eISSN: 1897-4317
ISSN: 1895-5770
Gastroenterology Review/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
NOWOŚĆ
Portal dla gastroenterologów!
www.egastroenterologia.pl
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2019
vol. 14
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł oryginalny

Preneoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder lesions detected after cholecystectomy

Servet Kocaöz
1
,
Gülay Turan
2

1.
Department of General Surgery, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey
2.
Department of Medical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey
Data publikacji online: 2019/02/04
Plik artykułu:
- preneoplastic.pdf  [0.08 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 

Introduction

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common cancer of the biliary system. The annual incidence is estimated to be 1 or 2 people per 100.000 [1, 2]. The GBC spreads very quickly and has a high mortality rate. The most important prognostic factor is the stage of the disease [3, 4]. The GB stones are thought to cause a number of changes that cause atrophy, metaplasia, dysplasia, and ultimately cancer in the GB epithelium [3, 5]. Because it does not cause any symptoms in the early period, the disease is diagnosed during surgery or at an advanced stage. The GBC was diagnosed in 0.1–3% of all cholecystectomies [26]. The survival rate is higher in early-stage GBC that has undergone cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis [7, 8]. Because of the high risk of cancer, cholecystectomy is recommended in the presence of a GB polyps (GP) larger than 1 cm or when vascular pedicle is seen on ultrasonography (USG) [9]. Cellular differentiation begins in the GB due to inflammation and other factors added to the GB, resulting in intestinal metaplasia (IM). Increased cell damage causes dysplasia and ultimately carcinoma in situ [10, 11]. Development of dysplasia-carcinoma in the GB is a long process. Preliminary lesions, environmental factors, and risk factors need to be combined [12, 13].

Aim

In our study, we aimed to review the clinical and morphological aspects of pre-neoplastic lesions of the GB in patients undergoing cholecystectomy and to analyse the results and our results in cancers observed in this organ.

Material and methods

A total of 5026 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017 were included in the study. Medical records and histopathological findings of these patients were evaluated retrospectively. All samples taken after surgery included in these reports were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde and stored in paraffin. In addition, the sections obtained from the samples were stained with haematoxylin-eosin and PAS/Alcian Blue (pH = 2.5) and then prepared for routine light microscopy. Then, all the samples were evaluated by an expert pathologist. In each case, the presence of stones in the lumen of the GB, type of inflammation in the wall of the sac, cholesterolosis, polyps, metaplasia, dysplasia, cancer, and other lesions were recorded. It was compared with the previous histopathology report and re-evaluated in the presence of incompatibility. Demographic information (age, sex) of the patients was reviewed.

Ethical considerations

Before initiating the present study, the researchers gained the approval of Balıkesir University Medical Faculty Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision no: 196, date: 05.12.2018) and the written permission of Balıkesir Atatürk City Hospital where the research was conducted.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained from this study were transferred to the SPSS program (Version 25.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and then analysed. The number, percentage, mean, and standard deviation values were utilised for the evaluation of descriptive statistics. The chi-square test (χ2) was used to define the correlations among the clinical and pathological datum.

Results

Of the 5026 patients (1228) who underwent open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), 24.43% were male (3798) and 75.56% were women. The mean age of male patients was 54.11 ±13.77 years, and the mean age of female patients was 51.27 ±14.43 years. It was found that female patients had GB disease at an earlier age than male patients (p = 0.002). Histopathological examination of the patients found acute stone cholecystitis in 15.06% (757), acute gangrenous cholecystitis in 1.33% (67), acalculous acute cholecystitis in 0.82% (41), XGC in 2.43% (122), follicular cholecystitis in 0.72% (36), eosinophilic cholecystitis in 0.34% (17), GB polyps in 5.95% (299), cholesterolosis in 24.05% (1209), and chronic stone cholecystitis in 47.97% (2411). In addition, operated patients were found to have antral type metaplasia in 12.5% (628), intestinal metaplasia in 2.55% (128), dysplasia in 0.97% (49), and adenocarcinoma in 0.35% (18). Of the 299 patients detected with polyps in the GB of histopathology, 0.22% (11) had inflammatory polyps, 3.04% (153) had adenomyomatous hyperplasia, 0.16% (8) had hyperplastic polyps, 0.5% (25) had tubular adenomas, and 2.03% (102) had cholesterol polyps (Table I). In patients with GBC, the mean age of men was 63.25 ±11.35 years and the mean age of women was 66.21 ±12.15 years. GBC was higher in women than in men (14/4 = 3.5). A significant correlation was found between cholelithiasis and GBC (p = 0.031). Six of the patients with GBC had stage I A (T1a + T1b), five had stage 1b (T2N0), two had stage II A (T3N0), three had stage 2b (T1-3 N1), one had stage III (T4 N0), and one had stage IV (T3N1M1) (Table II). In addition, IM was higher in women than in men (K/E = 3.3). There was no relationship between IM and gender (p = 0.595). Similarly, no correlation was found between age and IM (p = 0.451). A meaningful relationship was found between cholecystitis and IM (p < 0.001). A meaningful association was observed between IM and adenomyomatous hyperplasia (p = 0.016). A meaningful relationship was found between the presence of cholesterol and IM comorbidity (p < 0.001).

