eISSN: 1897-4317
ISSN: 1895-5770
Gastroenterology Review/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2010
vol. 5
 
Share:
Share:
more
 
 
Original paper

Influence of Helicobacter pylori genetic type on gastroesophageal acid reflux disease in children and teenagers

Monika Parzęcka
,
Anna Szaflarska-Popławska
,
Grażyna Mierzwa
,
Marta Gorzkiewicz
,
Sylwia Łuczak
,
Tomasz Grzybowski
,
Mieczysława Czerwionka-Szaflarska

Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny 2010; 5 (3): 151–156
Online publish date: 2010/06/24
Article file
- Influence.pdf  [0.10 MB]
Get citation
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 
Introduction
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is an aetiological factor of chronic inflammatory lesions of the gastric mucosa, chronic gastric and duodenal peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer or MALT lymphoma of lymphoid tissue of the mucosa. Bacteria eradication is the most efficient method for treatment of chronic inflammation of the gastric mucosa and chronic peptic ulcer disease with concomitant H. pylori infection [1].
The role of H. pylori infection in pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease remains controversial. The presence of H. pylori in the gastric mucosa can play the role of a protective and aggressive factor.
It seems that the influence of H. pylori infection on the frequency and degree of gastroesophageal acid reflux depends on the place where inflammation exists and on inflammation intensity [1-5].
Helicobacter pylori strains producing cytotoxin VacA and protein CagA are more active in inducing lesions in the gastric mucosa. Simultaneously, there are reports indicating that CagA positive strains protect better against gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications [6, 7]. Not all results of studies confirm the presence of this connection [8]. The pathomechanism of these dependences is also not entirely known.
Clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori are divided into two groups: type I – CagA-positive and VacA-positive phenotype showing vacuolising activity and strong cytotoxic effect; and type II – does not contain cagA in the genome and does not present vacuolising activity, but contains vacA homological sequences. Most likely infection with type I strain causes peptic ulcer or atro­phic inflammation. Strains with allele s1m1 are characterized by strong cytotoxic activity. Type II is isolated from patients with milder course of the disease [9].

Aim
The aim of the study was to assess the significance of H. pylori genotype in gastroesophageal acid reflux coexisting with inflammation of the gastric and/or duodenal mucosa in children and teenagers.

Material and methods
A total of 101 patients older than 3 years, with gastric and/or duodenal mucosa inflammation with concomitant H. pylori infection, were included in the study.
The criteria excluding patients from the study were:
• earlier diagnosis of H. pylori infection and its treatment,
• earlier diagnosis and treatment of GERD (neutralizing drugs, PPI, H2-blockers).
To eliminate false-negative results of diagnostic tests in detection of H. pylori infection (urease test, breath test) and in detection of GERD (Ph-metric test) only those patients were qualified who did not undergo:
• antibiotic therapy 4 weeks before the examination,
• treatment with PPI or H2-blockers 2 weeks before the examination.
Patients were divided into two groups:
1) patients with inflammation of the gastric and/or duodenal mucosa with concomitant type I H. pylori infection,
2) patients with inflammation of the gastric and/or duodenal mucosa with concomitant type II H. pylori infection.

Diagnostics in Helicobacter pylori infection
Endoscopic examination of the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract was performed using OLYMPUS GIF 160 or OLYMPUS XP 160, and three biopsy specimens of the gastric mucosa were taken from the prepyloric region (one to perform the urease test, one for the histological examination, one to identify H. pylori using the PCR method), from the stomach fundus or from the upper part of the stomach body and from unexplained macroscopic lesions. Macroscopic lesions within the mucosa of the oesophagus, stomach and duodenum were assessed during the examination according to the Sydney System classification. Biopsy specimens for the histopathological examination were stained with haematoxylin and eosin to assess inflammation, but using the Giemsa method modified by Gray to identify H. pylori bacterium. The whole was assessed according to the Sydney System classification grading inflammatory lesions (low, medium, high) and infection (+, ++, +++).
The urease test was performed in all patients, using the rapid urease test produced by the National Food and Nutrition Institute in Warsaw. The test has been validated. Change in colour from yellow to red, raspberry red or rose was acknowledged as an abnormal result of the urease test. A normal result of the test occurred when there was no change of base colour.
The urease breath test was performed in all the patients. Measurement of 13C concentration was performed using an OLYMPUS Fanci 2 infrared analyser, assuming 4‰ as a cut-off point.
Helicobacter pylori identification was performed using the PCR method in biopsy specimens from the gastric mucosa, assessing genetic type of the bacterium (CagA-positive, CagA-negative, VacA-positive, VacA-negative). Isolation of H. pylori DNA was performed using the Genomic Mini set of DNA Gdansk according to the producer’s recommendations. Reactions of ureA and cagA genes amplification were conducted using the PCR-Helicobacter pylori diagnostic set of DNA Gdańsk according to the producer’s recommendations. Amplification reaction of vacA gene fragment was performed using starters with the following sequence: F: 5’-GAAATACAACAAACACACCGC-3’ R: 5’-GGCTTGTTTGAGCCCCCAG-3’. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed in patients with a positive result of the urease test and/or abnormal result of the urea breath test and ascertainment of bacterium presence in biopsy specimens of the stomach and/or the duodenum.

Diagnostics in gastroesophageal reflux disease
pH-metry of the oesophagus was performed in all patients to assess exposure of the oesophageal mucosa to gastric contents. pH-metric measurements were accomplished using a one-channel antimony probe and the registering device Microdigitrapper 4 Mb by Synectics Medical. The probe was introduced through the nose into the oesophagus, placing the probe at the level of 4-5 cm over the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES). Lower oesophageal sphincter positions were defined using Strobel’s formula (5 cm + 0.252 × child’s length). More-over, all patients before placing the probe underwent endoscopic examination of the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract and the length of the stomach cardia was determined. The examination lasted for 18 h minimum and always included the period of night sleep. The total percentage of time with pH below 4, considered as the presence of acid pathological gastroesophageal reflux, called the reflux index, exceeded 4% [10].
Triple eradication therapy was applied in children and teenagers with confirmed H. pylori infection: clarithromycin, amoxycillin, PPI or metronidazole, amoxycillin, PPI (in patients who often received clarithromycin because of other indications) for a period of 7 days and later PPI for 3 weeks.
Control urea breath test and control pH-metry were performed to control efficacy of eradication therapy after 6 weeks from completion of treatment.

Statistical study
Non-parametric independence test 2 was used to verify dependences between infection with type I strains (CagA-positive VacA-positive) and GER incidence. A four-field correlation table was constructed and the value of 2 (2kr = 3.81) was calculated. The result of this test was also confirmed in the test for two fractions. Consent of the Bioethical Committee of L. Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz was obtained to perform the study.

Results

Helicobacter pylori infection
A total of 101 patients in whom H. pylori infection was diagnosed were included in the study. Thirty-three patients (33/101, 32.7%) were infected with type I strain (CagA-positive VacA-positive), and 68 patients (68/101, 67.3%) with type II. The result of pH-metry was normal in the group of patients infected with type I H. pylori in 14 patients (14/33, 42.4%), but GER was diagnosed in 19 patients (19/33, 57.6%).

Gastroesophageal reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux was diagnosed in 31 children and teenagers infected with type II H. pylori (31/68, 45.6%), but in 37 cases the result of the examination was normal (37/68, 54.4%). The precise data of this analysis are presented in Table I. A statistically significant difference was not found in the analysis of GER incidence in the group of patients infected with type I and II H. pylori.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori
Eradication of H. pylori infection was obtained in 20 patients with type I infection (20/34, 58.8%) and in 52 patients infected with type II (52/67, 77.6%).

Genetic type of Helicobacter pylori
Considering the group of patients infected with type I (CagA-positive VacA-positive), GER was de novo induced in 3 cases (3/20, 15%) and in 3 cases was withdrawn after eradication (3/20, 15%). No change in GER intensity was noted in 14 patients (14/20, 70%).

Gastroesophageal reflux post-eradication
Gastroesophageal reflux was de novo induced in the group of patients infected with type II H. pylori in 6 cases (6/47, 12.8%) and in 6 cases was removed after eradication (6/47, 12.8%). No change in GER intensity was noted in 35 patients (35/47, 74.4%) in this group of patients. The result of pH-metry after treatment had no diagnostic value in 5 patients.
Differences concerning changes of GER intensity, its withdrawal and de novo induction after eradication of type I and II H. pylori infection were not statistically significant. Precise data of this analysis are presented in Table II.

Discussion
Studies of recent years indicate that the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease varies depending on the geographic region. Incidence is higher in countries well developed economically. However, it was also observed that the percentage of persons with GERD symptoms and with H. pylori infection is lower than in the group without H. pylori infection, which may suggest a protective role of this bacterium on GERD [11]. Results of epidemiological studies indicate the presence of an inverse correlation between GERD and H. pylori infection [12, 13].
In our own studies H. pylori infection did not influence GER incidence in children and teenagers. Two hundred and fourteen patients with dyspeptic symptoms at the age of over 3 were included in the study. All the children underwent endoscopic examination of the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract and pH-metry. There was no difference concerning GER incidence (%) in the compared groups (p = 0.99 – ns). At that time there was no analysis of the significance of the bacteria’s genetic type [14].
The following mechanisms should be considered in pathogenesis concerning the effect of H. pylori infection on GERD:
• influence on LES tension,
• influence on gastric secretion and induction of atrophic changes of the gastric mucosa,
• neutralizing activity of ammonium ions [2].
Helicobacter pylori infection causes disorder of the gastrin–somatostatin axis through diminishing the activity and amount of D cells in the pyloric part of the stomach. The dependence concerning H. pylori infection and the mechanism of D cell inhibition is not entirely known. It is supposed that inhibiting factors could be proinflammatory cytokines and TNF- released by activated cells during infection. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) can be released by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in the bacteria cell membrane and additionally can activate secretion of pepsinogen and gastrin [1].
Lopez et al. [15], noting H. pylori infection in the prepyloric region, measured the blood concentration of pepsinogen I and II, obtaining high concentrations accompanying infection and depending on infection of type CagA-positive VacA-positive.
It seems that differences concerning virulence among H. pylori strains can significantly influence the GERD pathomechanism. The influence of CagA-positive VacA-positive strains on gastroesophageal reflux disease is based on the effect on gastric secretion. More significant inflammation and induction of atrophic lesions in the gastric mucosa during infection with type I H. pylori causes a decrease of gastric juice acidity. The region Cag PAI also contains genes stimulating production of IL-8 by epithelial cells [9].
Hypergastrinaemia accompanying infection causes an increase of acidity and the volume of gastric acid, acceleration of gastric emptying and decrease of LES tension [2, 3, 5]. These are essential mechanisms in GER pathogenesis.
The presence of the CagA-positive strain was discovered in 33% of patients with H. pylori infection in the study of Mierzwa et al. [16], but infection with this strain did not correlate with more severe course of the disease.
Similar absence of dependence concerning H. pylori genotype (presence of cagA gene and vacA gene composition) and intensity of inflammatory lesions in the stomach were obtained in subsequent studies expanded with typing alleles of the vacA gene. A large majority of patients (50/56; 89%) were infected with strains possessing the cagA gene. Alleles s1 and s2 of the vacA gene were found in 47 (84%) and 2 patients (4%) respectively, but in 3 (5%) mixed genotypes s1 and s2 were noted, and in 4 (7%) allele s was not identified. Alleles m1 and m2 occurred with the same frequency, each of them being found in 24 patients (43%); in 7 (12%) alleles m1 and m2 were noted simultaneously, while in one patient (2%) allele m was not identified. Together mixed infections were discovered in 9 patients (16%), but 4 (7%) were infected with strains not typing alleles of the vacA gene [17]. Results of the study of Arents et al. [18] indicate the protective character of CagA-positive and iceA1 strains. Researchers in this study isolated CagA-negative and IceA1-negative strains from patients suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Deterioration of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its de novo induction was observed by Reshetnikov et al. [19] for 2 years in teenagers with type I infection in the pyloric region.
A lower rate of H. pylori incidence in patients with GERD is observed and this fact can confirm the protective role of this bacterium [6, 7]. Some researchers assume that this role is caused mainly by CagA-positive bacterium strains [20, 21] and occurs during infection of the entire stomach – pangastritis [2]. Parzęcka et al. did not observe a significant dependence in the analysis of the impact of pangastritis of H. pylori infection on the incidence of GERD in children and young people, without taking into account the significance of the genetic type of bacteria [22]. Most likely infection with type I strain causes peptic ulcer or atrophic inflammation. Strains with s1 alleles have strong cytotoxic activity, but s2 strains produce only a minimal amount of VacA toxin (or they do not produce toxin at all). Strains with genotype s1m1 are more virulent than s1m2 strains, causing more severe forms of infections. Type II is isolated from patients with a milder course of disease [9]. The protective character of CagA-positive strains results from extension and severity of induced inflammation due to the fact that severe inflammation causes significant impairment of acid production [8, 20, 21]. The protective role of CagA-positive strains was confirmed by Brazilian researchers in their studies [23]. They divided 108 patients infected with H. pylori (with diagnosed chronic peptic ulcer disease/gastritis and/or duodenitis or with symptoms of dyspepsia) into two groups: not suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease and with oesophagitis measured on the scale I-IV. Colonization by CagA-positive strains did not differ statistically significantly between the two groups, but patients suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease of degree II-IV were less colonized by bacteria than patients with degree I of the disease. Based on the results of these studies it is possible to conclude that CagA-positive strains protect the oesophageal mucosa from severe forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Considering our studies, the genetic type of H. pylori did not influence GER occurrence and change of GER intensity after eradication therapy.
Fallone et al. [8] in their study assessing chronic duodenal ulcer disease also found that the type of H. pylori strains does not influence GERD occurrence.

Conclusions
Genetic type of H. pylori did not influence gastroesophageal reflux occurrence or change of gastroesophageal reflux intensity degree after eradication.

