eISSN: 2720-5371
ISSN: 1230-2813
Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology/Postępy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Scientific board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 
2/2022
vol. 31
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Review article

Molecular mechanisms of antipsychotics – their influence on intracellular signaling pathways, and epigenetic and post-transcription processes

Paulina Rok-Bujko
1

1.
Second Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroses, Personality Disorders and Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
Adv Psychiatry Neurol 2022; 31 (2): 74-84
Online publish date: 2022/07/20
Article file
- Molecular.pdf  [0.17 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotics were discovered in the late 1950s as part of the process of improving anesthetic agents. They proved ineffective as anesthetic drugs but, surprisingly, attenuated psychotic symptoms in patients. In the 1960s and 1970s the primary mechanism of antipsychotic action was determined to be the antagonism of dopamine receptors (DRD2) and these drugs were referred as “typical”. In late 1980s and 1990s “atypical” or “second-generation” antipsychotics were introduced to improve the treatment of negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia and to alleviate extrapyramidal side effects (clozapine). Atypical antipsychotics turned out to be multi-action agents, blocking not only DRD2. They induce less severe extrapyramidal side effects but, on the other hand, were associated with weight gain and obesity in patients [1]. They all have ability to modulate intra-cellular pathways, metabolism, the structure or even apoptosis of cells, which probably corresponds to the impairments associated with psychiatric disorders but also with their therapeutic potential and side effects. Despite the use of antipsychotics to treat psychotic and affective disorders over the last several decades, knowledge about their molecular actions is still incomplete. The aim of this review is to present the current and basic knowledge about the mechanisms of antipsychotics’ functioning at the intracellular level, in light of their clinical efficacy and side-effects. The direct and indirect molecular mechanisms of antipsychotics will be discussed on the basis of three stages of signaling: intracellular pathways, and epigenetic (DNA methylation and histone modification) and post-transcription (microRNA) processes.

INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PATHWAYS

Intracellular signaling is necessary for the regulation of gene transcription. The common intracellular mediators include cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), AKT pathway known also as protein kinase B (PKB)/glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. All antipsychotics act on the DRD2 receptors, which are Gi/o type G-protein-coupled receptors; their main downstream signaling pathway is adenylate cyclase-cAMP protein kinase A (PKA). The influence of typical and atypical antipsychotics on cAMP and PKA is complex and region-dependent, probably due to their affinities for different G-protein-coupled receptors stimulating adenyl cyclase signaling [2]. The majority of antipsychotics blocking DRD2 receptors increase cAMP production by removing the tonic inhibition of dopamine transmission by Gi/o proteins on adenylate cyclase activity. The increase in cAMP production activates PKA and increases PKA-dependent phosphorylation of DARPP-32 (dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of molecular weight 32 000). DARPP-32 is a neuronal phosphoprotein that displays a regional distribution in the mammalian brain very similar to that of dopamine-containing nerve terminals, being highly concentrated in the basal ganglia. The main role of DARPP-32 is the integration of responses to natural reinforcing stimuli, with a focus on food as a natural reinforcer [3]. In the prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia, levels of DARPP-32 have been shown to be significantly decreased [4]. Typical and atypical neuro­leptics differ in their influences on the PKA pathway. Treatment with haloperidol has been shown to increase PKA activity by enhancing its mRNA and protein synthesis in the rat striatum, while clozapine reduced these parameters in the striatum, hippocampus and frontal cortex of rats [5]. The administration of halo­peridol and clozapine induces DARPP-32 phosphorylation at the TH34 site, converting it into an inhibitor of proteophosphates 1 (PP1) in mouse dorsal stratum, which probably affects gene transcription and synthesis of protein like cAMP (cAMP response element-binding protein), which is a cellular transcription factor binding to certain DNA sequences called cAMP response elements (CRE) [6].
The next example of intercellular signaling is the AKT/glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) pathway (Figure I). GSK-3 is a serine-threonine protein kinase and is negatively regulated by the phosphorylation of its serine residues by AKT (known as protein kinase B). The role of kinase enzyme is to transfer a phosphate group from a high-energy donor molecule to residues (serine, threo­nine or tyrosine) on the recipient molecule. The inactivation of GSK-3 via phosphorylation by AKT has important consequences for the functioning of neurons. GSK-3 is implicated in glucose metabolism, neurodevelopment, differentiation and development, intracellular trafficking, apoptosis, regulation of gene transcription, and synaptic plasticity in the brain [7, 8]. SNPs (signal nucleotides polymorphisms) of GSK-3β are described to be risk factors for schizophrenia. The synthesis of glycogen is regulated by two subunits of GSK-3 (α and β) [9]. AKT plays a role in cognition through its modulation of long-term potentiation, synaptic plasticity and, in consequence, working memory [10]. Three isoforms of AKT have been detected. AKT1 is the isoform most associated with schizophrenia; its reduced levels have been revealed in the brains (hippocampus and frontal cortex) of patients suffering from schizophrenia, whereas increased signaling of AKT1 was observed in rodent neurons in response to acute antipsychotic treatment. Genetic have studies revealed that AKT1-mediated regulation of neuronal cell size and volume, and its polymorphism was associated with brain volume reduction in the caudate bilaterally and right prefrontal cortex [11]. AKT2 is implicated in the regulation of metabolism through insulin-regulated glucose homeostasis and AKT3 is involved in postnatal brain development [12].
Activation of the postsynaptic D2 receptor by dopamine (DA) leads to formation of the complex of molecules consisted of by binding β-arrestin 2 (scaffolding protein), AKT and phosphatase 2A (PP2A). The role of this complex is to desensitize the D2 receptor, which subsequently leads to its internalization. Thus, the activation of dopamine D2 receptors by dopamine leads to the dephosphorylation of the phosphorylated and inactivated AKT complex by phosphatase PP2 (an enzyme that removes a phosphate group from its substrate). Inactivated AKT complex indirectly leads to increased GSK-3 activity, as active AKT exerts inhibiting influences on both isoforms of GSK-3 (α and β) [7]. The G-protein-independent intracellular cascade β-arrestin 2-PP2A-AKT plays an important regulatory role in the modulation of neurons by DA or antipsychotics.
Antipsychotics acting as DRD2 antagonists inhibit the assembly and activation of the complex of β-arrestin, PP2A and AKT. Next, the prevention of β-arrestin 2/PP2A recruitment leads to phosphorylation and the activation of AKT and, in consequence, the AKT signaling is not inhibited [9, 13]. AKT is a convergent antipsychotic signaling mechanism. Although AKT pathways are modulated by multiple first and second generation antipsychotics, the extent of impact varies between different antipsychotic drugs. Masari et al. demonstrated that antipsychotics such as haloperidol, risperidone, ziporasidone, clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole all prevented the binding of β-arrestin 2 to DRD2 induced by the administration of a DRD2 agonist in cell culture [14]. Antipsychotic drugs like haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, cloza­pine, quetiapine, or ziprasidone have been demonstrated to increase the phosphorylation of GSK-3 by AKT, which inhibits GSK-3 activity in different brain regions [15, 16]. An increased level of AKT in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum was described in of rats treated with olanzapine [17]. Other studies also showed that both classes of antipsychotics have similar effects on the AKT-GSK pathway. Some neuroleptics (clozapine, olanzapine) produce the phosphorylation of AKT and GSK, whereas others (haloperidol) induce the phosphorylation of only AKT, which leads to further phosphorylation of GSK-3. Interestingly, the newer antipsychotics, such as aripiprazole, activate AKT-GSK-3β signaling [18], which is similar to the activation of AKT-GSK-3β signaling by mood stabilizers such as lithium [9]. It is also worth noting that lithium has been shown to disrupt the β-arresting 2/Akt/PP2A complex, preventing the dopamine-induced dephosphorylation of AKT, which was expressed clinically as the blocking of amphetamine-induced locomotion (via dopaminergic transmission) [19]. The activation of AKT is upstream of multiple signaling cascades involved in transcription, protein synthesis, metabolism and other cellular processes. For example, the AKT-mTORC1 (mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1, or mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) pathway has been proven to be another site of antipsychotic modulation. This is a protein complex that functions as a nutrient/energy/redox sensor and controls protein synthesis. Bowling demonstrated that acute antipsychotic treatment induces the action of AKT-mTORC1 protein synthesis pathway, resulting in immediate changes in protein synthesis [20].
The mechanism of intracellular signaling associated with AKT/GSK-3 is the Wingless (Wnt) receptor pathway (Figure II). These two pathways of intercellular signaling work in parallel and intersect with each other. Wnt signaling is a group of signal transduction pathways which begin with proteins that pass signals into a cell through surface receptors and next to the Dishevelled protein (Dvl) inside the cell. Members of the Wnt protein family are secreted glycoproteins. The Wnt pathways are comprised of three different complexes: the “canonical” pathway involving GSK-3 and -catenin regulating gene transcription, the “noncanonical” cell polarity pathway (PCP) that regulates the cytoskeleton responsible for cell shape, and the “noncanonical” Wnt/calcium pathway that regulates calcium transport inside the cell. Thus the Wet signaling network is associated with cell differentiation, proliferation and migration, playing a significant role in processes of embryogenesis and carcinogenesis. Abnormalities in Wnt pathways have been described in type II diabetes, tissue regeneration in adult bone marrow, and abnormal brain development [21]. Wnt signaling has also been described as neurodevelopment abnormality in schizophrenia patients [22]. Dishevelled-3 (Dvl-3) is the protein associated with the D2 dopamine receptors and with Wnt receptors. Antipsychotics may act on Dvl-3 via D2 dopamine receptors to initiate a cascade of downstream changes involving Axin, GSK-3 and β-catenin [23]. Axin and GSK-3 form a complex along with APC protein (adenomatous polyposis coli, a tumor suppressor), which is responsible for the phosphorylation and destruction of β-catenin. β-catenin is a protein accumulating in the nucleus and regulating gene-transcription through interactions with DNA transcription factors. In the absence of Wnt receptor activation, β-catenin is continuously phosphorylated by GSK-3, leading to degradation. The binding of ligands to Wnt receptors leads to the phosphorylation of Wnt-receptor related proteins (LRP5 or LPR6) and activation of the disheveled intracellular protein (Dvl), enabling the separation of GSK-3 from β-catenin. Next, the phosphorylation of GSK-3 by Akt prevents β-catenin phosphorylation by GSK-3 and allows β-catenin to migrate to the nucleus and regulate gene transcription. A significant increase in Dishevelled 3 (Dvl-3), β-catenin and GSK-3β been revealed after chro­nic treatment with clozapine, haloperidol, risperi­done in rat ventral midbrain, medial prefrontal cortex and striatum [24]. Chronic treatment with clozapine and haloperidol has been shown to increase Wnt-5a, then the levels of Dvl-3, Axin and AKT phosphorylating GSK-3β in the rat frontal cortex [23]. Both clozapine and haloperidol induce the phosphorylation of AKT and GSK-3β [16]. In the group of antipsychotics, clozapine shows an outstanding profile of influence on the Wnt and AKT pathway as it induces phosphorylation of GSK-3β and AKT but being the only drug that increases both phosphorylation and the amount of Dvl in the rat frontal cortex [16]. Moreover, clozapine has been shown to enhance GSK-3β signaling via the activation of the Wnt pathway but not via AKT signaling [25]. The above facts suggest that antipsychotics the first and second generations differently regulate the AKT and Wnt pathways, which is probably dependent on their relative D2 or 5-HT2 receptor antagonism. The unique effects of clozapine might be related to its unique profile of action.
One of the clinical significances of Wnt/β-catenin signaling is regulation of osteoblast apoptosis, which might contribute to antipsychotic-induced osteal side effects, like decreased bone mineral density and fractures [26]. Wnt/β-catenin signaling is an important bone homeostasis modulator through the promotion of mesenchymal stem differentiation into osteoblasts. This study proved that antipsychotics induced apoptosis of osteoblasts through Wnt/β-catenin signaling suppression, which has been suggested to be a novel mechanism apart from the elevation of prolactin secretion caused by such drugs.
In conclusion, disruption of AKT, GSK-3 or Wnt signaling in the brain has been demonstrated to be involved in brain disorders like schizophrenia, and its restoration through the use of antipsychotics may play a significant role in clinical improvement. For example, reduced AKT level in some regions of the brain in schizophrenia patients leads to enhanced of GSK-3 activity, and in consequence the degradation of the gene transcription modulator – β-catenin. In addition, the increased expression of the Wnt-1 a molecule in the Wnt pathway has been described in the hippocampus of subjects with schizophrenia [27], and an association between genes in the Wnt signaling pathway and psychotic subtypes of bipolar disorder has been demonstrated [28].
The last intracellular mechanism described here is the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway, which is important in a number of neuronal functions such as regulation of gene expression, protein synthesis and receptor modulation. The above processes contribute to synaptic plasticity, learning and memory. Antipsycho­tic drugs may modulate the MAPK pathway in different ways. Typical and atypical antipsychotics exert different impacts on extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK 1/2) phosphorylation in the brain. For example, a single injection of haloperidol increases the phospho­rylation of ERK 1/2 and Elk1 (Elk-1, a member of the Ets domain transcription factor family) in the dorsal striatum in mice, whereas clozapine administration impairs these phosphorylations [6]. Moreover, the research demonstrated that clozapine but not olanzapine or halo­peridol induced initial inhibition and subsequent activation of cortical and striatal ERK 1/2 and p90RSK (p90 ribosomal S6 kinase) phosphorylation in mice. This clozapine-induced ERK 1/2 activation is mediated by the epidermal growth factor receptors (EGF), which demonstrates the unique action of clozapine in comparison to other antipsychotics [29, 30].