Table I

Histopathological changes of the gallbladder

ParameterNumber of patientsPercentage
Chronic cholecystitis241147.97
Acute cholecystitis75715.06
Gangrenous cholecystitis671.33
Cholesterolosis120924.05
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis1222.43
Follicular cholecystitis360.72
Eosinophilic cholecystitis170.34
Acalculous cholecystitis410.82
Adenomyomatous hyperplasia1533.04
Cholesterol polyp1022.03
Hyperplasic polyp80.16
Tubular adenoma250.5
Inflammatory polyp110.22
Antral type metaplasia62812.5
Intestinal metaplasia1282.55
Dysplasia490.97
Cancer180.35
Table II

Stages of patients with gallbladder cancer

StageNumber of patientsPercentage
I A633.33
I B527.78
II A211.11
II B316.67
III15.56
IV15.56

Discussion

Cholecystectomy is a common method for the treatment of GB diseases. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is preferred for reasons such as shorter operation time, lower complication and mortality rates, and early return of patients to daily life activities during the postoperative period. However, open cholecystectomy is performed in the presence of factors such as cancer suspicion in the GB, congenital anomalies of the biliary tract and gallbladder, liver cirrhosis, bleeding disorders, especially third trimester of pregnancy, and adhesions between GB and surrounding tissue. In order to detect clinically asymptomatic malignancies, it is recommended that a sufficient number of samples be taken from cholecystectomy material [14].

The most common malignant tumour (88%) in the GB is adenocarcinoma. Squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, and other tumours can be seen less frequently [15]. Clinically, a significant proportion of GB malignancies are asymptomatic and incidentally found in the histopathological examination (47%) [15]. In our study, GBC prevalence was found to be 0.35% in the histopathology of LC patients. In the study of Pitt et al. the prevalence of GBC was found to be 0.19%. In a similar study by Martins-Filho et al. the prevalence of GBC was found to be 0.34%. Our study was consistent with the literature [16, 17]. Utsumi et al. found the prevalence of GBC to be 2.3%. It has been reported that factors such as Asian or African American race, age over 65 years, female gender, obesity, biliary stone, polypoid lesions, high alkaline phosphatase level, and nutrition can cause a high prevalence [18]. In our study, among GBC patients, 78% (14) were female, 67% (12) had cholelithiasis, and 11% (2) had GB polyps. Cholelithiasis causes inflammation of the GB as a result of chronic irritation, followed by the development of mucosal dysplasia and eventually development of carcinoma. In the early stages, GB wall thickening is seen in both cholecystitis and cancer. It is therefore difficult to distinguish. In the case of suspected GBC, intraoperative frozen section examination should be performed [19]. In our study, two cases had an intraoperative frozen pathologic examination. Subsequently, GB bed resection and hepatic peduncle lymphadenectomy were performed. The only curative treatment for GBC is surgical resection. LC is sufficient in stage pT1a. Six patients in our study had LC. GB bed resection and hepatic peduncle lymphadenectomy should be performed in stage pT1b. Five patients with stage pT1b underwent resection of the GB bed and lymphadenectomy. Resection of hepatic segment 4a and 5, hepatic peduncle lymphadenectomy, and additional radical surgical procedures should be performed in stage pT2 [18, 20].

The relationship among cholelithiasis and GBC is well known. A relationship between cholecystolithiasis and XGC, adenomyomatous hyperplasia and antral metaplasia has been reported [21, 22]. In our study, a significant correlation was found between cholelithiasis and GBC (p = 0.031). The high risk of GBC in women is partly explicable by the proportion of higher cholesterol cytolysis in men than in women. Longer exposure to female sex hormones (such as oestrogen and progesterone) may increase the risk of GBC [23].

