Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny
eISSN: 1897-4317
ISSN: 1895-5770
Gastroenterology Review/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
NOWOŚĆ
Portal dla gastroenterologów!
www.egastroenterologia.pl
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2025
vol. 20
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł oryginalny

High-dose amoxicillin and pantoprazole regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a multi-center, multinational randomized controlled trial

Pezhman Alavinejad
1
,
Samira Mohamadi
1
,
Mohammad Javad Rezaei
,
Abazar Parsi
1
,
Ahmad Hormati
2
,
Eskandar Hajiani
1
,
Omid Eslami
3
,
Morteza Nayebi
4
,
Siamak Baghaei
1
,
Mohammed Hussien Ahmed
5
,
Quang Trung Tran
6
,
Azam Satari
1

  1. Alimentary Tract Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  2. Liver and Pancreatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  5. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam
Gastroenterology Rev 2025; 20 (2): 178–184
Data publikacji online: 2025/06/09
Plik artykułu:
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (HP) is a Gram-negative and microaerophilic bacterium prevalent in more than half of the world’s population, particularly in developing countries [1]. HP infection is a significant public health concern, and its treatment remains challenging. The infection affects 24% of people in Oceania, 37% in North America, 47% in Europe, 55% in Asia, 63% in Latin America, and 79% in Africa [26]. Many upper gastrointestinal diseases, including gastric ulcers, cancer and lymphoma, are associated with HP infection [7, 8]. Successful eradication of HP can ameliorate gastric mucosal damage and prevent stomach cancer and other complications [9].

In the past, the standard triple therapeutic regimen consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole has been recommended as the first line choice for treatment of HP infection [10, 11]. Unfortunately, increased antibiotic resistance diminished the efficacy of the triple regimen [12]. The prevalence of resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin was reported to be greater than 15%, so the efficacy of the standard triple regimen has diminished to fewer than 80% of cases over time [1315]. Thus, using therapeutic regimens with high efficacy and minimal side effects, such as quadruple alternative regimens, is essential for HP eradication [16, 17]. Even though these treatment regimens can achieve acceptable eradication rates, the complexity and side effects of regimens containing multiple drugs may reduce patient compliance [18]. In addition, the use of four-drug regimens containing multiple antibiotics may result in multidrug resistance and, as a result, reduce the number of available effective antibiotics for alternative therapy in the event that eradication therapy fails [19, 20]. Therefore, effective therapeutic regimens with fewer drugs as an alternative option, particularly for elderly patients with several comorbidities, are necessary. Due to the antibiotic resistance of HP to many existing drugs, including clarithromycin, further research is required to determine the optimal first-line treatment regimen with the highest eradication rate and lowest side effects [21, 22]. In this regard, a combination of high-dose PPI and amoxicillin as dual therapy could be an effective therapeutic option for HP eradication [2327]. To this end, the current multi-centric clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy of the two-drug regimen of amoxicillin and pantoprazole with the quadruple clarithromycin-based regimen for eradicating HP infection.

Material and methods

The present study is a double blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) on patients with confirmed HP infection referring to 8 medical centers in 3 countries (Iran, Egypt, and Vietnam) during the period October 2021 to March 2022. The study was performed after obtaining permission from the Research Council and approval of the Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS) (IR.AJUMS.HGOLESTAN.REC.1400.098) and registration in the Clinical Trial Center of Iran (IRCT20211019052812N1, https://irct.ir/). Firstly, the purpose and method of conducting the study and the common side effects of the prescribed medication were explained to the patients. Then, eligible patients were included in the study if they wished, and were requested to sign a written consent form. In addition, at all stages of the study, provisions of the ethics statements of the Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of confidentiality of patients’ information were observed.

Inclusion criteria included patients aged over 18 years, clinical diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), non-ulcer dyspepsia and or intestinal metaplasia based on a pathology report with confirmed HP infection, and no previous history of receiving HP infection treatment during the last year.

Exclusion criteria included patients aged less than 18 years and unwillingness to participate in the study, use of antibiotics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the last 4 weeks, history of allergy to any of the study protocol medications, history of gastric surgery or severe concomitant illness such as cancer, and pregnancy or lactation for women.