Grant for Thesis Supervisor of Ministry of Science and Informatics KBN 2PO5E 077 29.

References
1. Konturek SJ. Gastroenterologia i hepatologia kliniczna. 5nd ed. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warsaw 2006; 35-177.  
2. Dzieniszewski J, Jarosz M. Choroba refluksowa żołądkowo- -przełykowa a zakażenie Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterol Pol 2000; 7: 119-22.  
3. Bukowska L, Korzonek M, Szmatłoch E. Choroba refluksowa przełyku – problemy diagnostyki i terapii. Przew Lek 2002; 59: 99-103.  
4. Marek T, Nowak A, Rymarczyk G. Choroba refluksowa przełyku – wybrane zagadnienia. Przew Lek 1999; 6: 44-5.  
5. Mierzwa G, Czerwionka-Szaflarska M, Bała G. Choroba refluksowa u dzieci z zapaleniem błony śluzowej żołądka i (lub) dwunastnicy ze współistniejącym (lub bez) zakażeniem Helicobacter pylori. Ped Współcz 2003; 5: 17-20.  
6. Kuipers EJ, Malfertheiner P. Helicobacter pylori and nonmalignant diseases. Helicobacter 2004; 9 suppl 1: 29-4.  
7. Sładek M, Jedynak-Wąsowicz U, Pieczarkowski S. Zaburzenia motoryki górnego odcinka przewodu pokarmowego pokarmowego dzieci z zakażeniem Helicobacter pylori. Ped Współcz 2002; 4: 335-8.  
8. Fallone CA, Barkun AN, Friedman G. Is Helicobacter pylori eradication associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease? Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 914-20.  
9. Jaguszyn-Krynicka EK, Gajkowska A, Godlewska R. Czynniki wirulencji Helicobacter pylori. Mikrobiol Med 1999; 3: 3-13.
10. Ryżko J, Socha J. Zaburzenia czynnościowe układu pokarmowego u dzieci i młodzieży. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warsaw 2004; 23-31.
11. Jarosz M. Commentary to article: Helicobacter pylori a choroba refluksowa przełyku. Med Dypl 2005; 14: 120-22.
12. Cremonini F, Di Caro S, Delgado-Aros S, et al. Meta-analysis: the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 279-89.
13. Varanasi RV, Fantry GT, Wilson KT. Decreased prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Helicobacter 1998; 3: 188-94.
14. Parzęcka M, Szaflarska-Popławska A. Mierzwa G. Does Helicobacter pylori infection influence on incidence of acid gastroesophageal reflux in children and teenagers? Przegl Gastro­enterol 2009; 4: 159-65.
15. Lopes AI, Palha A, Lopes H, et al. Gastrinemia, pepsynogemia ang virulence determinans in H. pylori-assiociated gastritis in a Portuguese paediatric population. Gut Proceedings of the 13th International of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Workshop on gastroduodenal Pathology and H. pylori; 2000, Rome, Italy, suppl. 1, 47, A96:14/14.
16. Mierzwa G, Bała G, Czarny J, et al. Analiza występowania i wpływu zakażenia szczepami CagA (+) Helicobacter pylori na zmiany zapalne błony śluzowej żołądka i dwunastnicy u dzieci. Med Wieku Rozw 2005; 9 (4 cz. I): 647-54.
17. Mierzwa G, Dzierżanowska-Fangrat K, Szaflarska-Popławska A, et al. Genotypes of Helicobacter pylori isolate from children and adolescents in the kuivia-pomeranin district of Poland. Proceedings of pediatric gastroenterology, Toruń 2006; 108-17.
18. Arents NL, van Zwet AA, Thijs JC, et al. The importance of vacA, cagA, and iceA genotypes of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2603-8.
19. Reshetnikov OV, Kurilovich SA, Krotova VA, et al. Helicobacter pylori and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in adolescents: role of cagA-comprising strains. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol 2006; 4: 25-7.
20. Schutze K. Helicobacter pylori and gasroesophageal reflux disease. Acta Med Austiaca 2000; 27: 122-5.
21. Voutilainen M, Färkkilä M, Mecklin JP, et al. The Central Finland Endoscopy Study Group: Chronic inflammation at the gastroesophageal junction (carditis) appears to be a specific finding related to Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 3175-80.
22. Parzecka M, Szaflarska-Popławska A, Mierzwa G. Pangastritis a choroba refluksowa przełyku. Przegl Gastroenterol 2008; 3: 289-94.
23. Pereira-Lima J, Marques DL, Pereira-Lima LF, et al. The role of cagA Helicobacter pylori strains in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 643-47.
Copyright: © 2010 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2020 Termedia Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
Developed by Bentus.
PayU - płatności internetowe