Health Problems of Civilization
eISSN: 2354-0265
ISSN: 2353-6942
Health Problems of Civilization Physical activity: diseases and issues recognized by the WHO
Bieżący numer Archiwum Online first O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2025
vol. 19
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
AKTYWNOŚĆ FIZYCZNA GRUP SPOŁECZNYCH I ZAWODOWYCH
Artykuł przeglądowy

DEVELOPMENT OR DECLINE OF PHYSICAL CULTURE? PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OF THE ALPHA GENERATION FROM THE POLISH PERSPECTIVE

Paweł Adam Piepiora
1
,
Justyna Bagińska
2
,
Zbigniew Norbert Piepiora
3
,
Jolita Vveinhardt
4

  1. Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
  2. Faculty of Humanities and Social Studies, Karkonosze University of Applied Sciences, Jelenia Góra, Poland
  3. Faculty of Spatial Management and Landscape Architecture, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
  4. Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania
Health Prob Civil. 2025; 19(3): 306-314.
Data publikacji online: 2024/12/06
Plik artykułu:
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 

Introduction

A multitude of theories have been put forth to explain the functioning of generations [1]. The most widely accepted theory in this regard is that of generations as proposed by William Strauss and Neil Howe [2]. The theory is concerned with the characteristics of generations in American society, which are assumed to be shaped by the conditions of society during the individuals’ childhood and youth. These characteristics exert an influence on the functioning of existing generations and their differences in terms of their approach to work [3].

The theory proposed by William Strauss and Neil Howe has been demonstrated to have universal applicability, as evidenced by its coverage in other countries, albeit only in the context of contemporary generations [4]. Those born after the Second World War exhibit the same dominant characteristics, and the boundaries between generations are shaped by technological advancement. Consequently, the emergence of intergenerational boundaries is estimated to occur within a range of plus or minus five years [5], contingent on the pace of technological development in a given country. In the Polish context, five post-war generations can be identified [6].

The cohort of individuals who are currently the oldest living generation is commonly referred to as the ‘Baby Boomers’ or BB. These are individuals who were born in Poland during the substantial increase in births that occurred between 1946 and 1964 [7]. The term ‘success’ is primarily associated with systematic work, during which they independently attained their elevated positions. They espouse traditional values and adhere to a conservative family structure [8]. They are characterized by their persistence in work and commitment to their resolutions [9]. A sense of stability is a key aspect of their identity. They demonstrate loyalty and respect for authority figures [10]. However, they experience a sense of fulfilment when they are able to contribute to a meaningful cause, which often leads them to pursue leisure activities during their retirement years [11]. The subsequent cohort, designated as the ‘Great Unknown’ (X), comprises individuals born in Poland during a period of socio-political uncertainty between 1965 and 1980 [12]. At that time, Poland functioned as the People’s Republic of Poland, and the prevailing political and economic system was communism, which was opposed by society at large [13]. These individuals value quality and leisure time but do not differentiate between social classes based on wealth [14]. They place great importance on peace and the preservation of traditions [15]. They are socially sensitive and work efficiently, with a strong sense of loyalty to one job if they receive a fair wage [16].

The subsequent cohort of the population is designated as the Millennial Generation (Y). These individuals were born between 1981 and 1995, representing the final generation to be born in the 20th century [17]. They are individuals who integrate leisure activities with professional pursuits and personal growth [18]. They are adept at multitasking and do not identify with a single workplace [19]. They prefer a relaxed work environment and are motivated by praise [20]. This manifests as a drive for self-realization through the pursuit of high-quality activities, imbued with a strong sense of motivation [21]. The subsequent generation is colloquially referred to as ‘Snowflakes’ (Z). These individuals were born between 1996 and 2010, which corresponds to the turn of the century [22]. The term ‘Snowflakes’ is used to describe this generation because they have had a largely stress-free upbringing [23]. They demonstrate an effective integration of online and offline functioning [24]. The Zs are adept at managing multiple tasks and are inclined to work remotely, which affords them the opportunity to travel frequently [25]. They only engage in work activities when they perceive the potential for personal growth [26] and exhibit pessimistic and critical attitudes yet demonstrate creativity and independence in their work. The theory of the fifth youngest generation, designated Alpha, was developed by Mark McCrindle [27]. The Alpha Generation comprises individuals born between 2011 and 2025, who are believed to have been exposed to smart technology from an early age [28]. The Alpha Generation is exerting a significant influence on social media and pop culture [29]. They are the most technologically adept generation to date and are unable to function without the Internet [30]. They prefer to learn and play on apps, which presents a challenge for them in functioning offline [31]. This is reflected in their lack of initiative in organizing their leisure time, their difficulty in forming relationships and in maintaining their attention span [32].