At the beginning of the study, patients’ essential characteristics, including age, sex, nationality, race, habitual history such as smoking and other concomitant comorbidities were collected and recorded based on a data collection questionnaire. After obtaining written consent, the patients participating in the study were randomly divided into two groups. The randomization method was based on random number allocation. In group A (high-dose dual regimen), the participants received amoxicillin 1000 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg every 8 h for 14 days and then pantoprazole at a dose of 40 mg every 12 h continued for 4 weeks. The subjects in group B (quadruple regimen) were treated with clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, bismuth sub citrate 240 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg every 12 h for 2 weeks, then pantoprazole at 40 mg every 12 h was continued for 4 weeks. The participants were in touch with responsible care given and requested to report any side effect leading to discontinuation of the medication by the patient.

Two weeks after the end of the treatment, a fecal HP antigen test was performed to prove the eradication of bacteria and the effectiveness of the treatment. The compliance of the participants was observed by assessment of the number of remaining medications. If the patient took the 14-day course of antibiotics thoroughly, it was considered as completion of the treatment.

Statistical analysis

The collected data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics software version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For quantitative variables, mean and median were used to describe central tendency, and interquartile range (IQR) was used to describe the spread of data between quartiles. Frequency and percentage were used to describe the data for qualitative variables. The normality of the data was evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the Levene test was used to evaluate the homogeneity of variance. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 test were used to analyze the univariate data. Logistic regression and determination of the odds ratio at a 95% confidence interval were used for multivariate data analysis. The significance level for the tests was set at 0.05.

Results

Overall, 619 patients with confirmed HP infection were included and randomly allocated to group A (high-dose dual regimen; 300 patients) and group B (clarithromycin-based quadruple regimen; 319 patients) (Figure 1). Patients included 259 (41.8%) men with mean age 44.3 ±14.11 years (range: 18 to 83 years). The baseline characteristics of the participants are presented in Table I. Causes of eradication include duodenal ulcer in 82 (13.1%) patients, non-ulcer dyspepsia in 462 (74.6%) patients, intestinal metaplasia in 36 (5.8%) patients, and gastric ulcer in 39 (6.3%) patients.

Figure 1

CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram of the study

/f/fulltexts/PG/56229/PG-20-56229-g001_min.jpg
Table I

Baseline characteristics of participants; *χ2 test, **t-test.

VariablesGroup A (n = 300)Group B (n = 319)P-value
Age, mean ± SD46.02 ±14.1542.66 ±13.570.0014**
Gender, male, n (%)107 (35.7)152 (47.6)0.003*
Race, n (%)
Caucasian238 (79.3)270 (84.6)0.106*
Arab46 (15.3)22 (6.9)
Turkish14 (4.7)19 (6)
Asian1 (0.3)5 (1.6)
African1 (0.3)3 (0.9)
Nationality, n (%)
Iranian292 (97.3)306 (95.9)0.325*
Afghan5 (1.7)5 (1.6)
Egyptian1 (1.3)6 (1.9)
Vietnamese1 (1.3)2 (0.6)
Iraqi1 (1.3)0
Smoking, n (%)47 (15.7)68 (21.3)0.071*
Causes of eradication, n (%)
PUD53 (17.6)68 (21.3)0.454*
NUD226 (75.3)236 (74)
IM21 (7)15 (4.7)

[i] PUD – peptic ulcer disease, NUD – non-ulcer dyspepsia, IM – intestinal metaplasia.

The rate of HP eradication in ITT and PP analysis in group A and B were 68.3% & 72.2% vs. 85.6% & 89.9% respectively (p < 0.0001, Table II). Other variables such as age, gender, race, nationality, smoking, and cause of eradication had no significant effect on the rate of eradication (p > 0.05). The RR of side effects in the high-dose dual regimen was 0.548 (95% CI: 0.705–0.426,) compared to the clarithromycin-based quadruple regimen.

Table II

Comparison of eradication rates of HP infection and treatment compliance between two groups (*χ2 test, §from 299 patients, #from 195 patients, ¥from 319 patients, $from 284 patients)

VariablesGroup A (n = 300)Group B (n = 319)P-value
ComplianceComplete272 (90.7%)284 (89%)0.718*
Incomplete (> 50%)16 (5.3%)22 (6.9%)
Incomplete (< 50%)12 (4%)13 (4.1%)
Rate of eradicationITT205 (68.3%)§273 (85.6%)¥< 0.0001*
PP195 (72.2%)#255 (89.9%)$< 0.0001*

[i] ITT – intention-to-treat analysis, PP – per-protocol analysis.