Acute cholecystitis and gangrenous cholecystitis were more common in men. The results are similar in other studies [5]. In a male patient with acute cholecystitis, GBC was determined. Non-infectious GB adenomyomatous hyperplasia is defined as a precancerous lesion. Cases of GBC associated with adenomyomatous hyperplasia have been reported [24].

XGC is a rare purulent and devastating GB disease that can propagate to neighbouring structures and can be mingled with cancer. Microscopically, purulent cell infiltration is seen in the GB wall, as well as the presence of a large number of foamy macrophage groups. XGC is detected in approximately 2% of cholecystectomies. Men and women are seen as equal and often with gallstones [25]. In our study, this rate was found at 2.43%. The GBC was reported as determined in 9% to 12% of patients with XGC [25, 26]. In our study, cancer was detected in a patient with XGC. Cholecystitis in which lymphoid follicles with a germinal centre filling the lamina propria are seen is known as follicular cholecystitis. In this study, a patient with follicular cholecystitis was also diagnosed with cancer.

Metaplastic changes are associated with cancer. There are two metaplastic changes in the GB: antral and intestinal. Metaplastic changes and dysplasia increase with age and are most common in patients over 50 years of age [11]. In our study, metaplastic changes were found in 78.7% (96) of patients with XGC, in 75% (27) of patients with follicular cholecystitis, and in 33.99% (52) of patients with adenomyomatous hyperplasia.

In our study, 18 patients had adenomatous polyps. Adenomatous polyps show cancer transformation. However, malignant transformation of adenoma is rare. The evolution of cancer is connected with the size of the adenomatous polyps [5]. In our study, metaplastic changes were found in 68% (17) of the patients with adenoma.

Cholesterolosis occurs as a result of the collection of cholesterol esters and triglycerides in the cytoplasm of macrophages in the GB wall. Macroscopically, it is seen as yellow lines (strawberry sac) on the mucosal surface or as polypoid lesions of 0.1–0.5 cm. It is thought that the serum cholesterol level is due to its height. However, it has been shown not to have any association with high cholesterol levels [27]. Polypoid shaped ones are also known as cholesterol polyps and are the most common polyp type in the GB. It is possible to observe at the same time various purulent, reactive, and neoplastic polyps in the GB mucosa. In the presence of polyps larger than 10 mm in the GB, the presence of GBC should be investigated [28]. In our study, cholesterol polyp was detected in 2.03% of patients who underwent LC. A meaningful association was found between the presence of cholesterosis and metaplastic changes (p < 0.001).

On ultrasonography, when the GB wall is seen to be thickened (greater than 3 mm), approximately 50% of these patients appear to have XGC. Because of the high risk of cancer in these patients, LC is recommended. Again, in patients with large gallstones in the GB (greater than 3 cm), prophylactic cholecystectomy in the presence of porcelain gallbladder and stemless polyps (greater than 1 cm) is reported to reduce the GBC-related mortality rate [27]. However, Lee et al. reported no significant correlation between LC rate, GBC incidence, and mortality [28]. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that prophylactic LC should be performed in patients with asymptomatic cholecystitis to diminish the incidence and mortality of rare GBC [29, 30].

Conclusions

In this study, chronic cholecystitis, XGC, follicular cholecystitis, adenomyomatous hyperplasia, adenomatous polyp, and even cholesterolosis were associated with metaplastic changes. It is thought that metaplasia-dysplasia may be associated with GBC. However, further studies on GB carcinogenesis are needed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Shih SP, Schulick RD, Cameron JL, et al. , authors. Gallbladder cancer: the role of laparoscopy and radical resection. Ann Surg. 2007. 245:p. 893–901

2 

Hundal R, Shaffer EA , authors. Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014. 6:p. 99–109

3 

Lazcano-Ponce EC, Miquel JF, Muñoz N, et al. , authors. Epidemiology and molecular pathology of gallbladder cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001. 51:p. 349–64

4 

Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Zou XP, et al. , authors. Incidental gallbladder carcinoma diagnosed during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2009. 33:p. 2651–6

5 

Roa I, de Aretxabala X, Araya JC, Roa J , authors. Preneoplastic lesions in gallbladder cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2006. 93:p. 615–23

6 

Meirelles-Costa AL, Bresciani CJ, Perez RO, et al. , authors. Are histological alterations observed in the gallbladder precancerous lesions? Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010. 65:p. 143–50

