the routine performance of the EEG. Despite the general high sensitivity of the EEG, the relatively low specificity of other changes that can be found in recordings is still its limitation. The EEG study can be a valuable diagnostic tool for differential diagnosis in particular if we consider the overall occurrence of an incorrect record in 90-100% of patients with NMDAR compared to 20.4% of patients with the first psychotic episode [27-29]. Some of EEG changes like diffuse slowing, extreme delta brush, and electroencephalographic seizures are not found early in primary psychiatric illness and are not caused by treatment with atypical antipsychotics or benzodiazepines, which can be helpful [44].

Conflict of interest

Absent.

Financial support

Absent.

References

1. Suvisaari J, Mantere O, Keinänen J, Mäntylä T, Rikandi E, Lindgren M, et al. Is it possible to predict the future in first-episode psychosis? Front Psychiatry 2018; 9: 580.
2. Broadley J, Seneviratne U, Beech P, Buzzard K, Butzkueven H, O’Brien T, et al. Prognosis in autoimmune encephalitis: database. Data Brief 2018; 21: 2694-2703.
3. Venkatesan A, Adatia K. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: from bench to clinic. ACS Chem Neurosci 2017; 8: 2586-2595.
4. Rita CG, Nieto Gañan I, Jimenez Escrig A, Carrasco Sayalero Á. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate encephalitis as paraneoplastic manifestation of germ-cells tumours: a cases report and literature review. Case Reports Immunol 2019; 2019: 4762937.
5. Lee KW, Liou LM, Wu MN. Fulminant course in a patient with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis with bilateral ovarian teratomas: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e0339.
6. Sancho-Saúco J, Corraliza-Galán V, Lázaro-Carrasco de la Fuente J, Sánchez-Martínez C, Pelayo-Delgado I, De Pablos-Antona MJ, et al. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: two case reports associated with ovarian teratoma and a literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 39: 864-865.
7. Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-mediated encephalitis. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 840-851.
8. Chefdeville A, Treilleux I, Mayeur ME, Couillault C, Picard G, Bost C, et al. Immunopathological characterization of ovarian teratomas associated with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019; 7: 38.
9. Bradshaw MJ, Linnoila JJ. An overview of autoimmune and paraneoplastic encephalitides. Semin Neurol 2018; 38: 330-343.
10. Steiner J, Prüss H, Köhler S, Frodl T, Hasan A, Falkai P. Autoimmune encephalitis with psychosis: warning signs, step-by-step diagnostics and treatment. World J Biol Psychiatry 2019; 4: 1-14.
11. Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangué T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, et al. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 157-165.
12. Dalmau J, Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R. Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 63-74.
13. Aungsumart S, Ha A, Apiwattanakul M. Abnormal level of consciousness predicts outcomes of patients with anti-NMDA encephalitis. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 62: 184-187.
14. Endres D, Perlov E, Baumgartner A, Hottenrott T, Dersch R, Stich O, et al. Immunological findings in psychotic syndromes: a tertiary care hospital’s CSF sample of 180 patients. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 476.
15. Kovac S, Alferink J, Ahmetspahic D, Arolt V, Melzer N. Update on anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Nervenarzt 2018; 89: 99-112.
16. Chanson E, Bicilli E, Lauxerois M, Kauffmann S, Chabanne R, Ducray F, et al. Anti-NMDA-R encephalitis: should we consider extreme delta brush as electrical status epilepticus? Neurophysiol Clin 2016; 46: 17-25.
17. Tominaga N, Kanazawa N, Kaneko A, Kaneko J, Kitamura E, Nakagawa H, et al. Prodromal headache in anti-NMDAR encephalitis: an epiphenomenon of NMDAR autoimmunity. Brain Behav 2018; 8: e01012.
18. Gillinder L, Warren N, Hartel G, Dionisio S, O’Gorman C. EEG Findings in NMDA encephalitis – a systematic review. Seizure 2019; 65: 20-24.
19. Dalmau J, Tuzun E, Wu HY, Masjuan J, Rossi JE, Voloschin A, et al. Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Ann Neurol 2007; 61: 25-36.
20. Zhang Y, Llinas RR, Lisman JE. Inhibition of NMDARs in the nucleus reticularis of the thalamus produces delta frequency bursting. Front Neural Circuits 2009; 3: 20.
21. Snyder MA, Gao WJ. NMDA receptor hypofunction for schizophrenia revisited: perspectives from epigenetic mechanisms. Schizophr Res 2019; pii: S0920-9964(19)30104-5.
22. Carvajal FJ, Mattison HA, Cerpa W. Role of NMDA receptor-mediated glutamatergic signaling in chronic and acute neuropathologies. Neural Plast 2016; 2016: 2701526.