EPIGENETICS

Epigenetics is a new area of study exploring the influences of environment on phenotypic outcome during ontogenetic development. Epigenetics involves functional changes to genetic expression without any changes in gene sequences. Many recent studies have shown that epigenetics are involved in the etiology of many somatic and mental disorders [31]. Environmental influences on gene expression occur due to the modification of histone, changes in the methylation level that regulates transcription, translation and protein synthesis and RNA based mechanisms such as microRNA. The analysis conducted by Burghardt demonstrated that the pharmacoepigenetic literature on antipsychotic use gives inconsistent and variable results and there is an urgent need to conduct prospective surveys [32]. The epigenetic characterization of an organism is expressed by of the genomic methylation at the broad level as global DNA methylation, reflecting the methylation status of total genomic content within a given sample. The next level of epigenetic changes is the gene-specific methylation critical regulatory regions like CpG islands and promoter areas. In line with the result of the review by Burghardt, antipsychotic drugs have been shown to influence specific epigenetic mechanisms. The epigenome-wide association studies showed that anti­psychotics induce methylation changes within a wide number of genes and pathways like the WNT/-catenin pathway, in lipid metabolism and in immune-related, neurogenesis, cell adhesion, respiration and mitochondrial activity [33]. The gene-specific studies concern seve­ral specific genes, but among them only the genes for COMT (catechol-O-methyltransferase), 5-HTR2A (5-hydro­xytryptamine [serotonin] receptor 2A) and 5-HTT (5-hydroxytryptamine/serotonin-transporter) have been described in more than one study. Other studies have shown that there were no uniform or replicable changes in methylation (increase or decrease) in antipsychotic-treated patients, mainly due to the variability of the sample population, poorly defined antipsychotic exposure, and the use of different methodologies of analysis. Studies also revealed that peripheral blood DNA methy­lation is less correlated with brain DNA methylation, whereas saliva appears to have a higher correlation with the brain methylation level [34]. Histones are the primary protein components of euka­ryotic chromatin, which play a role in gene regu­lation [35]. Histone modifications were detected in samples from patients treated with antipsychotics. Studies reported that long-term clozapine and risperidone but not haloperidol treatment strongly decreased H3 acetylation at the promoter site of metabolic glutamate receptor 2 (mGlu 2) in mouse frontal cortex [36]. This corresponds with the findings of decreased histone H3 acetylation at the mGlu2 promoter and increased expression of HDAC2 (histone deacetylase) in the frontal cortex of schizophrenia patients treated with atypical antipsychotics [36]. Another mechanism of antipsychotic action associated with histone modification is Hdac2 (histone deacetylase) transcription regulation. Endoge­nous Hdac2 activity plays a critical role in cognitive performance as an enhanced level of Hdac2 leads to restraint of structural and functional synaptic plasticity [37]. The family of transcription factors involved in the regulation in synaptic plasticity, inflammation and immune responses is NF-κB. Increased activity of NF-κB leads to its binding to the Hdac2 promoter and enhancement of Hdac2 transcription. It has been found that known that chronic antipsychotic medication leads to a decline of cognitive abilities in rodent models and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia patients, though they do lead to a significant reduction of psychotic symptoms. Chronic atypical antipsychotic drug treatment led to elevations in Hdac2 promoter activity within the frontal cortex through a linear signaling pathway that involves the 5-HT2A-receptor. A study by Ibi et al. revealed similar effects after chronic treatment with the atypical antipsychotics like clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and sulpiride but not with the typical antipsychotic haloperidol. They also demonstrated that atypical antipsychotic clozapine but not haloperidol induced detriment in synaptic remodeling and cognitive processes, which was associated with 5-HT2A receptor-dependent augmentation of Hdac2 epigenetic function [38]. It would be necessary in further research to find out whether pharmacological inhibitors of this pathway (5-HT2A) improves brain plasticity and cognition in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Clini­cal studies demonstrate that drugs such as valproate, one of whose functions is to act as a nonspecific histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, are efficacious when given chronically in combination with atypical antipsychotic drugs, which suggests HDAC2 as a promising new target for schizophrenia treatment [39]. Studies of global DNA methylation have revealed a positive correlation of methylation with clozapine treatment, and a negative correlation with diagnosis. Higher methylation levels were demonstrated in antipsychotic-treated patients [40] and a higher level of methylation was detected in patients treated with haloperidol compared to other antipsychotics, at the similar level as in healthy control group [41]. On the other hand, other studies did not prove any associations between antipsychotics and methylation [42]. Some research has demonstrated that haloperidol treatment is associated with higher levels of global DNA methylation in the leucocytes of patients with schizophrenia [41], and with increase in the phosphorylation and acetylation of histone H3 in the mouse striatum [43]. It has also been shown that haloperidol differently affects DNA methylation in various rat tissues depending on sex. Studies conducted by Shimabukuro et al. showed statistically significant differences in the methylation content of leukocyte DNA in rats (males more than females), which was also consistent with previous results demonstrated in humans [44]. The apparent paradox of a lower methylation state in females may be partly explained by the global hypomethylation of the inactive X chromosome. However, there was no difference in the mC (genomic 5-methylcytosine) content between males and females in either the brain or liver DNA in drug-free control groups. After haloperidol treatment, increased global DNA methylation in both males and females was discovered in the liver, but the difference was statistically significant in males only. In the brain, haloperidol treatment resulted in a decrease of methylation in females, and the decrease was statistically significant. Thus, the differential effects of haloperidol on DNA methylation in various tissues and the sexes suggest that specific hormones may play a role in haloperidol’s modification of the methylation state of DNA, and that processes are complex [45].
Epigenome-wide methylation studies have shown antipsychotic-induced methylation, associated with a wide range of cellular processes. Insulin resistance induced by antipsychotic treatment is associated with gene-specific DNA methylation, in particular the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [46]. The studies of Kinoshita et al. revealed DNA methylation decrease in genome sites responsible for the expression of cell adhesion molecules in patients after a year of clozapine treatment [47]. The studies also indicate that antipsychotics may directly modify gene-specific methylation. Clozapine and sulpiride, but not haloperidol and olanzapine, induced the demethylation of the methylated genes of reelin and GAD67 (glutamic acid decarboxylase 67), as a low expression of these genes has been found in the brains of subjects with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [48, 49]. Studies conducted by Melka et al. [50] revealed epigenetic changes in some brain regions induced by olanzapine. Significant differences in methy­lation in genes related to dopamine expression were described in the hippocampus, cerebellum, and liver, for example: significantly increased methylation at the dopamine-DARPP-32 pathway and decreased methylation at CDc42 gene in hippocampus (cell division control protein 42 homolog – a protein involved in regulation of the cell cycle). This might be particularly relevant to the clinical potential of olanzapine as Cdc42 is a signaling protein important for the reorganization of actin cytoskeleton and morphogenesis of cells, playing a role in synaptic plasticity, learning and memory processes. In the cerebellum, increased methylation was seen in ephrin-receptor signaling, the role of which is to mediate a variety of cell-cell interactions during embryonic development and during adulthood in the process of long term potentiation, angiogenesis and oncogenesis [50]. Studies by Abdolmaleky showed that lifetime antipsychotic use was correlated with decrease in methylation of DTNBP1 (dystrobrevin binding protein 1) [51] and the 5-HTT (serotonin transporter) gene-site [52], but increased methylation of the HTR2A site in comparison to drug-free patients [53]. Burghardt [54] demonstrated increased DNA methylation observed for AKT1, AKT2 but not in the AKT3 gene site in patients treated with antipsychotics (31% quetiapine, 25% risperidone, 19% olanzapine, 13% asenapine, and 13% aripiprazole) versus patients treated with mood stabilizers (43% lamotrigine, 43% lithium, and 14% valproic acid) and this trend was observed between AKT methylation and insulin resistance.
In conclusion, it might be suggested that gene methylation changes in tissues (mainly in skeletal muscle) and the expression of key insulin-signaling protein (AKT) may be responsible for the development of insulin resistance during antipsychotic treatment. Results from other studies on the role of antipsychotics in methylation status are inconsistent, as D’Addario revealed no effects of antipsychotic use in patients with schizophrenia [55]. An analysis taking into account correction for multiple testing also revealed no associations for any medication [56]. Contrarily, Venugopal et al. described increased methylation to the level similar to the control group in patients treated with antipsychotics [57].