The aforementioned generations operate concurrently, employing contemporary technology to varying extents. However, it is the Alpha Generation that is most dependent on technology, due to their prolonged and pervasive exposure to digital devices from the earliest stages of their lives [33]. This is reflected in their constant understanding of reality solely from the perspective of technology use, which is less evident in the other generations: BB, X, Y, Z. In the field of culture in the broadest sense, this problem is particularly evident in the domain of physical culture, which aims to maintain health through the shaping of physical fitness.

Aim of the work

The objective of this humanist article is therefore to ascertain the trajectory of physical culture in the 21st century. Given that the entirety of physical culture’s activities and attitudes must adapt to the characteristics of the Alpha Generation in order to survive, it is reasonable to inquire whether this represents an opportunity for the development or the decline of physical culture.

Methods

The methods of analysis of source materials and critical analysis of the source text were used [34]. The method of source analysis is widely used in all scientific disciplines. It allows assumptions to be verified on the basis of the results of published work and the authors’ own experience. With this method, knowledge can be verified qualitatively [35]. The method of source material analysis does not define numerical indicators to characterize the phenomenon or object of study but requires a thorough analysis of the available materials through a deep understanding of reality [36]. This is followed by a verification of the data through a critical analysis of the source text. In this way, it is possible to demonstrate the originality of the problem situation chosen for study and the desirability of its analysis. By verifying what already exists in literature, it is possible to demonstrate the relationships, differences and dependencies of the problem under study with the current state of knowledge [37]. Particular reference was made to the latest research reports on the Alpha Generation in open access, with a particular focus on the last two years.

Literature review results

Physical culture according to the Alpha Generation

Physical culture is a component of culture in general. The interdisciplinary approach is applicable to physical activity in its broadest sense, encompassing the areas of physical education, rehabilitation, recreation, sport (amateur, competitive, professional) and tourism [38]. It is crucial to consider the impact of physical culture on the physical and mental health of society, achieved through systematic exercise [39]. This encompasses the formation of correct bodily habits and attitudes, personality, self-discipline and functioning in society [40]. However, when effective physical culture methodologies are confronted with the specifics of the Alpha Generation, the results are increasingly poor. In Poland, there is a noticeable decline in interest in physical activity among the youngest generation [41].

The Alpha Generation is, on the one hand, digitally literate, but on the other hand, demonstrates difficulties in functioning in everyday social situations [33]. The initial response in this group is typically driven by online sources that are perceived as trendy, with the information found there being accepted as inherent to social relations. Such reactions encompass technologies that are progressively sophisticated and accessible exclusively via smart technology [42]. It is also noteworthy that the Alpha Generation tends to avoid situations that induce boredom and prefers for their parents to initiate activities on their behalf. They are willing to engage in a range of physical activities that align with online trends and utilize smart technology. In contrast to older generations, the Alpha Generation is primarily motivated and encouraged to engage in regular physical activities by parents, teachers, coaches and educators [43]. The youngest generation is inclined to closely monitor the effects of their activities, as observed in their engagement with digital games. Consequently, they are drawn to e-sports and popcorn gaming [44]. Additionally, they demonstrate interest in traditional forms of exercise when integrated with smartwatches, smartphones or interactive whiteboards.