23. Zhang Y, Liu G, Jiang MD, Li LP, Su YY. Analysis of electroencephalogram characteristics of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis patients in China. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128: 1227-1233.
24. Hirschfeld AS, Lubiński D, Szumerowicz Ł. Przypadek seronegatywnej ostrej fazy autoimmunologicznego zapalenia mózgu z przeciwciałami przeciwko receptorom NMDA (anti-NMDAR encephalitis), z obecnością przeciwciał dla HSV. Pol Przegl Neurol 2019; 15. DOI: 10.5603/PPN.2019.0020.
25. Finke C, Kopp UA, Pruss H, Dalmau J, Wandinger KP, Ploner CJ. Cognitive deficits following anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012; 83: 195-198.
26. Bharadwaj B, Sathyanarayanan G, Kaliaperumal V, Dhodapkar R. Anti-NMDA receptor antibody positivity in acute psychotic states: An exploratory study. Asian J Psychiatr 2019; 43: 95-98.
27. Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, Rossi JE, Peng X, Lai M, et al. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 1091-1098.
28. Florance NR, Davis RL, Lam C, Szperka C, Zhou L, Ahmad S, et al. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents. Ann Neurol 2009; 66: 11-18.
29. Manchanda R, Norman R, Malla A, Harricharan R, Northcott S, Richard J. Electroencephalographic abnormalities and 5-year outcome in first-episode psychosis. Can J Psychiatry 2014; 59: 285-288.
30. Abbas A, Garg A, Jain R, Mazibrada G, Jacob S. Extreme delta brushes and BIRDs in the EEG of anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis. Pract Neurol 2016; 16: 326-327.
31. Da SF, Castro LH, Andrade JQ, Bastos CG, Moreira CH, Valerio RM, et al. Serial and prolonged EEG monitoring in anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptor encephalitis. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 1541-1544.
32. Ueda J, Kawamoto M, Hikiami R, Ishii J, Yoshimura H, Matsumoto R, et al. Serial EEG findings in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: correlation between clinical course and EEG. Epileptic Disord 2017; 19: 465-470.
33. Schmitt SE, Pargeon K, Frechette ES, Hirsch LJ, Dalmau J, Friedman D. Extreme delta brush: a unique EEG pattern in adults with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurology 2012; 79: 1094-1100.
34. Wang J, Wang K, Wu D, Liang H, Zheng X, Luo B. Extreme delta brush guides to the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. J Neurol Sci 2015; 353: 81-83.
35. Castellano J, Glover R, Robinson J. Extreme delta brush in NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurohospitalist 2017; 7: NP3-NP4.
36. Whitehead K, Pressler R, Fabrizi L. Characteristics and clinical significance of delta brushes in the EEG of premature infants. Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2017; 2: 12-18.
37. Gazeteci Tekin H, Gökben S, Serdaroğlu G. Extreme delta brush activity: could it be a marker for early diagnosis and prognosis of anti-NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) encephalitis? Turk Pediatri Ars 2019; 54: 61-65.
38. Jiang N, Guan H, Lu Q, Ren H, Peng B. Features and prognostic value of quantitative electroencephalogram changes in critically ill and non-critically ill anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients: a pilot study. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 833.
39. Baykan B, Gungor Tuncer O, Vanli-Yavuz EN, Baysal Kirac L, Gundogdu G, Bebek N, et al. Delta brush pattern is not unique to NMDAR encephalitis: evaluation of two independent long-term EEG cohorts. Clin EEG Neurosci 2018; 49: 278-284.
40. Kikuchi YS, Sato W, Ataka K, Yagisawa K, Omori Y, Kanbayashi T, et al. Clozapine-induced seizures, electroencephalography abnormalities, and clinical responses in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014; 10: 1973-1978.
41. De Berardis D, Rapini G, Olivieri L, Di Nicola D, Tomasetti C, Valchera A, et al. Safety of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: a focus on the adverse effects of clozapine. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2018; 9: 237-256.
42. Pruss H, Dalmau J, Harms L, Höltje M, Ahnert-Hilger G, Borowski K, et al. Retrospective analysis of NMDA receptor antibodies in encephalitis of unknown origin. Neurology 2010; 75: 1735-1739.
43. Blattner MS, de Bruin GS, Bucelli RC, Day GS. Sleep disturbances are common in patients with autoimmune encephalitis. J Neurol 2019; 266: 1007-1015.
44. Warren N, Siskind D, O’Gorman C. Refining the psychiatric syndrome of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2018; 138: 401-408.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License allowing third parties to download and share its works but not commercially purposes or to create derivative works.
Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe