eISSN: 2300-6722
ISSN: 1899-1874
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Suplementy Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
4/2023
vol. 39
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł oryginalny

Ciąża w bliźnie po cięciu cesarskim. Analiza terapii dopęcherzykowej w retrospektywnej kohorcie 35 pacjentek

Grzegorz Swiercz
1
,
Jakub Kabza
2
,
Katarzyna Zacharska
2
,
Marta Mlodawska
1
,
Jakub Młodawski
1

1.
Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
2.
Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Provincial Combined Hospital, Kielce, Poland
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne 2023; 39 (4): 359-363
Data publikacji online: 2023/12/30
Plik artykułu:
- Caesarean.pdf  [0.12 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 

Introduction

Pregnancy in a scar after caesarean section (CSP) is a rare complication of pregnancy. It is estimated that this form accounts for approximately 6% of all ectopic pregnancies [1]. The main concern with CSP is its association with the development of morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) in most cases, which carries a high risk of maternal peripartum mortality and morbidity, as well as neonatal prematurity [2]. Ultrasonographic imaging of CSP reveals a gestational sac (GS) on the anterior uterine wall, absence or thinning of the myometrium at the bladder junction, absence of GS in the cervical canal and uterine cavity, and visualization of blood flow around the GS using colour Doppler ultrasound [3].
The management of CSP is not yet clearly established, although with the emergence of studies involving larger patient cohorts, it is slowly becoming more clarified. Currently, surgical procedures such as operative resection (wedge resection) can be utilized for patients who want to preserve fertility, while gravid hysterectomy is an option for patients who do not express such a desire. In cases of medical therapy, intragestational injection of potassium chloride (KCl) and methotrexate (MTX) or transcervical Foley catheter placement can be employed. Additionally, supportive methods such as systemic administration of MTX, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) have been described in the literature [4, 5].

Aim of the research

The diagnosis of CSP contraindicates uterine curettage due to the high risk of haemorrhage and perforation at the scar site. Vaginal use of misoprostol, as in the case of missed miscarriage, is also not recommended. Given the lack of well-established management guidelines, the relatively small number of reported cases, and the increasing prevalence, we decided to present our study focusing on 35 cases of CSP hospitalized at our institution.

Material and methods

We reviewed the medical records of all patients hospitalized in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Provincial Integrated Hospital in Kielce from 2013 to 2023. We collected data on patient age, number of previous caesarean sections, gestational age, initial b-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) levels, size of the gestational sac, presence of an embryo with a heartbeat, treatment method used, length of hospitalization, rate of perioperative complications, and rehospitalization rate. The criteria for hospital discharge were as follows: a decrease in b-HCG of at least 15% during measurements taken after 4 days from MTX administration, the absence of clinically significant pain symptoms, and the absence of significant uterine cavity bleeding. Intramuscular doses were administered in cases where this reduction in the study was less than the aforementioned value. Another intramuscular dose was administered when the biochemical criterion for patient discharge from the ward was not met again after 4 days. The study was conducted retrospectively and relied on medical documentation.
Statistical analysis
For qualitative data, results were presented as percentages, while for quantitative data, the median or arithmetic mean was used, with the interquartile range or standard deviation used as measures of dispersion, respectively. Nonparametric Spearman correlation was used to assess correlations. Correlation was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 35 patients with a diagnosis of pregnancy in a scar after CSP were included in the study. The mean age was 33 years, with patients ranging in age from 27 to 43 years. The demographic characteristics of the group are presented in Table 1. The median gestational age was 6 weeks. The gestational age range of patients included in the study was from 5 to 10 weeks of pregnancy. The maximum number of previous caesarean sections in a patient was 5 (1 patient). In all pregnancies beyond 6 weeks, an embryo with heartbeat was visualized (10 cases, 28.5%). In cases where no heartbeat was detected, transcervical administration of MTX to the GSunder ultrasound guidance was performed. In cases where an embryo with a heartbeat was visualized, in addition to transcervical administration of MTX, intragestational injection of 5 mEq into the GS was also used. The mean b-HCG concentration for gestational age expressed in weeks is presented in Table 2. Intragestational MTX doses ranged from 25 to 100 mg (intragestational administration involved a solution with a concentration of 50 mg/ml, so the volume of the solution administered to the GS ranged from 0.25 to 1 ml) and additionally, 11 (32%) patients received intramuscular MTX due to insufficient decrease in b-HCG levels (defined similarly to ectopic tubal pregnancy as a decrease of ≥ 15%). The intramuscular MTX dose ranged from 75 to 100 mg (intramuscularly, a solution of 20 mg/ml was administered). Additionally, 3 patients received a third dose of MTX, each with a gestational age of 7 weeks or more. The median length of hospitalization for patients was 6 days, with a range of 2 to 19 days. We did not observe a significant correlation between the length of hospitalization and pre-procedure b-HCG levels, number of previous caesarean sections, or patient age (Table 3). However, this may be attributed to the small sample size, which carries a high risk of type II error. In 7 (20%) patients, the uterine cavity was evacuated after the procedure, while the remaining cases experienced spontaneous evacuation. This procedure was performed earliest at 4 days after MTX administration into the gestational sac. One patient in our cohort experienced clinically significant vaginal bleeding. None of the patients required additional procedures such as operative resection, gravid hysterectomy, or UAE. One patient required blood transfusion (2 units of packed red blood cells and 2 units of fresh frozen plasma). This patient, who had 4 previous caesarean sections and was in the eighth week of pregnancy, experienced heavy bleeding after treatment based on transvaginal KCl and MTX administration, leading to miscarriage before evacuation of the uterine contents. The lowest haemoglobin concentration in the aforementioned patient was 6.8 g/dl.

Discussion

Despite the relatively small sample size in our study, the findings suggest that the approach based on transcervical puncture of the GS with intragestational injection of MTX, along with additional KCl administration in the presence of foetal heart rate (FHR), is a safe procedure with a low incidence of perioperative complications and high treatment efficacy.
Untreated CSP left to its natural course can lead to various complications that pose a threat to the health and life of the mother, such as uterine rupture. In cases where this complication does not occur, there is a high incidence of postpartum hysterectomy due to the presence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). It is now recognized that the diagnosis of pregnancy in a caesarean scar in the first trimester is a natural precursor to PAS, and histologically, these 2 conditions represent a continuum and cannot be distinguished [6]. From the perspective of further pregnancy management, the position of the GS relative to the scar niche in the caesarean scar is crucial. Among women who chose to continue the pregnancy, 17% of those with the GS located “on the niche” in the first trimester developed PAS, requiring postpartum hysterectomy. On the other hand, in the group of patients with the GS located inside the niche, over 90% required postpartum hysterectomy, and histopathological examination confirmed the presence of MAP in the specimen. However, the study was limited by a relatively small sample size [7].
PAS is a pregnancy complication associated with a significant risk of perioperative haemorrhage in the patient. According to data from a systematic review published in 2013, the average number of units of packed red blood cells transfused per patient during the perioperative period is 5, with some women receiving more than 100 units of packed red blood cells. Additionally, intraoperative urinary tract injuries occur in up to one-third of patients, with a median operation time of 5 h [8, 9]. In cases of unexpected intraoperative finding of PAS in an unprepared centre, the mortality rate reached 22%, and the rate of intensive care unit hospitalization was 85% [10]. Studies indicate that the establishment of specialized centres for the treatment of this complication is the best solution because a significant proportion of deaths can be prevented by improving the qualifications of the personnel and surgical techniques [11, 12].
In the era of the contemporary epidemic of caesarean sections and increased availability of drugs used in postpartum atony, PAS may become the dominant indication for postpartum hysterectomy and replace uterine atony in countries with high CSP rates [13]. Studies conducted on cohorts of patients in some countries have shown an increasing trend in the occurrence of this form of ectopic pregnancy. A study conducted in the Canton province of China, which included 3915 hospitalized patients with ectopic pregnancy between 2012 and 2019, demonstrated that the percentage of caesarean scar pregnancies among ectopic pregnancies increased from 5.42% to 12.48%, and this trend was statistically significant (p < 0.05) [14]. During this time, there was also an increase in the rate of caesarean sections in the country [15].
Early diagnosis of this complication is crucial in terms of management, and it is possible from the moment of GS appearance (i.e. from approximately 5 weeks of gestation) [16]. Our results show that early diagnosis allows for effective treatment with a low incidence of perioperative complications, which can be a solution for patients who do not wish to continue the pregnancy in the face of life-threatening complications and mortality associated with PAS.
Ultrasound is the basis for diagnosis. Currently, according to recommendations regarding ultrasound examinations in pregnancy, an ultrasound scan performed before the 10th week of pregnancy is indicated for medical reasons (not mandatory) [17]. However, it seems that the group of patients with a history of CSP should be stratified as a high-risk group and undergo early ultrasound examinations in the era of widespread access to ultrasound devices. This should especially apply to patients who had a documented caesarean scar niche before becoming pregnant, as this complication after CSP is associated with an increased risk of caesarean scar pregnancy [18].
Transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis demonstrates a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% CI: 0.763–0.905) in detecting caesarean scar pregnancy. Cases that were undiagnosed in the cited study were mistakenly interpreted as cervical pregnancy or ongoing miscarriage [19]. Awareness of this complication should also be present among individuals involved in first-trimester pregnancy diagnosis. However, studies indicate that this awareness is not comprehensive among physicians and sonographers [20].
After the diagnosis of this complication, the unresolved issue remains the choice of treatment method. Surgical treatment can be an alternative to the approach presented in our study. In the case of a procedure based on resection of pregnancy in a caesarean scar, a crucial factor is understanding the risk factors for increased perioperative blood loss. In a cohort of 273 patients treated with resection using a multivariable model, the major risk factors for a blood loss of 300 ml or more during the procedure were the size of the GS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–1.14) and the thickness of the myometrium at the border with the urinary bladder (adjusted odds ratio = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36–0.73) (3). Myometrial thickness (MT) is also the strongest factor in the development of MAP. In one study, using a cut-off point of 3.3 mm for MT as a risk classifier for severe complications in pregnancy, such as intraoperative blood loss ≥ 1000 ml or severe forms of MAP, such as placenta increta or placenta percreta, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.818 was obtained, with a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 81.8% [21].
The treatment used in our centre is described in the literature as being applied both in cases of foetal demise and viable pregnancies. Such management is reported to be less effective than surgical treatment in terms of recurrence. In a group of 18 patients treated at King’s College Hospital in London, operative treatment involving lesion excision was successful in 100% of cases, while intragestational MTX treatment was effective in 5 out of 7 cases, and conservative management was successful in only 1/3 of cases [22]. It is worth noting that, unlike surgical therapy, the effects of medical therapy require time. The reduction in b-HCG levels is not immediate. The literature also lacks clear data on the initial decline in b-HCG levels that is considered effective, as seen, for example, in the treatment of ectopic tubal pregnancy using MTX (a 15% decrease on the fourth day). In a cohort of 97 patients hospitalized at the General Hospital in Beijing, with a mean initial b-HCG level of 20.321 ±965 IU/l and a mean gestational age of 6.1 ±0.8 weeks, the average time to b-HCG normalization was 40 days (range: 21 to 140 days). The time for the disappearance of the scar lesion was shorter, with a mean of 39 days (± 29 days). The failure rate in this study was low, at 3.9%. The average b-HCG concentration in this group was higher, with a mean of 91.359 IU/l [23]. In our opinion, conservative management is a worthwhile consideration in every case of CSP in the first trimester. We have successfully used this method even in the case of a viable cervical pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation, in a patient who retained her uterus, along with supportive measures such as the placement of a Foley catheter in the uterine cavity and UAE. In cases of treatment failure with local KCl injection and MTX, more invasive methods such as UAE in cases of bleeding or classical uterine artery ligation can always be applied.
The results presented in our study, in comparison to existing literature, demonstrate the relatively large sample size on which we conducted our analysis. The treatment was also highly effective. However, a limitation of this study was its retrospective nature and the lack of complete standardization of procedures. The doses of MTX varied among patients, both in cases of intragestational and intramuscular administration, and were subjectively determined by the operator based on the size of the GS and the stage of pregnancy. Additionally, we did not conduct follow-up after the completion of treatment. However, we did not observe any re-admissions to the hospital due to bleeding or other complications following the procedure.
Despite these limitations, we believe that our study provides valuable information regarding the effectiveness of treatment in cases of caesarean scar pregnancies diagnosed before 10 weeks of gestation.

Conclusions

Intra-amniotic administration of MTX (combined with KCl in cases of visible cardiac activity) is an effective and safe approach for managing CSP diagnosed in the first trimester. It is also the least invasive method among the described treatment options.