It is of paramount importance to emphasize that the future of civilization is inextricably linked to the actions and decisions of successive generations [5]. The significance of a specific generation increases gradually, initially through the dissemination of specific ideas and trends, which eventually become the norms of society. This illustrates the gradual association of individuals striving to actualize the proclaimed ideas. In this way, generations forge notions about their aspirations and goals, which may not always be justified but are always defined. In this mechanism, which has been in place for years, it is noticeable that the Alpha Generation is strengthening. In this way, the older generation is gradually being superseded by the younger generation, who are demolishing or modifying existing social norms [45].

Solution to the problem: development or decline of physical culture?

It would be prudent to consider the most effective means of encouraging the Alpha Generation to engage in physical activity. This may be accomplished by addressing issues that are pertinent to this demographic. In light of the growing significance of e-sports and smart technology among this demographic, it seems reasonable to posit that the next phase of physical culture evolution will entail the incorporation of these elements into existing physical activities. E-sports can be a valuable addition to traditional forms of physical activity or a means of introducing the Alpha Generation to the world of sport. It can be reasonably deduced that the integration of smart technology into educational settings, training programs and tourism and recreation activities can serve to enhance the level of engagement exhibited by young individuals engaged in physical exercise. The utilization of smartwatches has been observed to be particularly effective among the Alpha Generation, as evidenced by their ability to continuously monitor vital signs such as heart rate, calorie expenditure and the number of steps taken. Furthermore, the incorporation of multimedia displays has been demonstrated to be an efficacious strategy among younger age groups, as it motivates engagement in physical activity through the observation of demonstrations of movement tasks performed at a proficient level. The demonstration of exemplary performances by celebrated athletes serves to motivate younger students to engage in a prescribed movement activity under the guidance of an instructor or coach. It is notable that the Alpha Generation is particularly drawn to influencers on social media. Consequently, incorporating instructional videos from a designated YouTube channel into the prescribed movement activities could prove beneficial. In such instances, the role of the supervisor would be to select the most pertinent YouTube channels and then, in a manner analogous to existing physical culture methodology, to oversee the exercise practitioners.

Conversely, the shift of emphasis towards e-sports and the utilization of intelligent technology in physical activities may potentially result in a decline in mindful physical activity. Since time immemorial, those engaged in physical activities have acquired the requisite knowledge, skills and competencies to maintain their own fitness and health. Should digital interactions become the primary determinants of exercise participation, it would signify a transfer of responsibility for physical fitness and health to the domain of digital entities. This raises the question of the boundaries of such entities. The answer is straightforward: e-sports and smart technology ends where there is no Internet access. Consequently, in contexts where Internet access is unavailable, the Alpha Generation must possess the requisite knowledge, ability and capacity to engage in humanizing exercises based on the accumulated wisdom of older generations.

It was thus concluded that it is beneficial to derive advantages from technological advancement while simultaneously upholding the significance of ancestral achievements. It may therefore be concluded that the prospect of the development, rather than decline, of physical culture for the Alpha Generation is the result of the incorporation of modern technology into the support of physical activity. It is important to emphasize that this integration is not intended to replace traditional forms of activity in all areas of physical culture. Therefore, the development of physical culture through the integration of modern technologies must be sustainable. This is the only way in which it is possible to educate wise and independent generations. Discussion of the review results

The success of the physical activities undertaken by the Alpha Generation is contingent upon a comprehensive understanding of their expectations. It is of the utmost importance for the older generation, who are by definition nurturers, to be able to exert influence over the younger generation while simultaneously learning from them. This reciprocal relationship will result in a sense of mutual satisfaction and, subsequently, a favorable outcome of the physical activities in question. The combination of technology with a shared experience of intergenerational physical culture values represents a crucial step in addressing the aforementioned issue.