PROTEOMIC AND TRANSCRIPTOMIC STUDIES

The hypothesis for the origin of schizophrenia mostly concerns developmental and functional abnormalities in brain regional connectivity, neurotransmitter systems of neurons, and the activity of oligodendrocytes and the myelinization process. Antipsychotics have been shown to influence many intracellular processes in neurons and oligodendrocytes, by modulating synthesis and processes like translation initiation, translation elongation and folding in the class of proteins associated with metabolism, protein synthesis, the cytoskeleton, cell adhesion and synaptic activity. Reduced levels of transcripts in blood and olfactory cells has been revealed in patients with schizophrenia in comparison to control subjects [58]. The upregulation of proteins involved in the synthesis of ribosomal proteins and tRNAs is one of the cellular process targeted by antipsychotics. Studies conducted by Kumarasinghe [59] demonstrated that antipsychotics normalized aberrant AKT1 but not DISC1 (disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1) protein transcript levels in mononuclear cells of schizophrenia patients compared with healthy volunteers. The same study also revealed that anti­psychotics restored the physiological levels of ribosomal proteins and tRNA (transfer RNA) synthesizing protein in a group of patients. Bowling et al. described, in their studies, the role of antipsychotics in protein synthesis due to modification of mTORC 1 signaling and changes in ribosomal proteins within the first hours of treatment [19].
The group of proteins involved in respiratory and metabolism processes is also a target for antipsychotics. Mitochondria-related oxidative stress and damage were evident in the prefrontal cortex tissue of patients suffering from schizophrenia, including decreased mitochondrial size and altered cellular distribution [60]. Antipsychotic treatment has been shown to alter the transcription and protein abundance of several specific genes indicated in mitochondrial and metabolic defects. Numerous changes in the level of metabolism-related transcripts and proteins such as DISC1 (disrupted-in-schizophrenia), optic atrophy 1 (OPA 1), glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GLUD1) and AKT1 have been revealed after acute and chronic antipsychotic treatment [61-63]. Moreover, the altered expression of proteins involved in glycolysis and glucose metabolism was described in cortical synaptoneurosomes of rats treated with antipsychotics for 4 weeks, which suggests alterations in mitochondrial and energy metabolism [64].
The genes involved in cytoskeleton processes like micro­tubule dynamics, dendritic branching, and spine dynamics are also the area affected in schizophrenia and targeted by antipsychotics. One of these cytoskeletal proteins is micro­tubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2). The expression of the MAP2 gene, usually decreased in human patients with schizophrenia, is increased at the transcript and proteome level during treatment with antipsychotics [65]. Rodent have studies revealed an increase in MAP2 gene transcripts in the brain following antipsychotic treatment [61]. Cell adhesion processes regulated by genes, coding cell adhesion molecules and synaptic stability are also the shared mechanisms underlying disease and treatment [66, 67]. Analysis of prolonged antipsychotic treatment and protein synthesis (ribosomal, chaperone and tRNA-related proteins) demonstrated that cytoskeletal protein expression may be induced within a day of treatment and maintained. In addition, other cytoskeletal proteins and rodent neural progenitor cells (NPCs) such as dynamic 1 (DNM1), glial fibrillary and acidic protein (Gfap) have been demonstrated to be increased during antipsychotic treatment [68]. Finally, alterations in the abundance of cell-adhesion and synaptic-activity proteins have been demonstrated as being due to antipsychotic treatment. The altered proteins include: NCAM1 (neural cell adhesion molecule), and synaptosomal-associated protein 91 kDa (SNAP91), involved in cell adhesion and clathrin-dependent presynaptic vesicle assembly.
Finally, at the transcription level of the expression of the ADAMTS2 gene, antipsychotics share molecular mechanisms for the development of schizophrenia and the treatment of this disease. ADAMTS2 is localized in the brain regions like the mesolimbic and mesocortical dopamine systems. ADAMTS2 is one of the most upregulated genes in patients with schizophrenia during their first episode and is down-regulated in those who clinically improved after treatment with antipsychotics [69]. ADAMTS2 expression is activated by dopaminergic trans­mission (through D1-class receptors) and downstream by cAMP/CREB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK signaling. Antipsychotic drugs inhibit D1-mediated activation of ADAMTS2 expression in neurons, which is probably involved in the clinical response to treatment in schizophrenia patients. Incubation with atypical APDs such as paliperidone, aripiprazole and risperidone leads to inhibition of ADAMTS2 basal mRNA expression with fast but transient responses (< 1 h). Clozapine and halo­peridol induce a fast and sustained – up to 24 h – inhibition of ADSAMTS2 expression. These molecular effects deserve further investigation, as clozapine has superior efficacy for treatment-resistant cases as well as suicidality and ability to decrease substance abuse in schizophrenia patients [69].