7 

Cavallaro A, Piccolo G, Panebianco V, et al. , authors. Incidental gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: managing an unexpected finding. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. 18:p. 4019–27

8 

Sun CD, Zhang BY, Wu LQ, Lee WJ , authors. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of unexpected early-stage gallbladder cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2005. 91:p. 253–7

9 

Aloia TA, Járufe N, Javle M, et al. , authors. Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford). 2015. 17:p. 681–90

10 

Mukhopadhyay S, Landas SK , authors. Putative precursors of gallbladder dysplasia: a review of 400 routinely resected specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005. 129:p. 386–90

11 

Fernandes JE, Franco MI, Suzuki RK, et al. , authors. Intestinal metaplasia in gallbladders: prevalence study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008. 126:p. 220–2

12 

Lewis JT, Talwalkar JA, Rosen CB, et al. , authors. Prevalence and risk factors for gallbladder neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: evidence for a metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007. 31:p. 907–13

13 

Khan MR, Raza SA, Ahmad Z, et al. , authors. Gallbladder intestinal metaplasia in Pakistani patients with gallstones. Int J Surg. 2011. 9:p. 482–5

14 

Amiraslanov A, Zade KY, Musayev J , authors. Histopathological profile of the gallbladder in cases who have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Marmara Med J. 2015. 28:p. 32–37

15 

Duffy A, Capanu M, Abou-Alfa GK, et al. , authors. Gallbladder cancer (GBC): 10-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). J Surg Oncol. 2008. 98:p. 485–9

16 

Pitt SC, Jin LX, Hall BL, et al. , authors. Incidental gallbladder cancer at cholecystectomy: when should the surgeon be suspicious? Ann Surg. 2014. 260:p. 128–33

17 

Martins-Filho ED, Batista TP, Kreimer F, et al. , authors. Prevalence of incidental gallbladder cancer in a tertiary-care hospital from Pernambuco, Brazil. Arq Gastroenterol. 2015. 52:p. 247–9

18 

Utsumi M, Aoki H, Kunitomo T, et al. , authors. Evaluation of surgical treatment for incidental gallbladder carcinoma diagnosed during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single center results. BMC Res Notes. 2017. 10:p. 56

19 

Kwon AH, Imamura A, Kitade H, Kamiyama Y , authors. Unsuspected gallbladder cancer diagnosed during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2008. 97:p. 241–5

20 

Watson H, Dasari B, Wyatt J, et al. , authors. Does a second resection provide a survival benefit in patients diagnosed with incidental T1b/T2 gallbladder cancer following cholecystectomy? HPB (Oxford). 2017. 19:p. 104–7

21 

Martínez-Guzmán G, de la Rosa-Bayón J , authors. Neoplasms and dysplasias of the gallbladder and their relationship with lithiasis. A case-control clinicopathological study. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 1998. 63:p. 82–8

22 

Khanna R, Chansuria R, Kumar M, Shukla HS , authors. Histological changes in gallbladder due to histological changes in gallbladder due to stone disease. Indian J Surg. 2006. 68:p. 201–4

23 

Shukla VK, Chauhan VS, Mishra RN, Basu S , authors. Lifestyle, reproductive factors and risk of gallbladder cancer. Singapore Med J. 2008. 49:p. 912–5

24 

Cariati A, Piromalli E, Cetta F , authors. Gallbladder cancers: associated conditions, histological types, prognosis, and prevention. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. 26:p. 562–9

25 

Spinelli A, Schumacher G, Pascher A, et al. , authors. Extended surgical resection for xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking advanced gallbladder carcinoma: a case report and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. 12:p. 2293–6

26 

Kwon AH, Sakaida N , authors. Simultaneous presence of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and gallbladder cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2007. 42:p. 703–4

27 

Dairi S, Demeusy A, Sill AM, et al. , authors. Implications of gallbladder cholesterolosis and cholesterol polyps? J Surg Res. 2016. 200:p. 467–72

28 

Lee H, Kim K, Park I, et al. , authors. Preoperative predictive factors for gallbladder cholesterol polyp diagnosed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for polypoid lesions of gallbladder. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2016. 20:p. 180–6

29 

Kapoor VK , author. Cholecystectomy in patients with asymptomatic gallstones to prevent gall bladder cancer: the case against. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2006. 25:p. 152–4

30 

Le MD, Henson D, Young H, Albores-Saavedra J , authors. Is gallbladder cancer decreasing in view of increasing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Ann Hepatol. 2011. 10:p. 306–14

Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.