The Alpha Generation is characterized by a distinctive way of being, a specific mode of life, a particular occupational profile, a set of character traits and a level of mental development that sets them apart from preceding generations. The defining characteristics of this generation have resulted in a divergence from the norms of their predecessors in terms of cognitive processes, behavioral patterns and emotional responses [27]. However, as with preceding generations, the Alpha Generation is defined by a time frame of approximately fifteen years [42]. It is estimated that those born between 2026 and 2040 will constitute the Beta generation, which, by definition, will grow up with the development of artificial intelligence [46]. Therefore, the youngest Alpha Generation studied today will be the equivalent of the older generation interacting with the Beta generation in the coming years [47]. The developments made with the Alpha Generation will have a bearing on the future [48]. If the introduction of e-sports and smart technology is only to be a tool to maintain the values of physical culture and pass these on to the next generation, then this is the only sensible solution to the problem addressed.

In consideration of the aforementioned factors, it has been proposed that the issue of generational research from an interdisciplinary perspective remains a pertinent and ongoing concern [49]. The general and specific characteristics of each generation emerge from the unconscious and are possessed by the majority of the representatives of a generation, to a more or less equal degree, manifesting as characteristics common to all [50]. Diversity is transformed into homogeneity. Moreover, the status of the youngest generation is frequently regarded as a license for irresponsibility. Conversely, a contagion of negative attitudes may develop among the youngest generation if the reprehensible behavior observed among other young people is not adequately punished [51]. Furthermore, the desensitization of adults can result in the youngest generation becoming susceptible to a range of negative influences. In the absence of healthy intergenerational relationships, younger individuals will invariably seek authority in forms of communication that are accessible to them, which will often be digital [52].

In conclusion, it is vital to facilitate the effective communication of the experiences of older generations in physical culture to younger generations through the rational use of modern technology. This form of communication between generations can provide an attractive reinforcement of mutual learning, which is essential for the preservation of physical cultural assets. Therefore, it is crucial to involve the Alpha Generation in physical activity by linking intergenerational relationships based on sustainability, where common sense serves as the coordinating value.

Conclusions

The advancement of physical culture through the harmonization of conventional values and contemporary technologies is contingent upon the implementation of sustainable development practices. Conversely, the prioritization of modern technologies over the traditional values of physical culture represents a significant risk factor for the future of this field.

Disclosures and acknowledgements

The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.

Artificial intelligence (AI) was not used in the creation of the manuscript.

Notes

[1] Piepiora PA, Bagińska J, Piepiora ZN, Vveinhardt J. Development or decline of physical culture? Physical activity of the Alpha Generation from the Polish perspective. Health Prob Civil. 2025; 19(3): 306-314. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.2024.145535

References

1 

Orłowski H. [Generations or sorting out history]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauka I Innowacje; 2015 (in Polish).

2 

Strauss W, Howe N. Generations. The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Harper Perennial; 1992.

3 

Howe N, Strauss W. The fourth turning: an American prophecy – what the cycles of history tell us about America’s next rendezvous with destiny. New York: Broadway Books; 1997.

4 

Bieńkowski M. [Sociological theory of generational cycle by Neil Howe and William Strauss]. Człowiek–Niepełnosprawność–Społeczeństwo; 2018; 4 (42): 89-106 (in Polish). 10.5604/01.3001.0013.0285

5 

Piepiora PA, Kalina RM. Hypothesis on the supreme value criteria of the global civilization. In: Kalra J, Lightner N, editors. Healthcare and medical devices. AHFE (2023) International Conference. USA: AHFE International; 2023. p. 280-289. 10.54941/ahfe1003498

6 

Piepiora PA, Bagińska J, Piepiora ZN. Perspective on solving the problem of declining interest in physical activity in Poland. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2024; 6: 1416154. 10.3389/fspor.2024.1416154

7 

Krumsiek KJ. Retention of knowledge from “Baby Boomers” prior to leaving the workforce. In: Even A, Christiansen B, editors. Effective human resources management in the multigenerational workplace. Hershey: IGI Global; 2024. p. 23-50. 10.4018/979-8-3693-2173-7.ch002

8 

Hughes E, Webber DJ, Parry G. Baby Boomers. In: Hughes E, Webber DJ, Parry G, editors. Migration, mobility and the creative class. New horizons in regional science series. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2024. p. 60-95. 10.4337/9781802208627.00008

9 

Balderas-Cejudo A, Patterson I. Beyond tourism: the importance of Baby Boomer generation volunteers. Population Ageing. 2024. 10.1007/s12062-024-09445-w