POST-TRANSCRIPTION PROCESSES: MICRORNA MODULATION

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) with relatively few nucleotides in length (22 on the average). They are transcribed from intergenic regions or spliced from introns of protein-coding genes. Next, they are transformed into mature miRNA transcript that post-transcriptionally control gene expression by binding to sites located in the 3’ UTR region of the mRNA target (3’ untranslated region), inhibiting mRNA translation. The expression and regulation of mRNA in particular have been found to be important for a wide range of biological processes and are involved in the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. miRNAs are stored in exosomes produced from the multi vesicular bodies of the endosomal pathway of the cell. Exosomes with miRNA are secret­ed from the cell of origin and can fuse with the plasma membrane of the recipient cells, unloading their miRNA cargo and post-transcriptionally modulate/inhibit multiple genes. This kind of cell-to-cell communication influences neuronal and glial development and function and, in consequence, synaptic plasticity. Post-mortem studies have shown miRNA dysregulation in the brains of patients with psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia, autism, and Tourette’s syndrome, but still little is known about the role of exosome-associated miRNA in the development of disease and its treatment [70]. Nevertheless, the central regu­latory role of microRNA (miRNA) in gene expression makes them promising biomarkers. For example described changes in miRNA from people with schizophrenia include the up-regulation of hsa-miR-34a and downregulation of hsa-miR-432 [71]. However, the data for other miRNAs are conflicting. Antipsychotics may also influence the secretion of miRNA in different tissues. For example, olanzapine and haloperidol significantly reduced intracellular and exosomal miR-223 in cortical neurons but increased the secretion of miR-223 in the exosomal fraction of miRNA in astrocytes [72]. The secretion of miR-223 from astrocytes influences NMDA receptor gene expression in neurons and was detected in orbito-frontal cortex of patients who had a psychotic episode at the time of death. Increased miRNA-223 was negatively correlated with the expression of NMDA and AMPA-type subunits and GABAeric gene expression, which has clinical significance as hypofunction of NMDA transmission in the prefrontal cortex has been implicated in the cognitive and behavioral impairments in schizophrenia and other psychiatric illnesses [73]. In addition, pre-treatment with antipsychotics like haloperidol or clozapine prevented changes in miR-219 level induced by the administration of NMDA receptor antagonists (dizocilpine) in the prefrontal cortex [74]. These data support an integral role for miR-219 in the expression of behavioral aberrations associated with NMDA receptor hypofunction, involved in schizophrenia associated aberrations. Haloperidol and clozapine also appeared to regulate the expression of a large number of miRNAs related to oxidative stress and metabolism, which might be related to drug side-effects like weight gain, metabolic syndrome or insulin resistance [75, 76]. There are studies showing a decrease in plasma expression of hsa-miR-365, hsa-miR-520c-3p, and hsa-miR-181b after antipsychotic treatment, corresponding with a positive correlation between the expression of miRNA-181b and the improvement of negative symptoms [77, 78]. Finally, an in vitro antipsychotic treatment response study in T lymphocyte cell lines demonstrated that miR-200c-3p and miR-28-5p were down-regulated in haloperidol-treated cell lines in comparison to controls [79]. In contrast, the level of hsa-miR-34a and hsa-miR-432 as well as their expressions were not changed following treatment, suggesting their potential as diagnostic markers [80].

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the efficacy of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorders over the last seve­ral decades their molecular mechanisms of action have turned out to be very complex and have not been fully elucidated. Recent thinking about more personalized and endophenotype-specific diagnostics and treatment requires a more advanced genomic and proteomic approach and seems to be the next step in new treatments. In conclusion, it is worth mentioning that among the proteins most expressed by antipsychotic treatment are those involved in the following: cell communication and signaling, protein metabolism, nucleic acid metabolism, transport, cell growth and maintenance, immune response, and energy metabolism. In patients who responded clinically to antipsychotic treatment the significant differences between the proteins were observed for protein metabolism pathways (twice the number of proteins in responders) and energy metabolism protein levels (shown only in non-responders). Approximately 25% of plasma proteins whose concentration significantly changed in responders was unknown and the only protein identified as increased in responders and decreased in non-responders was coronin-2A, which could be a potential biomarker [81].

Acknowledgments

The author wants to thank to Natalia Leszczak and Natalia Bujko for the preparation of Figures I and II.

Conflict of interest

Absent.

Financial support

Absent.

