Biology of Sport
eISSN: 2083-1862
ISSN: 0860-021X
Biology of Sport
Current Issue Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Archive Ethical standards and procedures Contact Instructions for authors Journal's Reviewers Special Information
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

Open access

without publication fees
Share:
Send email
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Effects of velocity loss with blood flow restriction in full squat on strength gains, neuromuscular adaptations, and muscle hypertrophy

Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas
1, 2
,
Luis Rodiles-Guerrero
2, 3
,
Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza
2, 4, 3
,
Jose Antonio Paez-Maldonado
2, 5
,
Clara Cano-Castillo
4
,
Beatriz Bachero-Mena
2, 3
,
Miguel Sánchez-Moreno
2, 6
,
Juan José González-Badillo
4
,
Eduardo Saez de Villarreal
4
,
Fernando Pareja-Blanco
2, 4

  1. Physical Education and Sports Department, Cardenal Spínola CEU Andalucía University, Bormujos, Sevilla, Spain
  2. Science-Based Training Research Group, Physical Performance and Sports Research Center, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
  3. Department of Human Movement and Sport Performance, University of Seville, Spain
  4. Faculty of Sports Sciences, Department of Sports and Computer Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
  5. University of Osuna (Centre attached to the University of Seville), Osuna, Spain
  6. Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
Biol Sport. 2026; 43: 65–75
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2025.151657
Online publish date: 2025/08/05
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
To analyse the effects of four full squat (SQ) training programmes with different velocity loss (VL) thresholds (0%, 10%, 20%, and 40%) with blood flow restriction (BFR) implementation on muscle size, lower limb strength, and neuromuscular adaptations. Forty-six strength-trained men carried out an 8-week (16 sessions) SQ training programme with BFR that differed in the VL attained within the set: BFR 0% VL (BFR0, n = 11), BFR 10% VL (BFR10, n = 11), BFR 20% VL (BFR20, n = 11), and BFR 40% VL (BFR40, n = 13). The same inter-set recovery (2 minutes), sets (3), intensity (from 55% to 70% 1RM), and level of BFR (50% of arterial occlusion pressure) were established for all groups. Before and after the training intervention, the following tests were carried out: 1) vastus lateralis muscle size; 2) countermovement jump; 3) maximal isometric SQ test; 4) progressive loading SQ test; and 5) fatigue SQ test. Muscle hypertrophy increased as the VL increased (“group×time” interaction: p = 0.013). Only BFR20 significantly improved force production at various time intervals (“group×time” interactions: p ≤ 0.05). Moreover, effect sizes suggest that low-to-moderate VL thresholds maximize the improvements in SQ strength against different loads (BFR0: 0.47 1.75; BFR10: 0.61–1.96; BFR20: 0.71–2.18; BFR40: 0.38–1.53). In BFR contexts, low-to moderate VL thresholds should be prescribed to optimize leg strength performance. Extremely low VL (i.e., 0%) seemed insufficient to maximize strength gains, while higher VL thresholds are more effective for promoting muscle hypertrophy but may somewhat compromise strength improvements.
keywords:

Velocity-based training, Full squat, Muscle size, Strength, Gains, Jump performance

  
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.