10 

Li S. How do Baby Boomers travel differently from the Silent Generation?. Transportation. 2023. 10.1007/s11116-023-10410-3

11 

Aulia C, Retnowati S, Reginasari A. Quality time: what Baby Boomers need for parenting their Generation Z children. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal. 2023; 38(2): e07. 10.24123/aipj.v38i2.5240

12 

Nurhayati M, Kusumawardani N, Saputra ARP, Santosa A. Competence, innovative work behavior, and work engagement: a comparison of Generation X and Millennials. Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen. 2023; 19(2): 446-460. 10.33830/jom.v19i2.4855.2023

13 

Fisher P. A generation divided: the politics of Generation X. Politics & Policy. 2024; 52(5): 900-917. 10.1111/polp.12620

14 

Miller JD, Laspra B, Polino C, Branch G, Ackerman MS, Pennock RT. The development of attitudes toward science and technology: a longitudinal analysis of Generation X. Science and Public Policy. 2024; scae051. 10.1093/scipol/scae051

15 

Hughes E, Webber DJ, Parry G. Generation X. In: Hughes E, Webber DJ, Parry G, editors. Migration, mobility and the creative class. New horizons in regional science series. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2024. p. 96-133. 10.4337/9781802208627.00009

16 

Kumar J, Rani V, Rani G, Rani M. Does individuals’ age matter? A comparative study of Generation X and Generation Y on green housing purchase intention. Property Management. 2024. 10.1108/PM-08-2023-0081

17 

Erdoğan P, Tekin İÇ. The effect of psychological empowerment on job satisfaction: regulatory role of Generations X and Y. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management. 2023; 18(3). 10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2143

18 

Putra IKP. Job satisfaction in Generation Y employees at Swiss-Belresort Pecatu. JETBIS: Journal of Economics, Technology and Business. 2024; 3(9): 1724-1736. 10.57185/jetbis.v3i9.146

19 

Bhaskaran A, Swarupa R. Impact of social media reviews on Generation Y consumers buying behaviour. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT). 2024; 4(5): 253-259. 10.48175/IJARSCT-16657

20 

Sriratree T, Suwannamek O, Srinuan C. Structural equation model of the variables affecting the online shopping behavior of Generation-Y. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental. 2024; 18(11): e05418. 10.24857/rgsa.v18n11-063

21 

Valentine D, Powers T. Understanding Generation Y: technology and innovation drives consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Insights. 2013; 8(3): 102-115. 10.1108/JCM-07-2013-0650

22 

Sharma H, Srivastav P. Purchase preference of Generation Z: a comparison with Gen Y and Gen X. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. 2023; 5(4). 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i04.5767

23 

Alfaruqy MZ. Generation Z and perceived values from her parents. PSYCHE: A Psychological Journal. 2022; 4(1): 84-95. 10.36269/psyche.v4i1.658

24 

Kwartawaty NN, Ismail MH, Martadi NSD. Most effective leadership styles for Generation Z: a review. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2024; 3(9): 3321-3338. 10.55927/fjmr.v3i9.11009

25 

Ma K, Fang B. Exploring Generation Z’s expectations at future work: the impact of digital technology on job searching. European Journal of Training and Development. 2023; 48(9). 10.1108/EJTD-05-2023-0076

26 

Dikeç G, Öztürk S, Taşbaşı N, Figenergül D, Güler BB. The perceptions of Generation Z university students about their futures: a qualitative study. Sci. 2023; 5(4): 45. 10.3390/sci5040045

27 

McCrindle M. Generation Alpha. London: Headline; 2021.

28 

Cieśliński W, Witkowski K, Prystupa E, Pałka T, Piepiora P. Smart organization–digitalization of combat sports services. Archives of Budo. 2023; 19: 257-266.