References

1. Carli M, Kolachalam S, Longoni B, Pintaudi A, Baldini M, Aringhieri S, et al. Atypical antipsychotics and metabolic syndrome: from molecular mechanisms to clinical differences. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14: 238.
2. Turalba AV, Leite-Morris KA, Kaplan GB. Antipsychotics regulate cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and phosphorylated cyclic AMP response element-binding protein in striatal and cortical brain regions in mice. Neurosci Lett 2004; 357: 53-57.
3. Scheggi S, De Montis MG, Gambarana C. DARPP-32 in the orchestration of responses to positive natural stimuli. J Neurochem 2018; 147: 439-453.
4. Kunii Y, Hino M, Matsumoto J, Nagaoka A, Nawa H, Kakita A, et al. Differential protein expression of DARPP-32 versus Calcineurin in the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 14877.
5. Dwivedi Y, Rizavi HS, Pandey GN. Differential effects of haloperidol and clozapine on [(3)H]cAMP binding, protein kinase A (PKA) activity, and mRNA and protein expression of selective regulatory and catalytic subunit isoforms of PKA in rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002; 301: 197-209.
6. Pozzi L, Håkansson K, Usiello A, Borgkvist A, Lindskog M, Greengard P, et al. Opposite regulation by typical and atypical anti-psychotics of ERK1/2, CREB and Elk-1 phosphorylation in mouse dorsal striatum. J Neurochem 2003; 86: 451-459.
7. Beaulieu JM, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG. The Akt-GSK-3 signaling cascade in the actions of dopamine. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2007; 28: 166-172.
8. Kockeritz L, Doble B, Patel S, Woodgett JR. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 – an overview of an over-achieving protein kinase. Curr Drug Targets 2006; 7: 1377-1388.
9. Rampino A, Torretta S, Gelao B, Veneziani F, Iacoviello M, Marakhovskaya A, et al. Evidence of an interaction between FXR1 and GSK3β polymorphisms on levels of negative symptoms of schizophrenia and their response to antipsychotics. Eur Psychiatry 2021; 64: e39.
10. Freyberg Z, Ferrando SJ, Javitch JA. Roles of the Akt/GSK-3 and Wnt signaling pathways in schizophrenia and antipsychotic drug action. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 388-396.
11. Tan HY, Nicodemus KK, Chen Q, Li Z, Brooke JK, Honea R, et al. Genetic variation in AKT1 is linked to dopamine-associated prefrontal cortical structure and function in humans. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 2200-2208.
12. Dummler B, Hemmings BA. Physiological roles of PKB/AKT isoforms in development and disease. Bioch Soc Trans 2007; 35: 231-235.
13. Beaulieu JM, Del’guidice T, Sotnikova TD, Lemasson M, Gainetdinov RR. Beyond cAMP: the regulation of Akt and GSK3 by Dopamine Receptors. Front Mol Neurosci 2011; 4: 38.
14. Masri B, Salahpour A, Didriksen M, Ghisi V, Beaulieu JM, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG. Antagonism of dopamine D2 receptor/beta-arrestin 2 interaction is a common property of clinically effective antipsychotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 13656-13661.
15. Pan B, Lian J, Deng C. Chronic antipsychotic treatment differentially modulates protein kinase A- and glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta-dependent signaling pathways, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and γ-aminobutyric acid A receptors in nucleus accumbens of juvenile rats. J Psychopharmacol 2018; 32: 1252-1263.
16. Roh MS, Seo MS, Kim Y, Kim SH, Jeon WJ, Ahn YM, et al. Haloperidol and clozapine differentially regulate signals upstream of glycogen synthase kinase 3 in the rat frontal cortex. Exp Mol Med 2007; 39: 353-360.
17. Réus GZ, Abelaira HM, Agostinho FR, Ribeiro KF, Vitto MF, Luciano TF, et al. The administration of olanzapine and fluoxetine has synergistic effects on intracellular survival pathways in the rat brain. J Psychiatr Res 2012; 46: 1029-1035.
18. Pan B, Chen J, Lian J, Huang XF, Deng C. Unique effects of acute aripiprazole treatment on the dopamine D2 receptor downstream cAMP-PKA and Akt-GSK3β signalling pathways in rats. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0132722.
19. Beaulieu JM, Marion S, Rodriguez RM, Medvedev IO, Sotnikova TD, Ghisi V, et al. A b-arestin 2 signaling complex mediates lithium action on behavior. Cell 2008; 132: 125-126.
20. Bowling H, Zhang G, Bhattacharya A, Pérez-Cuesta LM, Deinhardt K, Hoeffer CA, et al. Antipsychotics activate mTORC1-dependent translation to enhance neuronal morphological complexity. Sci Signal 2014; 7: ra4.
21. McMahon AP, Bradley A. The Wnt-1 (int-1) proto-oncogen is required for development of a large region of the mouse brain. Cell 1990; 62: 1073-1085.
22. Cotter D, Kerwin R, Al-Sarrajl A, Brion JP, Chadwich A, Lovestone S, et al. Abnormalities of Wnt signaling in schizophrenia- evidence for neurodevelopment abnormality. Neuroreport 1998: 9: 1261-1265.
23. Sutton LP, Honardoust D, Mouyal J, Rajakumar N, Rushlow WJ. Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway by the antipsychotics haloperidol and clozapine involves dishevelled-3. J Neurochem 2007; 102: 153-169.
24. Alimohamad H, Sutton L, Mouyal J, Rajakumar N, Rushlow WJ. The effects of antipsychotics on beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase-3 and dishevelled in the ventral midbrain of rats. J Neurochem 2005; 95: 513-525.
25. Kang UG, Seo MS, Roh MS, Kim Y, Yoon SC, Kim YS. The effects of clozapine on the GSK-3-mediated signaling pathway. FEBS Lett 2004; 560: 115-119.
26. Li P, Wang Y, Liu X, Zhou Z, Wang J, Zhou H, et al. Atypical antipsychotics induce human osteoblasts apoptosis via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2019; 20: 10.
27. Miyaoka T, Seno H, Ishino H. Increased expression of Wnt-1 in schizophrenic brains. Schizophr Res 1999; 38: 1-6.
28. Okerlund ND, Cheyette BN. Synaptic Wnt signaling-a contributor to major psychiatric disorders? J Neurodev Disord 2011; 3: 162-174.