In general, the most common side effects in group A include nausea and vomiting (8.7%), diarrhea (5.7%) and abdominal pain (3.3%), in comparison with bitter taste (18.8%) as the most observed side effect in group B (p < 0.0001). During the study period, the incidence rates of side effects in groups A and B were 66 (22.0%) and 128 (40.1%), respectively (p < 0.0001) (Table III).

Table III

Frequency of side effects in treatment groups (*χ2 test)

VariablesGroup A (n = 300)Group B (n = 319)P-value*
Abdominal pain10 (3.3)25 (7.8)0.015
Bitter taste9 (3)60 (18.8)< 0.0001
Diarrhea17 (5.7)7 (2.2)0.025
Reflux3 (1.2)4 (1.4)0.834
Nausea and vomiting26 (8.7)38 (11.9)0.185
Bloating16 (5.6)33 (10.4)0.031
Loss of appetite7 (2.3)4 (1.3)0.31
Body pain6 (2.3)8 (2.6)0.823
Fullness4 (1.4)2 (0.6)0.329
Eructation3 (1.2)6 (2)0.433
Fatigue3 (1.2)8 (2.8)0.197
Constipation2 (0.8)5 (1.9)0.308
Swelling02 (1)0.219
Headache13 (4.4)26 (8.2)0.051
Pruritus04 (1.3)0.058
Other1 (0.4)4 (1.3)0.222

Non-adjusted analysis results showed that the success rate of the high-dose dual regimen (group A) was lower than that of group B (quadruple regimen) (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.23–0.58, p < 0.0001). However, the dual regimen is associated with fewer side effects (OR = 2.37; 95% CI: 1.16–3.38, p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, the drug regimen had no significant effect on predicting adherence to treatment (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.7–2.02, p = 0.501). In the modified logistic regression (adjusted analysis) based on various variables such as age, sex, race, nationality, diagnosis and cause of eradication and smoking, the two-drug regimen had a less successful eradication rate (p < 0.0001) and fewer side effects (p < 0.0001) but did not have a significant effect on predicting adherence (p = 0.57) (Table IV).

Table IV

Logistic regression to predict the effectiveness of two-drug regimen therapy (*adjusting for age, sex, race, nationality, smoking, diagnosis)

VariablesNon-adjusted analysisAdjusted analysis*
OR (95% CI)P-valueORad (95% CI)P-value
Compliance1.197 (2.022–0.709)0.5011.167 (0.685–1.988)0.57
Side effects2.376 (1.169–3.382)< 0.00012.547 (1.76–3.686)< 0.0001
HP eradication0.385 (0.231–0.584)< 0.00010.386 (0.251–0.594)< 0.0001

[i] ORad – adjusted odds ratio, CI – confidence interval.

Discussion

According to the findings of the current study, the rates of HP eradication in the high-dose dual regimen of amoxicillin and PPI and the clarithromycin-based quadruple regimen group were 68.3% and 85.6%, respectively, based on ITT analysis, and 72.2% and 89.8%, respectively, based on PP, with a statistically significant difference. Consistent with the present study’s findings, the eradication rate with the high-dose dual regimen containing amoxicillin and PPI in the United States and South Korea did not demonstrate satisfactory results [28, 29]. In a study by Hu et al., the rate of eradication with the two-drug regimen in ITT and PP analyses was 78.1% and 79.1%, respectively, in comparison with 84.3% and 86.2% with the quadruple regimen. The incidence of side effects and drug compliance were comparable between the two groups [26].

In another study, Gao et al. compared the efficacy of a high-dose dual regimen and a four-drug regimen for eradicating HP. In the ITT and PP analyses, the eradication rate was 82.9% and 89.2% in the two-drug group and 86.1% and 93.9% in the four-drug group, respectively [30]. On the other hand, several studies have indicated that high-dose dual-drug regimens containing PPI and amoxicillin, if administered at the proper dosage and frequency, could be an effective method for eradicating HP infection [26, 31]. A study by Yang et al. demonstrated an eradication rate of 95.3% in the high-dose two-drug treatment group, 85.3% in the ten-day sequential treatment group, and 80.7% in the clarithromycin-based triple treatment group [31]. The efficacy of dual drug therapy was significantly superior to that of other regimens. There were no significant differences in drug side effects or treatment adherence in the study groups. The researchers concluded that the amoxicillin-based dual regimen was superior to the standard regimens for HP eradication, with the same tolerability and safety as the standard regimens.