Acknowledgments

Paper were financed under Jan Kochanowski University project no SUB. RN 21.071.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1373-1381.
2. Fonseca A, Ayres de Campos D. Maternal morbidity and mortality due to placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 72: 84-91.
3. Ban Y, Shen J, Wang X, Zhang T, Lu X, Qu W, Hao Y, Mao Z, Li S, Tao G, Wang F, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Cui B. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy clinical classification system with recommended surgical strategy. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141: 927.
4. Huang J, Phillips C, Moshiri M. Scarred for life: a review of cesarean section scar pregnancy and potential pitfalls in diagnosis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48: 2672-2683.
5. Li Y, Hua C. Is high-intensity focused ultrasound superior to uterine artery embolization in cesarean scar pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy outcomes? A meta-analysis of the Chinese population. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30: 180-191.
6. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Maymon R, Arslan AA, Patil N, Popiolek D, Mittal KR. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 383-395.
7. Kaelin Agten A, Cali G, Monteagudo A, Oviedo J, Ramos J, Timor-Tritsch I. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 510.e1-510.e6.
8. Miller SE, Leonard SA, Meza PK, Ku S, Ren LY, Lyell DJ, Sultan P, Butwick A. Red blood cell transfusion in patients with placenta accreta spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141: 49-58.
9. Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA, Salmanian B, Diaz-Arrastia CR, Lee W, Baker BW, Ballas J, Chen Q, Van Veen TR, Javdian P, Sangi-Haghpeyka H, Zacharias N, Welty S, Cassady CI, Moaddab A, Popek EJ, Hui SR, Teruya J, Bandi V, Coburn M, Cunningham T, Martin SR, Belfort MA. Maternal morbidity in patients with morbidly adherent placenta treated with and without a standardized multidisciplinary approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 218.e1-9.
10. Aryananda RA, Nieto-Calvache AJ, Duvekot JJ, Aditiawarman A, Rijken MJ. Management of unexpected placenta accreta spectrum cases in resource-poor settings. AJOG Glob Rep 2023; 3: 100191.
11. Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, Abuhamad AZ, Simhan H, Huls CK, Belfort MA, Wright JD. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 561-568.
12. Nieto-Calvache AJ, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Vergara-Galliadi LM, Matera L, Sanín-Blair JE, Rivera EP, Rozo-Rangel AP, Burgos-Luna JM. Latin American Group for the Study of Placenta Accreta Spectrum. All maternal deaths related to placenta accreta spectrum are preventable: a difficult-to-tell reality. AJOG Glob Rep 2021; 1: 100012.
13. Lama S, Todi S, Shrestha R, Acharya S. Peripartum hysterectomy among patients admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Centre: a descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2023; 61: 400-403.
14. Tang P, Li X, Li W, Li Y, Zhang Y, Yang Y. The trend of the distribution of ectopic pregnancy sites and the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy. Reprod Health 2022; 19: 182.
15. Long Q, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Tang X, Kingdon C. Changes in caesarean section rates in China during the period of transition from the one-child to two-child policy era: cross-sectional National Household Health Services Surveys. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e059208.
16. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1373-1381.
17. Borowski D, Pietryga M, Basta P, Cnota W, Czuba B, Dubiel M, Fuchs T, Huras H, Iciek R, Jaczynska R, Kaczmarek P, Kosinski P, Kwiatkowski S, Nocun A, Pomorski M, Ropcka-Lesiak M, Rybak-Krzyszkowska M, Sieroszewski P, Wegrzyn P, Wiechec M, Wielgos M, Zimmer M. Practice guidelines of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians – Ultrasound Section for ultrasound screening in uncomplicated pregnancy – 2020. Ginekol Pol 2020; 91: 490-501.
18. Armstrong F, Mulligan K, Dermott RM, Bartels HC, Carroll S, Robson M, Corcoran S, Mc Parland P, Brien DO, Brophy D, Brennan DJ. Cesarean scar niche: an evolving concern in clinical practice. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2023; 161: 356-366.
19. Makukhina T, Beberashvili G, Makukhina V. VP60.01: Doctors’ awareness of Cesarean scar pregnancy diagnostic tools. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 328.
20. Fu L, Luo Y, Huang J. Cesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48: 1683-1690.
21. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 220-227.
22. Li Q, Xu H, Wang Y, Liu Q, He P, Wang L. Ultrasound-guided local methotrexate treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester: 12 years of single-center experience in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 243: 162-167.
23. Mlodawski J, Chabik A, Albrzykowski M, Mlodawska M, Swiercz G. Conservatively treated, live, 12-week cervical pregnancy – case report. J Educ Health Sport 2022; 12: 311-316.
Copyright: © 2023 Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.