29. Pereira A, Sugiharto-Winarno A, Zhang B, Malcolm P, Fink G, Sundram S. Clozapine induction of ERK1/2 cell signalling via the EGF receptor in mouse prefrontal cortex and striatum is distinct from other antipsychotic drugs. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2012; 15: 1149-1160.
30. Pereira A, Zhang B, Malcolm P, Sundram S. Clozapine regulation of p90RSK and c-Fos signaling via the ErbB1-ERK pathway is distinct from olanzapine and haloperidol in mouse cortex and striatum. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2013; 40: 353-363.
31. Thompson PM, Jahanshad N, Ching CRK, Salminen LE, Thomopoulos SI, Bright J, et al. ENIGMA Consortium. ENIGMA and global neuroscience: a decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries. Transl Psychiatry 2020; 10: 100.
32. Burghardt KJ, Khoury AS, Msallaty Z, Yi Z, Seyoum B. Antipsychotic medications and DNA methylation in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a systemic review. Pharmacotherapy 2020; 40: 331-342.
33. Burghardt KJ, Goodrich JM, Lines BN, Ellingrod VL. The influence of metabolic syndrome and sex on the DNA methylome in schizophrenia. Int J Genomics 2018; 2018: 8076397.
34. Bakulski KM, Hallady A, Hu VW, Mill J, Fallin MD. Epigenetic research in neuropsychiatric disorders: the “tissue issue”. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep 2016; 3: 264-274.
35. Kim S, Kaang BK. Epigenetic regulation and chromatin remodeling in learning and memory. Exp Mol Med 2017; 49: e281.
36. Kurita M, Holloway T, García-Bea A, Kozlenkov A, Friedman AK, Moreno JL, et al. HDAC2 regulates atypical antipsychotic responses through the modulation of mGlu2 promoter activity. Nat Neurosci 2012; 15: 1245.
37. Yamakawa H, Cheng J, Penney J, Gao F, Rueda R, Wang J, et al. The transcription factor Sp3 cooperates with HDAC2 to regulate synaptic function and plasticity in neurons. Cell Rep 2017; 20: 1319-1334.
38. Ibi D, de la Fuente Revenga M, Kezunovic N, Muguruza C, Saunders JM, Gaitonde SA, et al. Antipsychotic-induced Hdac2 transcription via NF-κB leads to synaptic and cognitive side effects. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20: 1247-1259.
39. Suzuki T, Uchida H, Takeuchi H, Nakajima S, Nomura K, Tanabe A, et al. Augmentation of atypical antipsychotics with valproic acid. An open-label study for most difficult patients with schizophrenia. Hum Psychopharmacol 2009; 24: 628-638.
40. Bönsch D, Wunschel M, Lenz B, Janssen G, Weisbrod M, Sauer H. Methylation matters? Decreased methylation status of genomic DNA in the blood of schizophrenic twins. Psychiatry Res 2012; 198: 533-537.
41. Melas PA, Rogdaki M, Ösby U, Schalling M, Lavebratt C, Ekström TJ. Epigenetic aberrations in leukocytes of patients with schizophrenia: association of global DNA methylation with antipsychotic drug treatment and disease onset. FASEB J 2012; 26: 2712-2718.
42. Bromberg A, Levine J, Nemetz B, Belmaker RH, Agam G. No association between global leukocyte DNA methylation and homocysteine levels in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res 2008; 101: 50-57.
43. Li J, Go Y, Schroeder FA, Youngs RM, Schmidt TW, Ferris C, et al. Dopamine D2-like antagonists induce chromatin remodeling in striatal neurons through cyclic AMP-protein kinase A and NMDA receptor signaling. J Neurochem 2004; 90: 1117-1131.
44. Shimabukuro M, Sasaki T, Imamura A, Tsujita T, Fuke C, Umekage T, et al. Global hypomethylation of peripheral leukocyte DNA in male patients with schizophrenia: a potential link between epigenetics and schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 2007; 41: 1042-1046.
45. Shimabukuro M, Jinno Y, Fuke C, Okazaki Y. Haloperidol treatment induces tissue- and sex-specific changes in DNA methylation: a control study using rats. Behav Brain Funct 2006; 2: 37.
46. Burghardt KJ, Goodrich JM, Dolinoy DC, Ellingrod VL. Gene-specific DNA methylation may mediate atypical antipsychotic-induced insulin resistance. Bipolar Disord 2016; 18: 423-432.
47. Kinoshita M, Numata S, Tajima A, Yamamori H, Yasuda Y, Fujimoto M, et al. Effect of clozapine on DNA methylation in peripheral leukocytes from patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18: 632.
48. Guidotti A, Auta J, Davis JM, Di-Giorgi-Gerevini V, Dwivedi Y, Grayson DR, et al. Decrease in reelin and glutamic acid decarboxylase67 (GAD67) expression in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a postmortem brain study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57: 1061-1069.
49. Dong E, Nelson M, Grayson DR, Costa E, Guidotti A. Clozapine and sulpiride but not haloperidol or olanzapine activate brain DNA demethylation.Proc Natl Aced Sci U S A 2008; 105: 13614-13619.
50. Melka MG, Laufer BI, McDonald P, Castellani CA, Rajakumar N, O‘Reilly R. The effects of olanzapine on genome-wide DNA methylation in the hippocampus and cerebellum. Clin Epigenetics 2014; 6: 1.
51. Abdolmaleky HM, Pajouhanfar S, Faghankhani M, Joghataei MT, Mostafavi A, Thiagalingam S. Antipsychotic drugs attenuate aberrant DNA methylation of DTNBP1 (dysbindin) promoter in saliva and post-mortem brain of patients with schizophrenia and Psychotic bipolar disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2015; 168: 687-696.
52. Abdolmaleky HM, Nohesara S, Ghadirivasfi M, Lambert AW, Ahmadkhaniha H, Ozturk S, et al. DNA hypermethylation of serotonin transporter gene promoter in drug naïve patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2014; 152: 373-380.
53. Abdolmaleky HM, Yaqubi S, Papageorgis P, Lambert AW, Ozturk S, Sivaraman V, Thiagalingam S. Epigenetic dysregulation of HTR2A in the brain of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophr Res 2011; 129: 183-190.
54. Burghardt KJ, Seyoum B, Dass SE, Sanders E, Mallisho A, Yi Z. Association of protein kinase B (AKT) DNA hypermethylation with maintenance atypical antipsychotic treatment in patients with bipolar disorder. Pharmacotherapy 2018; 38: 428-435.
55. D’Addario C, Micale V, Di Bartolomeo M, Stark T, Pucci M, Sulcova A, et al. A preliminary study of endocannabinoid system regulation in psychosis: distinct alterations of CNR1 promoter DNA methylation in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2017; 188: 132-140.