Other studies that have also used a high-dose dual-drug regimen to eradicate HP infection have evidenced that the high-dose two-drug regimen exhibits the same efficacy and compliance as the quadruple regimen, with fewer side effects [25, 32, 33]. The meta-analysis by Yang et al. revealed that high-dose amoxicillin-based dual therapies and bismuth-based quadruple regimens for HP eradication had comparable efficacy (97.8% vs. 95.0%) and typically caused fewer side effects (14.4% vs. 11.4%) [31].

According to a recent meta-analysis by Xu et al., the two-drug regimen (high dose for 14 days) was reported as the optimal first-line treatment for HP eradication in the Asian population, with comparable efficacy and compliance along with fewer side effects than standard quadruple regimens. In the ITT analysis, the eradication rate for the two-drug treatment group was 91.7% vs. 86.7% for the four-drug regimen, and 95.7% vs. 92.0%, respectively, in the PP analysis. In addition, side effects were significantly lower in the group receiving a dual drug regimen in comparison with the four-drug regimen (9.6% vs. 23.0%). In a recent study conducted in China by Guan et al. (2022), the rate of HP eradication in the high-dose two-drug treatment group was 89.4% in the ITT analysis and 90.6% in the PP analysis, which was comparable to the eradication rate in the four-drug regimen group [32].

In a recent South Korean study, the rates of successful eradication with a four-drug treatment based on clarithromycin and bismuth as the first line of eradication treatment were 74% and 93%, respectively [34]. Multiple studies have reported a higher incidence of side effects in the clarithromycin and bismuth-based quadruple HP eradication regimen [32, 34]. For instance, a four-drug regimen consisting of clarithromycin, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline was associated with a 61% side effect rate, according to one study. In contrast, 27% of patients in the amoxicillin and PPI treatment group experienced side effects. To overcome the challenges of antimicrobial resistance of HP and to reduce the effect on intestinal microbiota, it is necessary to identify appropriate and novel treatment regimens with a high eradication rate with minimal side effects. Although high-dose two-drug regimens containing a combination of antibiotics and PPI with different prescribed doses from the present study demonstrated acceptable eradication rates [23, 35], taking into account the promising results in using high-dose two-drug regimens evidenced in previous studies, additional research on optimizing high-dose two-drug regimens are recommended.

Although the current study was multicenter, with a large sample size, it also faced some limitations. It was not possible to match the two groups in terms of age and sex due to the multicenter design and high number of samples. Moreover, differences in race/ethnicity can affect bacterial resistance and the rate of eradication of HP infection. In the present study, there was no possibility of monitoring gastric pH and morphological changes of HP in patients’ stomachs during treatment, which may play a role in failure to achieve satisfactory effects of dual drug treatment [36]. It was also not possible to perform antibiotic susceptibility testing (especially for amoxicillin and clarithromycin) and evaluate the CYP2C19 polymorphism before starting treatment, which can help select the appropriate antibiotic and the optimal dose of PPI.

Conclusions

The present study revealed that a high-dose dual-drug treatment containing amoxicillin and PPI for treating HP infection was not associated with higher eradication rates than a clarithromycin-based quadruple regimen. Compared to the high-dose two-drug regimen, the four-drug regimen exhibited a higher eradication rate but more side effects and similar compliance. In order to eradicate HP infection, a four-drug regimen based on clarithromycin is still recommendable as first-line therapy.

Funding

The study performed under approval and Supervision of Alimentary Tract Research Center without any financial support.

Ethical approval

Approval number: IR.AJUMS.HGOLESTAN.REC.1400.098.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Thung I, Aramin H, Vavinskaya V, et al. the global emergence of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43: 514-33.

2 

Georgopoulos S, Papastergiou V. An update on current and advancing pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of H. pylori infection. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22: 729-41.

3 

Hooi JK, Lai WY, Ng WK, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 420-9.

4 

Sonnenberg A. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55: S1-3.

5 

Sayehmiri F, Darvishi Z, Sayehmiri K, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis study to investigate the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and the sensitivity of its diagnostic methods in Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16: e12581.

6 

Jaroń K, Pietrzak A, Daniluk J, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations on Helicobacter pylori infection. Recommendations of the Working Group of the Polish Society of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterol Rev 2023; 18: 225-48.

7 

Mladenova I. Clinical relevance of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 3473.

8 

Majumdar D, Bebb J. Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcers. Medicine 2019; 47: 292-300.

