Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny

Abstract

1/2022 vol. 17
Systematic review/Meta-analysis

N-acetylcysteine in non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
  2. Department of Digestive Disease, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
  3. Department of Gastroenterology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
  4. Department of Gastroenterology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
  5. Department of Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA
  6. Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dearborn, MI, USA
  7. Department of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts, Worchester, MA, USA
Gastroenterology Rev 2022; 17 (1): 9–16
Online publish date: 2021/07/14
View full text
Confronting perimenopausal women’s knowledge of coronary heart disease with their health behaviours. Controversial role of hormone replacement therapy in the protection of coronary heart disease

Introduction

There are discordant reports on N-acetylcysteine (NAC) efficacy in non-acetaminophen acute liver failure (ALF).

Aim

To determine whether NAC is beneficial in non-acetaminophen ALF.

Material and methods

We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of published data to address the question. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched using the terms non-acetylcysteine and ALF due to non-acetaminophen, viral infection, drug-induced or autoimmune hepatitis. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were transplant-free survival and length of hospital stay. Risk ratios were calculated using a random model for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 672 patients were included in this meta-analysis from 5 prospective studies (NAC group: n = 334; control group: n = 338). Viral hepatitis (45.8% vs. 32.8%) followed by drug-induced liver injury (24.6% vs. 27.5%), indeterminate cause (13.2% vs. 21.6%) and autoimmune hepatitis (6.6% vs. 8.9%) were the most common etiologies of ALF in the treatment group and control group respectively. Treatment with N-acetylcysteine improved the transplant-free survival significantly (55.1% vs. 28.1%; RR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33–0.94) whereas the overall survival was not improved with NAC (71% vs. 59.8%; RR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.48–1.09). The NAC treatment was associated with shorter hospital stay (Standard difference in means (SMD) = –1.62; 95% CI: –1.84 to –1.40, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The treatment of patients with acute liver failure with N-acetylcysteine improved transplant-free survival and length of stay.

Share
without publication fees