56. Houtepen LC, van Bergen AH, Vinkers CH, Boks MP. DNA methylation signatures of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics in bipolar disorder. Epigenomics 2016; 8: 197-208.
57. Venugopal D, Shivakumar V, Subbanna M, Kalmady SV, Amaresha AC, Agarwal SM, et al. Impact of antipsychotic treatment on methylation status of Interleukin-6 [IL-6] gene in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 2018; 104: 88-95.
58. English JA, Fan Y, Föcking M, Lopez LM, Hryniewiecka M, Wynne K, et al. Reduced protein synthesis in schizophrenia patient-derived olfactory cells. Transl Psychiatry 2015; 5: e663.
59. Kumarasinghe N, Beveridge NJ, Gardiner E, Scott RJ, Yasawardene S, Perera A. Gene expression profiling in treatment-naive schizophrenia patients identifies abnormalities in biological pathways involving AKT1 that are corrected by antipsychotic medication. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 16: 1483-1503.
60. Prabakaran S, Swatton JE, Ryan MM, Huffaker SJ, Huang JT, Griffin JL, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in schizophrenia: evidence for compromised brain metabolism and oxidative stress. Mol Psychiatry 2004; 9: 684-697, 643.
61. Ahmed EU, Ahmed S, Ukai W, Matsumoto I, Kemp A, McGregor IS, Kashem MA. Antipsychotic induced alteration of growth and proteome of rat neural stem cells. Neurochem Res 2012; 37: 1649-1659.
62. Chiba S, Hashimoto R, Hattori S, Yohda M, Lipska B, Weinberger DR, Kunugi H. Effect of antipsychotic drugs on DISC1 and dysbindin expression in mouse frontal cortex and hippocampus. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2006; 113: 1337-1346.
63. Ma D, Chan MK, Lockstone HE, Putsch SR, Jones DN, Cilia J, et al. Antipsychotic treatment alters protein expression associated with presynaptic function and nervous system development in rat frontal cortex. J Proteome Res 2009; 8: 3284-3297.
64. Ji B, Zhang Z, Zhang M, Zhu H, Zhou K, Yang J, et al. Differential expression profiling of the synaptosome proteome in a rat model of antipsychotic resistance. Brain Res 2009; 1295: 170-178.
65. Shelton MA, Newman JT, Gu H, Sampson AR, Fish K, MacDonald ML, et al. Loss of microtubule-associated protein 2 immunoreactivity linked to dendritic spine loss in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 78: 374-385.
66. Ayalew M, Le-Niculescu H, Levey DF, Jain N, Changala B, Patel SD, et al. Convergent functional genomics of schizophrenia: from comprehensive understanding to genetic risk prediction. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17: 887-905.
67. Goes FS, McGrath J, Avramopoulos D, Wolyniec P, Pirooznia M, Ruczinski I, et al.Genome-wide association study of schizophrenia in Ashkenazi Jews. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2015; 168: 649-659.
68. Ahmed EU, Ahmed S, Ukai W, Matsumoto I, Kemp A, McGregor IS, et al. Antipsychotic induced alteration of growth and proteome of rat neural stem cells. Neurochem Res 2012; 37: 1649-1659.
69. Ruso-Julve F, Pombero A, Pilar-Cuéllar F, García-Díaz N, Garcia-Lopez R, Juncal-Ruiz M, et al. Dopaminergic control of ADAMTS2 expression through cAMP/CREB and ERK: molecular effects of antipsychotics. Transl Psychiatry 2019; 9: 306.
70. Amoah SK, Rodriguez BA, Logothestis CN, Chander P, Sellgren CM, Wick JP, et al. Exosomal secretion of a psychosis-altered miRNA that regulates glutamate receptor expression is affected by antipsychotics. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020; 45: 656-665.
71. Sun XY, Lu J, Zhang L, Song HT, Zhao L, Fan HM, et al. Aberrant microRNA expression in peripheral plasma and mononuclear cells as specific blood-based biomarkers in schizophrenia patients. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22: 570-574.
72. Santarelli DM, Liu B, Duncan CE, Beveridge NJ, Tooney PA, Schofield PR, et al. gene-micrRNA interactions associated with antipsychotic mechanisms and the metabolic side effects of olanzpine. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 2013; 227: 67-78.
73. Harraz MM, Eacker SM, Wang X, Dawson VL. MicroRNA-223 is neuroprotective by targeting glutamate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 18962-18967.
74. Kocerha J, Faghihi MA, Lopez-Toledano MA, Huang J, Ramsey AJ, Caron MG, et al. MicroRNA-219 modulates NMDA receptor-mediated neurobehavioral dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 3507-3512.
75. Gardiner E, Carroll A, Tooney PA, Cairns MJ. Antipsychotic drug-associated gene-miRNA interaction in T-lymphocytes. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 17: 929-943.
76. Newcomer JW. Antipsychotic medications: metabolic and cardiovascular risk. J Clin Psychiatry 2007; 68 Suppl 4: 8-13.
77. Song HT, Sun XY, Zhang L, Zhao L, Guo ZM, Fan HM, et al. A preliminary analysis of association between the down-regulation of microRNA-181b expression and symptomatology improvement in schizophrenia patients before and after antipsychotic treatment. J Psychiatr Res 2014; 54: 134-140.
78. Sun XY, Lu J, Zhang L, Song HT, Zhao L, Fan HM, et al. Aberrant microRNA expression in peripheral plasma and mononuclear cells as specific blood-based biomarkers in schizophrenia patients. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22: 570-574.
79. Gardiner E, Carroll A, Tooney PA, Cairns MJ. Antipsychotic drug-associated gene-miRNA interaction in T-lymphocytes. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 17: 929-943.
80. Lai CY, Scarr E, Udawela M, Everall I, Chen WJ, Dean B. Biomarkers in schizophrenia: a focus on blood based diagnostics and theranostics. World J Psychiatry 2016: 6: 102-117.
81. Martins-de-Souza D, Solari FA, Guest PC, Zahedi RP, Steiner J. Biological pathways modulated by antipsychotic in the blood plasma of schizophrenia patients and their association to a clinical response. NPJ Schizophr 2015; 1: 15050.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License allowing third parties to download and share its works but not commercially purposes or to create derivative works.
Quick links
© 2022 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.