9 

Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’morain CA, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection–the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut 2017; 66: 6-30.

10 

Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Suzuki M, et al. Proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin versus proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-metronidazole as first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. J Clin Biochem Nutrition 2012; 51: 114-6.

11 

Mahachai V, Vilaichone RK, Pittayanon R, et al. Helicobacter pylori management in ASEAN: the Bangkok consensus report. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33: 37-56.

12 

Ding SZ, Du YQ, Lu H, et al. Chinese consensus report on family-based Helicobacter pylori infection control and management (2021 edition). Gut 2022; 71: 238-53.

13 

Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moss SF. ACG clinical guideline: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 212-39.

14 

Zou Y, Qian X, Liu X, et al. The effect of antibiotic resistance on Helicobacter pylori eradication efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter 2020; 25: e12714.

15 

Rokkas T, Gisbert JP, Malfertheiner P, et al. Comparative effectiveness of multiple different first-line treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection: a network meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2021; 161: 495-507.

16 

McNicholl AG, Bordin DS, Lucendo A, et al. Combination of bismuth and standard triple therapy eradicates Helicobacter pylori infection in more than 90% of patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 89-98.

17 

Kim SJ, Chung JW, Woo HS, et al. Two-week bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and concomitant therapy are effective first-line treatments for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a prospective open-label randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25: 6790.

18 

Chua BQ, Chong VW, Teng TZ, et al. Does technology-enhanced communication improve Helicobacter pylori eradication outcomes? A meta-analysis. Helicobacter 2022; 27: e12890.

19 

Savoldi A, Carrara E, Graham DY, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis in World Health Organization regions. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 1372-82.

20 

Kuo YT, Liou JM, El-Omar EM, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2: 707-15.

21 

Hajiani E, Alavinejad P, Avandi N, et al. Comparison of levofloxacin-based, 10-day sequential therapy with 14-day quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized clinical trial. Middle East J Dig Dis 2018; 10: 242.

22 

Alavinejad P, Seiedian SS, Hajiani E, et al. Comparison of furazolidone versus clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. Afro-Egyptian J Infect Endemic Dis 2021; 11: 44-50.

23 

Öztürk K, Kurt Ö, Çelebi G, et al. High-dose dual therapy is effective as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Turk J Gastroenterol 2020; 31: 234.

24 

Yang X, Wang JX, Han SX, Gao CP. High dose dual therapy versus bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2019; 98: e14396.

25 

Zhu YJ, Zhang Y, Wang TY, et al. High dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13: 1756284820937115.

26 

Hu CT. High-dose dual therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection–a review of the strengths, weaknesses, and proposed solutions. Tzu-Chi Med J 2022; 34: 303.

27 

Yin Z, Li J, Huang W, et al. High-dose dual therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Turk J Gastroenterol 2022; 33: 454.

28 

Graham DY, Dore MP. Helicobacter pylori therapy: a paradigm shift. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2016; 14: 577-85.

29 

Kwack W, Lim Y, Lim C, Graham DY. High dose ilaprazole/amoxicillin as first-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016; 2016: 1648047.

30 

Gao CP, Xiao X, Liu PX, et al. High-dose amoxicillin/esomeprazole dual therapy as a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. World Chin J Digestol 2018; 26: 353-9.

31 

Yang JC, Lin CJ, Wang HL, et al. High-dose dual therapy is superior to standard first-line or rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 895-905.

32 

Guan JL, Hu YL, An P, et al. Comparison of high-dose dual therapy with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori-infected treatment-naive patients: an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy 2022; 42: 224-32.

33 

Tai WC, Liang CM, Kuo CM, et al. A 14 day esomeprazole-and amoxicillin-containing high-dose dual therapy regimen achieves a high eradication rate as first-line anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment in Taiwan: a prospective randomized trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74: 1718-24.

34 

Kim YI, Lee JY, Kim CG, et al. Ten-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy versus 7-day proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin containing triple therapy as first-line empirical therapy for the Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea: a randomized open-label trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21: 95.

35 

Gao W, Ye H, Deng X, et al. Rabeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy as first-line treatment for H pylori eradication in special patients: a retrospective, real-life study. Helicobacter 2020; 25: e12717.

36 

Hu JL, Yang J, Zhou YB, et al. Optimized high-dose amoxicillin–proton-pump inhibitor dual therapies fail to achieve high cure rates in China. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 275.

Copyright: © 2025 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.