29 

Hidayat T, Matondang AP, Syukron A. Study of education analysis of Alpha Generation in marginal communities. NUSRA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan. 2024; 5(4): 1437-1446. 10.55681/nusra.v5i4.3208

30 

Miller D. Embracing the technological metamorphosis: envisioning higher education for Generation Alpha in a shifting educational landscape. International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS). 2023; 3(2): 88-96. 10.35870/ijsecs.v3i2.1492

31 

Gill A, Mathur A. Exploring the futuristic landscape of artificial intelligence for Alpha Generation: a comprehensive study. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2023; 20(02): 1250-1264. 10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.2.2369

32 

Garaigordobil M. Educational psychology: the key to prevention and child-adolescent mental health. Psicothema. 2023; 35(4): 327-339. 10.7334/psicothema2023.1

33 

Höfrová A, Balidemaj V, Small MA. A systematic literature review of education for Generation Alpha. Discov Educ. 2024; 3: 125. 10.1007/s44217-024-00218-3

34 

Flick U. [Qualitative research: a handbook]. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch; 2000 (in German).

35 

Silverman D. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: S AGE Publications Ltd; 2004.

36 

Rubacha K. [Education research methodology]. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Łośgraf; 2011 (in Polish).

37 

Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Seventh edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd: 2024.

38 

Piepiora PA, Piepiora ZN, Stackeová D, Bagińska J. Editorial: Physical culture from an interdisciplinary perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1254027. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1254027

39 

Pawłucki A. [Physical culture sciences]. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls; 2015 (in Polish).

40 

Pawłucki A. [Sports, asceticism and love]. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls; 2019 (in Polish).

41 

Drygas W, Gajewska M, Zdrojewski T. [Insufficient level of physical activity in Poland as a threat and challenge to public health]. Warszawa: Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego – Państwowy Zakład Higieny; 2021 (in Polish).

42 

McCrindle M. The ABC of XYZ: understanding the global generations. Sydney: UNSW Press; 2009.

43 

Zembura P, Korcz A, Cieśla E, Nałęcz H. [Report on the state of physical activity of children and adolescents in Poland within the framework of the Global Matrix 4.0 project]. Warszawa: Fundacja V4Sport; 2022 (in Polish).

44 

Behnke M, Stefanczyk MM, Żurek G, Sorokowski P. Esports players are less extroverted and conscientious than athletes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2023; 26(1): 50-56. 10.1089/cyber.2022.0067

45 

Witkowski K, Kalina RM. Struggle: the most frequently used word in the public sphere since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Kalra J, Lightner N, editors. Healthcare and medical devices. AHFE (2023) International Conference. USA: AHFE International; 2023. p. 299-306. 10.54941/ahfe1003500

46 

Piepiora PA. INNOAGON generation born after 2025 – alternative recommended by science. In: Kalra J, editor. Human factors in sports, performance and wellness. AHFE (2024) International Conference. USA: AHFE International; 2024. p. 84-92. 10.54941/ahfe1005293

47 

Guo J. Innovative practice of physical education teaching in colleges and universities based on artificial intelligence technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. 2024; 9(1). 10.2478/amns-2024-0224

48 

Kalina RM. Methodology of complementary research as the basis for integrating science in fulfilling its social mission in the future. Archives of Budo. 2023; 19: 77-82.

49 

Kalina RM, Bagińska J. Language of innovative agonology: a guide in combining micro and macro scales of preventive, therapeutic and defensive actions. In: Kalra J, Lightner N, editors. Healthcare and medical devices. AHFE (2023) International Conference. USA: AHFE International; 2023. p. 307-315. 10.54941/ahfe1003501

50 

Podolski A, Warchoł T, Tuczyński K. Directions and scope of child grooming in the context of modern technologies–a challenge for contemporary education. Archives of Budo. 2023; 19: 267-274.

51 

Podolski A, Forystek K, Kania K. Cyberbullying and interpersonal aggression as a public health problem–for the consideration of educators and tutors. Archives of Budo. 2022; 18: 317-326.

52 

Podolski A, Kania K. Cyborgization in sport–a problem on the borderline of interfering with the athlete’s body, ethical and pedagogical challenges. Archives of Budo. 2022; 18: 307-316.

Copyright: © 2024 Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.